Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 96, Issue 2, pp 275–293 | Cite as

Knowing One’s Lot in Life Versus Climbing the Social Ladder: The Formation of Redistributive Preferences in Urban China

  • Russell SmythEmail author
  • Vinod Mishra
  • Xiaolei Qian
Article

Abstract

This paper examines, how individual preferences for redistribution in general and redistribution to improve access to education, improve social protection for the poor, reduce income inequality and reduce unemployment depend on beliefs about what determines one’s lot in life and self-assessed prospects for climbing the social ladder in urban China. We find that beliefs about what determine one’s lot in life and subjective perceptions of future mobility are correlated with preferences for redistribution. We find that those who believe one’s lot in life is outside their control are generally more likely to favour redistribution. We show that this result is consistent with the existence of an altruism effect among the rich and entitlement effect among the poor. These findings are robust to the inclusion of control variables for the respondent’s personal characteristics and the location in which he or she lives.

Keywords

China Equal opportunities Redistribution Mobility 

References

  1. Alesina, A., & Angeletos, G. M. (2005). Fairness and redistribution. The American Economic Review, 95, 960–980. doi: 10.1257/0002828054825655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alesina, A., & Fuchs-Schundeln, N. (2007). Good-bye Lenin (or not)? The effect of communism on people’s preferences. The American Economic Review, 97, 1507–1528. doi: 10.1257/aer.97.4.1507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alesina, A., Glaeser, E., & Sacerdote, B. (2001). Why doesn’t the United States have a European welfare state? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 187–254. doi: 10.1353/eca.2001.0014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2005). Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunity. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 897–931. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.05.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allen, F., Qian, J., & Qian, M. (2005). Law, finance, and economic growth in China. Journal of Financial Economics, 77, 57–116. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.06.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Appleton, S., Knight, J., Song, L., & Xia, Q. (2002). Labor retrenchment in China: Determinants and consequences. China Economic Review, 13, 252–275. doi: 10.1016/S1043-951X(02)00067-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Armitage, C. (2003). China’s ‘iron rice bowl’ gets the chop. The Australian (Sydney), 13 January, p. 12.Google Scholar
  8. Bian, Y. (2002). Chinese social stratification and social mobility. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 91–116. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.140823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bian, Y., Shu, X., & Logan, R. (2001). Communist party membership and regime dynamics in China. Social Forces, 79, 805–841. doi: 10.1353/sof.2001.0006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. China Daily. (2003). Helping migrants belong in cities. China Daily, November 28.Google Scholar
  11. Corneo, G. (2001). Inequality and the state: Comparing US and German preferences. Annales d’Economie et de Statistique, 63–64, 283–296.Google Scholar
  12. Corneo, G., & Gruner, H. P. (2002). Individual preferences for political redistribution. Journal of Public Economics, 83, 83–107. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00172-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ding, D., Akhtar, S., & Ge, G. L. (2006). Organisational differences in managerial compensation and benefits in Chinese firms. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17, 693–715. doi: 10.1080/09585190600581675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. (2003). Theories of fairness and reciprocity—evidence and economic applications. In M. Dewatripont, L. P. Hansen, & S. J. Turnovsky (Eds.), Advances in economics and econometrics: Theory and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Fong, C. (2001). Social preferences, self interest and the demand for redistribution. Journal of Public Economics, 82, 225–246. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00141-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Forney, M. (2003). Worker’s wasteland. Time Magazine Asia, 13(December), 13.Google Scholar
  17. Greenfield, T. K., Midanik, L. T., & Rogers, J. D. (2000). Effects of telephone versus face-to-face interview modes on reports of alcohol consumption. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 95, 277–284. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.95227714.x.Google Scholar
  18. Groves, R. M. (1977). An experimental comparison of national telephone and personal interview surveys. In Proceedings of the Section on Social Statistics: American Statistical Association (pp. 232–241). Washington, DC: American Statistical Association.Google Scholar
