Social Indicators Research

, Volume 89, Issue 1, pp 61–77 | Cite as

The Evaluation of a Self-enumerated Scale of Quality of Life (CASP-19) in the Context of Research on Ageing: A Combination of Exploratory and Confirmatory Approaches

  • R. D. WigginsEmail author
  • G. Netuveli
  • M. Hyde
  • P. Higgs
  • D. Blane


This paper describes the conceptual development of a self-enumerated scale of quality of life (CASP-19) and presents an empirical evaluation of its structure using a combination of exploratory and confirmatory factor analytic approaches across three different survey settings for older people living in England and Wales in the new millennium. All evaluations are conducted using MPlus which allows the analyst to evaluate the properties of the scale for a set of multivariate categorical items which are subject to item non-response. CASP-19 is a subjective measure of well-being derived from an explicit theory of human need spanning four life domains: control, autonomy, self-realisation and pleasure. Put formally, CASP-19 is a self-reported summative index consisting of 19 Likert scale items. The three survey settings include a postal survey of 263 people in early old age followed up from childhood when the respondents were first interviewed in the 1930's, the first wave (2002) of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA_1) and the eleventh wave of the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS_11) also conducted in 2002. These nationally representative surveys consisted of 9300 and 6471 respondents aged 55 years and older. The Boyd-Orr sample provides an exploratory context for the evaluation and ELSA_1 together with BHPS_11 provide the opportunity for confirmatory analyses of three measurement models. There is some support for the use of CASP-19 as a stand alone summative index. However, the analysis reveals that a shortened 12-item scale which combines the life domains 'control and autonomy' in a second order measurement model is the recommended model for analysts. The work was funded under the UK's Economic and Social Research Council's Growing Older Programme and their Priority Network on Human Capability and Resilience. Grant Nos. L480254016 & L326253061.


Quality of life Confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis Shortened 12-item version of CASP-19 Ageing 


