Social and Economic Wellbeing in Europe and the Mediterranean Basin: Building an Enlarged Human Development Indicator
This paper calculates a human Wellbeing Composite Index (WCI) for 42 countries, belonging to the European Economic Space, North Africa and the Middle East, as an alternative to the shortcomings of other well-known measures of socio-economic development (i.e. Gross Domestic Product per head and Human Development Index). To attain this goal, different data envelopment analysis (DEA) models are used as an aggregation tool for seven selected socio-economic variables which correspond to the following wellbeing dimensions: income per capita, environmental burden of disease, income inequality, gender gap, education, life expectancy at birth and government effectiveness. The use of DEA allows avoiding the subjectivity that would be involved in the exogenous determination of weights for the variables included in WCI. The aim is to establish a complete ranking of all countries in the sample, using a three-step process, with the last step consisting in the use of a model that combines DEA and compromise programming, and permits to obtain a set of common weights for all countries in the analysis. The results highlight the distance that still separates Southern Mediterranean countries from the benchmark levels established by some European countries, and also point to the main weaknesses in individual countries’ performance. Nordic countries, plus Switzerland, top the list of best performers, while Mauritania, Libya and Syria appear at the bottom.
KeywordsWellbeing Composite Index (WCI) Human development Data envelopment analysis (DEA) Compromise programming European and Southern Mediterranean countries
Financial support from Sustainmed Project (FP7-KBBE, European Commission) and from AGL2010-17560-C02-02 Project (Plan Nacional de I+D+i, Spanish Government) is gratefully acknowledged.
- Alkire, S. (2010). Human development: Definitions, critiques and related concepts. Human Development Research Paper, No. 2010/01, United Nations Development Program.Google Scholar
- Barr, R. S., Durchholz, M. L., & Seiford, L. (2000). Peeling the DEA onion: Layering and rank-ordering DMUs using tiered DEA. Technical Report, Southern Methodist University, USA.Google Scholar
- Cohon, J. L. (1978). Multiobjective programming and planning. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2007). Data envelopment analysis. A comprehensive text with models, applications, references ad DEA-solver software (2nd ed.). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Emerson, J., Esty, D. C., Srebotnjak, T., Levy, M. A., Mara, V., de Sherbinin, A., et al. (2010). Environmental Performance Index 2010. Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy, Yale University, and Center for International Earth Science Information-Network, Columbia University, in collaboration with World Economic Forum and Joint Research Center (European Commission).Google Scholar
- Hausmann, R., Tyson, L. D., & Zahidi, S. (2009). The global gender gap report 2009. Geneva: World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
- Jurado, A., & Perez-Mayo, J. (2011). Construction and evolution of a multidimensional well-being index for the Spanish regions. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-011-9835-4. Published online: April 13, 2011.
- Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2009). Governance matters VIII. Aggregate and individual governance indicators 1996–2008. Policy Research Working Paper No. 4978, The World Bank. Development Research Group. Macroeconomics and Growth Team.Google Scholar
- Mahlberg, B., & Obersteiner, M. (2001). Remeasuring the HDI by data envelopment analysis. Interim Report IR-01-069. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Laxenburg, Austria).Google Scholar
- Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Hoffman, A., & Giovannini, E. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. Paris: OECD and Joint Research Center (European Commission).Google Scholar
- Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Saaty, T. L. (2001). Decision making for leaders. The analytic hierarchy process for decisions in a complex world (3rd ed.). Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.Google Scholar
- Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- United Nations Development Program (UNDP). (1990). Human development report 1990: Concept and measurement of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- United Nations Development Program (UNDP). (2009). Linking climate change policies to human development analysis and advocacy. A guidance note for human development report teams. Washington, DC: United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Report Office.Google Scholar