Skip to main content
Log in

A Model Test and the Ultimate Capacity Analysis of Multi-Underreamed Anchors in Silty Clay

  • EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS
  • Published:
Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering Aims and scope

Multi-underreamed anchors (MUAs) are widely used in areas with soft soils owing to their high ultimate capacity. To explore the bearing mechanism of MUAs in soft soil, this paper performs a model test of MUAs in silty clay and draws the following conclusions. With an increase in the underream number of MUAs, the ultimate capacity of the anchors significantly increases. The strength of MUAs develops faster and more efficiently than that of non-underreamed anchors but is lost faster after the load reaches its peak value. There are two failure modes of MUAs, namely arch-shaped and cylindrical failure modes. Both of them involve three processes: initial cracking, crack deflection, and crack penetration. The ultimate capacity of ground anchors is composed of end and side bearing capacity. For MUAs, both the side and end resistance effects are improved. Owing to the superposition of the two kinds of effects, the ultimate capacity of MUAs is higher than that of non-underreamed anchors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. K. Kim, “Performance of tension and compression anchors in weathered soil,” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 129(12), 1138-1150 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. N. K. Kim, “Numerical simulation of ground anchors,” Comput. Geotech., 34(9), 498-507 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. C. Li and B. Stillborg, “Analytical models for rock bolts,” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 36(8), 1013-1029 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. H. J. Liao, K. W. Wu, and S. T. Shu, “Uplift behaviour of a cone-shape anchor in sand,” Int. Conf. Ground Anchorages and Anchored Structures, Thomas Telford, London, 401-410 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. L. Hu and P. W. Zhang, “Development of underreamed anchor and experimental study of uplift resistance,” Rock Soil Mech., 30(6), 1615-9 (2009) (in Chinese).

  6. L. K. Cheng, “Research and new progress in ground anchorage,” Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng., 24(21), 3803-3811 (2005).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. C. L. Kerr and R. K. Neil, “A self-burying anchor of considerable holding power,” Proceedings of the Annual Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas (1976).

  8. J. J. Wang, C. H. Zhao, and G. Z. Yao, “Application of earth anchor with squibbing in landslide control,” Chin. J. Geotech. Eng., 18(3), 41-46 (1996).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. L. M. Wang, M. S. Shi, L. Y. Xu, Y. B. Wang, and J. M. Zhou, “Retrievable enlarged-end anchor with looped non-sticky steel-string,” Chin. J. Geotech. Eng., 32(S2), 471-474 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. A. Newson and F. W. Smith, “An experimental study of inflatable offshore anchors in soft clay,” International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Honolulu, HI(US) (2003).

  11. J. W. Cao, Z. B. Peng, W. X. Peng, Z. M. He, and Q. Yin, “Model test study of inflated anchors in sands,” Rock Soil Mech., 32(7), 1957-1962 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. W. Cao, W. X. Peng, Z. B. Peng, Z. M. He, and Q. Yin, “Experimental study on deformation and bearing features of inflatable anchors in sands,” J. Cent. South Univ. (Sci. Technol.), 42(5), 1369-1374 (2011).

  13. J. W. Cao, Z. B. Peng, W. X. Peng, Z. M. He, and Q. H. Wu, “Experimental study on mechanical characteristics of inflatable anchors in soft clay,” Chin. J. Geotech. Eng., 33(9), 1399-1404 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. X. Mei, M. Xu, L. H. Song, F. Zhou, and J. M. Zai, “In-situ tests on new umbrella-shaped anti-float anchors,” Chin. J. Geotech. Eng., 32(6), 892-896 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. J. Zhang, J. J. Zheng, P. Y. Li, J. Zhang, and S. Yu. Shun, “A method for predicting mechanical behaviour of HPJG–Anchors – Part I: Mechanical characteristics and load transfer models,” Comput. Geotech., 45, 62-73 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Tistel, G. Grimstad, and G. Eiksund, “Testing and modeling of cyclically loaded rock anchors,” J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng., 6(9), 22-42 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  17. T. Wang, J. C. Chang, Z. Q. Yin, P. Gong, W. B. Shi, and N. Li, “Theory and full-scale simulation testing of the mechanical properties of anchors under a variable lateral pressure coefficient,” Arab. J. Geosci., 14(2) (2021).

  18. R. K. Rowe and J. R. Booker, “The elastic response of multiple underream anchors,” Int. J. Num. Anal. Meth. Geom., 4(4). 313-332 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Andreadis and R. C. Harvey, “A design procedure for embedded anchors,” Appl. Ocean Res., 3(4), 177-182 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. C. Chen, Y. Xia, and Q. Ni, “Investigation on the working mechanism and structural parameters optimization of multiple ball shaped nodular anchors,” Soil Mech. Found. Eng., 57, 49-56 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. W. X. Peng, X. Zhang, and J. W. Cao, “Calculation method for ultimate bearing capacity of inflatable anchor,” Rock Soil Mech., 34(6), 1696-1702 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  22. W. X. Peng, X. Zhang, J. J. Mo, Y. Y. Huang, and Y. Q. Quan, “Bladder-type inflatable anchor ultimate up-lift bearing capacity ultimate displacement contrast test,” J. Hunan Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 42(7), 93-99 (2015).

  23. E. A. Dickin and C. F. Leung, “Performance of piles with enlarged bases subject to uplift forces,” Can. Geotech. J., 27(5), 546-556 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. J. L. Hu and P. W. Zhang, “Development of underreamed anchor and experimental study of uplift resistance,” Rock Soil Mech., 30(6), 1615-1619 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Z. Li, B. Li, L. Gao, and J. S. Zhang, “Research on model test of multiple underreamed anchors in sands,” Journal of Xi’an University of Technology, 32(3), 259-264 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. Das and A. K. Bera. “Ultimate uplift capacity of bell-shaped anchor in river sand using finite element software ABAQUS,” Geotech. Geol. Eng., 37, 4121-4133 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Y. F. Ni, Z. F. Qiao, Y. Zhu, and H. H. Zhu, “Experimental study on uplift failure of anchor plate based on PIV technology,” J. Civ. Environ. Eng., 42(1), 24-30 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Y. Xu and R. Liu, “Simulation on foundation pit excavation with fracture strength theory and interpretation of observed data,” Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng., 23(15), 2573-2578 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. Zhou.

Additional information

Translated from Osnovaniya, Fundamenty i Mekhanika Gruntov, No. 6, November-December, 2023.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, Y., Shi, S. & Cai, Q. A Model Test and the Ultimate Capacity Analysis of Multi-Underreamed Anchors in Silty Clay. Soil Mech Found Eng 60, 564–573 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11204-024-09930-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11204-024-09930-6

Navigation