Abstract
In a rebuttal of Easterlin (1995), Hagerty and Veenhoven (2003) analyze data for 21 countries and conclude that “growing national income does go with greater happiness.” But the U.S. experience does not support this conclusion, which they obtain only by mixing together two sets of noncomparable surverys. Moreover, the result of studies of European countries and the U.S. by other scholars do not support their claim either. Furthermore, the experience of 6 out of 7 of their non-European countries fail to support their claim. Finally, if countries in their analysis with quite similar growth rates are grouped, one finds quite disparate trends in happiness, suggesting that factors other than growth in income are responsible for the differential trends in happiness. Instead of straining to feed the illusion that a focus on economic growth will create happiness, an approach is needed that explores the impact on national trends in life satisfaction, not just of material goods, but also of family life, health, work utility, and the like.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D.G. Blanchflower A.J. Oswald (2004) ArticleTitle‘Well-being over time in Britain and the USA’ Journal of Public Economics 88 1359–1386 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00168-8
B. Christoph H.-H. Noll (2003) ArticleTitle‘Subjective well-being in the European Union during the 90s’ Social Indicators Research 64 521–546 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1025983431755
J.A. Davis T.W. Smith (2002) General Social Surveys, 1972–2002 [machine-readable data file] National Opinion Research Center Chicago
E. Diener S. Oishi (2000) ‘Money and happiness: Income and Subjective well-being across nations’ E. Diener E.M Suh (Eds) Culture and Subjective Well-being . The MIT Press Cambridge, MA 185–218
R.A. Easterlin (1974) ‘Does economic growth improve the human lot?’ P.A. David M.W. Reder (Eds) Nations and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honor of Moses Abramovitz. Academic Press Inc New York
R.A. Easterlin (1995) ArticleTitle‘Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all?’ Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 27 IssueID1 35–48 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0167-2681(95)00003-B
Easterlin R. A.: 2003, ‘Explaining happiness,’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100(19), (September 16) pp. 11176–11183. A substantially expanded version is forthcoming under the title ‘Building a better theory of well-being’ in L.Bruni and P. Porta (eds.), Economics and Happiness: Reality and Paradoxes (Oxford, Eng.: Oxford University Press)
R.A. Easterlin (2005) ArticleTitle‘Diminishing marginal utility of income? caveat emptor’ Social Indicators Research 70 243–255 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s11205-004-8393-4
G. Griffiths (2003) ArticleTitle‘Letter from Bruni to Thomas Cambiatore’ Journal of European Economic History 32 IssueID2 352–359
M.R. Hagerty R. Veenhoven (2003) ArticleTitle‘Wealth and happiness revisited – growing national income does go with greater happiness’ Social Indicators Research 64 1–27 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1024790530822
O. Hellevik (2003) ArticleTitle‘Economy, values and happiness in Norway’ Journal of Happiness Studies 4 243–283 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1026232018534
J. Hirata (2003) Happiness and Economics: Some Ethical Considerations Institute for Business Ethics, University of St. Gallen St. Gallen, Switzerland
R. Inglehart H.-D. Klingemann (2000) ‘Genes, culture, democracy, and happiness’ E. Diener E.M Suh (Eds) Culture and Subjective Well-being. The MIT Press Cambridge, MA 165–183
R. Inglehart J.-R. Rabier (1986) ‘Aspirations adapt to situations – but why are the Belgians so much happier than the French?’ F.M Andrews (Eds) Research on the Quality of Life. Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 1–56
C. Kenny (1999) ArticleTitle‘Does growth cause happiness, or does happiness cause growth?’ Kyklos 52 IssueID1 3–26
A. Maddison (2001) The World Economy: A Millennial Perspective Development Centre of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Paris, France
V. Møller (2001) ArticleTitle‘Happiness trends under democracy: Where will the new South African set-level come to rest?’ Journal of Happiness Studies 2 33–53 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1011557404822
V. Møller H. Dickow (2002) ArticleTitle‘The role of quality of life surveys in managing change in democratic transitions: The South African case’ Social Indicators Research 58 267–292 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1015792002279
Schyns P. (2003). Income and Life Satisfaction: A Cross-National and Longitudinal Study. Delft (Netherlands: Eburon)
T.W. Smith (1979) ArticleTitle‘Happiness: Time trends, seasonal variations, intersurvey differences, and other mysteries’ Social Psychology Quarterly 42 IssueID1 18–30
InstitutionalAuthorNameUS Bureau of the Census. (2003) Statistical Abstract of the United States 2003 Government Printing Office Washington, DC
R. Veenhoven (1991) ArticleTitle‘Is happiness relative?’ Social Indicators Research 24 1–34 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00292648
R. Veenhoven (1993) Happiness in Nations, Subjective Appreciation of Life in 56 Nations 1946–1992 Erasmus University Rotterdam
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Easterlin, R.A. Feeding the Illusion of Growth and Happiness: A Reply to Hagerty and Veenhoven. Soc Indic Res 74, 429–443 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-6170-z
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-6170-z