Advertisement

Quality of Life Experienced by Human Capital: An Assessment of European Cities

Abstract

This paper aims to provide an assessment of urban quality of life (QoL) of European cities from the perspective of qualified human resources. The competitiveness of cities relies increasingly in their capacity to attract highly educated workers, as they are important assets for firms when choosing a location. Qualified human resources, on the other hand, tend to value QoL over other urban features. This is why policymakers and urban planners need to evaluate QoL of cities and be provided with tools that can guide action to improvements in this area. We assess urban QoL by means of a composite indicator constructed using data envelopment analysis, based on Urban Audit data and Mercer’s framework of analysis, to give account of 246 European cities. Besides presenting a ranking of the best and the worst scores of QoL, this methodology allows benchmarking strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 199

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

References

  1. Beaupuy, J. (2005). Report on the urban dimension in the context of enlargement. Technical report 2004/2258. Committee on Regional Development, Session Document of the European Parliament.

  2. Bigcities. (2003). Quality of life in New Zealand's eight largest cities. http://www.bigcities.govt.nz/pdfs/Quality_of_Life_2003.pd.

  3. Blair, J. P., & Premus, R. (1987). Major factors in industrial location: A review. Economic Development Quarterly, 1(1), 72–85.

  4. Blomquist, G. C., Berger, M. C., & Hoehn, J. P. (1988). New estimates of quality of life in urban areas. The American Economic Review, 78(1), 89–107. ArticleType: Research-article/full publication date: March, 1988 Copyright 1988 American Economic Association.

  5. Brown, A. L. (2003). Increasing the utility of urban environmental quality information. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65(1–2), 85–93.

  6. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.

  7. Chen, Y., & Rosenthal, S. S. (2008). Local amenities and life-cycle migration: Do people move for jobs or fun? Journal of Urban Economics, 64(3), 519–537.

  8. Cherchye, L., Moesen, W., & Puyenbroeck, T. V. (2004). Legitimately diverse, yet comparable: On synthesizing social inclusion performance in the EU. Journal of Common Market Studies, 42, 919–955.

  9. Cherchye, L., Moesen, W., Rogge, N., & Puyenbroeck, T. V. (2007). An introduction to benefit of the doubt composite indicators. Social Indicators Research, 82(1), 111–145.

  10. Cherchye, L., Moesen, W., Rogge, N., Puyenbroeck, T. V., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., et al. (2008). Creating composite indicators with DEA and robustness analysis: The case of the technology achievement index. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59(2), 239–251.

  11. Cheshire, P., & Magrini, S. (2006). Population growth in european cities: Weather matters but only nationally. Regional Studies, 40(1), 23–37.

  12. Cheshire, P., & Magrini, S. (2009). Urban growth drivers in a europe of sticky people and implicit boundaries. Journal of Economic Geography, 9(1), 85–115.

  13. Costa, D. L., & Kahn, M. E. (2000). Power couples: Changes in the locational choice of the college educated, 1940–1990. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(4), 1287–1315.

  14. Diener, E. (2006). Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1(2), 151–157.

  15. European Commission. (2007). Adding value to the european urban audit. Technical report 2005CE160AT012. European Commission.

  16. Florida, R. (2003). The rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.

  17. Glaeser, E. L. (1998). Are cities dying?. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(2), 139–160.

  18. González, E., Cárcaba, A., & Ventura, J. (2010). The importance of the geographic level of analysis in the assessment of the quality of life: The case of spain. Social Indicators Research. doi:10.1007/s11205-010-9674-8.

  19. IISD—International Institute for Sustainable Development. (2007). City of winnipeg quality of life indicators. http://www.iisd.org/pdf/wpg.qoli.pd.

  20. Kamp, I., Leidelmeijer, K., Marsman, G., & de Hollander, A. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human well-being: Towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts; a literature study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65(1–2), 5–18.

  21. Lambiri, D., Biagi, B., & Royuela, V. (2006). Quality of life in the economic and urban economic literature. Social Indicators Research, 84(1), 1–25.

  22. Martin-Brelot, H., Grossetti, M., Eckert, D., Gritsai, O., & KovCs, Z. (2010). The spatial mobility of the creative class: A european perspective. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(4), 854–870.

  23. Melyn, W., & Moesen, W. (1991). Towards a synthetic indicator of macroeconomic performance: Unequal weighting when limited information is available. Technical report. Catholic University of Leuven, Centre for Economic Studies.

  24. Mercer. (2010). Defining quality of living. http://www.mercer.com/referencecontent.htm?idContent=138046.

  25. Mitchell, G., Namdeo, A., & Kay, D. (2000). A new disease-burden method for estimating the impact of outdoor air quality on human health. The Science of The Total Environment, 246(2–3), 153–163.

  26. Morais, P., & Camanho, A. S. (2011). Evaluation of performance of european cities with the aim to promote quality of life improvements. Omega, 39(4), 398–409.

  27. OECD—Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. OECD Publishing.

  28. Ritter, J. A. (1990). The industrial location decision: A practitioner’s perspective. Economic Development Quarterly, 4(2), 154–156.

  29. Rogerson, R. J. (1999). Quality of life and city competitiveness. Urban Studies, 36(5), 969.

  30. Rojas, M. (2010). The Measurement of economic performance and social progress report and quality of life: Moving forward. Social Indicators Research. doi:10.1007/s11205-010-9737-x.

  31. Salvaris, M., Burke, T., Pidgeon, J., & Kelman, S. (2000). Social benchmarks and indicators for victoria. Technical report. Melbourne: Institute for Social Research, Swinburne University of Technology.

  32. Salvesen, D., & Renski, H. (2003). The importance of quality of life in the location decisions of new economy firms. Technical report. Center for Urban and Regional Studies.

  33. Stafford, H. (1985). Environmental protection and industrial location. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 75(2), 227–240.

  34. Ulengin, B., Ulengin, F., & Guvenc, U. (2001). A multidimensional approach to urban quality of life: The case of istanbul. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(2), 361–374.

  35. Whisler, R. L., Waldorf, B. S., Mulligan, G. F., & Plane, D. A. (2008). Quality of life and the migration of the college-educated: A life-course approach. Growth and Change, 39(1), 58–94.

  36. Wong, C. (2001). The relationship between quality of life and local economic development: An empirical study of local authority areas in england. Cities, 18(1), 25–32.

  37. Yuan, L. L., Yuen, B., & Low, C. (1999). Urban quality of life: Critical issues and options. Singapore: Singapore University Press.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Paulo Morais.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 6.

Table 6 Composite indicator for each city

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morais, P., Miguéis, V.L. & Camanho, A.S. Quality of Life Experienced by Human Capital: An Assessment of European Cities. Soc Indic Res 110, 187–206 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9923-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Quality of life
  • Human capital
  • Data envelopment analysis
  • Composite indicator