Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Enhancing life satisfaction by government accountability in China

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Finding the rationale for democracy requires not merely a conceptual task but also an empirical study. One rationale is that democracy maximizes people’s happiness by satisfying everyone. A further qualification of this is that democracy minimizes the maximum regret of the disadvantaged. This is compatible with the protection theory of government, which states that the government serves to protect the powerless. These arguments lead to hypotheses that perceived government accountability enhances the life satisfaction of the citizen, especially the powerless one. The hypotheses attain support from the present study, which surveyed 732 inhabitants in Beijing, China. Accordingly, government accountability including reducing corruption and inequality and increasing tolerance and democracy showed significant effects on life satisfaction in all economic, cultural, and political aspects. Furthermore, the effects are stronger on one with lower education and occupational status, and working outside the government. These findings demonstrate the salutary effect of the legitimation policy by enhancing government accountability or democracy in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken L.S., West S.G. 1991. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett S.E., Resnick D. 1990. “The implications of nonvoting for democracy in the United States” American Journal of Political Science 34(3):771–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bo Z. 2004. “Hu Jintao and the CCP’s ideology: A historical perspective” Journal of Chinese Political Science 9(2):27–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmahn T. 2000. “Modernity and happiness: The case of Germany” Journal of Happiness Studies 1:375–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bytheway B. 1995. Ageism Buckingham, UK: Open University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen C. 2005. “Institutional legitimacy of an authoritarian state: China in the mirror of Eastern Europe” Problems of Post-Communism 52(4):3–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernick M.R. 1999. Bootstrap Methods: A Practitioner’s Guide New York: John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung C-k, Leung K-k 2004. “Forming life satisfaction among different social groups during the modernization of China” Journal of Happiness Studies 5:25–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole D.A. 1987. “Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 55(4):584–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond L. 2003. “The rule of law as transition to democracy in China” Journal of Contemporary China 12(35):319–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener Ed, Lucas R.E. 2000. “Explaining differences in societal levels of happiness: Relative standards, need fulfillment, culture, and evaluation theory” Journal of Happiness Studies 11:41–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farran C.J., Eleanora K-H, Salloway S., Kupferer S., Wilkin C.S. 1991. “Finding meaning: An alternative paradigm for Alzheimer’s disease family caregivers” Gerontologist 31(4):483–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Femia J.V. 1993. Marxism and Democracy Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Fewsmith J. 2003. “Chinese politics under Hu Jintao: Riding the tiger of politics and public health” Problems of Post-Communism 50(5):14–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, Z.: 1996, On Elderly Culture. Beijing, China: Chinese Art

  • Gilliland N., Havir L. 1990. “Public opinion and long-term care policy”. In: Biegel D.E., Blum A. (eds) Aging and Caregiving: Theory, Research, and Policy. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Pp. 242–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Goesling B. 2001. “Changing income inequalities within and between Nations: New evidence” American Sociological Review 66(5):745–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffin R.D., Jackson D.N. 1988. The structural validity of the index of organizational reactions Multivariate Behavioral Research 23: 327–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, David S.G.: 1996, ‚The People’s Republic of China: The party-state, capitalist revolution and new entrepreneurs’. In: The New Rich in Asia: Mobile Phones, McDonalds and Middle-class Revolution (Routledge, London), pp. 225–242

  • Graham, C. and S. Pettinato: 2001, ‚Happiness, markets, and democracy: Latin America in comparative perspective’. Journal of Happiness Studies 2, pp. 237–268

  • Gu Y. 2002. Information on 2000 Census of Beijing Municipality Beijing, China: China Statistics

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo X. 2003. State and Society in China’s Democratic Transition: Confucianism, Leninism, and Economic Development New York: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Holcombe R.G. 1994. The Economic Foundations of Government Washington Square, NY: New York University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou W., Zhang Y., Huang M. 2003. Conflict and Integration Beijing: China: Chinese People

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu Li-tze, Bentler P.M. 1999. “Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives” Structural Equation Modeling 6(1):1–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington S.P. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies New Haven: Yale University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington S.P. 1971. “The change to change: Modernization, development, and politics” Comparative Politics 3(3):283–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington S.P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century London, UK: University of Oklahoma Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings V.L. 2003. Public Opinion and Democratic Accountability: How Citizens Learn about Politics Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyland J.L. 1995. Democratic Theory: The Philosophical Foundations Manchester, UK: Mancester University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart R. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffee D. 1990. Levels of Socio-economic Development Theory New York: Praeger

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog K.G., Sorbom D. 1993. LISREL 8 User’s Reference Guide Chicago, IL: Scientific Software

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingston P.W. 2000. The Classless Society Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane R.E. 2000. The Loss of Happiness in Market Democracies New Haven, CT: Yale University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Li B., Walder A.G. 2001. “Career-advancement as party patronage: Sponsored mobility into the Chinese Administrative Elite, 1949–1996” American Journal of Sociology 106(5):1371–1408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H. 2003. “Middle class: Friends or foes to Beijing’s new leadership” Journal of Chinese Political Science 81(1&2):87–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, P.: 2001, ‚Options for China in the New Stage Reform: Analysis of social situation’, in 2000: Liu Jiang, Xueyi Lu and Tianlun Dan (eds.), Analysis and Forecast of China’s Social Situation (China Social Science, Beijing, China), pp. 1–26

