Skip to main content
Log in

Cultural Consumption Patterns in South Africa: An Investigation of the Theory of Cultural Omnivores

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contrary to Bourdieu’s theory (Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press (1984)) that cultural consumption of so-called “high” versus popular culture is determined by socio-economic class, Peterson (Poetics 21:243–258, 1992; Poetics 33:257–282, 2005) finds that higher income and education groups are more likely to be “cultural omnivores”—consumers of a wide variety of both high and popular cultural goods. Omnivores were also found to be much less likely to exclude other cultures and to be more open to, and tolerant of, the views of others than those with narrower cultural tastes, called “cultural univores”. This article investigates the omnivore/univore hypothesis in a South African context, using survey data collected from 500 attendees of live theatre performances at the National Arts Festival in 2008. Multiple correspondence analysis (also called perceptual mapping) shows an interesting intermediate state between Boudieu-like high culture univores and Peterson omnivores, which could have interesting implications for the development of social tolerance in multi-cultural South Africa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The antilog of the coefficient gives the odds ratio, while the percentage change in the odds can be given by subtracting 1 from the antilog and multiplying by 100.

References

  • Abdi, H., & Valentin, D. (2007). Multiple correspondence analysis. In N. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, B. (1996). Anything but heavy metal: Symbolic exclusion and musical dislikes. American Sociological Review, 61(5), 884–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marais, L. (2004). Personal communication (Interview), 10/04, Grahamstown.

  • Maraun, M. D., Slaney, K., & Jalava, J. (2005). Dual scaling for the analysis of categorical data. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85(2), 209–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neff, D. F. (2007). Subjective well-being, poverty and ethnicity in South Africa: Insights from an exploratory analysis. Social Indicators Research, 80, 313–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. (1992). Understanding audience segmentation: From elite and mass to omnivore and univore. Poetics, 21, 243–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. (2005). Problems in comparative research: The example of omnivorousness. Poetics, 33, 257–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronge, B. (2004). Mirrors of the mind. Sunday Times Magazine, 19/09/2004 Sunday Times, South Africa.

  • SAARF. (2002). SAARF Universal LSM: Living standards measure. Bryanston: South African Advertising Research Foundation Pub. AC Neilson Media International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowball, J. (2005). Art for the masses? Justification for the public support of the arts in developing countries: 2 Arts festivals in South Africa. Journal of Cultural Economics, 29(2), 107–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snowball, J. D. (2006). The economic valuation of cultural events in developing countries. Unpublished doctoral thesis: Rhodes University, South Africa.

  • Snowball, J., & Antrobus, G. (2004). The National Arts Festival Festino Survey 2004. Commissioned by the National Arts Festival, Grahamstown, South Africa.

  • Snowball, J., & Antrobus, G. (2006). The National Arts Festival Festino Survey 2006. Commissioned by the National Arts Festival, Grahamstown, South Africa.

  • Snowball, J. & Bragge, B. (2007). Why arts proponents love economic impact studies and cultural economists hate them. Presented at the 9th International Conference on Arts and Cultural Management, Valencia, Spain.

  • Sullivan, O. & Katz-Gerro, T. (2007). The omnivore thesis revisited: Voracious cultural consumers. European Sociological Review 23(2): 123–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, S., Davis, J., & Zhao, Y. (2008). Art for arts’ sake? An examination of motives for arts performance attendance. Non-profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37, 300–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tampubolon, G. (2008). Revisiting omnivores in America circa 1990 s: The exclusiveness of omnivores? Poetics, 36, 243–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Eijck, K., & Leivens, J. (2008). Cultural omnivorousness as a combination of highbrow, pop, and folk elements: The relation between taste patterns and attitudes concerning social integration. Poetics, 36, 217–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warde, A., Wright, D., & Gayo-Cal, M. (2007). Understanding cultural omnivorousness: Or, the myth of the cultural omnivore. Cultural Sociology, 1(2), 143–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, K., & Snowball, J. (2009). Investigating how the attributes of live theatre productions influence consumption choices using conjoint analysis: The example of the National Arts Festival, South Africa. Journal of Cultural Economics, 33(3), 167–184.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. D. Snowball.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Snowball, J.D., Jamal, M. & Willis, K.G. Cultural Consumption Patterns in South Africa: An Investigation of the Theory of Cultural Omnivores. Soc Indic Res 97, 467–483 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9513-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9513-y

Keywords

Navigation