Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 96, Issue 2, pp 229–247 | Cite as

Investigating Validity Evidence of the Satisfaction with Life Scale Adapted for Children

  • Anne M. GadermannEmail author
  • Kimberly A. Schonert-Reichl
  • Bruno D. Zumbo
Article

Abstract

This study introduces the Satisfaction with Life Scale adapted for Children (SWLS-C) and presents psychometric findings regarding its validation. The SWLS-C was adapted from the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS; Diener et al. 1985), which is one of the most commonly used measures to assess satisfaction with life in adults. Three subject matter experts adapted the SWLS by changing the wording of the item stem and response format in order to make it more understandable for children. A stratified random sample of 1,233 students (48% girls) in grades 4–7 (mean age 11 years and 7 months) provided data on the SWLS-C and measures of optimism, self-concept, self-efficacy, depression, emphatic concern, and perspective taking. The SWLS-C demonstrated a unidimensional factor structure and high internal consistency. Furthermore, differential item functioning and differential scale functioning analyses indicated that the SWLS-C measures satisfaction with life in the same way for different groups of children (i.e., with regard to gender, first language learned at home—English vs. other language(s) than English—and across different grades) at the item and at the scale level. Associations between scores on the SWLS-C and demographic variables were statistically non-significant or of small effect size. In addition, the SWLS-C showed evidence of convergent and discriminant validity in relation to the other measures. Our results indicate that the SWLS-C is a psychometrically sound instrument that demonstrated evidence of construct validity for this age group. Limitations and future directions are discussed.

Keywords

Satisfaction with Life Scale adapted for Children Satisfaction with life Children Adolescents Subjective well-being 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This project was made possible through the generous support of United Way of the Lower Mainland and a Cordula and Gunter Paetzold Fellowship, University of British Columbia. We would like to thank Dr. Anita Hubley and Martin Guhn for their feedback on this manuscript. Part of this study was presented at the 2007 conference of the International Society for Quality of Life Studies, San Diego, CA.

