Social Indicators Research

, Volume 111, Issue 1, pp 341–359 | Cite as

Personality and Subjective Well-Being: Evidence from South Korea

Article

Abstract

Although the statistically significant relationship between personality traits and subjective well-being (i.e., self-reported happiness and life satisfaction) is well-known in the field of positive psychology, some scholars still cast doubt on the external validity of this finding and the strength of personality dimensions vis-à-vis other individual-level determinants of subjective well-being such as income, employment status, marital status, self-reported health, and so on. Using a nationally representative, face-to-face survey fielded in South Korea in 2009, we find that personality traits (measured by the Five-factor Model)—particularly, Emotional Stability and Extraversion—are positively associated with happiness and life satisfaction, after controlling for other covariates. The effects of personality traits are often on par with, and sometimes even greater than, those of other well-known determinants.

Keywords

Personality The “Big Five” Subjective well-being Happiness Life satisfaction South Korea 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This paper was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean goverment (NRF-2010-330-B00128).

References

  1. Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Princeton, NJ: Psychological Review Company.Google Scholar
  2. Alvarez-Díaz, A., González, L., & Radcliff, B. (2010). The politics of happiness: On the political determinants of quality of life in the American states. Journal of Politics, 72, 894–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Argyle, M. (2001). The psychology of happiness (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Blanchflower, D., & Oswald, A. (2008). Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle? Social Science and Medicine, 66, 1733–1749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borghans, L., Duckworth, A. L., Heckman, J. J., & ter Weel, B. (2008). The economics and psychology of personality traits. Journal of Human Resources, 43, 972–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouchard, T. J., Jr. (2004). Genetic influence on human psychological traits. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 148–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bullock, J. G., Green, D. P., & Ha, S. E. (2010). Yes, but what’s the mechanism? (Do not expect an easy answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 550–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  9. Carney, D. R., Jost, J. T., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29, 807–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caspi, A., Roberts, B. W., & Shiner, R. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cattell, R. B. (1943). The description of personality: Basic traits resolved into clusters. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38, 476–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cha, K.-H. (2003). Subjective well-being among college students. Social Indicators Research, 62(63), 455–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 668–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R. Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.Google Scholar
  15. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Hunter, J. (2003). Happiness in everyday life: The uses of experience sampling. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 197–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R., & Oswald, A. (2001). Preferences over inflation and unemployment: Evidence from surveys of happiness. American Economic Review, 91, 335–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2002). Will money increase subjective well-being? A literature review and guide to needed research. Social Indicators Research, 57, 119–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Diener, E., Diener, M., & Diener, C. (1995). Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 851–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Diener, E., Gohm, C. L., Suh, E., & Oishi, S. (2000). Similarity of the relations between marital status and subjective well-being across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 419–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Personality and subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwartz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundation of hedonic psychology (pp. 213–229). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  22. Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 403–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy: A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 94–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Easterlin, R. A. (2001). Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. Economic Journal, 111, 465–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Easterlin, R. A. (2006). Life cycle happiness and its sources: Intersections of psychology, economics and demography. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27, 463–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1976). Psychoticism as a dimensions of personality. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
  27. Feldman, S., & Johnston, C. (2009). Understanding the determinants of political ideology: Implications of structural complexity. Stony Brook University. Typescript.Google Scholar
  28. Flavin, P., Pacek, A. C., & Radcliff, B. (2010). Labor unions and life satisfaction: Evidence from new data. Social Indicators Research, 98, 435–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Funder, D. C. (2008). Persons, situations, and person-situation interactions. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 568–580). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  30. Funder, D. C., & Fast, L. A. (2010). Personality in social psychology. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindsey (Eds.). Handbook of social psychology. 5th edition (pp.668-697). New York. Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., Dowling, C. M., & Ha, S. E. (2010). Personality and political attitudes: Relationships across issue domains and political contexts. American Political Science Review, 104, 111–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative ‘description of personality’: The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gosling, S. D. (2008). Snoop: What your stuff says about you. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  34. Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the big-five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gray, J. A. (1991). Neural systems, emotion, and personality. In J. Madden (Ed.), Neurobiology of learning, emotion, and affect (pp. 273–306). New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