  • Liu, G., X. Zhang, W. Chen and T. Wen: 1998, Outline of Deng Xiaopeng's Theory. Guangzhou, China: Zhongshan University

  • Louis V.V., Shanyang Z. 2002. “Effects of family structure, family SES, and adulthood experience on life satifaction” Journal of Family Issues 23(8):986–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo H., Lu J. 1997. “1996–1997 Analysis and forecast of China’s social situation”. Sociology (China) 1997(2):86–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason T.D., Clements J. 2002. “Tiananman square thirteen years after: The prospects for civil unrest in China” Asian Affairs: An American Review 29(3):159–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moller V., Dickon H. 2002. “The role of quality of life surveys in managing change in democratic transitions: The South African case” Social Indicators Research 58:267–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moller V. 2001. “Happiness trends under democracy: Where will the New South African set-level come to rest?” Journal of Happiness Studies 2:33–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molm L.D. 1997. Coercive Power in Social Exchange Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Neto F. 1992. “The satisfaction with life scale: Psychometrics properties in an adolescent sample” Journal of Youth and Adolescence 22(2):125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevitte N, Kanji M. 2002. “Authority, orientations and political support: A cross-national analysis of satisfaction with governments and democracy” Comparative Sociology 1(3–4):387–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris P., Inglehart R. 2002. “Islamic culture and democracy: Testing the clash of civilizations thesis” Comparative Sociology 1(3–4):235–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pei M. 2002. “China’s governance crisis” Foreign Affairs 81(5):96–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Rampichini C, Schifini D’Andrea S 1998. “A hierarchical ordinal probit model for the analysis of life satisfaction in Italy” Social Indicators Research 44(1):41–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rindskopf D., Rose T. 1988. “Some theory and applications of confirmatory second-order factor analysis” Multivariate Behavioral Research 23:51–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross C.E., Mirowsky J. 1989. “Explaining the social patterns of depression: Control and problem solving–or support and talking?” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 30(2):206–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross C.E., Reynolds J.R., Geis K.J. 2000. “The contingent meaning of neighborhood stability for residents’ psychological well-being” American Sociological Review 65:581–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, A., D. Williams, B. Israel, A. Becker, E. Parker, S.A. James and J. Jackson: 2000, `Unfair treatment neighbor and effects and mental health in the Detroit metropolitan area'. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 41, pp. 314–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Schyns P. 2001. “Income and satisfaction in Russia” Journal of Happiness Studies 2:173–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seckington I. 2005. “Nationalism, ideology and China’s fourth generation leadership” Journal of Contemporary China 14(42):23–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shek, Daniel Tan-lei, Ying-keung Chan and Paul Siu-nam Lee (eds.): 2005, Social indicators research series (vol. 25): Quality of Life Research in Chinese, Western and Global Contexts (Springer, Netherlands)

  • Sheldon K.M., Kasser T. 2000. “Goals, congruence, and positive well-being: New empirical support for humanistic theories” Journal of Humanistic Psychology 41(4):30–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman H.J. 1987. Foundations of Radical Political Economy Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe

    Google Scholar 

  • Szalay L.B., Strohl J.B., Fu L., Lao P-s 1994. American and Chinese Perceptions and Belief Systems: A People’s Republic of China-Taiwanese Comparison New York: Plenum

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C.: 1996, ‚Social development in 1995–1996 Analysis and forecast’, in 1995–1996: Liu Jiang, Xueyi Lu and Tianlun Dan (eds.), Analysis and Forecast of China’s Social Situation (China Social Science, Beijing, China), pp. 16–27

  • Wang Y. 1999. The Contents and Features of the Socialist Market Economy Beijing, China: China Planning

    Google Scholar 

  • Womack B. 2005. “Democracy and the governing party: A theoretical perspective” Journal of Chinese Political Science 10(1):23–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright E.O. 1997. Class Counts: Comparative Studies in Class Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiang, L. and Shi L.: 2001, ‚New trends in income distribution’, in 2000: Liu Jiang, Xueyi Lu and Tianlun Dan (eds.), Analysis and Forecast of China’s Social Situation (Beijing, China: China Social Science), pp. 139–158

  • Yu K.P. 2002. “Toward an Incremental Democracy and Governance: Chinese Theories and Assessment Criteria” New Political Science 24(2):181–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zagorski, K.: 1999, ‚Egalitarianism, perception of conflicts, and support for transformation in Poland,’ in Stefan Svallfors and Peter Taylor-Gooby (eds.), The End of the Welfare State? Responses to State Retrenchment (Routledge, London), pp. 190–217

  • Zheng S. 2003. “Leadership change, legitimacy, and party transition on China” Journal of Chinese Political Science 81(1):47–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou X., Hou L. 1999. “Children of the cultural revolution of: The state and the life course in the People’s Republic of China” American Sociological Review 64:12–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social Work, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, N.T., Hong Kong, HKSAR, China

    Chau-kiu Cheung & Kwan-kwok Leung

Authors
  1. Chau-kiu Cheung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kwan-kwok Leung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chau-kiu Cheung.

Additional information

This article evolves from a research project, solely funded by the Strategic Research Grant of the City University of Hong Kong (#7000902). Its principal investigator is Kwan-kwok Leung and the other research team members are Glenn Drover and Chau-kiu Cheung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheung, Ck., Leung, Kk. Enhancing life satisfaction by government accountability in China. Soc Indic Res 82, 411–432 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-006-9043-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-006-9043-9

Key words

Search

Navigation