Skip to main content
Log in

Using Qualitative Methods with Poor Children in Urban Ethiopia: Opportunities & Challenges

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses the advantages and challenges of using qualitative methods to elicit poor children’s perspectives about threats and positive influences on their wellbeing. It draws on research carried out by the author on the subjective experiences of poor children in Addis Ababa, the capital of Ethiopia in terms of their understandings of wellbeing, threats to their wellbeing, coping strategies, and positive or resilient outcomes. After a brief introduction reviewing previous approaches to child poverty in general and research on Ethiopian children in particular, the second section describes the research setting and the ethical approach to the study, which influenced how consent was obtained and the data analysed. The paper then describes the use of qualitative methods such as semi-structured interviews, draw-and-tell, and diaries, the kinds of data they produced and the methodological and ethical dilemmas and tensions encountered in using them. It concludes that despite the challenges qualitative methods are invaluable in order to understand what poor children see as threats and positive influences on their wellbeing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The Wellbeing in Developing Countries (WeD) is a four-country (Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Peru and Thailand) 5-year study financed by the Economic and Social Research Council, UK. In Ethiopia the WeD Research Program has six sites: two urban sites (Kolfe in Addis Ababa and Kebele 08/09 in Shashemene), two sites in Oromia Region (Turufe Kecheme and Korodegaga) and two sites in Amhara Region (Yetemen and Denki).

References

  • Backett-Milburn, K., & McKie, L. (1999). A critical appraisal of the draw and write technique. Health Education Research, 14, 387–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J., & Weller, S. (2003). Is it fun? Developing children centred research methods. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 23(1/2), 33–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belcher, E. L. (1932). A technique for diary analysis. Child Development, 3(1), 53–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bethlehem, T. (2005). Poverty and the social context of sex work in Addis Ababa: An anthropological perspective. Addis Ababa: Forum for Social Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, S., & White, H. (1997). Combining the quantitative and qualitative approaches to poverty measurement and analysis, World Bank Technical Paper No. 366.

  • Christensen, P., & Prout, A. (2005). Anthropological and sociological perspectives on the study of children. In S. Greene & D. Hogan (Eds.), Researching children’s experience: Methods & approaches (pp. 42–60). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiaensen, L. (2001, March). The Qual-Quant debate within its epistemological context: Some practical implications. Paper Presented at a Qualitative and Quantitative Poverty Appraisal Workshop, Cornell University.

  • Cillessen, A. H. N. (2003). Sociometric status and children’s peer experiences: Use of the daily diary method. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49(4), 427–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M., & Leonard, M. (2002). Against all odds: Family life on a low income in Ireland. Dublin: Combat Poverty Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J., & Ridge, T. (1997). Same scenery, different lifestyle: Rural children on a low income. London: Children’s Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeny, T., & Boyden, J. (2003). Children and poverty: A review of contemporary literature and thought on children and poverty. In Children and Poverty Series, Part I, Christian Children’s Fund, Richmond, website: http://www.christianchildrensfund.org/uploadedFiles/Publications/7659_Poverty%20Pt%201.pdf.

  • Feeny, T., & Boyden, J. (April 2004). Acting in adversity—rethinking the causes, experiences and effects of child poverty in contemporary literature. QEH Working Papers. Working Paper Number 116, website: http://www3.qeh.ox.ac.uk/RePEc/qeh/qehwps/qehwps116.pdf.

  • Habtamu, W. (Ed.). (1996). Research papers on the situation of children and adolescents in Ethiopia. Proceedings, Addis Ababa University.

  • Heinonen, P. (2000). Anthropology of street children in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Durham, Durham, UK.

  • Hill, M. (2005). Ethical considerations in researching children’s experiences. In S. Greene & D. Hogan (Eds.), Researching children’s experience: Methods & approaches (pp. 61–86). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J., Thomson, R., & Henderson, S. (2006). Qualitative longitudinal research: A discussion paper, Working Paper No. 21, Families & Social Capital ESRC Research Group, London South Bank University.

  • Irwin, L. G., & Johnson, J. (2005). Interviewing young children: Explicating our practice and dilemmas. Qualitative Health Research, 15(6), 821–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, N., & Sumner, A. (2007, June). Does mixed methods research matter to understanding childhood wellbeing? Paper Presented at Wellbeing in International Development Conference (WeD), Bath, UK.

  • Kanbur, R. (2001, March). Qualitative and quantitative poverty appraisal: The state of play and some questions. Paper Presented at a Qualitative and Quantitative Poverty Appraisal Workshop, Cornell University.

  • Kortesluoma, R.-L., Hentinen, M., & Nikkonen, M. (2003). Conducting a qualitative chid interview: Methodological considerations. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 45(5), 434–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, D., Patel, R., Schafft, K., Rademacher, A., & Koch-Schulte, S. (2000). Voices of the poor: Can anyone hear us? New York: Published for the World Bank, Oxford University Press. Available from: http://www1.worldbank.org/prem/poverty/voices/reports.htm#cananyone.

  • Percy, M. S. (2003). Feeling loved, having friends to count on, and taking care of myself: Minority children living in poverty describe what is ‘special’ to them. Journal of Children and Poverty, 9, 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poluha, E. (2004). The power of continuity: Ethiopia through the eyes of its children. Uppsala: Nordic Africa Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulha, E. (2007). An annotated bibliography on children and childhood in Ethiopia. Stockholm: Save the Children Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punch, S. (2002a). Interviewing strategies with young people: The ‘secret box’ stimulus material and task-based activities. Children and Society, 16(1), 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Punch, S. (2002b). Research with children: The same or different from research with adults? Childhood, 9(3), 321–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridge, T. (2002). Childhood poverty and social exclusion: From a child’s perspective. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roker, D. (1998). Worth more than this: Young people growing up in family poverty. Ilford: The Children’s Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. A. (1996). Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: Using interpretative phenomenological analysis in health psychology. Psychology and Health, 11, 261–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2003). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 51–80). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tassew, W., et al. (2005). Mainstreaming children into national poverty strategies: A child-focused analysis of the Ethiopian Sustainable Development and Poverty Reduction Program (2002–2005). Young Lives: Working Paper No. 22.

  • Tatek A. (2008). Ethiopian childhoods: A case study of the lives of orphans and working children. PhD Dissertation, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.

  • Van der Hoek, T. (2005). Through children’s eyes: An initial study of children’s personal experiences and coping strategies growing up poor in an affluent Netherlands. Innocenti Working Paper No. 2005–2006, UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, Florence.

  • Willig, C. (2001). Introducing qualitative research in psychology. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willow, C. (2002). Bread is free: Children and young people talk about poverty. London: Children’s Rights Alliance & Save the Children Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2000). Attacking poverty: World development report 2000/2001. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tekola Bethlehem.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tekola, B., Griffin, C. & Camfield, L. Using Qualitative Methods with Poor Children in Urban Ethiopia: Opportunities & Challenges. Soc Indic Res 90, 73–87 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9313-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9313-9

Keywords

Navigation