Social Indicators Research

, Volume 89, Issue 1, pp 41–60 | Cite as

The Influence of Environment and Personality on the Affective and Cognitive Component of Subjective Well-being

  • Ulrich Schimmack
  • Jürgen Schupp
  • Gert G. Wagner
Article

Abstract

Subjective well-being (SWB) has two components: affective well-being (AWB) and cognitive well-being (CWB). The present study demonstrated that AWB and CWB have are influenced by different factors in a nationally representative sample in Germany (N = 1053). Neuroticism was a stronger predictor of AWB than CWB. Unemployment and regional differences between the East and West of Germany were stronger predictors of CWB than AWB. In addition, the study demonstrated that shared evaluative biases in personality and SWB ratings inflate estimates of the effect size of personality. After controlling for this bias, the effects of environmental factors (unemployment, regional differences) on CWB were stronger than the effects of personality (neuroticism). The results demonstrate that AWB and CWB are distinct components of SWB and that research findings for one component may not generalize to the other component. The results also raise important questions about the weighing of the two components in the creation of subjective social indicators.

Keywords

Well-being Life satisfaction Affect Unemployment Personality Neuroticism 

References

  1. Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  2. Anusic, I., & Schimmack, U. (2007). The nature and structure of correlations among the Big Five personality traits (Manuscript in preparation).Google Scholar
  3. Biesanz, J. C., & West, S. G. (2004). Towards understanding assessments of the Big Five: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of convergent and discriminant validity across measurement occasion and type of observer. Journal of Personality, 72(4), 845–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bobko, P., Roth, P. L., & Bobko, C. (2001). Correcting the effect size of d for range restriction and unreliability. Organizational Research Methods, 4(1), 46–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell, A. (1976). Subjective measures of well-being. American Psychologist, 31(2), 117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cantril, H. (1965). The pattern of human concerns. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2 ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Conley, J. J. (1984). The hierarchy of consistency: A review and model of longitudinal findings on adult individual differences in intelligence, personality and self-opinion. Personality and Individual Differences, 5(1), 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(4), 668–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1988). Personality in adulthood: A six-year longitudinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings on the NEO personality inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 853–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Costa, J. P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEOPI-R) and five factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  12. DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 197–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DeYoung, C. G. (2006). Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(6), 1138–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Personality and subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 213–229). New York, NY, US: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  16. Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Scollon, C. N. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. American Psychologist, 61(4), 305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(6), 1246–1256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ehrhardt, J. J., Saris, W. E., & Veenhoven, R. (2000). Stability of life-satisfaction over time: Analysis of change in ranks in a national population. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(2), 177–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 402–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Frijters, P., Haisken-DeNew, J. P., & Shields, M. A. (2004). Money does matter! Evidence from increasing real income and life satisfaction in East Germany following reunification. American Economic Review, 94(3), 730–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fujita, F., & Diener, E. (2005). Life satisfaction set point: Stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(1), 158–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1989). Personality, life events, and subjective well-being: Toward a dynamic equilibrium model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 731–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heller, D., Watson, D., & Ilies, R. (2004). The role of person versus situation in life satisfaction: A critical examination. Psychological Bulletin, 130(4), 574–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Izard, C. E., Libero, D. Z., Putnam, P., & Haynes, O. M. (1993). Stability of emotion experiences and their relations to traits of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 847–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 3–25). New York, NY, US: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  27. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2006). Would you be happier if you were richer? A focusing illusion. Science, 312(5782), 1908–1910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Killeen, P. R. (2005). An alternative to null-hypothesis significance tests. Psychological Science, 16(5), 345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lang, F. R., Baltes, P. B., & Wagner, G. G. (2007). Desired lifetime and end-of-life desires across adulthood from 20 to 90: A dual-source information model on aging, Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences (series b), 62B, 268–276.Google Scholar
  30. Larsen, R. J., & Buss, D. M. (2008). Personality psychology: Domains of knowledge about human nature. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hilll.Google Scholar
  31. Lucas, R. E., Clark, A. E., Georgellis, Y., & Diener, E. (2004). Unemployment alters the set point for life satisfaction. Psychological Science, 15(1), 8–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., Grob, A., Suh, E. M., & Shao, L. (2000). Cross-cultural evidence for the fundamental features of extraversion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(3), 452–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 616–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lykken, D., & Tellegen, A. (1996). Happiness is a stochastic phenomenon. Psychological Science, 7(3), 186–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McCrae, R. R. (2002). The maturation of personality psychology: Adult personality development and psychological well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(4), 307–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1991). Adding Liebe und Arbeit: The full five-factor model and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(2), 227–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Michalos, A. C. (1985). Multiple discrepancies theory (Mdt). Social Indicators Research, 16(4), 347–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Murphy, G. C., & Athanasou, J. A. (1999). The effect of unemployment on mental health. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Paulhus, D. L., & John, O. P. (1998). Egoistic and moralistic biases in self-perception: The interplay of self-deceptive styles with basic traits and motives. Journal of Personality Special Issue: Defense Mechanisms in Contemporary Personality Research, 66(6), 1025–1060.Google Scholar
  40. Rammstedt, B. (2007). Who worries and who is happy? Explaining individual differences in worries and satisfaction by personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1626–1634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8(2), 23–74.Google Scholar
  42. Schilling, O. (2006). Development of life satisfaction in old age: Another view on the “Paradox’’. Social Indicators Research, 75(2), 241–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schimmack, U. (2007). The structure of subjective well-being. In R. J. Larsen, & M. Eid (Eds.), Subjective well-being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Schimmack, U., & Diener, E. (2003). Predictive validity of explicit and implicit self-esteem for subjective well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 100–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schimmack, U., Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2002a). Life-satisfaction is a momentary judgment and a stable personality characteristic: The use of chronically accessible and stable sources. Journal of Personality, 70(3), 345–384.Google Scholar
  46. Schimmack, U., & Lucas, R. E. (2007). Marriage matters: Spousal similarity in life satisfaction. Journal of Applied Social Science Studies, 127, 1–7.Google Scholar
  47. Schimmack, U., & Oishi, S. (2005). The influence of chronically and temporarily accessible information on life satisfaction judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(3), 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schimmack, U., Oishi, S., Furr, R. M., & Funder, D. C. (2004). Personality and life satisfaction: A facet-level analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(8), 1062–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schimmack, U., Radhakrishnan, P., Oishi, S., Dzokoto, V., & Ahadi, S. (2002b). Culture, personality, and subjective well-being: Integrating process models of life satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(4), 582–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schimmack, U., Wagner, G. G., Krause, P., & Schupp, J. (2007). An experimental panel study of the short-term stability of well-being indicators (submitted manuscript).Google Scholar
  51. Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2007). Theory-based special cross-sectional samples within the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP). DIW Data Documentation. Berlin.Google Scholar
  52. Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1999). Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their methodological implications. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 61–84). New York, NY, US: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  53. Statistisches Bundesamt (Ed.). Datenreport 2006. Bonn.Google Scholar
  54. Suh, E., Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Triandis, H. C. (1998). The shifting basis of life satisfaction judgments across cultures: Emotions versus norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 482–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sumner, W. (1996). Welfare, happiness, and ethics. Oxford: Claredon Press.Google Scholar
  56. Thorndike, E. L. (1920). A constant error in psychological ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4(1), 25–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Thompson, S. K. (2006). Targeted random walk designs. In: Survey Methodology 32(1): 11–24.Google Scholar
  58. Veenhoven, R. (1994). Is happiness a trait—Tests of the theory that a better society does not make people any happier. Social Indicators Research, 32(2), 101–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vitterso, J. (2001). Personality traits and subjective well-being: Emotional stability, not extraversion, is probably the important predictor. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(6), 903–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wagner, G. G. (2007). Wie die 11er-Skala in das SOEP kam—Ein Beitrag zu den Problemen und Möglichkeiten multidisziplinärer Forschung und zugleich eine Fußnote zum Design der SOEP-Stichprobe. [On the inclusion of the 11-point scale in the SOEP] In J. Schwarze , J. Raebiger, & R. Thiede (Eds.), Arbeitsmarkt- und Sozialpolitikforschung im Wandel—Festschrift für Christof Helberger zum 65. Geburtstag (pp. 40–62). Verlag Dr. Kovac: Hamburg.Google Scholar
  61. Wagner, G. G., Frick, J. R., & Schupp, J. (2007). The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP)—Evolution, scope, and enhancements. Schmollers Jahrbuch, 127(1), 139–169.Google Scholar
  62. Walker, S., & Schimmack, U. (in press). Validity of a happiness implicit association test as an implicit measure of well being. Journal of Research in Personality.Google Scholar
  63. Winkelmann, L., & Winkelmann, R. (1998). Why are the unemployed so unhappy? Evidence from panel data. Economica, 65(257), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ulrich Schimmack
    • 1
  • Jürgen Schupp
    • 2
  • Gert G. Wagner
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Toronto, Mississauga (UTM)MississaugaCanada
  2. 2.German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) and Free University of BerlinBerlinGermany
  3. 3.Berlin University of Technology and German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP)BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations