Investigating Validity Evidence of the Satisfaction with Life Scale Adapted for Children
- 1.3k Downloads
This study introduces the Satisfaction with Life Scale adapted for Children (SWLS-C) and presents psychometric findings regarding its validation. The SWLS-C was adapted from the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS; Diener et al. 1985), which is one of the most commonly used measures to assess satisfaction with life in adults. Three subject matter experts adapted the SWLS by changing the wording of the item stem and response format in order to make it more understandable for children. A stratified random sample of 1,233 students (48% girls) in grades 4–7 (mean age 11 years and 7 months) provided data on the SWLS-C and measures of optimism, self-concept, self-efficacy, depression, emphatic concern, and perspective taking. The SWLS-C demonstrated a unidimensional factor structure and high internal consistency. Furthermore, differential item functioning and differential scale functioning analyses indicated that the SWLS-C measures satisfaction with life in the same way for different groups of children (i.e., with regard to gender, first language learned at home—English vs. other language(s) than English—and across different grades) at the item and at the scale level. Associations between scores on the SWLS-C and demographic variables were statistically non-significant or of small effect size. In addition, the SWLS-C showed evidence of convergent and discriminant validity in relation to the other measures. Our results indicate that the SWLS-C is a psychometrically sound instrument that demonstrated evidence of construct validity for this age group. Limitations and future directions are discussed.
KeywordsSatisfaction with Life Scale adapted for Children Satisfaction with life Children Adolescents Subjective well-being
This project was made possible through the generous support of United Way of the Lower Mainland and a Cordula and Gunter Paetzold Fellowship, University of British Columbia. We would like to thank Dr. Anita Hubley and Martin Guhn for their feedback on this manuscript. Part of this study was presented at the 2007 conference of the International Society for Quality of Life Studies, San Diego, CA.
- AERA, APA, & NCME. (1999). Validity. Standards for educational and psychological testing (pp. 9–24). Washington, DC: AERA, APA, & NCME. Chap. 1.Google Scholar
- Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. (1995). Great transitions: Preparing adolescents for a new century (Executive Summary). New York: Carnegie. Retrieved October 18, 2008, from http://www.carnegie.org/sub/pubs/reports/great_transitions/gr_exec.html#intro.
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Davis, M. A. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.Google Scholar
- Developmental Studies Center. (2003). Retrieved November 23, 2008, from http://www.devstu.org/pdfs/cdp/DSC_ElemSch_scales.pdf.
- Eccles, J. S., Lord, S., & Buchanan, C. M. (1996). School transitions in early adolescence: What are we doing to our young people? In J. L. Graber, J. Brooks-Gunn, & A. C. Petersen (Eds.), Transitions through adolescence: Interpersonal domains and context (pp. 251–284). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Greenberg, M., & Lengua, L. (1995). Scale construction of the Seattle personality inventory. (Fast track project technical report). Seattle, Washington: University of Washington.Google Scholar
- Guhn, M., Gadermann, A. M., & Zumbo, B. D. (2007). Does the EDI measure school readiness in the same way across different groups of children? Early Education and Development, 18, 453–472.Google Scholar
- Hubley, A. M., & Zumbo, B. D. (1996). A dialectic on validity: Where we have been and where we are going. The Journal of General Psychology, 123, 207–215.Google Scholar
- Huebner, E. S., & Alderman, G. L. (1993). Convergent and discriminant validation of a children’s life satisfaction scale: Its relationship to self- and teacher-reported psychological problems and school functioning. Social Indicators Research, 30, 71–82. doi: 10.1007/BF01080333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Huebner, E. S., & Diener, C. (2008). Research on life satisfaction of children and youth. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 376–392). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Kershaw, P., Irwin, L., Trafford, K., & Hertzman, C. (2005). The British Columbia atlas of child development (1st ed., Vol. 40). Vancouver, BC: Human Early Learning Partnership/Western Geographical Press.Google Scholar
- Mannes, M., Roehlkepartain, E. C., & Benson, P. L. (2005). Unleashing the power of community to strengthen the well-being of children, youth, and families: An asset-building approach. Child Welfare, 84, 233–250.Google Scholar
- Marsh, H. W. (1988). Self-description questionnaire: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of preadolescent self-concept: A test manual and a research monograph. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
- McDonald, R. P. (1985). Factor analysis and related methods. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Miles, J., & Shevlin, M. (2004). Applying regression and correlation: A guide for students and researchers. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Rains, C. (2003). Seattle personality questionnaire-original. (Fast track project technical report). Retrieved September 9, 2007, from http://www.fasttrackproject.org/.
- Ramsay, J. O. (1997). A functional approach to modeling test data. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 381–394). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Ramsay, J. O. (2000). TESTGRAF: A program for the graphical analysis of multiple choice test and questionnaire data. McGill University. Retrieved November 2007, from http://www.psych.mcgill.ca/faculty/ramsay/ramsay.html.
- Song, M. (2003). Two studies on the resilience inventory (RI): Toward the goal of creating a culturally sensitive measure of adolescence resilience. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Witarsa, P. M. (2003). Nonparametric item response modeling for identifying differential item functioning in the moderate-to-small-scale testing context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia, BC.Google Scholar
- Zullig, K. J., Valois, R. F., Huebner, E. S., Oeltmann, J. E., & Drane, W. (2001). The relationship between life satisfaction and selected substance abuse behaviors among public high school adolescents. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 29, 279–288. doi: 10.1016/S1054-139X(01)00269-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zumbo, B. D. (1999). A handbook on the theory and methods of differential item functioning (DIF): Logistic regression modeling as a unitary framework for binary and Likert-type (ordinal) item scores. Ottawa, ON: Directorate of Human Resources Research and Evaluation/Department of National Defense.Google Scholar
- Zumbo, B. D. (2007a). Validity: Foundational issues and statistical methodology. In C. R. Rao & S. Sinharay (Eds.), Handbook of statistics: Psychometrics (Vol. 26, pp. 45–79). The Netherlands: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Zumbo, B. D. (2007b). Three generations of differential item functioning (DIF) analyses: Considering where it has been, where it is now, and where it is going. Language Assessment Quarterly, 4, 223–233.Google Scholar
- Zumbo, B. D., Gadermann, A. M., & Zeisser, C. (2007). Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta for Likert rating scales. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods; JMASM, 6, 21–29.Google Scholar
- Zumbo, B. D., Gelin, M. N., & Hubley, A. M. (2002). The construction and use of psychological tests and measures. In the psychology theme of the encyclopedia of life support systems (EOLSS). Oxford, UK: Eolss Publishers.Google Scholar