Who Benefits from Religion?
Many studies have documented the benefits of religious involvement. Indeed, highly religious people tend to be healthier, live longer, and have higher levels of subjective well-being. While religious involvement offers clear benefits to many, in this paper we explore whether it may also be detrimental to some. Specifically, we examine in detail the relation between religious involvement and subjective well-being. We first replicate prior findings showing a positive relation between religiosity and subjective well-being. However, our results also suggest that this relation may be more complex than previously thought. While fervent believers benefit from their involvement, those with weaker beliefs are actually less happy than those who do not ascribe to any religion—atheists and agnostics. These results may help explain why—in spite of the well-documented benefits of religion—an increasing number of people are abandoning their faith. As commitment wanes, religious involvement may become detrimental to well-being, and individuals may be better off seeking new affiliations.
KeywordsReligion Religiosity Well-being Apostasy
We thank Jeana Frost, Adam Galinsky, and Stephanie Wu for their advice and assistance.
- Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (1997). Amazing conversions: Why some turn to faith and others abandon religion. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Press.Google Scholar
- Beck, A. T., Rial, W. Y., & Rickels, K. (1974). Short form of depression inventory: Cross-validation. Psychological Reports, 34(3, Pt 2), 1184–1186.Google Scholar
- Dawkins, R. (2006). The God delusion. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
- Dennett, D. C. (2006). Breaking the spell: Religion as a natural phenomenon. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Diener, E., & Clifton, D. (2002). Life satisfaction and religiosity in broad probability samples. Psychological Inquiry, 13(3), 206–209.Google Scholar
- Gruber, J. (2005). Religious market structure, religious participation, and outcomes: Is religion good for you? NBER working paper.Google Scholar
- Idler, E. L., & Kasl, S. V. (1997). Religion among disabled and nondisabled persons II: Attendance at religious services as a predictor of the course of disability. The Journals of Gerontology, 52B(6), S306–S316.Google Scholar
- Koenig, H. G. (1997). Is religion good for your health? Effects of religion on mental and physical health. New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
- Kosmin, B., & Keysar, A. (2009). American Religious Identification Survey, Summary Report, from http://www.americanreligionsurvey-aris.org/.
- Kosmin, B., Mayer, E., & Keysar, A. (2001). American religious identification survey. New York: City University of New York.Google Scholar
- Larson, D. B., Sherrill, K. A., Lyons, J. S., Craigie, F. C., Thielman, S. B., Greenwold, M. A., et al. (1992). Associations between dimensions of religious commitment and mental health reported in the American Journal of Psychiatry and Archives of General Psychiatry: 1978–1989. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 149(4), 557–559.Google Scholar
- Larson, D. B., Swyers, J. P., & McCullough, M. E. (1997). Scientific research on spirituality and health: A consensus report. Rockville, MD: National Institute for Healthcare Research.Google Scholar
- Pargament, K. I. (1997). The psychology of religion and coping. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Plante, T. G., & Sherman, A. C. (Eds.). (2001). Faith and health: Psychological perspectives. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
- Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Stern, J. (2003). Terror in the name of God: Why religious militants kill. New York: Ecco/Harper Collins.Google Scholar
- Strawbridge, W. J., Shema, S. J., Cohen, R. D., Roberts, R. E., & Kaplan, G. A. (1998). Religiosity buffers effects of some stressors on depression but exacerbates others. The Journals of Gerontology, 53B(3), S118–S126.Google Scholar