Skip to main content

Americans Less Rushed But No Happier: 1965–2010 Trends in Subjective Time and Happiness


A general societal consensus seems to have emerged that the pace of daily life, at least in the US and other Western countries, is speeding up. However, there seems little empirical evidence to document its presence, let alone its increase. The present article reviews results from two questions on subjective-time pressure that have been asked periodically in US national probability surveys since 1965, and which were repeated in separate 2009 and 2010 surveys. Counter to the popular societal consensus on an increasingly time-pressured society noted above, respondent reports of feelings of being “always rushed” declined by 6–9 points from those reported in 2004. The decline was found both among employed and unemployed respondents, indicating it was not simply a function of higher unemployment. At the same time, feelings of being “very happy” also declined over this period, despite the finding that time-pressured people have consistently reported being less happy. Moreover, more time-pressured people continued to report being less happy in these 2009–2010 surveys, even after controls for marital status, employment and other important predictors of happiness. Somewhat higher correlations with happiness were found for a related subjective-time question on having excess time on one’s hands.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2


  • American Psychological Association. (2012). Stress in America. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, F., Morgan, J., & Sonquist J. (1973). Multiple Classification Analysis. Institute for Social Research. University of Michigan.

  • Andrews, F., & Robinson, J. (1991). Happiness and life satisfaction. In J. Robinson, P. Shaver, & L. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes New York. NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Time-Use Survey. (ATUS). (2112).

  • Bradburn, N., & Caplovitz, D. (1966). Reports on happiness. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, Lee. (1993). Busy bodies: Why our time obsessed society keeps us running in place. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., Converse, P. & Rodgers, W. (1978). The quality of American life. New York: Russell Sage.

  • Darrah, C., Freeman, J., & English-Lueck, J. (2007). Busier than ever! Why American families can’t slow down. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Graff, J. (2003). Take back your time. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

  • Economist. (2010). The great American slowdown. April 10, 2008.

  • Epstein, C., & Kalleberg, A. (Eds.). (2004). Fighting for time: Shifting boundaries of work and social life. London: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, W. (2010). The great American migration slowdown. Washington, DC: Brookings Research Report 12/9.

  • Hunnicutt, B. (1998). Work without end: Abandoning shorter hours for the right to work. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J., & Gerson, K. (2004). The time divide: work, family and gender inequality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, A. (Ed.). (2005). Busyness Issue of Social Research, 72(2).

  • Robinson, Joe. (2003). Work to live: The guide to getting a life. New York: Perigee Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J., & Godbey, G. (1996). The great American slowdown. American Demographics, 18(6), 42–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J., & Godbey, G. (1999). Time for life (revised edition) State College. PA: Penn State Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J., & Martin, S. (2008). What do happy people do? Social Indicators Research, 89, 565–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, H. (2005). Acceleration, the change of time structures in the modern era. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, H., & Scheuerman, W. (2010). High-speed society: Social acceleration, power, and modernity. State college, PA: Penn State Press.

  • Schor, J. (1991). The overworked American: The unexpected decline of leisure. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. (2011). Trends in well-being: 1972–2010 General Social Survey. National Opinion Research Center. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szalai, A. (1972). The use of time. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

Download references


The research in this article was made possible by grant R24HD41041 from the National Institutes of Health and by the support of Prof. Sandra Hofferth of the Maryland Population Research Center and Prof. Paul Harwood formerly at the University of North Florida.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to John P. Robinson.

Additional information

John P. Robinson is a professor of sociology at the University of Maryland, where he directs the Americans’ Use of Time Project.

Appendix: UNF Methodology: October–November Omnibus Survey 2009

Appendix: UNF Methodology: October–November Omnibus Survey 2009


This survey completed telephone interviews with 997 adult Americans. The survey was conducted by the Public Opinion Research Laboratory at the University of North Florida. The interviews, conducted in English and Spanish, were completed in October 2009. Analysis is weighted by Census Bureau data on age, education, income, marital status, employment status, race and region. The margin of error for the entire sample is ±3.0 %, with that margin of error being higher for cross tabulations.

Sample Design

The telephone samples were provided by Genesys Sampling Systems at Marketing Systems Group. These samples were drawn using standard list-assisted random digit dialing (RDD) methodology.


Interviews were conducted from November 5 through November 17, 2009. As many as 6 attempts were made to contact every sampled telephone number. The sample is released in replicates–representative subsamples of the larger sample.


Respondent gender, age, race, education, and income were weighted to data from the Census. Responses “Do not know” and “Refused” were removed for analysis purposes.

Sample Disposition

Table 5 below illustrates the disposition coding for all sampled callback telephone numbers ever dialed in this survey.

Table 5 Sample disposition (UNF October Omnibus 2009)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robinson, J.P. Americans Less Rushed But No Happier: 1965–2010 Trends in Subjective Time and Happiness. Soc Indic Res 113, 1091–1104 (2013).

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


  • Subjective time
  • Social trends
  • Happiness
  • Quality of life
  • Time use