References

  1. AERA, APA, & NCME. (1999). Validity. Standards for educational and psychological testing (pp. 9–24). Washington, DC: AERA, APA, & NCME. Chap. 1.Google Scholar
  2. Antaramian, S. P., Huebner, E. S., & Valois, R. F. (2008). Adolescent life satisfaction. Applied psychology: An international review, 57, 112–126. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00357.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ben-Arieh, A., & Frones, I. (2007). Indicators of children’s well-being: Concepts, indices and usage. Social Indicators Research, 80, 1–4. doi: 10.1007/s11205-006-9069-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. (1995). Great transitions: Preparing adolescents for a new century (Executive Summary). New York: Carnegie. Retrieved October 18, 2008, from http://www.carnegie.org/sub/pubs/reports/great_transitions/gr_exec.html#intro.
  5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Damon, W. (2004). What is positive youth development? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591, 13–24. doi: 10.1177/0002716203260092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis, M. A. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.Google Scholar
  9. Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–126. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Developmental Studies Center. (2003). Retrieved November 23, 2008, from http://www.devstu.org/pdfs/cdp/DSC_ElemSch_scales.pdf.
  11. Dew, T., & Huebner, E. S. (1994). Adolescents’ perceived quality of life: An exploratory investigation. Journal of School Psychology, 32, 185–199. doi: 10.1016/0022-4405(94)90010-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eccles, J. S. (1999). The development of children ages 6 to 14. The Future of Children, 9, 30–44. doi: 10.2307/1602703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eccles, J. S., Lord, S., & Buchanan, C. M. (1996). School transitions in early adolescence: What are we doing to our young people? In J. L. Graber, J. Brooks-Gunn, & A. C. Petersen (Eds.), Transitions through adolescence: Interpersonal domains and context (pp. 251–284). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  17. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215–251. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Flora, D. B., & Curran, P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9, 466–491. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gilman, R., & Huebner, E. S. (1997). Children’s reports of their life satisfaction: Convergence across raters, time and response formats. School Psychology International, 18, 229–243. doi: 10.1177/0143034397183004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gilman, R., & Huebner, E. S. (2000). Review of life satisfaction measures for adolescents. Behaviour Change, 17, 178–183. doi: 10.1375/bech.17.3.178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gilman, R., & Huebner, S. (2003). A review of life satisfaction research with children and adolescents. School Psychology Quarterly, 18, 192–205. doi: 10.1521/scpq.18.2.192.21858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Greenberg, M., & Lengua, L. (1995). Scale construction of the Seattle personality inventory. (Fast track project technical report). Seattle, Washington: University of Washington.Google Scholar
  23. Grühn, D., Rebucal, K., Diehl, M., Lumley, M., & Labouvie-Vief, G. (2008). Empathy across the adult lifespan: Longitudinal and experience-sampling findings. Emotion (Washington, DC), 8, 753–765. doi: 10.1037/a0014123.Google Scholar
  24. Guhn, M., Gadermann, A. M., & Zumbo, B. D. (2007). Does the EDI measure school readiness in the same way across different groups of children? Early Education and Development, 18, 453–472.Google Scholar
  25. Gullone, E., & Cummins, R. A. (1999). The comprehensive quality of life scale: A psychometric evaluation with an adolescent sample. Behaviour Change, 16, 127–139. doi: 10.1375/bech.16.2.127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haranin, E. C., Huebner, E. S., & Suldo, S. M. (2007). Predictive and incremental validity of global and domain-based adolescent life satisfaction reports. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 25, 127–138. doi: 10.1177/0734282906295620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hubley, A. M., & Zumbo, B. D. (1996). A dialectic on validity: Where we have been and where we are going. The Journal of General Psychology, 123, 207–215.Google Scholar
  28. Huebner, E. S. (1991a). Initial development of the students’ life satisfaction scale. School Psychology International, 12, 231–240. doi: 10.1177/0143034391123010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Huebner, E. S. (1991b). Further validation of the students’ life satisfaction scale: The independence of satisfaction and affect ratings. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 9, 363–368. doi: 10.1177/073428299100900408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Huebner, E. S. (2004). Research on assessment of life satisfaction of children and adolescents. Social Indicators Research, 66, 3–33. doi: 10.1023/B:SOCI.0000007497.57754.e3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Huebner, E. S., & Alderman, G. L. (1993). Convergent and discriminant validation of a children’s life satisfaction scale: Its relationship to self- and teacher-reported psychological problems and school functioning. Social Indicators Research, 30, 71–82. doi: 10.1007/BF01080333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Huebner, E. S., & Diener, C. (2008). Research on life satisfaction of children and youth. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 376–392). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  33. Huebner, E. S., Funk, B. A., I. I. I., & Gilman, R. (2000). Cross-sectional and longitudinal psychosocial correlates of adolescent life satisfaction reports. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 16, 53–64. doi: 10.1177/082957350001600104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Huston, A. C., & Ripke, M. N. (2006). Middle childhood: Contexts of development. In A. C. Huston & M. N. Ripke (Eds.), Developmental contexts in middle childhood: Bridges to adolescence and adulthood (pp. 1–22). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Janus, M., & Offord, D. (2007). Development and psychometric properties of the early development instrument (EDI): A measure of children’s school readiness. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 39, 1–22. doi: 10.1037/cjbs2007001.Google Scholar
  36. Jodoin, M. G., & Gierl, M. J. (2001). Evaluating type I error rate and power rates using an effect size measure with the logistic regression procedure for DIF detection. Applied Measurement in Education, 14, 329–349. doi: 10.1207/S15324818AME1404_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Johnson, W., & Krueger, R. F. (2006). How money buys happiness: Genetic and environmental processes linking finances and life satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 680–691. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kershaw, P., Irwin, L., Trafford, K., & Hertzman, C. (2005). The British Columbia atlas of child development (1st ed., Vol. 40). Vancouver, BC: Human Early Learning Partnership/Western Geographical Press.Google Scholar
