Culture and Wellbeing: The Case of Indigenous Australians

Abstract

A recurring theme in Indigenous affairs in Australia is a tension between maintenance of Indigenous culture and achievement of socio-economic ‘equity’: essentially ‘self-determination’ versus ‘assimilation’. Implicit in this tension is the view that attachment to traditional cultures and lifestyles is a hindrance to achieving ‘mainstream’ economic goals. Using data from the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Survey, stronger attachment to traditional culture is found to be associated with enhanced outcomes across a range of socio-economic indicators. This suggests Indigenous culture should be viewed a part of the solution to Indigenous disadvantage in Australia, and not as part of the problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Ampe Akelyernemane Meke Mekarle (Little Children are Sacred), Report of Northern Territory Board of Inquiry into the Protection of Aboriginal Children from Sexual Abuse (2007).

  2. 2.

    For example, in a longitudinal survey conducted between 1994 and 1996 Australian jobseekers indicated a willingness to move house if offered a suitable job in only around half of all job-search episodes, and the figure is even lower for short-term episodes (ABS 1997, p. 37).

  3. 3.

    More specifically, the SAS 9.0 Factor procedure was used with principal components method.

  4. 4.

    A second measure of cultural attachment was developed based on a ‘hierarchical’ allocation (see Dockery 2009a, b). The motivation for this second measure was firstly as a sensitivity or robustness test to the principal measure of cultural attachment. Second, the value of the cultural attachment score is strongly influenced by the individual’s activities. This potentially creates problems of endogeneity in which declining socio-economic outcomes, say poor health, may be argued to cause the decline in cultural attachment. The hierarchical measure gives much greater weighting to fixed cultural traits of speaking an Indigenous language at home, fluency in Indigenous language, recognition of homelands and identification with a clan, tribal or language group. These are unlikely to be affected by the outcome measures being modeled. Similar results to those reported in Tables 3 and 4 are achieved when the hierarchical measure of cultural attachment is used instead of the measure based on the factor analysis.

  5. 5.

    Completion of a vocational certificate level I or II was deemed equivalent to one half a year’s education, a trade or Certificate III/IV equivalent to 1 year and a Diploma to 2 years. The finding of a positive effect of cultural attachment on educational attainment is insensitive to alternative specifications, including an ordered probit model of highest qualification attained or a binary probit model of the probability of completing high school.

  6. 6.

    Hunter has previously presented evidence that Indigenous 13–17 year olds are substantially more likely to attend school if they speak an Indigenous language than those who do not (2007b, Table 3).

References

  1. Alesina, A., & Giuliano. P. (2007). The power of the family, NBER Working Paper w13051, National Bureau of Economic Research, Massachusetts, April.

  2. Altman, J. C. (2007). The Howard Government’s Northern Territory Intervention: Are Neo-Paternalism and Indigenous Development Compatible? (Address to Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies Conference ‘Forty Years On: Political transformation and sustainability since the Referendum and into the future’, Canberra, 7 November 2007, Retrieved August 25 2008 from http://www.anu.edu.au/caepr/Publications/topical/Altman_AIATSIS.pdf).

  3. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (1997). Australian’s Employment and Unemployment Patterns 19941996, ABS Catalogue No. 6286.0, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra.

  4. Carroll, C. D., Rhee, B., & Rhee, C. (1994). Are there cultural effects on saving? Some cross-sectional evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(3), 685–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Casson, M. (1993). Cultural determinants of economic performance. Journal of Comparative Economics, 17, 418–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chiswick, B. R. (1983). The earnings and human capital of American Jews. Journal of Human Resources, 18, 313–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Christie, M. J. (1985). Aboriginal perspectives on experience and learning: The role of language in Aboriginal education. Melbourne: Deakin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dockery, A. M. (2009a). Cultural dimensions of Indigenous participation in vocational education and training, NCVER Monograph Series 02/2009, National Centre for Vocational Education Research, Adelaide.

  9. Dockery, A. M. (2009b). Culture and wellbeing: The case of Indigenous Australians, CLMR Discussion Paper Series 09/1, Centre for Labour Market Research, Curtin Business School.

  10. Dockery, A. M., & Milsom, N. (2007). A review of Indigenous employment programs. Adelaide: National Centre for Vocational Education Research.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fernández, R. (2005). Culture: An empirical investigation of beliefs, work, and fertility, NBER Working Paper No. W11268, National Bureau of Economic Research, Massachusetts, March.

  12. Franke, R. H., Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1991). Cultural roots of economic performance: A research note. Strategic Management, 12(Special Issue), 165–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. London: H. Hamilton.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gray, H. P. (1996). Culture and economic performance: Policy as an intervening variable. Journal of Comparative Economics, 23(3), 278–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Greer, S., & Patel, C. (2000). The issues of Australian Indigenous word-views and accounting. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 13(3), 307–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gruber, J. (2005). Religious market structure, religious participation, and outcomes: Is religion good for you?, NBER Working Paper No. W11377, National Bureau of Economic Research, Massachusetts, May.

  17. Guiso, L., Sapienza, P. & Zingales, L. (2004). Cultural biases in economic exchange, NBER Working Paper No. 11005, National Bureau of Economic Research, Massachusetts.

  18. Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2006). Does culture affect economic outcomes?, NBER Working Paper No. 11999, National Bureau of Economic Research, Massachusetts, January.

  19. Heineck, G. (2004). Does religion influence the labor supply of married women in Germany? Journal of Socio-Economics, 33(3), 307–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hofstede, G. (2001). Cultures consequences: comparing values, behaviours, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1998). The confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organisational Dynamics, 16(4), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hofstede, G., & McCrae, R. (2007). Personality and culture revisited: Linking traits and dimensions of culture. Cross-Cultural Research, 38(1), 52–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hunter, B. (2007a). Conspicuous compassion and wicked problems: The Howard government’s national emergency in Indigenous affairs. Agenda, 14(3), 35–51.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hunter, B. (2007b). Cumulative causation and the productivity commission’s framework for overcoming Indigenous disadvantage. Australian Journal of Labour Economics, 10(3), 185–202.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hunter, B. (2008). Is policy the problem or the solution for Indigenous people? A rejoinder to Gary Johns. Agenda, 15(3), 95–97.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ingelhart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Johns, G. (2008). The Northern Territory intervention in Aboriginal affairs: Wicked problem or wicked policy? Agenda, 15(2), 65–84.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Long, S., Memmott, P. & Seelig, T. (2007). An audit and review of Australian Indigenous housing research, AHURI Final Report No. 102, Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute, July.

  29. Northern Territory Board of Inquiry into the Protection of Aboriginal Children from Sexual Abuse. (2007). Ampe Akelyernemane Meke Mekarle (Little children are Sacred), Report of the Board of Inquiry, Northern Territory Government.

  30. Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Reimers, C. W. (1985). Cultural differences in labor force participation among married women. American Economic Review, 75(2), 251–255.

    Google Scholar 

  32. SCRGSP (Steering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provision). (2007). Overcoming Indigenous Disadvantage: Key Indicators 2007. Canberra: Productivity Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tabellini, G. (2006). Culture and institutions: Economic development in the regions of Europe, Levine’s Working Paper Archive.

  34. Thompson, S. J., Gifford, S. M., & Thorpe, L. (2000). The social and cultural context of risk and prevention: Food and physical activity in an urban Aboriginal community’. Health Education and Behavior, 27(6), 725–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Throsby, D. (2001). Economics and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Triandis, H. C. (2000). Cultural syndromes and subjective well-being. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 13–36). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Trudgen, R. (2000). Why warriors lie down and die. Adelaide: Aboriginal Resource and Development Services Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Uchida, Y., Norasakkunkit, V., & Kitayama, S. (2004). Cultural construction of happiness: Theory and empirical evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5(3), 223–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The measure of ‘cultural attachment’ used in this paper was developed as part of a project funded by the National Centre for Vocational Education Research entitled Cultural Dimensions of Indigenous Participation in Vocational Education and Training. The results relating to educational attainment and the literature review also derive from that project see (Dockery 2009a). I would also like to acknowledge the useful feedback provided by members of the Indigenous Advisory Panel to that NCVER project.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alfred Michael Dockery.

Additional information

I would like to dedicate this paper to Deborah.

Appendix 1: Factor Scores (Loadings) for Calculating Index of Cultural Attachment

Appendix 1: Factor Scores (Loadings) for Calculating Index of Cultural Attachment

Table 6 Loadings for the ‘cultural attachment’ factor

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dockery, A.M. Culture and Wellbeing: The Case of Indigenous Australians. Soc Indic Res 99, 315–332 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9582-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Indigenous
  • Culture
  • Wellbeing
  • Australia