  36. Heine, S. J., & Buchtel, E. E. (2009). Personality: The universal and the culturally specific. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 369–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Helliwell, J. F. (2003). How’s life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being. Economic Modelling, 20, 331–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Helliwell, J. F. (2006). Well-being, social capital, and public policy: What’s new? Economic Journal, 116, C34–C45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 359, 1435–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Inglehart, R. (2002). Gender, aging, and subjective well-being. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 43, 391–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 114–158). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  42. Johnson, W., & Krueger, R. F. (2006). How money buys happiness: Genetic and environmental processes linking finances and life satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 680–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jost, J. T. (2006). The end of the end of history. American Psychologist, 61, 651–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lelkes, O. (2006). Knowing what is good for you: Empirical analysis of personal preferences and the “objective good”. Journal of Socio-Economics, 35, 285–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Leung, S. L., & Bozionelos, N. (2004). Five-factor model traits and the prototypical image of the effective leader in the Confucian culture. Employee Relations, 26, 62–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lim, C., & Putnam, R. (2010). Religion, social networks, and life satisfaction. American Sociological Review, 75, 914–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2005). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  50. Lucas, R. E., & Diener, E. (2008). Personality and subjective well-being. In O. P. John, R. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 795–814). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  51. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1991). Adding liebe und arbeit: The full five-factor model and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 227–232.Google Scholar
  52. McCrae, R. R. (2002). NEO-PI-R data from 36 cultures: Further intercultural comparisons. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The five-factor model of personality across cultures (pp. 105–125). New York: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 159–181). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  54. Mondak, J. J. (2010). Personality and the foundations of political behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Myers, D. G. (1999). Close relationship and quality of life. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwartz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundation of hedonic psychology (pp. 374–391). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  56. Napier, J. L., & Jost, J. T. (2008). Why are conservatives happier than liberal? Psychological Science, 19, 565–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Okun, M. A., Stock, W. A., Haring, M. J., & Witter, R. A. (1984). Health and subjective well-being: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 19, 111–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pacheco, G., & Lange, T. (2010). Political participation and life satisfaction: A cross-European analysis. International Journal of Social Economics, 37, 686–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Paunonen, S. V., & Ashton, M. C. (2001). Big five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 524–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pussman, S. D., & Cohen, S. (2005). Does positive affect influence health? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 925–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schmitt, D. P., Allik, J., McCrae, R. R., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2007). The geographic distribution of Big Five personality traits: Patterns and profiles of human self-description across 56 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 173–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Scollon, C., Kim-Prieto, C., & Diener, E. (2003). Experience sampling: Promises and pitfalls, strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediation analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 138–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stutzer, A., & Frey, B. S. (2006a). Does marriage make people happy or do happy people get married? Journal of Socio-Economics, 35, 326–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stutzer, A., & Frey, B. S. (2006b). Political participation and procedural utility: An empirical study. European Journal of Political Research, 45, 391–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Van Gestel, S., & Van Broeckhoven, C. (2003). Genetics of personality: are we making progress? Molecular Psychiatry, 8, 840–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Witter, R. A., Okun, M. A., Stock, W. A., & Haring, M. J. (1984). Education and subjective well-being: A meta-analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 6, 165–173.Google Scholar
  70. Yik, M. S. M., Russell, J. A., Ahn, C.-K., Dols, J. M. F., & Suzuki, N. (2002). Relating the five-factor model of personality to a circumplex model of affect. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The five-factor model of personality across cultures (pp. 79–104). New York: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceBrooklyn College-City University of New YorkBrooklynUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologySungkyunkwan UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations