Absolute Income, Relative Income, and Happiness

Abstract

This paper uses data from the World Values Survey to investigate how an individual’s self-reported happiness is related to (i) the level of her income in absolute terms, and (ii) the level of her income relative to other people in her country. The main findings are that (i) both absolute and relative income are positively and significantly correlated with happiness, (ii) quantitatively, changes in relative income have much larger effects on happiness than do changes in absolute income, and (iii) the effects on happiness of both absolute and relative income are small when compared to the effects several non-pecuniary factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Notes

  1. 1.

    Although there are cases in which spouses or jobs can in some sense be purchased, and to some extent good health can be “bought” through expenditures on health care.

  2. 2.

    See http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org. This survey is the main source of data for this paper.

  3. 3.

    Conducted by the Public Opinion Analysis sector of the European Commission. See http://europa.eu.int/comm/public_opinion/description_en.htm.

  4. 4.

    Conducted by the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago. See http://www.norc.uchicago.edu.

  5. 5.

    Conducted by the Institute for Social and Economic Research at the University of Essex. See http://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/bhps/index.php.

  6. 6.

    See http://www.gallup-international.com/surveys1.htm.

  7. 7.

    See Diener (1984), Eckman et al. (1990), Pavot et al. (1991), Shedler et al. (1993), Sandvik et al. (1993), Balatsky and Diener (1993), Sutton and Davidson (1997), and Siedlitz et al. (1997).

  8. 8.

    See Ouweneel and Veenhoven (1991), and Diener et al. (1995).

  9. 9.

    See Veenhoven (1993, 1996), Diener et al. (1999), Diener and Suh (2000), and Frey and Stutzer (2002).

  10. 10.

    See Horley and Lavery (1995), Diener and Suh (1997), Nolen-Hoeksema and Rustig (1999), and Lucas and Gohm (2000).

  11. 11.

    See Lee et al. (1991) and Myers (1999).

  12. 12.

    See Clark and Oswald (1994), and Di Tella et al. (2001).

  13. 13.

    See Frey and Stutzer (2000) and Veenhoven (2000).

  14. 14.

    See Alesina et al. (2001) and Graham and Felton (2004).

  15. 15.
  16. 16.

    In eliciting these ratings of subjective well-being, Cantril used a survey methodology that was somewhat more subtle than simply asking people to choose a number. Details on Cantril’s “self-anchoring” methodology can be found in Easterlin (1974) and in the original study (Cantril 1965).

  17. 17.

    The estimated slope is 0.6486, with a p-value of 0.086. The r-squared for the regression is 0.2257.

  18. 18.

    The influential cases are the US and India; the countries with “unusual political circumstances” are Cuba and the Dominican Republic. With these four cases deleted, an OLS line has a slope of 0.1014, with a p-value of 0.535. The r-squared is 0.0498.

  19. 19.

    Even if absolute incomes were not distributed identically around their means across countries, this would be true as long as there was no systematic relationship between mean income and income distribution.

  20. 20.

    Surveys that focus on the relationship between money and happiness can be found in Argyle (1999), Diener and Oishi (2000), Frey and Stutzer (2000), and Easterlin (2001).

  21. 21.

    For individuals in the highest income category (for which no upper limit is specified), we use a figure equal to 120% of the lower bound of the category as an approximation of family income in local currency.

  22. 22.

    Ideally, we might also adjust family income for the number of people in the respondent’s family, but the WVS contains no explicit question on household or family size, nor does it contain other questions from which family size could be inferred with any reasonable confidence.

  23. 23.

    We are therefore implicitly assuming, as did Easterlin (1974), that the reference group to which a person compares herself is the population of the country in which she lives. An interesting area for further research would be to investigate the extent to which people’s happiness depends on their status relative to comparison groups defined by other criteria, such as ethnicity, religion or occupation. Praag and Ferrer-i-Carbonell (2004, Chap. 8) discuss recent research along these lines.

  24. 24.

    The term “housewife” is one of the employment categories listed in the WVS codebook. There is no category for men who work full time on domestic tasks.

  25. 25.

    Data on purchasing power parity GDP per capita are taken from World Bank (2004). Wave 3 of the WVS was conducted in different years in different countries; for each country, we use the value of PPP GDP per capita corresponding to the year in which wave 3 of the WVS was conducted there (see Tables 2 and 3).

  26. 26.

    These 43 countries are the same as those listed in Table 2, except that (i) Montengro, Serbia and Taiwan are dropped because World Bank (2004) does not have GDP data for them, and (ii) Ghana, the Philippines, Slovenia and the UK, which were excluded from Table 2 because of missing data on family income in the WVS, are added.

  27. 27.

    An OLS line through the non-eastern European data still has a positive slope, but the significance level falls to 94.9%, the estimated slope is just 0.2260, and the r-squared falls to 0.1440.

  28. 28.

    With an estimated coefficient of 1.2549, significant at above the 99.9% confidence level, and an r-squared of 0.7944.

  29. 29.

    An OLS line through just the eastern European data has an estimated slope of 0.7977, significant at the 99.2% confidence level, with an r-squared of 0.4009.

  30. 30.

    The limitation in the WVS documentation is that for many countries no information is available on what local currency values were used to define the boundaries of the family income brackets used in item 227. Without that information, it is not possible to approximate respondents’ family incomes, which, as described in Sect. 3, is necessary for the construction of abs, rel_pct, and rel_med.

  31. 31.

    For a detailed exposition of the ordered probit regression model, see Long (1997) and Long and Freese (2001).

  32. 32.

    To see the collinearity problem formally, let med(j) represent the median absolute income of country j; the median absolute income of the country whose dummy variable is excluded from the regression is then denoted \( med{\left( {\ifmmode\expandafter\bar\else\expandafter\=\fi{j}} \right)} \). The following + 2 vectors then add up to a vector of all zeros: a vector of constants, each equal to \(\hbox{ln}{\left({med{\left({\ifmmode\expandafter\bar\else\expandafter\=\fi{j}} \right)}} \right)} \); one vector for each of the − 1 countries whose dummies are included, each vector of the form ln(med (j))d j ; the vector of observed values of ln(abs); and negative one times the vector of observed values of ln(rel_med). Intuitively, the source of the collinearity is that, because rel_med is defined as the ratio of abs to med(j), the difference between ln(abs) and ln(rel_med) is constant within countries. (For all individuals in any country j, that difference is equal to ln(med (j))).

  33. 33.

    Data for both of these variables is from World Bank (2004).

  34. 34.

    As described in Inglehart (1997).

  35. 35.

    See Easterlin (1995, 2001, 2003).

  36. 36.

    As Easterlin (2004) has pointed out, however, this U-shaped relationship between age and happiness appears in analyses that hold constant factors such as health and whether one is widowed. Since people’s health and probability of being widowed in fact do not remain constant over their life-spans, this U-shaped relationship is not inconsistent with the possibility that people’s experienced happiness levels tend to fall in the later periods of their lives.

  37. 37.

    Because the regressions estimate the effect of employment status on happiness with absolute and relative income held constant, the increases in happiness attributed to finding a full-time job are the consequence of factors other than changes in the individual’s income associated with finding a job. Our analysis does not tell us exactly what those other factors are, but it seems reasonable to speculate that they have to do with increased self-esteem and respect from others, and perhaps an increased feeling of purpose or productivity (that may come from simply having a job, even if the purpose or product of the job are not inspiring to the person holding it).

  38. 38.

    There are also less restrictive conditions under which a change in an individual’s absolute income would not be accompanied by a change in her relative income. If we measure relative income by rel_pct (as in regression 1), this would be the case as long as the change in the individual’s absolute income did not change her rank in the national income distribution (perhaps because of simultaneous changes in the absolute incomes of some or all of the other people in her country). If we measure relative income by rel_med (as in regression 2), it would be the case as long as median income in the individual’s country increased proportionately with her absolute income.

  39. 39.

    We assume that, other than absolute and relative income, all of the variables upon which \( \widehat{H} \) depends are held constant, and so write \( \widehat{H} \) as a function of just abs and rel.

  40. 40.

    Blanchflower and Oswald (2000) present similar results showing that people value important non-pecuniary qualities of life as much as very large amounts of money.

  41. 41.

    Frank (1999) presents extensive evidence of this phenomenon.

References

  1. Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2001). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? NBER Working Paper no. 8198.

