Skip to main content
Log in

Ultimate Capacity of Drilled Displacement Piles: Static Analysis and CPT-Based Methods

  • DESIGN
  • Published:
Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering Aims and scope

Since the increasing use of drilled displacement piles in new constructions, estimation of their axial capacity has found great importance. This paper aims to analyze different predictive methods in projecting the ultimate load carrying capacity of drilled displacement piles. In this regard, two common approaches to determining the axial pile capacity based on static analysis and CPT-based methods are presented, compared, and evaluated. Also, a database is compiled and presented consisting of 69 drilled displacements pile load tests. Four different criteria were selected to evaluate the ratio of the predicted to measured pile capacities. To Compare the prediction of the pile’s bearing capacity, estimation approaches, as well as their accuracy plus efficiency evaluation, the Rank Index (RI) was utilized. Based on this evaluation, method A, method B, and the American Petroleum Institute (API) method showed the best performance in predicting the ultimate load bearing capacity of drilled displacement piles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Park, L. A. Roberts, and A. Misra, “Design methodology for axially loaded auger cast-in-place and drilled displacement piles,” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 138, 1431-1441 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Prezzi and P. Basu, “Overview of construction and design of auger cast-in-place and drilled displacement piles,” Conf. on Deep Foundations, Chicago, 497-512 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Basu, M. Prezzi, and D. Basu, “Drilled displacement piles–current practice and design,” DFI J., 4, 3-20 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Y. Abu-Farsakh and H. H. Titi, “Assessment of direct cone penetration test methods for predicting the ultimate capacity of friction driven piles,” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 130, 935-944 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Eslami, B. Hosseini, and A. Eslami, “Structural and geotechnical aspects of long driven piles for Urmiyeh lake causeway bridge,” Conf. on Deep Foundations, Deep Found. Institute (DFI), Hollywood, USA, 2010.

  6. L. Zhang, W. H. Tang, L. Zhang, and J. Zheng, “Reducing uncertainty of prediction from empirical correlations,” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 130, 526-534 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. I. Polischuk and D. A. Chernyavskii, “Calculation of bearing capacity of augercast tapered piles in clayey soils,” Soil Mech. Found. Eng., 57, 273-280 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Heidarie Golafzani, R. Jamshidi Chenari, and A. Eslami, “Reliability based assessment of axial pile bearing capacity: static analysis, SPT and CPT-based methods,” Georisk Assess. Manag. Risk Eng. Syst. Geohazards, 14, 216-230 (2020).

  9. A. Eslami and B. H. Fellenius, “Pile capacity by direct CPT and CPTu methods applied to 102 case histories,” Can. Geotech. J., 34, 886-904 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual, 4th edition, Vancouver (2006).

  11. T. P. Brettmann and W. P. NeSmith, “Advances in auger pressure grouted piles: design, construction and testing,” Geo-Frontier, 1-13 (2005).

  12. M. Bustamante and L. Gianeselli, “Design of auger displacement piles from in situ tests,” Inter. Geotech. Seminar on Deep Foundations, BAP II, Balkema, Rotterdam, 21-34 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. Togliani, “Pile capacity prediction using CPT—case history,” Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing (CPT), 10, 3-13 (2010).

  14. F. S. Niazi and P. W. Mayne, “Cone penetration test based direct methods for evaluating static axial capacity of single piles,” Geotech. Geol. Eng., 31, 979-1009 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. H.-G. Kempfert and P. Becker, “Axial pile resistance of different pile types based on empirical values,” Proc. Geo-Shanghai, 149-154 (2010).

  16. S. Moshfeghi and A. Eslami, “Reliability-based assessment of drilled displacement piles bearing capacity using CPT records,” Mar. Geores. Geotech., 37, 67-80 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Ghareh.

Additional information

Translated from Osnovaniya, Fundamenty i Mekhanika Gruntov, No. 1, January-February, 2023

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rad, S.H., Ghareh, S., Eslami, A. et al. Ultimate Capacity of Drilled Displacement Piles: Static Analysis and CPT-Based Methods. Soil Mech Found Eng 60, 29–35 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11204-023-09860-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11204-023-09860-9

Navigation