  1. Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). 1976 Social indicators of well-being: Americans’ perception of life quality. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arbuckle, J. L., & Wothke, W. (1999). AMOS 4.0 user’s guide. USA: SmallWaters Corporation.Google Scholar
  3. Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2003). Full-information-maximum-likelihood information estimation of general two-level latent variable models.Google Scholar
  4. Baker, F. D., & Intagliata, J. (1982). Quality of life in the evaluation of community support systems. Evaluation and Program Planning, 5, 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartholomew, D., & Knott, M. (1999). Latent variable models and factor analysis. Kendall’s library of Statistics 7, 2nd ed. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  6. Berney, L., & Blane, D. (1997). Collecting retrospective data: Accuracy and recall after 50 years judged against historical records. Social Science and Medicine, 45, 1519–1522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biemer, P., Groves, R. M., Lyberg, L. E., Mathiowetz, N. A., & Sudman, S. (eds.). (1991). Measurement errors in surveys. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1993). Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Börsch-Supan, A., Brugiavini, A., Jürges, H., Makenbach, J., Siegrist, J., & Weber, G. (eds.). (2005). Health, ageing and retirement in Europe. First results from the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe (SHARE). Mannheim: Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Aging (MEA).Google Scholar
  10. Bowling, A. (1995). What things are important in people’s lives? A survey of the public’s judgements to inform scales of health related quality of life. Social Science and Medicine, Special Issue ‘Quality of Life’, 10, 1447–1462.Google Scholar
  11. Bowling, A. (1997). Measuring health: A review of quality of life measurement scales, 2nd ed. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Brenner, M., Marsh, P., & Brenner, M. (eds.). (1978). The social contexts of method. Croomhelm Ltd.Google Scholar
  13. Brown, J., Bowling, A., & Flynn, T. N. (2004). Models of quality of life. A taxonomy and systematic review of the literature. Report commissioned by the European Forum on Population Ageing Research/Quality of Life, University of Sheffield (professor Alan Walker).Google Scholar
  14. Bullinger, M. (2002). Assessing health related quality of life in medicine. An overview over concepts, methods and applications in international research. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 20, 93–101.Google Scholar
  15. Campbell, A., Walker, J., & Farrell, G. (2003). Confirmatory factor analysis of the GHQ-12: Can I see that again? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 37, 475–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cronbach, J. L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research, 31, 103–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40, 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cummins, R. A. (1996). The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos. Social Indicators Research, 38, 303–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Doyal, L., & Gough, I. (1991). A theory of human need. Hamphshire: Macmillan, Basingstoke.Google Scholar
  21. Eid, M., & Diener, E. (2004). Global judgements of subjective well-being: Situational variability and long-term stability. Social Indicators Research, 65, 245–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Everitt, B. S. (1984). An introduction to latent variable models. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  23. Farquhar, M. (1995). Elderly people’s definitions of quality of life. Social Science and Medicine, Special Issue ‘Quality of Life’, 10, 1439–1446.Google Scholar
  24. Felce, D., & Perry, J. (1995). Quality of life: Its definition and measurement. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 16(1), 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  26. Gilleard, C., & Higgs, P. (2000). Cultures of ageing. London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  27. Goldberg, D. (1972). The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire. London: Oxford Press Monograph.Google Scholar
  28. Goldberg, D., & Williams, P. (1988). The user’s guide to the general health questionnaire. Windsor: NFER-NELSON.Google Scholar
  29. Gunnell, D., Davey-Smith, G., Frankel, S., Nanchahal, K., Braddon, F., & Peters, T. (1996). Lifecourse exposure and later diseases: A follow-up study based on a survey of family diet and health in pre-war Britain (1937–1939). Public Health, 110, 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. HAPiEE Study (2005). UCL Department of Epidemiology and Public Health. Health, Alcohol and Psychosocial factors in Eastern Europe. Accessed 7/12/2005.
  31. Higgs, P., Hyde, M., Wiggins, R. D., & Blane, D. (2003). Researching quality of life: The importance of the sociological dimension. Social Policy and Administration, 37, 239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hyde, M., Wiggins, R. D., Blane, D., & Higgs, P. (2003). A measure of quality of life in early old age: The theory, development and properties of a needs satisfaction model. Aging and Mental Health 7, 86–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jabine, T., Straf, M., Tanur, J., & Tourangeau, R. (eds.). (1994). Cognitive aspects of survey methodology: Building a bridge between the disciplines. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  34. Joseph, S., Linley, P. A., Harwood, J., Lewis, C. A., & McCollam, P. (2004). Rapid assessment of well-being: the short depression-happiness scale (SDHS). Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 77, 463–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kalliath, T. J., O’Driscoll, M. P., & Brough, P. (2004). A confirmatory factor analysis for GHQ-12. Stress and Health, 20, 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kaiser, H. F. (1958) The varimax criteria for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23, 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Von dem Knesebeck, O., Hyde, M., Higgs, P., Kupfer, A., & Siegrist, J. (2005). Quality of life and well-being. In A. Börsch-Supan, A. Brugiavini, H. Jürges, J. Mackenbach, J. Siegrist, & G. Weber (eds.), Health, ageing and retirement in Europe: First results from the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe (pp. 199–203). Germany: Strauss, Mannheim.Google Scholar
  38. Laslett, P. (1996). A fresh map of life, 2nd ed. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  39. Marmot, M., Banks, J., Blundell, R., Lessof, C., & Nazroo, J. (2003). Health, wealth and lifestyles of the older population in England: The 2002 English longitudinal study of ageing. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies, University College.Google Scholar
  40. Marsh, H. W., & Balla, J. R. (1988). Goodness of fit indices in confirmatory factor analysis: the effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 391–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maxwell, A. E. (1977). Multivariate analysis in behavioural research. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  42. McKennell, A. (1977). Attitude scale construction. Chapter 7, Vol 1. Exploring Data Structures, The Analysis of Survey Data.Google Scholar
  43. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2004). Mplus. Statistical analysis with latent variables. Los Angeles: User’s Guide. Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  44. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2005). Mplus short course notes day 1: Ttaditional latent variable modelling using Mplus. Copyright Muthén & Muthén.
  45. Netuveli, G., Blane, D., & Bartley, M. (2007). Wellbeing and welfare states: Cross-national comparison of quality of life in market and transition economies. Blane Bartley.pdf. Accessed 30/10/07.
  46. Office for National Statistics (ONS) (1998). Social focus on older people. ONS, London.Google Scholar
  47. Patrick, B. C., Skinner, E. U., & Connell, P. J. (1993). What motivates children’s behaviour and emotion in the academic domain? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 781–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Phillipson, C. (1998). Reconstructing old age. New agendas in social theory and practice. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  49. Scase, R., & Scales, J. (2000). Fit and fifty. Swindon, Wiltshire: Economic and Social Research Council.Google Scholar
  50. Smith, A. E. (2000). Quality of life: A review. Education and Ageing, 15(3), 419–435.Google Scholar
  51. Taylor, M. (ed.) with Brice, J., Buck, N., & Prentice-Lane, E. (2003). British household panel survey user manual volume A. Introduction, Technical Report and Appendices. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive, University of Essex.Google Scholar
  52. Turner, B. (1995). Ageing and identity: some reflections on the somatisation of the self. In M. Featherstone, A Wernick (eds.), Images of aging (pp. 245–260). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Vincent, J. (2003). Old age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Ware, J. E., Gandek, B., the IQOLA Project Group (1994). The SF-36® Health Survey: Development and use in mental health research and the IQOLA Project. International Journal of Ment Health, 23(2), 49–73.Google Scholar
  55. Ware, J. E., Kosinki, M., & Keller, S. D. (1995). SF-12®: How to score the SF-12® physical and mental health summary scales, 2nd ed. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center.Google Scholar
  56. Ware, J. E., Kosinki, M., Turner-Bowker, D. M., & Gnadek, B. (2002). How to score Version 2 of the SF-12®: the SF-12® Health Survey (with Supplement documenting Version 1). Lincoln: QualityMetric Incorporated.Google Scholar
  57. Wiggins, R. D., Bynner, J. (1993). ‘Social attitudes’, in Life at 33, Chapter 8. In: Ferri E (ed.), National Children’s Bureau, London, pp 75–92.Google Scholar
  58. Wiggins, R. D., & Sacker, A. (2002). A comparative evaluation of strategies to handle missing data in the context of structural equation modelling. Chapter 6, With Sacker, A. In G Marcoulides, I Moustaki (eds.), Latent variable and latent structure models. London: Erlbaum and Laurence.Google Scholar
  59. Wiggins, R. D., Erzberger, C., Hyde, M., Higgs, P., & Blane, D. (2007) Optimal matching analysis using ideal types to describe the lifecourse: an illustration of how histories of work, partnerships and housing relate to quality of life in early old age. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 10(4), 259–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Young, M., & Schuller, Y. (1991). Life after work: The arrival of the ageless society. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. D. Wiggins
    • 1
    Email author
  • G. Netuveli
    • 2
  • M. Hyde
    • 3
  • P. Higgs
    • 4
  • D. Blane
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Quantitative Social Science, The Faculty of Policy and Society, The Institute of EducationUniversity of LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Imperial College of Science, Technology and MedicineLondonUK
  3. 3.Sheffield Hallam UniversitySheffieldUK
  4. 4.University CollegeLondonUK

Personalised recommendations