Social Indicators Research

, Volume 113, Issue 1, pp 401–418 | Cite as

The Palliative Function of System Justification: Concurrent Benefits Versus Longer-Term Costs to Wellbeing

Article

Abstract

We examined the extent to which system justification buffered the negative effect of retrospective experiences of active harm from general sources in society on life satisfaction during the same assessment period, and prospectively 1 year later. Results from a nationally representative sample indicated that the retrospective assessment of active harm and quality of life were uncorrelated for people who endorsed system justifying ideology (N = 6,518). Study 2 replicated the concurrent buffering effect of system justification on subjective wellbeing and demonstrated that the effect reversed over time. For people high in system justification beliefs, societal-level harm prospectively predicted lower life satisfaction 1 year later (N = 136 undergraduates). Perceiving the system as fair and legitimate in the face of harm from others in society has opposing short and longer-term effects on wellbeing. We argue that these opposing effects occur because although system justification trumps experiences of harm and buffers life satisfaction in the short-term; the resulting experience-belief conflict engenders a state of ideological dissonance that predicts negative psychological outcomes down the track.

Keywords

System justification Subjective wellbeing Life satisfaction Active harm 

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London, UK: SAGE.Google Scholar
  2. Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediation models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 558–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dalbert, C. (2002). Beliefs in a just world as a buffer against anger. Social Justice Research, 15, 123–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Diener, E., Horwitz, J., & Emmons, R. A. (1985). Happiness of the very wealthy. Social Indicators Research, 16, 263–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Diener, E., Ng, W., Harter, J., & Arora, R. (2010). Wealth and happiness across the world: Material prosperity predicts life evaluation, whereas psychosocial prosperity predicts positive feeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 52–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective wellbeing: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 403–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Donnellan, M. B., Frederick, L., Oswald, B. M. B., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). The Mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18, 192–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Finch, B. K., Kolody, B., & Vega, W. A. (2000). Perceived discrimination and depression among Mexican-origin adults in California. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41, 295–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Godfrey, E. B. (2011). Motive vs. status: System justification, mental health and behavior among disadvantaged mothers and their children (manuscript submitted for publication).Google Scholar
  11. Hammond, M. D., & Sibley, C. G. (2011). Why are benevolent sexists happier? Sex Roles, 65, 332–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harris, R., Tobias, M., Jeffreys, M., Waldegrave, K., Karlsen, S., & Nazroo, J. (2006). Effects of self-reported racial discrimination and deprivation on Maori health and inequalities in New Zealand: Cross sectional study. The Lancet, 367(9527), 2005–2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2002). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 111–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jost, J. T., Liviatan, I., van der Toorn, J., Ledgerwood, A., Mandisodza, A., & Nosek, B. A. (2010). System justification: How do we know it’s motivated? In A. C. Kay, et al. (Eds.), The psychology of justice and legitimacy: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 11). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  18. Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., Sheldon, O., & Sullivan, B. N. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 13–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jost, J. T., Pietrzak, J., Liviatan, I., Mandisodza, A., & Napier, J. (2008). System justification as conscious and nonconscious goal pursuit. In J. Shah & W. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  20. Jost, J. T., & Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kahneman, D., & Deaton, A. (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 16489–16493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kay, A. C., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Malka, A., & Miller, D. T. (2007). Political-economic values and the relationship between socio-economic status and self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 75, 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Napier, J. L., & Jost, J. T. (2008). Why are conservatives happier than liberals? Psychological Science, 19, 565–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Napier, J. L., Thorisdottir, H., & Jost, J. T. (2010). The joy of sexism? A multinational investigation of hostile and benevolent justifications for gender inequality and their relations to subjective well-being. Sex Roles, 62, 405–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. O’Brien, L. T., & Major, B. (2005). System-justifying beliefs and psychological well-being: The roles of group status and identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1718–1729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Paradies, Y. C. (2006). A systematic review of empirical research on self-reported racism and health. International Journal of Epidemiology, 35, 888–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pascoe, E. A., & Richman, L. S. (2009). Perceived discrimination and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 531–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pettit, F. A. (2002). A comparison of World-Wide Web and paper-and-pencil personality questionnaires. Behaviors Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 34(1), 50–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Quinn, D. M., & Crocker, J. (1999). When ideology hurts: Effects of belief in the Protestant ethic and feeling overweight on the psychological well-being of women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 402–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rankin, L. E., Jost, J. T., & Wakslak, C. J. (2009). System justification and the meaning of life: Are the existential benefits of ideology distributed unequally across racial groups? Social Justice Research, 22, 312–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Raver, J. L., & Nishii, L. H. (2010). Once, twice, or three times as harmful? Ethnic harassment, gender harassment, and generalized workplace harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 236–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rowe, G., Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. (2006). A comparison of responses to internet and postal surveys in a public engagement context. Science Communication, 27, 352–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sengupta, N. K., Osborne, D., Houkamau, C. A., Hoverd, W. J., Wilson, M. S., West-Newman, T., & Sibley, C. G. (2012). Income and subjective wellbeing in New Zealand (manuscript submitted for publication).Google Scholar
  36. Sibley, C. G. (2011). The BIAS Treatment Scale (BIAS-TS): A measure of the subjective experience of active and passive harm and facilitation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 300–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sibley, C. G., Luyten, N., Purnomo, M., Moberly, A., Wootton, L. W., Hammond, M. D., et al. (2011). The Mini-IPIP6: Validation and extension of a short measure of the Big-Six factors of personality in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 40, 142–159.Google Scholar
  38. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Statistics New Zealand. (2006). 2006 Census of populations and dwellings. Wellington, NZ: Statistics New Zealand.Google Scholar
  40. Williams, D. R., Neighbors, H. W., & Jackson, J. S. (2003). Racial/ethnic discrimination and health: Findings from community studies. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 200–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yip, T., Gee, G. C., & Takeuchi, D. T. (2008). Racial discrimination and psychological distress: The impact of ethnic identity and age among immigrant and United States-born Asian adults. Developmental Psychology, 44, 787–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.New York UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations