Skip to main content

The Time-Pressure Illusion: Discretionary Time vs. Free Time

Abstract

People’s welfare is a function of both time and money. People can – and, it is said, increasingly do – suffer time-poverty as well as money-poverty. It is undeniably true that people feel increasingly time pressured, particularly in dual-earner households. But much of the time devoted to paid and unpaid tasks is over and above that which is strictly necessary. In that sense, much of the time pressure that people feel is discretionary and of their own making. Using data from the 1992 Australian Time Use Survey, this paper demonstrates that the magnitude of this ‘time-pressure illusion’ varies across population groups, being least among lone parents and greatest among the childless and two-earner couples.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • R. Andorka (1987) ArticleTitle‘Time budgets and their uses’ Annual Review of Sociology. 13 149–164 Occurrence Handle10.1146/annurev.so.13.080187.001053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Ås (1978) ArticleTitle‘Studies of time-use. Problems and prospects’ Acta Sociologica. 21 IssueID2 125–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Ås D. (1982). ‘Designs for large scale, time use studies of the 24-hour day’. In: Staikov Z. (ed). It’s About Time. Proceedings of the International Research Group on Time Budgets and Social Activities. Institute of Sociology at the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences and Bulgarian Sociological Association, Sofia, pp. 17–53

  • A.B. Atkinson (1987) ArticleTitle‘On the measurement of poverty’ Econometrica. 55 747–764

    Google Scholar 

  • A.B. Atkinson (1995) Incomes and the Welfare State Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • A.B. Atkinson (1998) Poverty in Europe Blackwell Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (1993). Time Use Survey, Australia, 1992. User’s Guide. ABS Catalogue No. 4150.0. ABS, Canberra

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (1994). How Australians Use Their Time. Revised edn. ABS Catalogue No. 4153.0. ABS, Canberra

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (1998a). How Australians Use Their Time, 1997, ABS Catalogue No. 4153.0. ABS, Canberra

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (1998b). Time Use Survey, Australia. Users’ Guide, 1997, ABS Catalogue No. 4150.0. ABS, Canberra

  • J. Baxter D. Gibson (1990) Double Take. The Links Between Paid and Unpaid Work Australian Government Publishing Service Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Beckerman (1978) Measures of Leisure, Equality and Welfare Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Bittman (1992) Juggling Time. How Australian Families Use Time EditionNumber2 Office of the Status of Women Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittman M. (1999). Social participation and family welfare. The money and time costs of leisure. SPRC Discussion Paper No. 95 (Social Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW)

  • M. Bittman J. Pixley (1997) The Double Life of the Family Allen & Unwin Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Bittman J.M. Rice (2002) ArticleTitle‘The spectre of overwork. An analysis of trends between 1974 and 1997 using Australian time-use diaries’ Labour and Industry. 12 IssueID3 5–25

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Bittman J. Wajcman (2000) ArticleTitle‘The rush hour The character of leisure time and gender equity’. Social Forces. 79 IssueID1 165–189

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Campbell P.E. Converse W.L. Rodgers (1976) The Quality of American Life Russell Sage New York

    Google Scholar 

  • A.R. Ekirch (2001) ArticleTitle‘Sleep we have lost. Pre-industrial slumber in the British Isles’ American Historical Review. 106 IssueID2 343–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Gøsta. Esping-Andersen (1999) Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • I Garfinkel R.H. Haveman (1977) ArticleTitle‘Earnings capacity, economic status and poverty’ Journal of Human Resources 12 49–70

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Garfinkel R.H. Haveman (1978) Earnings Capacity, Poverty and Inequality Academic Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Gershuny (2000) Changing Times. Work and Leisure in Postindustrial Society Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Gershuny O. Sullivan (1998) ArticleTitle‘The sociological uses of time-use diary analysis’ European Sociological Review. 14 IssueID1 69–85

    Google Scholar 

  • F.K. Goldscheider L.J. Waite (1991) New Families, No Families? The Transformation of the American Home University of California Press Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt-Clermont L., Pagnossin-Aligisakis E. (1995). Measures of Unrecorded Economic Activities in Fourteen Countries. Occasional Paper No. 20, Human Development Report Office (United Nations Development Program, New York)

  • R.E. Goodin (1995) Utilitarianism as a Public Philosophy Cambridge University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • R.E. Goodin (2001) ArticleTitle‘Toward a post-productivist welfare state’ British Journal of Political Science. 31 IssueID1 13–40 Occurrence Handle10.1017/S0007123401000023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.E. Goodin B. Headey R. Muffels H.-J. Dirven (1999) The Real Worlds of Welfare Capitalism Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • R.E. Goodin A. Parpo O. Kangas (2004) ArticleTitle‘The temporal welfare state’ Journal of Social Policy. 33 IssueID4 527–548 Occurrence Handle10.1017/S0047279404007986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.C. Gornick J.A. Jacobs (1996) ArticleTitle‘A cross-national analysis of the wages of part-time workers. Evidence from the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia’ Work, Employment and Society. 10 IssueID1 1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • R.H. Haveman (1993) ArticleTitle‘Who are the nation’s truly poor? Problems and pitfalls in (re)defining and measuring poverty’ Brookings Review. 11 IssueID1 24–27

    Google Scholar 

  • R.H. Haveman A. Bershadker (1998) ArticleTitle‘Self-reliance as a poverty criterion. Trends in earnings-capacity poverty (1975)–(1992)’ American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings). 88 IssueID2 342–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Haveman R.H., Bershadker A. (2001). ‘The “inability to be self-reliant” as an indicator of poverty. Trends for the U.S., 1975–1997’. Review of Income and Wealth. 47(3): 335–360

  • R.H. Haveman L.F. Buron (1993) ArticleTitle‘Escaping poverty through work – the problem of low earnings capacity in the United States, 1973–1988’ Review of Income and Wealth. 38 IssueID1 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • A.R. Hochschild (1989) The Second Shift. Working Parents and the Revolution at Home Viking New York

    Google Scholar 

  • A.R. Hochschild (1997) The Time Bind Metropolitan Books New York

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Office (ILO). (1935)/(1996). ‘Convention concerning the reduction of hours of work to forty a week [signed 1935; came into force 1957]’, in International Labour Conventions and Recommendations (ILO, Geneva). Vol. 1: 261–263

  • D. Ironmonger (1996) ArticleTitle‘Counting outputs, capital inputs and caring labor. Estimating gross household product’ Feminist Economics. 2 IssueID3 37–64 Occurrence Handle10.1080/13545709610001707756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.A. Jacobs K. Gerson (2004) The Time Divide. Work, Family and Gender Inequality Harvard University Press Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • F.T. Juster F.P. Stafford (1991) ArticleTitle‘The allocation of time. Empirical findings, behavioral models and problems of measurement’ Journal of Economic Literature. 29 IssueID2 471–552

    Google Scholar 

  • R.H. Kitterød (2001) ArticleTitle‘Does the recording of parallel activities in time use diaries affect the way people report their main activities?’ Social Indicators Research. 56 145–178 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1012289811886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S.B. Linder (1970) The Harried Leisure Class Columbia University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Lundberg (1985) ArticleTitle‘Tied wage-hours offers and the endogeneity of wages’ Review of Economics and Statistics 67 405–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (1995). Household Production in OECD Countries. Data Sources and Measurement Methods. OECD, Paris

  • S. Ringen (1988) ArticleTitle‘Direct and indirect measures of poverty’ Journal of Social Policy. 17 351–365

    Google Scholar 

  • J.P. Robinson (1977) How Americans Use Time Praeger New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson J.P. (1985). ‘The validity and reliability of diaries vs. alternative time use measures’. In: Juster F.T., Stafford F.P. (ed). Time, Goods, and Well-Being. Survey Research Centre, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, pp. 33–62

  • J.P. Robinson G. Godbey (1997) Time for Life. The Surprising Ways Americans Use their Time Pennsylvania State University Press University Park

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Saunders (1994) Welfare and Inequality. National and International Perspectives on the Australian Welfare State Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders P., O’Connor I., Smeeding T. (1994). ‘The distribution of welfare. inequality, earnings capacity and household production in a comparative perspective’, SPRC Discussion Paper No. 51. (Social Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW)

  • J.B. Schor (1991) The Overworked American. The Unexpected Decline of Leisure Basic Books New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schor J.B. (2000). ‘Working hours and time pressure. The controversy about trends in time use’. In: Golden L., Figart D.M. (ed). Working Time. International Trends, Theory, and Policy Perspectives. Routledge, London, pp. 73–86

  • P. Sorokin C. Berger (1939) Time-budgets of Human Behavior Harvard University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinson, L. L. (1999). ‘Measuring how people spend their time. a time-use survey design’, Monthly Labour Review 122(8). pp. 12–19. Accessed online on June, 7 2001 at. http://stats.bls.gov/opub/mlr/1999/08/art3full.pdf

  • SullivanO. J. Gershuny (2001) ArticleTitle‘Cross-national changes in time-use. some sociological (hi)stories re-examined’ British Journal of Sociology 52 IssueID2 331–347 Occurrence Handle11440060

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • A. Szalai P.E. Converse P. Feldheim E.K. Scheuch P.J. Stone (Eds) (1972) The Use of Time Mouton The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • US Council of Economic Advisers. (1999). Families and the Labour Market, 1969–1999. Analyzing the ‘Time Crunch’ (Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.). Accessed online on June, 7 2001 at. http://clinton4.nara.gov/media/pdf/famfinal.pdf

  • P. Van Parijs (1995) Real Freedom for All Clarendon Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Vickery (1977) ArticleTitle‘The time-poor. a new look at poverty’ Journal of Human Resources 12 27–48

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert E. Goodin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goodin, R.E., Rice, J.M., Bittman, M. et al. The Time-Pressure Illusion: Discretionary Time vs. Free Time. Soc Indic Res 73, 43–70 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-4642-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-4642-9

Keywords

  • discretionary time
  • free time
  • leisure
  • time pressure
  • time use