Skip to main content
Log in

Attracting Attention for the Cause. The Reporting of Three Indices in the UK National Press

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Indicators and indices (a collection of indicators into a single value) have been promoted for some time as convenient devices for the presentation of complex datasets to a more general audience. Examples of indices are the corruption perception index (CPI), human development index (HDI) and ecological footprint (EF). The research reported in this paper was designed to explore the extent to which the CPI, HDI and EF have been reported in UK national newspapers between January 1990 and December 2009, and whether there are differences between the indices in the pattern of reporting. Results suggest that reporting of the CPI was linked to the timing of reports issued by Transparency International. The same was partly true of reporting of the HDI and timing of release of Human Development Reports s by the UNDP. The EF has more reports than the CPI and HDI, and this is related in part to its greater flexibility and adaptability at more local (intra-UK) scales. The paper recommends that those creating such indices look beyond the methodological dimension and consider how best to make the index resonate with the media.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Agostini, S. J., & Richardson, S. J. (1997). A human development index for US cities: Methodological issues and preliminary findings. Real Estate Economics, 25(1), 13–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, R. U. (2000). Commentary on the utility of the ecological footprint concept. Ecological Economics, 32(3), 347–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S., & Morse, S. (2003). Measuring sustainability. Learning by doing. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S., & Morse, S. (2008). Sustainability indicators. Measuring the immeasurable (2nd ed.). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boykoff, M. T., & Boykoff, J. M. (2007). Climate change and journalistic norms: A case-study of US mass-media coverage. Geoforum, 38(6), 1190–1204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boykoff, M., & Mansfield, M. (2008). Ye Olde Hot Aire: reporting on human contributions to climate change in the UK tabloid press. Environmental Research Letters 3(2), Article Number: 024002.

  • Branton, R. P., & Dunaway, J. (2009). Slanted newspaper coverage of immigration: The importance of economics and geography. Policy Studies Journal, 37(2), 257–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M. (1981). Development indicators. Social Indicators Research, 9, 369–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, A. R. B. (2002). The assumptions underlying eco-footprinting. Population and Environment, 23(3), 303–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frønes, I. (2007). Theorizing indicators. On indicators, signs and trends. Social Indicators Research, 83(1), 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallopin, G. C. (1996). Environmental and sustainability indicators and the concept of situational indicators. A systems approach. Environmental Modelling and Assessment, 1, 101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haberl, H., Wackernagel, M., Krausmann, F., Erb, K. H., & Monfreda, C. (2004). Ecological footprints and human appropriation of net primary production: a comparison. Land Use Policy, 21(3), 279–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, G. P. (2006). People, planet and prosperity: The determinants of humanity’s environmental footprint. Natural Resources Forum, 30(1), 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hezri, A. A. (2005). Utilisation of sustainability indicators and impact through policy learning in the Malaysian policy processes. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 7(4), 575–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hezri, A. A., & Dovers, S. R. (2006). Sustainability indicators, policy and governance: Issues for ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 60, 86–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hezri, A. A., & Hasan, M. N. (2004). Management framework for sustainable development indicators in the state of Selangor, Malaysia. Ecological Indicators, 4, 287–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holliman, R. (2004). Media coverage of cloning: a study of media content, production and reception. Public Understanding of Science, 13(2), 107–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, J., Lundqvist, U., Robert, K. H., & Wackernagel, M. (1999). The ecological footprint from a systems perspective of sustainability. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 6(1), 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, A. C. (1991). The human development index: Handle with care. Population and Development Review, 17(2), 315–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitzes, J., Galli, A., Bagliani, M., Barrett, J., Dige, G., Ede, S., et al. (2009). A research agenda for improving national ecological footprint accounts. Ecological Economics, 68(7), 1991–2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitzes, J., & Wackernagel, M. (2009). Answers to common questions in ecological footprint accounting. Ecological Indicators, 9(4), 812–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambsdorff, J. G. (2002). Background paper to the 2002 corruption perceptions index. Framework Document 2002. Germany: Transparency International and Göttingen University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavis, J. N., Wilson, M. G., Oxman, A. D., Lewin, S., & Fretheim, A. (2009). SUPPORT tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 4: Using research evidence to clarify a problem. Health Research Policy and Systems, 7(Suppl 1), S4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lind, N. C. (1992). Some thoughts on the human development index. Social Indicators Research, 27, 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lind, N. (2004). Values reflected in the human development index. Social Indicators Research, 66(3), 283–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McComas, K., & Shanahan, J. (1999). Telling stories about global climate change—measuring the impact of narratives on issue cycles. Communication Research, 26(1), 30–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGillivray, M. (1991). The human development index: Yet another redundant composite development indicator? World Development, 19, 1461–1468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monfreda, C., Wackernagel, M., & Deumling, D. (2004). Establishing national natural capital accounts based on detailed—ecological footprint and biological capacity assessments. Land Use Policy, 21(3), 231–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutz, D. C., & Soss, J. (1997). Reading public opinion—the influence of news coverage on perceptions of public sentiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61(3), 431–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagar, A. D., & Najam, A. (1998). The human development index: A critical review. Ecological Economics, 25, 249–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampei, Y., & Aoyagi-Usui, M. (2009). Mass-media coverage, its influence on public awareness of climate-change issues, and implications for Japan’s national campaign to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 19(2), 203–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stapleton, L. M., & Garrod, G. D. (2007). Keeping things simple: Why the human development index should not diverge from its equal weights assumption. Social Indicators Research, 84(2), 179–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thapa, S. (1995). The human development index: A portrait of the 75 districts in Nepal. Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 10(2), 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP 1991, 1999). Human Development Reports, published annually between 1990 and 2009, Human Development Reports Office, UNDP, New York.

  • van den Bergh, J. C. J. M., & Verbruggen, H. (1999). Spatial sustainability, trade and indicators: An evaluation of the ecological footprint. Ecological Economics, 29(1), 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Kooten, G. C., & Bulte, E. H. (2000). The ecological footprint: useful science or politics? Ecological Economics, 32(3), 385–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderheiden, S. (2008). Two conceptions of sustainability. Political Studies, 56(2), 435–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2005). Apparent quality-of-life in nations: How long and happy people live. Social Indicators Research, 71(1), 61–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. E. (1996). Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the Earth. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, M., Schulz, N. B., Deumling, D., Linares, A. C., Jenkins, M., Kapos, V., et al. (2002). Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(14), 9266–9271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Commission’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under the grant agreement no 217207 (POINT project, www.point.pb-works.com). The author would like to thank all of his colleagues in POINT for providing support but especially Tom Bauler, Lea Sebastien and Lars Petersen.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Morse.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morse, S. Attracting Attention for the Cause. The Reporting of Three Indices in the UK National Press. Soc Indic Res 101, 17–35 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9660-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9660-1

Keywords