Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparative Case Study as Social Impact Assessment: Possibilities and Limitations for Anticipating Social Change in the Far North

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social impact assessment (SIA) is increasingly an accepted component of environmental impact assessment and project evaluation throughout North America. Tools and methodologies utilized to conduct such assessments vary greatly and continue to evolve with time and experience. This paper follows the evolution of case study methods in social impact assessment, focusing primarily on the comparative diachronic method. Exploring the utility of this method, this paper compares the potential social and economic impacts of the Mackenzie Gas Project (MGP) in the community of Inuvik, Northwest Territories, with the known social and economic impacts of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS) in the community of Valdez, Alaska. Through such comparison, insights into potential impacts from the proposed Mackenzie Gas Project are assessed while also drawing attention to, and discussing, the specific strengths and weaknesses of a comparative case study approach to social impact assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baring-Gould, M., & Bennet, M. (1976). Social impact of the trans-Alaska pipeline construction in Valdez, Alaska 1974–1975. (Testimony Prepared for the Mackenzie Valley Pipeline Inquiry. Proceedings held in Yellowknife on Oct. 4. Vol. 192 of transcripts).

  • Becker, H. A., & Vanclay, F. (Eds.). (2003). The international handbook of social impact assessment: Conceptual and methodological advances. Northampton, MA: Edward Elagar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, T. R. (1977). Northern frontier, Northern Homeland: The report of the Mackenzie Valley pipeline inquiry. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdge, R. J. (2004). The concepts, process and methods of social impact assessment. Middleton, WI: Social Ecology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdge, R. J., & Johnson, S. (1977). The socio-cultural aspects of the effects of resource development. In J. McEvoy & T. Dietz (Eds.), Handbook for environmental planning: The social consequences of environmental change (pp. 241–279). New York: Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of the Census. (1973). 1970 Census of population (In Vol 1: Characteristics of the population, part 3: Alaska. USA: Department of Commerce, Social and Economic Statistics Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of the Census. (1981). 1980 Census of population: number of inhabitants. Alaska, US: Department of Commerce, Social and Economic Statistics Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, W. J. (1996). The Alaskan labour market during the pipeline era. The Journal of Political Economy, 104(1), 186–218. doi:10.1086/262022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Census of Canada. (2006). 2006 Community Profile: Inuvik. Retrieved July, 2008, from http://www.statcan.ca.

  • Craig, D. (1990). Social impact assessment: Politically oriented approaches and applications. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 10, 37–54. doi:10.1016/0195-9255(90)90005-K.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desbrisay, D. (1994). The impact of major resource development projects on aboriginal communities: A review of the literature. (In Ottawa: Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples-1994).

  • Duinker, P. N., & Greig, L. A. (2006). The impotence of cumulative effects assessment in Canada: Ailments, and ideas for redeployment. Environmental Management, 37(2), 153–161. doi:10.1007/s00267-004-0240-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 420–433). London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenburg, W. R. (1981). Women and men in an energy boomtown: adjustment, alienation, and adaptation. Rural Sociology, 46(2), 220–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenburg, W. R. (1986). Social impact assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 12, 451–478. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.12.080186.002315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, D. J. (1978). The Berger inquiry: An impact assessment process. Science, 199(4334), 946–952. doi:10.1126/science.199.4332.946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government of the Northwest Territories (GNWT).(2000). A non-renewable resource development strategy for the Northwest Territories. Yellowknife: GNWT; October. Retrieved May 28, 2007 from http://www.gov.nt.ca/FMBS/documents/dox/NRRDS.pdf.

  • Government of the Northwest Territories (GNWT). (2006). Resource development impacts: Estimates of the cumulative impact of non-renewable resource development and the forced growth impact on government programs. Retrieved August 26, 2008 from http://www.ngps.nt.ca/Upload/Interveners/Government%20of%20the%20Northwest%20Territories/060202_GNWT_General_Submission_Impact_Report.pdf.

  • Haley, E., & Tunstall, R. (2005). Environmental health issues related to industrial pollution. In D. Davidson & K. Hatt (Eds.), Consuming sustainability: Critical social analysis of ecological change (pp. 181–204). Halifax: Fernwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Review Panel. (2004). Costs, economics and community services. Environmental impact statement for the Mackenzie gas project. Vol. 6, part A section 3. Retrieved July 2008, fromhttp://www.mackenziegasproject.com.

  • Joint Review Panel.(2005). Socio-Economic Baseline Inuvik Community Report. Environmental impact statement for the Mackenzie gas project. Vol. 4, part B section 2. Retrieved July 2008, from http://www.mackenziegasproject.com.

  • Joint Review Panel Hearings. (2006). Town of Inuvik submission, Feb 16 2006, Inuvik N. T. Retrieved July, 2008 from http://www.mackenziegasproject.com.

  • Mackenzie Valley Environmental Assessment Review Board. (2007). Socio–economic impact assessment guidelines. Northwest Territories: Yellowknife.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niezen, R. (1993). Power and dignity: The social consequences of hydro-electric development for the James Bay Cree. The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology. La Revue Canadienne de Sociologie et d’Anthropologie, 30, 510–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, B. F. (2002). Strategic environmental assessment: What is it and what makes it strategic? Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 2(2), 203–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northwest Territories Bureau of Statistics. (2006). Inuvik Community Profile. Retrieved on July 22, 2008, from http://www.stats.gov.nt.ca/Profile/Profile%20PDF/Inuvik.pdf.

  • O’Faircheallaigh, C. (1999). Making social impact assessment count: A negotiation-based approach to indigenous peoples. Society & Natural Resources, 12, 63–80. doi:10.1080/089419299279894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paci, C., Tobin, A., & Robb, P. (2002). Reconsidering the Canadian environmental impact assessment act: A place for traditional environmental knowledge. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 22, 111–127. doi:10.1016/S0195-9255(01)00095-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, H. (1990). Community social impact assessment: A framework for indigenous peoples. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 10, 185–193. doi:10.1016/0195-9255(90)90018-U.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheate, W., Dagg, S., Richardson, J., Aschemann, R., Palerm, J., & Steen, U. (2003). Integrating the environment into strategic decision-making: Conceptualizing policy SEA. European Environment, 13(4), 1–18. doi:10.1002/eet.305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strong, S. B. (1977). Alaska pipeline: social and economic impact on native people. Environmental-Social Program, Northern-Pipelines, of the Government of Canada. ESCOM Report No. A1-01.

  • The Interorganizational Committee on Guidelines, Principles for Social Impact Assessment. (1994). Guidelines and principles for social impact assessment. USA: US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgerson, D. (1986). Between knowledge and politics: Three faces of policy analysis. Policy Sciences, 19(1), 33–59. doi:10.1007/BF02124483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanclay, F. (2002). Conceptualising social impacts. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 22, 183–211. doi:10.1016/S0195-9255(01)00105-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanclay, F. (2003). International Principles for Social Impact Assessment. International Association for Impact Assessment, Special Publication Series No. 2.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada

    Jodie Asselin & John R. Parkins

Authors
  1. Jodie Asselin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John R. Parkins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John R. Parkins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Asselin, J., Parkins, J.R. Comparative Case Study as Social Impact Assessment: Possibilities and Limitations for Anticipating Social Change in the Far North. Soc Indic Res 94, 483–497 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9444-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9444-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation