Are UNDP Indices Appropriate to Capture Gender Inequalities in Europe?
- 659 Downloads
This study critically investigates the suitability of United Nations’ composite indices and other related measures—among which the Gender Inequality Index just released in 2010—to capture gender inequalities in the context of “highly developed” countries, focusing on the case of Europe. Our results indicate that many of the gender gaps in health and education variables have either vanished or even reversed, thus questioning their appropriateness to capture women’s disadvantage in Europe and inviting to construct region-specific measures. Alternatively, parliamentary representation and labor force participation are variables with large gender gaps that highlight important dimensions where women disadvantage prevails. Different cross-section and cross-time associations between economic growth and gender equality are generally not statistically significant—or at most weakly correlated—at European level. This is basically due to the fact that the gender gaps included in UNDP gender-related indices reached their normatively desirable values long ago, therefore leaving no room for further improvement.
KeywordsGender inequality United Nations Development Program Indices Europe
Financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Education “Juan de la Cierva” Research Grant Program and research projects ERC-2009-StG-240978, CSO2008-00654 and ECO2010-21668-C03-02 is gratefully acknowledged.
- Bericat, E. (2011) The European gender equality index: Conceptual and analytical issues. Social Indicators Research, doi: 10.1007/s11205-011-9872-z.
- Dollar, D., & Gatti, R. (1999). Gender inequality, income and growth: Are good times for women? Washington DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
- Gaye, A., Klugman, J., Kovacevic, M., Twigg, S., & Zambrano, E. (2010). Measuring key disparities in human development: The gender inequality index. Human Development Research Paper 2010/46.Google Scholar
- Hausmann, R., Tyson, L., & Zahidi, S. (2007). The global gender gap report 2007. Switzerland: World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
- Hawken, A., & Munck, G. (2009) Cross-national indices with gender-differentiated data: What do they measure? How valid are they? Technical background paper for the forthcoming UNDP Asia Pacific Human Development Report on gender. UNDP.Google Scholar
- Klasen, S. (1999). Does gender inequality reduce growth and development? Evidence from cross-country regressions. Policy research report on gender and development, Working paper series No.7, The World Bank.Google Scholar
- Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Hoffman, A., & Giovannini E. (2005). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. OECD Statistics Working Paper STD/DOC(2005)3, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
- Ravaillon, M. (2010). Mashup Indices of Development. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5432.Google Scholar
- Seth, S. (2009). A class of association sensitive multidimensional welfare indices. OPHI WP27.Google Scholar
- Social Watch (2004). Social Watch Annual Report 2004. Montevideo: Instituto del Tercer Mundo.Google Scholar
- UNDP (1995). Human Development Report 1995. Gender and Human Development, New York.Google Scholar
- UNDP (2010). Human Development Report 2010. The Real Wealth of Nations: Pathways to Human Development, New York.Google Scholar
- UNECA (United Nations Economic Commission for Africa). (2004). The African Gender and Development Index (Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Economic Commission for Africa).Google Scholar
- Unterhalter, E. (2006). Measuring gender inequality in education in South Asia. UNICEF and UNGEI.Google Scholar