Advertisement

Levels of Mental Health Continuum and Personality Traits

  • 679 Accesses

  • 23 Citations

Abstract

Empirically, mental health and mental illness are not opposite ends of a single measurement continuum. In view of this fact, Keyes (J Health Soc Behav, 43:207–202, 2002) operationalizes mental health as a syndrome of symptoms of both positive feelings (emotional well-being) and positive functioning (psychological and social well-being) in life. In his comprehensive model, the presence of mental health is described as flourishing in life, and the absence of mental health is characterized as languishing in life. The aim of this study was to investigate the discriminatory power of Big Five personality traits in discriminating among the levels of mental health continuum using an Iranian university student sample. Findings revealed that respondents with different levels of mental health differed significantly on four of the five personality traits (extraversion, neuroticism, conscientiousness, and agreeableness). All in all, the results of this study converged with prior findings about the importance of Big Five personality traits in predicting well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 199

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Along with the categorical approach to the diagnosis of mental health continuum, a continuous assessment also may be applied; in a way that we simply sum all scales of subjective well-being together to form a composite index (see, Keyes 2006). In the present study the categorical approach was used.

References

  1. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1994). Set like plaster? Evidence for the stability of adult personality. In T. F. Heatherton & J. L. Weinberger (Eds.), Can personality change? (pp. 21–40). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

  2. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.

  3. Diener, E., & Lucas, R. (1999). Personality, and subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 213–229). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

  4. Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 403–425.

  5. Diener, E., Sapyta, J., & Suh, E. (1998). Subjective well-being is essential to well-being. Psychological Inquiry, 9, 33–37.

  6. Diener, E., & Scollon, C. N. (2003). Subjective well-being is desirable, but not the summum bonum, Minnesota Interdisciplinary Workshop on Well-Being (October 24–26), Minneapolis.

  7. Diener, E., Scollon, C. N., & Lucas, R. E. (2004). The evolving concept of subjective well-being: The multifaceted nature of happiness. In P. T. Costa & I. C. Siegler (Eds.), Advances in cell aging and gerontology (Vol. 15, pp. 187–220). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  8. John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The ‘Big Five’ inventory: Versions 4a and 54. Technical Report. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Personality Assessment and Research.

  9. John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford Press.

  10. Joshanloo, M., Nosratabadi, M., & Jafari Kandovan, Gh. (2007). Social well-being, big five factors and self-esteem. Journal of Psychological Science, 21, 66–88. [in Persian]

  11. Joshanloo, M., Rostami, R., & Nosratabadi, M. (2006). Examining the factor structure of the Keyes’ comprehensive scale of well-being. Journal of Iranian Psychologists, 9, 35–51. [in Persian]

  12. Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 121–140.

  13. Keyes, C. L. M. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43, 207–222.

  14. Keyes, C. L. M. (2003). Complete mental health: An agenda for the 21st century. In C. L. M. Keyes & J. Haidt (Eds.), Flourishing: Positive psychology and the life well-lived (pp. 293–312). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.

  15. Keyes, C. L. M. (2004). The nexus of cardiovascular disease and depression revisited: The complete mental health perspective and the moderating role of age and gender. Aging and Mental Health, 8, 267–275.

  16. Keyes, C. L. M. (2005a). Mental illness and/or mental health? Investigating axioms of the complete state model of health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 539–548.

  17. Keyes, C. L. M. (2005b). Chronic physical disease and aging: Is mental health a potential protective factor? Ageing International, 30, 88–104.

  18. Keyes, C. L. M. (2006). Mental health in adolescence: Is America’s youth flourishing? American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 76(3), 395–402.

  19. Keyes, C. L. M., & Grzywacz, J. G. (2005). Health as a complete state: The added value in work performance and healthcare costs. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health, 47, 523–532.

  20. Keyes, C. L. M., & Lopez, S. (2002). Toward a science of mental health: Positive direction in diagnosis, interventions. In C. Rick Snyder & S. Lopez (Eds.), The handbook of positive psychology (pp. 45–59). New York: Oxford University Press.

  21. Keyes, C. L. M., & Shapiro, A. (2004). Social well-being in the United States: A descriptive epidemiology. In O. G. Brim, C. Ryff, & R. Kessler (Eds.), How healthy are we? A national study of well-being at midlife (pp. 350–372). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  22. Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 1007–1022.

  23. McAdams, D. P., & Pals, J. L. (2006). A new Big Five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61(3), 204–217.

  24. McCrae, R. R. (2004). Human nature and culture: A trait perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 3–14.

  25. Mroczek, D. K., & Kolarz, C. M. (1998). The effect of age on positive and negative affect: A developmental perspective on happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1333–1349.

  26. Ng, A. K., Ho, D. Y. F., Wong, S. S., & Smith, I. (2003). In search of the good life: A cultural odyssey in the East and West. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 129(4), 317–366.

  27. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.

  28. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.

  29. Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727.

  30. Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (1996). Psychological well-being: Meaning, measurement, and implications for psychotherapy research. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 65, 14–23.

  31. Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (1998). The contours of positive human health. Psychological Inquiry, 9, 1–28.

  32. Schimmack, U., Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2002). Life-satisfaction is a momentary judgment and a stable personality characteristic: The use of chronically accessible and stable sources. Journal of Personality, 70, 345–384.

  33. Schimmack, U., Radhakrishan, P., Oishi, S., Dzokoto, V., & Ahadi, S. (2002). Culture, personality, and subjective well-being. Integrating process model of life satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 582–593.

  34. Schmutte, P. S., & Ryff, C. D. (1997). Personality and well-being: What is the connection? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 549–559.

  35. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

  36. Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 678–691.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Mohsen Joshanloo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Joshanloo, M., Nosratabadi, M. Levels of Mental Health Continuum and Personality Traits. Soc Indic Res 90, 211–224 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9253-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Mental health continuum
  • Subjective well-being
  • Big Five