  2. Argyle, M. (1999). Causes and correlates of happiness. In D. Kahneman, Ed. Diener, & N. Schwartz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bagwell, L. S., & Bernheim, B. D. (1996). Veblen effects in a theory of conspicuous consumption. American Economic Review, 86, 349–373.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Balatsky, G., & Diener, Ed. (1993). Subjective well-being among Russian students. Social Indicators Research, 28, 225–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2000). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. NBER Working Paper no. 7487.

  6. Boskin, M., & Sheshinski, E. (1978). Optimal redistributive taxation when individual welfare depends on relative income. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 92, 589–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cantril, H. (1965). The pattern of human concerns. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (1994). Unhappiness and unemployment. Economic Journal, 104, 648–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (1996). Satisfaction and comparison income. Journal of Public Economics, 61, 359–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R. J., & Oswald, A. J. (2001). Preferences over inflation and unemployment: Evidence from surveys of happiness. American Economic Review, 91, 335–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Diener, Ed. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Diener, Ed., Diener, M., & Diener, C. (1995). Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 851–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Diener, Ed., & Suh, E. M. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40, 189–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Diener, Ed., & Suh, E. M. (2000). Measuring subjective well-being to compare the quality of life of cultures. In Ed. Diener, & E. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Diener, Ed., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Diener, Ed., Suh, E. M., Smith, H. L., & Shao, L. (1995). National differences in reported subjective well-being: Why do they occur? Social Indicators Research, 34, 7–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Diener, Ed., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Diener, Ed., & Oishi, S. (2000). Money and happiness: Income and subjective well-being across nations. In Ed. Diener, & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2002). Growth is good for the poor. Journal of Economic Growth, 7, 195–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Duesenberry, J. S. (1949). Income, savings and the theory of consumer behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Easterlin, R. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David, & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Easterlin, R. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 27, 53–47.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Easterlin, R. (2001). Income and happiness: Toward a unified theory. Economic Journal, 111, 465–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Easterlin, R. (2003). Explaining happiness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 11176–11183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Easterlin, R. (2004). Life cycle happiness and its sources. Draft.

  27. Easterlin, R. (2005). Diminishing marginal utility of income? A caveat. Social Indicators Research, 70, 243–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Eckman, P., Davidson, R. J., & Friesen, W. V. (1990). The duchenne smile: Emotional expression and brain physiology II. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 342–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Frank, R. H. (1984). Are workers paid their marginal products? American Economic Review, 74, 549–571.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Frank, R. H. (1985). Choosing the right pond. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Frank, R. H. (1996). Consumption externalities and the financing of social services. In V. R. Fuchs (Ed.), Individual and social responsibility: Child care, education, medical care, and long-term care in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Frank, R. H. (1997). The frame of reference as a public good. Economic Journal, 107, 1832–1847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Frank, R. H. (1999). Luxury fever: Why money fails to satisfy in an era of excess. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Frank, R. H., & Hutchens, R. M. (1993). Wages, seniority and the demand for rising consumption profiles. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 21, 251–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy and institutions. Economic Journal, 110, 918–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). Happiness and economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Graham, C., & Felton, A. (2004). Does inequality matter to individual welfare? An initial exploration based on happiness surveys from latin America. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution (draft).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Horley, J., & Lavery, J. J. (1995). Subjective well-being and age. Social Indicators Research, 34, 275–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Inglehart, R. et al. (2003). World values surveys and European values surveys, 1995–1997 [Computer file]. ICPSR Version. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research [producer], 1999. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].