  39. Leung, J., & Leung, K. (1992). Life satisfaction, self-concept, and relationship with parents in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21, 653–665. doi: 10.1007/BF01538737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 616–628. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mannes, M., Roehlkepartain, E. C., & Benson, P. L. (2005). Unleashing the power of community to strengthen the well-being of children, youth, and families: An asset-building approach. Child Welfare, 84, 233–250.Google Scholar
  42. Marsh, H. W. (1988). Self-description questionnaire: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of preadolescent self-concept: A test manual and a research monograph. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  43. Marsh, H. W. (1990). A multidimensional, hierarchical self-concept: Theoretical and empirical justification. Educational Psychology Review, 2, 77–172. doi: 10.1007/BF01322177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Martin, K., Huebner, E. S., & Valois, R. F. (2008). Does life satisfaction predict victimization experiences in adolescence? Psychology in the Schools, 45, 705–714. doi: 10.1002/pits.20336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McDonald, R. P. (1985). Factor analysis and related methods. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  46. Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from person’s responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. The American Psychologist, 50, 741–749. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Miles, J., & Shevlin, M. (2004). Applying regression and correlation: A guide for students and researchers. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  48. Neto, F. (1993). The satisfaction with life scale: Psychometric properties in an adolescent sample. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 22, 125–134. doi: 10.1007/BF01536648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The satisfaction with life scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 137–152. doi: 10.1080/17439760701756946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pavot, W., Diener, E., Colvin, C. R., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Further validation of the satisfaction with life scale: Evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 149–161. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5701_17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Piko, B. F. (2006). Satisfaction with life, psychosocial health and materialism among Hungarian youth. Journal of Health Psychology, 11, 827–831. doi: 10.1177/1359105306069072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rains, C. (2003). Seattle personality questionnaire-original. (Fast track project technical report). Retrieved September 9, 2007, from http://www.fasttrackproject.org/.
  53. Ramsay, J. O. (1997). A functional approach to modeling test data. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 381–394). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  54. Ramsay, J. O. (2000). TESTGRAF: A program for the graphical analysis of multiple choice test and questionnaire data. McGill University. Retrieved November 2007, from http://www.psych.mcgill.ca/faculty/ramsay/ramsay.html.
  55. Russell, D. W. (2002). In search of underlying dimensions: The use (and abuse) of factor analysis in personality and social psychology bulletin. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1629–1646. doi: 10.1177/014616702237645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. The American Psychologist, 55, 5–14. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Seligson, J. L., Huebner, E. S., & Valois, R. F. (2005). An investigation of a Brief Life Satisfaction Scale with elementary school children. Social Indicators Research, 73, 355–374. doi: 10.1007/s11205-004-2011-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shek, D. T. L. (2007). A longitudinal study of perceived parental psychological control and psychological well-being in Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 63, 1–22. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Song, M. (2003). Two studies on the resilience inventory (RI): Toward the goal of creating a culturally sensitive measure of adolescence resilience. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  60. Suldo, S. M., & Huebner, E. S. (2004). Does life satisfaction moderate the effects of stressful life events on psychopathological behavior during adolescence? School Psychology Quarterly, 19, 93–105. doi: 10.1521/scpq.19.2.93.33313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Valois, R. F., Zullig, K. J., Huebner, E. S., & Drane, J. W. (2004). Life satisfaction and suicide among high school adolescents. Social Indicators Research, 66, 81–105. doi: 10.1023/B:SOCI.0000007499.19430.2f.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Witarsa, P. M. (2003). Nonparametric item response modeling for identifying differential item functioning in the moderate-to-small-scale testing context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia, BC.Google Scholar
  63. Zullig, K. J., Valois, R. F., Huebner, E. S., Oeltmann, J. E., & Drane, W. (2001). The relationship between life satisfaction and selected substance abuse behaviors among public high school adolescents. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 29, 279–288. doi: 10.1016/S1054-139X(01)00269-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zumbo, B. D. (1999). A handbook on the theory and methods of differential item functioning (DIF): Logistic regression modeling as a unitary framework for binary and Likert-type (ordinal) item scores. Ottawa, ON: Directorate of Human Resources Research and Evaluation/Department of National Defense.Google Scholar
  65. Zumbo, B. D. (2007a). Validity: Foundational issues and statistical methodology. In C. R. Rao & S. Sinharay (Eds.), Handbook of statistics: Psychometrics (Vol. 26, pp. 45–79). The Netherlands: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  66. Zumbo, B. D. (2007b). Three generations of differential item functioning (DIF) analyses: Considering where it has been, where it is now, and where it is going. Language Assessment Quarterly, 4, 223–233.Google Scholar
  67. Zumbo, B. D., Gadermann, A. M., & Zeisser, C. (2007). Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta for Likert rating scales. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods; JMASM, 6, 21–29.Google Scholar
  68. Zumbo, B. D., Gelin, M. N., & Hubley, A. M. (2002). The construction and use of psychological tests and measures. In the psychology theme of the encyclopedia of life support systems (EOLSS). Oxford, UK: Eolss Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne M. Gadermann
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kimberly A. Schonert-Reichl
    • 1
  • Bruno D. Zumbo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ECPSUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations