Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating the Integrity of Slab–Soil Contact with Impulse Response Testing: Insights from Numerical Simulations

  • GEOTECHNICAL MONITORING
  • Published:
Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering Aims and scope

To assess the sensitivity of impulse response testing to potential poor support zones or voids beneath the foundation slabs, numerical simulations were performed using the finite element method. These simulations covered a range of scenarios, including soil-loosening zones, sub-slab cavities, and slab cracks. The analysis of the simulation results employed two distinct techniques: the normalized acoustic response method and the ASTM C1740 mobility spectrum approach. These methods allowed the parameters and attributes derived from changes in input signals to be described in relation to the specifications within the synthetic models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. V. Volodin and V. V. Kapustin, “Oscillation analysis of foundation slabs to assess contact with soils,” Geotekhnika, 13, No. 4, 64-79 (2021), https://doi.org/10.25296/2221-5514-2021-13-4-64-79.

  2. A. A. Churkin, A. Y. Khmel’nitskii, and V. V. Kapustin, “Evaluation of soil-structure contact state by normalized acoustic response analysis,” Soil Mech. Found. Eng., 59, 453-458 (2022), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11204-022-09836-1.

  3. A. Churkin and I. Smirnov, “Development of normalized acoustic response analysis for soil-structure contact state evaluation,” Earthq. Eng. Constr. Safety, No 3, 32-47 (2023), DOI: https://doi.org/10.37153/2618-9283-2023-3-32-47.

  4. I. N. Lozovsky and A. A. Churkin, “Multiscale entropy analysis for slab impulse response testing,” Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Physics, 87, No. 10, 1518-1522 (2023), DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1062873823703604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A. A. Churkin, “Experience of low strain impact testing of piled raft foundation at the construction stage,” Soil Mech. Found. Eng., 60, No. 4, 356-361 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. ASTM C1740-16 Standard Practice for Evaluating the Condition of Concrete Plates Using the Impulse-Response Method (2016), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/C1740-16.

  7. N. S. Ottosen, M. Ristinmaa, and A. G. Davis, “Theoretical interpretation of impulse response tests of embedded concrete structures,” J. Eng. Mech., No. 9, 1062-1071 (2004), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:9(1062).

  8. L. Sadowski, “Multi-scale evaluation of the interphase zone between the overlay and concrete substrate: methods and descriptors,” Appl. Sci., 9, No. 7, 893 (2017), DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app7090893.

  9. S. Sajid and L. Chouinard, “Impulse response test for condition assessment of concrete: A review,” Constr. Build. Mater., 211, 317-328 (2019), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.174,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Sajid, A. Taras, and L. Chouinard, “Defect detection in concrete plates with impulse-response test and statistical pattern recognition,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 161, 107948 (2021), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. H. X. Tang, S. G. Long, and T. Li, “Quantitative evaluation of tunnel lining voids by acoustic spectrum analysis,” Constr. Build. Mater., 228, 116762 (2019), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. H. Schon, Physical Properties of Rocks, Amsterdam, Elsevier (2011), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1567-8032(11)08006-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. O. P. Afinogenov, A. O. Afinogenov, and A. A. Seryakova, “On the issue of determining the values of soils short-term elastic modulus for the calculation of road covers,” Molodoy Uchenyi, 64, No. 5, 41-43 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Bulinski and L. Sergiel, “Effect of moisture content on soil density — Compaction relation during soil compacting in the soil bin,” Ann. Wars. Univ. Life Sci., No. 64, 5-13 (2014).

  15. S. Elkholy, B. El-Ariss, and S. Galal, “Structural performance of jointed reinforced concrete pavement slab with subbase erosion,” Structures, No. 26, 982–995 (2020), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.04.046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. E. Loseva, I. Lozovsky, R. Zhostkov, et al., “Wavelet analysis for evaluating the length of precast spliced piles using low strain integrity testing,” Appl. Sci., 12, No. 21, 10901 (2022), DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app122110901.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. A. Churkin.

Additional information

Translated from Osnovaniya, Fundamenty i Mekhanika Gruntov, No. 1, January-February, 2024.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Churkin, A.A., Lozovsky, I.N., Volodin, G.V. et al. Evaluating the Integrity of Slab–Soil Contact with Impulse Response Testing: Insights from Numerical Simulations. Soil Mech Found Eng 61, 62–67 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11204-024-09944-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11204-024-09944-0

Navigation