  41. Ireland, N. (1998). Satus-seeking, income taxation and efficiency. Journal of Public Economics, 70, 99–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kosicki, G. (1987). Savings as a non-positional good. Southern Economic Journal, 54, 422–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Landers, R. M., Rebitzer, J. B., & Taylor, L. J. (1996). Rat race redux: Adverse selection in the determination of work hours in law firms. American Economic Review, 86, 329–348.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Layard, R. (1980). Human satisfaction and public policy. Economic Journal, 90, 737–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Lee, G. R., Seccombe, K., & Shehan, C. L. (1991). Marital status and personal happiness. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 839–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2001). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lucas, R. E., & Gohm, C. L. (2000). Age and sex differences in subjective well-being across cultures. In Ed. Diener, & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Myers, D. G. (1999). Close relationships and quality of life. In D. Kahneman, Ed. Diener, & N. Schwartz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Neumark, D., & Postlewaite, A. (1996). Relative income concerns and the rise in married women’s employment. Journal of Public Economics, 70, 157–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Ng, Y.-K. (1997). A case for happiness, cardinalism, and interpersonal comparability. Economic Journal, 107, 1848–1858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Ng, Y.-K. (1987). Diamonds are a government’s best friend: Burden-free taxes on goods valued for their values. American Economic Review, 77, 186–191.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Rustig, C. L. (1999). Gender differences in well-being. In D. Kahneman, Ed. Diener, & N. Schwartz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Oswald, A. J. (1983). Altruism, jealousy and the theory of optimal non-linear taxation. Journal of Public Economics, 20, 77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Oswald, A. J. (1997). Happiness and economic performance. Economic Journal, 107, 1815–1831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Ouweneel, P., & Veenhoven, R. (1991). Cross-national differences in happiness: Cultural bias or societal quality. In N. Bleichrodt, & P. J. D. Drenth (Eds.), Contemporary issues in cross-cultural psychology. Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Pavot, W., Diener, Ed., Colvin, C. R., & Sandvik, Ed. (1991). Further validation of the satisfaction with life scale: Evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 149–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Van Praag, B. M. S., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2004). Happiness quantified. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Sandvik, Ed., Diener, Ed., & Seidlitz, L. (1993). Subjective well-being: The convergence and stability of self-report and non-self-report measures. Journal of Personality, 61, 317–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Seidlitz, L., Wyer, R. S., & Diener, Ed. (1997). Cognitive correlates of subjective well-being: The processing of valanced life events by happy and unhappy persons. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 240–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Shedler, J., Maymann, M., & Manis, M. (1993). The illusion of mental health. American Psychologist, 48, 1117–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Sutton, S. K., & Davidson, R. J. (1997). Prefrontal brain symmetry: A biological substrate of the behavioral approach and inhibition systems. Psychological Science, 8, 204–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Veenhoven, R. (1989). National wealth and individual happiness. In K. G. Grunert, & F. Oelander (Eds.), Understanding economic behavior. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Veenhoven, R. (1991). Is happiness relative? Social Indicators Research, 24, 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Veenhoven, R. (1993). Happiness in nations. Rotterdam: Risbo.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Veenhoven, R. (1996). Developments in satisfaction research. Social Indicators Research, 37, 1–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Veenhoven, R. (2000). Freedom and happiness: A comparative study in 44 nations in the early 1990s. In Ed. Diener, & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Veenhoven, R. (2003). World database of happiness. On-line database of research: http://www.eur.nl/fsw/research/happiness/.

  69. Warr, P., & Payne, R. (1982). Experience of strain and pleasure among British adults. Social Science and Medicine, 16, 1691–1697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. World Bank (2004). World development indicators. On-line statistical database: http://www.worldbank.org/data/onlinedbs/onlinedbases.htm.

  71. Zizzo, D. J., & Oswald, A. (2001). Are people willing to pay to reduce others’ incomes? Annales d’Economie et de Statistique, 63–64, 39–65.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

For helpful discussion and comments, we would like to thank Gabriela Catterberg, Ellsworth Dägg, Picard Janné, Christopher Kilby, Vladimir Kontorovich, and Anne Preston; participants in the Behavioral Research Council’s symposium on Behavioral Economics and Neoclassical Economics, July 2002, Great Barrington, MA; and participants in the 6th International Conference of the International Society for Quality of Life Studies, November 2004, Philadelphia, PA.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Ball.

Additional information

Kateryna Chernova completed work on this paper while an undergraduate student at Bryn Mawr College.

Data Appendix

Data Appendix

Self-reported Happiness, Absolute Income, and Relative Income

Variable name: happy

Source: WVS item V65

WVS item V65 asked respondents to choose a category on an integer scale from 1 (least satisfied) to 10 (most satisfied) in answer to the question “All things considered, how satisfied are you with your life as a whole these days?” Each individual’s value of happy simply equals the category chosen by the individual in response to this question.

Variable name: MEAN_HAPPY

Source: Constructed from happy

This is the mean value of happy for all individuals from the same country as the respondent.

Variable name: abs

Source: WVS item V227

WVS item V227 asked respondents to indicate which of 10 income categories their family incomes fell in. The boundaries of the categories were given in the currency of the respondent’s country. For respondents reporting incomes in all but the highest category, abs is equal to the midpoint of the category, converted from local currency to purchasing power parity dollars ($PPP), using “purchasing power parity conversion factors” obtained from World Bank (2004). For respondents reporting incomes in the highest category, abs is equal to 120% of the lower bound of the highest category, converted from local currency to $PPP as in all cases.

Variable name: rel_pct

Source: Constructed from abs

An individual’s value of rel_pct is equal to the percentage of respondents from her country with values of abs less than or equal to hers.

Variable name: rel_med

Source: Constructed from abs

An individual’s value of rel_med is equal to the individual’s value of abs divided by the median of abs for all respondents from her country.

Respondent’s Marital Status

Variable name: partner

Source: WVS item V89

This equals 1 if the respondent is married or “living as married,” and 0 otherwise.

Variable name: split

Source: WVS item V89

This equals 1 if the respondent is divorced or separated, and 0 otherwise.

Variable name: widow

Source: WVS item V89

This equals 1 if the respondent is widowed, and 0 otherwise.

Respondent’s Sex

Variable name: female

Source: WVS item V214

This equals 1 if the respondent is female, and 0 if the respondent is male.

Respondent’s Employment Status

Variable name: part_time

Source: WVS item V220

This equals 1 if the respondent is employed for pay and works less than 30 h per week, and 0 otherwise.

Variable name: self_employed

Source: WVS item V220

This equals 1 if the respondent is self-employed, and 0 otherwise.

Variable name: retired

Source: WVS item V220

This equals 1 if the respondent is retired, and 0 otherwise.

Variable name: housewife

Source: WVS item V220

This equals 1 if the respondent’s self-report of employment is “housewife not otherwise employed,” and 0 otherwise.

Variable name: student

Source: WVS item V220

This equals 1 if the respondent is a student, and 0 otherwise.

Variable name: unemployed

Source: WVS item V220

This equals 1 if the respondent is unemployed, and 0 otherwise.

Respondent’s Number of Children

Variable name: kid1

Source: WVS item V90

This equals 1 if the respondent has exactly 1 child, and 0 otherwise.

Variable name: kid2plus

Source: WVS item V90

This equals 1 if the respondent is the respondent has 2 or more children, and 0 otherwise.

Respondent’s Age

Variable name: age

Source: WVS item V216

Respondent’s age in years.

Variable name: age2

Source: Constructed from age

The square of the respondent’s age in years.

Respondent’s Health

Variable name: health

Source: WVS item V11

WVS item V11 asks “All in all, how would you describe your state of health these days? Would you say it is... “ Respondents are asked to choose among five categories: Very good, Good, Fair, Poor and Very poor. We have coded these categories, respectively, as 5, 4, 3, 2 and 1. (This reverses the order of the coding in the WVS codebook, but is consistent with the coding of other ordinal variables we use, for which larger numerical values correspond to “better” states.)

Importance of Religion in Respondent’s Life

Variable name: religion

Source: WVS item V190

WVS item V190 asks “How important is God in your life?” Respondents are asked to answer on an integer scale from 1 (“not at all important”) to 10 (“very important”). Each individual’s value of religion simply equals the category chosen by the individual in response to this question.

Level and Growth Rate of GDP per Capita in Respondent’s Country

Variable name: GDP_PC

Source: World Bank (2004)

GDP per capita, PPP (constant 1995 international $), for the year in which wave 3 of the WVS was conducted in the respondent’s country.

Variable name: GROWTH

Source: Constructed from GDP_PC

Percentage growth in GDP_PC in the respondent’s country over the 5 years preceding wave 3 of the WVS.

For year t, \( GROWTH{\left( t \right)} = \frac{{GDP\_PC{\left( t \right)} - GDP\_PC{\left( {t - 5} \right)}}} {{GDP\_PC{\left( {t - 5} \right)}}} \)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ball, R., Chernova, K. Absolute Income, Relative Income, and Happiness. Soc Indic Res 88, 497–529 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9217-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Subjective well-being
  • Happiness
  • Relative income