Abstract
Research on subjective well-being (SWB) for western nations has been growing for the last 30 years. So far there has not been any study of Subjective Well-Being in the case of Greece. This study is the first attempt to quantify the SWB in Greece which is in a state of deep economic and values crisis. For this purpose the Personal Well-being Index (PWI) developed by Cummins et al. (2002) and used by the International Well-being Group has been applied. Additionally this study attempts to give answers to two research questions: (i) what is the effect of economic crisis on PWI and as a consequence on the homeostasis hypothesis? (ii) is there any indication of association between different types of capital (built, natural, human, and social capital) and domains of life satisfaction? A cross-sectional survey of 1,216 participants included sociodemographic variables, questions relating to dimensions or domains of personal well-being, and questions pertaining to built, human, natural and social capital. Based on cross-sectional data, statistical analyses were performed for the whole sample and for men and women to account for gender differences. Descriptive, correlation, factor and regression statistical techniques were used. Regression models were used to determine, which types of capital variables had a statistically significant association with each domain of life satisfaction. The statistical results of this study demonstrate the reliability and validity of the Greek adaptation of the Cummins questionnaire. Significant differences are found between men and women in personal well-being index score. The results support the hypothesis that the economic crisis has an impact on personal well-being. It is, therefore, possible that such an impact affects the state of homeostasis. This suggests that other mechanisms such as homeorhesis may be applicable in explaining the behavior of the state of personal well-being index. Different types of capital and domains of life satisfaction are found to be positively related. These findings must be considered in light of cross-sectional limitations. This study evaluated the psychometric characteristics of the Greek version of the Cummins questionnaire. The PWI results are not within the range of normative data for western nations. This is an interesting and important result: it shows that the economic crisis matters significantly for personal well-being. The statistical results of this study offer an indicational support for the role of types of capital on domains of life satisfaction. Since we are using cross-sectional data, no causal inferences can be drawn.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
Bubolz, M. M., Eicher, J. B., Evers, S. J., & Sontag, M. S. (1980). A human ecological approach to quality of life: Conceptual framework and results of a preliminary study. Social Indicators Research, 7, 103–136.
Cantril, H. (1965). The pattern of human concerns. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Collados, C., & Duane, T. P. (1999). Natural capital and quality of life: A model for evaluating the sustainability of alternative regional development paths. Ecological Economics, 30, 441–460.
Costanza, R., Farley, J. & Templet, P. (2002). Background: Quality of life and the distribution of wealth and resources. In R. Costanza & S. E. Jorgensen (Eds.) Chow G. C. (1960): Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica, 28, 591–605.
Costanza, R., Fisher, B., & Ali, S. (2007). Quality of life: An approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being. Ecological Economics, 61, 267–276.
Costra, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 668–678.
Crampton, S. M., & Wagner, J. A. (1994). Percept-percept inflation in microorganizational research: an investigation of prevalence and effect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(1), 67–76.
Cummins, R. A. (1995). On the trail on the gold standard for subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 35, 179–200.
Cummins, R. A. (1998a). The second approximation to an international standard of life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 43, 307–334.
Cummins, R. A. (1998b). The second approximation to an international standard of life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 35, 179–200.
Cummins, R. A. (2000). Personal income and subjective well-being: A review. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 133–158.
Cummins, R. A., & Nistico, H. (2002). Maintaining life satisfaction: The role of positive cognitive bias. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 37–69.
Cummins, R. A., Gullone, E., & Lau, A. L. D. (2002). A model of subjective well-being homeostasis: The role of personality. In E. Gullone & R. A. Cummins (Eds.), The universality of subjective well-being indicators: Social indicators research series (pp. 7–46). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Cummins, R. A., Eckersley, R., Pallant, J., van Vugt, J., & Misajon, R. (2003). Developing a national index of subjective well-being. The Australian unity well-being index. Social Indicators Research, 64, 159–190.
Cummins, R. A., Lau, A., & Davern, M. (2009). Homeostatic mechanisms and subjective well-being. In K. C. Land (Ed.), Handbook of social indicators and quality-of-life-studies. Springer: New York and London (in press).
D’Hombres, B., Rocco, L., Suhrcke, M., & McKee, M. (2007). Does social capital determine health? Evidence from eight transition countries. Joint Research Centre: European Commission.
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.
Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being. The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55, 34–43.
Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science In The Public Interest, 5(1), 1–31.
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale: A measure of life satisfaction. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.
Diener, E., Suh, E., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.
Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H. (1998). Common methods bias: Does common methods variance really bias results? Organizational Research Methods, 1, 374–406.
Goldsmith, E. (2008). The way: An ecological world-view. University of Georgia Press.
Haidt, J. (2006). The happiness hypothesis. Putting ancient wisdom and philosophy to the test of modern science. London: Heinemann.
Headey, B., Holstrom, E., & Wearing, A. (1985). Models of well-being and ill-being. Social Indicators Research, 17(3), 211–234.
Helliwell, J. F. (2006). Well-being, social capital and public sector. What’s new? The economic Journal, 116, 34–35.
Kahn, R. L., & Prager, D. J. (1994). Interdisciplinary collaborations are a scientific and social imperative. The scientist 8 (14).
Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Foundations of hedonic psychology: Scientific perspectives on enjoyment and suffering. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Kawachi, I., Subramanian, S. V., & Kim, D. (2008). Social capital and health. In I. Kawachi, S. V. Subramanian, & D. Kim (Eds.), Social capital and health. New York: Springer Science.
Mulder, K., Costanza, R., & Erickon, J. (2006). The contribution of built, human, social and natural capital to quality of life in intentional and unintentional communities. Ecological Economics, 59, 13–23.
Nunnaly, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Nussbaum, M. C. (1997). Capabilities and human rights. Fordham Law Review, 66, 273–300.
O’Neill, R. V., DeAngelis, D. L., Waide, J. B., & Allen, T. F. H. (1986). A hierarchical concept of ecosystems. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Offer, A. (2006). The challenge of affluence. Self-control and well-being in the United States and Britain since 1950. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone. The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Robinson, T. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1991). Criteria for scale selection and evaluation in measure of personality and social psychological attitudes. Calif, San Diego: Academic Press.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Alfred A. Knopf: New York.
Shah, H., & Marks, N. (2004). A well-being manifesto for a flourishing society. London: New Economics Foundation.
Spector, P. E., & Brannick, M. T. (1995). The nature and effects of method variance in organizational research. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 249–274). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Temple, J. (2000). Growth effects of education and social capital in the OECD countries. Paris OECD, 2000 (ECO/WKP (2000)36).
van Teijlinger, E., & Hundley, V. (2002). The importance of pilot studies. Nursing Standard, 16, 33–36.
Vemuri, A. W., & Costanza, R. (2006). The role of human, social, built and natural capital in explaining life satisfaction at the country level: Toward a national well-being index (NWI). Ecological Economics, 58, 119–133.
Waddington, C. H. (1975). The evolution of an evolutionist. Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh.
Waddington, C. H. (1977). Tools for thought. Frogmore: Paladin.
Wilson, W. (1967). Correlates of avowed happiness. Psychological Bulletin, 67, 294–306.
Woolcock, M. (2001). The place of social capital in understanding social and economic outcomes. Isuma. Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2(1), 1–17.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Panas, E.E. Homeorhesis and Indication of Association Between Different Types of Capital on Life Satisfaction: The Case of Greeks Under Crisis. Soc Indic Res 110, 171–186 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9922-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9922-6