  19. Gustafsson, B., & Li, S. (2001). A more unequal China? Aspects of inequality in the distribution of income. In C. Riskin, C. Zhao, & S. Li (Eds.), China’s retreat from equality: Income distribution and economic transition. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  20. Hirschman, A. O. (1973). The changing tolerance for income inequality in the course of economic development. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, 544–566. doi: 10.2307/1882024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holbrook, A., Green, M., & Krosnick, J. (2003). Telephone versus face-to-face interviewing of national probability samples with long questionnaires: Comparisons of respondent satisfying and social desirability bias. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67, 79–126. doi: 10.1086/346010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Khan, A. R., & Riskin, C. (2005). China’s household income and its distribution, 1995 and 2002. The China Quarterly, 182, 356–384. doi: 10.1017/S0305741005000238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. King, G., & Zeng, L. (1999a). Logistic regression in rare events data. Department of Government, Harvard University, available from http://gking.harvard.edu. Accessed 15 Dec 2007.
  24. King, G., & Zeng, L. (1999b). Estimating absolute, relative, and attributable risks in case-control studies. Department of Government, Harvard University, available from http://gking.harvard.edu. Accessed 15 Dec 2007.
  25. King, G., & Zeng, L. (2001). Explaining rare events in international relations. International Organization, 55(3), 693–715. doi: 10.1162/00208180152507597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Knight, J., & Yueh, L. (2004). Job mobility of residents and migrants in urban China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 32, 637–660. doi: 10.1016/j.jce.2004.07.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). (2003). China statistical yearbook 2003. Beijing: National Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  28. National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). (2004a). China statistical yearbook 2004. Beijing: National Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  29. National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). (2004b). China population statistical yearbook 2004. Beijing: National Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  30. National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). (2005a). China statistical yearbook 2005. Beijing: National Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  31. National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). (2005b). Communiqué of the first national economic censor in 2004 (6 December 2005) (Chinese) [online, accessed July 2006], Available from http://www.stats,gov.cn/zgjjpc/cgfb/t20051206_402294807.htm.
  32. National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). (2007). China statistical yearbook 2007. Beijing: National Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  33. People’s Daily. (2002). China to focus on tax evasion by the wealthy. People’s Daily, August 23.Google Scholar
  34. Piketty, T., & Qian, N. (2006). Income inequality and progressive income taxation in China and India, 1986–2010. CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 5703.Google Scholar
  35. Ravallion, M., & Chen, S. (2007). China’s uneven progress against poverty. Journal of Development Economics, 82, 1–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2005.07.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ravallion, M., & Lokshin, M. (2000). Who wants to redistribute? The tunnel effect in Russia in the 1990s? Journal of Public Economics, 76, 87–104. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00064-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Reuters. (2003). China ousts US as top target for FDI in 2002. London: Reuters.Google Scholar
  38. Smyth, R., & Zhai, Q. (2003). Economic restructuring in China’s large and medium-sized state-owned enterprises: Evidence from liaoning. Journal of Contemporary China, 12, 173–206. doi: 10.1080/10670560305461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tsai, K. S. (2002). Back-alley banking: Private entrepreneurs in China. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Walder, A. (1995). Career mobility and the communist political order. American Sociological Review, 60, 309–328. doi: 10.2307/2096416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Warner, M. (1996). Economic reforms, industrial relations and human resources in the People’s Republic of China: An overview. Industrial Relations Journal, 27, 195–210. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2338.1996.tb00769.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. World Bank. (1997). Sharing rising income disparities in China. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  43. Wu, Z. (2006). Ruhe lijie shehui gongzheng [“How to Understand Social Justice”]. http://theory.people.com.cn/GB/40764/68330/68333/68334/4638343.html. Accessed 15 Dec 2007.
  44. Zhang, H., Ming, L., & Liang, C. (2001). Blue book of private enterprises. Beijing: Social Science Documentation Publishing House. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  45. Zhao, W., & Zhuo, X. (2004). Chinese organizations in transition: Changing promotion patterns in the reform era. Organization Science, 15, 186–199. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1030.0046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhou, X. (2001). Political dynamics and bureaucratic career patterns in the People’s Republic of China, 1949–1994. Comparative Political Studies, 34, 1036–1062. doi: 10.1177/0010414001034009004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhu, C. J. (1997). Human resource development in China during the transition to a new economic system. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 25, 19–44.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Monash UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations