Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical Investigation of Pipeline Responses to Tunneling-Induced Ground Settlements in Clay

  • Published:
Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering Aims and scope

Tunnel excavation causes stress changes in the ground, leading to soil movements that may affect the safety and serviceability of existing pipelines. Although the tunnel-soil-pipe interaction has attracted increasing research attention, previous studies primarily focused on the responses of existing pipelines due to tunneling in sand. In this study, an extensive numerical parametric study with 540 numerical runs is conducted to investigate the effects on existing pipelines due to tunneling in clay. Soil responses to uplift and downward pipe-soil relative movements are explicitly simulated. Parameters considered in the tunnel-soil-pipe interaction include ground settlement profile, pipe dimension, material properties, pipe burial depth, and undrained shear strength. A dimensionless plot of relative pipe-soil stiffness and the ratio of maximum pipe curvature to ground curvature are developed to directly estimate pipeline curvature due to tunnel excavation in clays. When the relative pipe-soil stiffness is less than 1×10-4, the existing pipeline deforms with tunneling-induced ground settlement. The existing pipeline is relatively rigid when the pipe-soil stiffness is larger than 10.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. B. Attewell, J. Yeates, and A. R. Selby, Soil movements induced by tunneling and their effects on pipelines and structures, Blackie and Son Ltd., London (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Klar, T.E.B. Vorster, K. Soga, and R.J. Mair, "Soil-pipe-tunnel interaction: Comparison between Winkler and elastic continuum solutions," Geotechnique, 55, 461-466 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Klar and A.M. Marshall, "Linear elastic tunnel pipeline interaction: the existence and consequence of volume loss equality," Geotechnique, 65, 788-792 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Klar, T. E. B. Vorster, K. Soga, and R.J. Mair, "Elastoplastic solution for soil-pipe-tunnel interaction," J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 133, 782-792 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Klar, A. M. Marshall, K. Soga, and R. J. Mair, "Tunneling effects on jointed pipelines," Can. Geotech. J., 45, 131-139 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Y. Wang, J. W. Shi, and C. W. W. Ng, "Numerical modeling of tunneling effect on buried pipelines," Can. Geotech. J., 48, 1125-1137 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. T. E. B. Vorster, The effect of tunneling on buried pipes, Ph.D. thesis, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (2005).

  8. T. E. B. Vorster, A. Klar, K. Soga, and R. J. Mair, "Estimating the effects of tunneling on existing pipelines," J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 131, 1399-1410 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. M. Marshall, A. Klar, and R. J. Mair, "Tunneling beneath buried pipes -a view of soil strain and its effect on pipeline behavior," J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 136, 1664-1672 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R. B. Peck, "Deep excavation and tunneling in soft ground," Proc. of the 7th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Mexico City, State of the Art volume, 266-290 (1969).

  11. ASCE Committee on Gas and Liquid Fuel Lifeline. Guidelines for the Seismic Design of Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. W. Shi, Y. Wang, and C. W. W. Ng, "Buried pipeline responses to ground displacements induced by adjacent static pipe bursting," Can. Geotech. J., 50, 481-492 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. S. Vesic, Breakout resistance of objects embedded in ocean bottom, ASCE Ocean Engineering Conference, Miami Beach (1969).

  14. R. K. Rowe and E. H. Davis, "The behavior of anchor plates in clay," Geotechnique, 32, 9-23 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Ali, Pullout resistance of anchor plates and anchors piles in soft bentonite clay, M. S. Thesis, Duke Univerisity, Durham, North Carolina (1968).

  16. L.C. Reese and A.O.P. Casbarian, "Pipe soil interaction for a buried offshore pipeline," the 43rd Annual Fall Meeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, Houston, Texas (1968).

  17. Hibbitt, Karlsson and Sorensen Inc. ABAQUS User's Manual, version 6.8.2 (2008).

  18. C. Moormann, "Analysis of wall and ground movements due to deep excavations in soft soil based on a new worldwide database," Soils Found., 44, 87-98 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. F.P. Beer, E.R. Johnston, and J.T. Dewolf, Mechanics of Materials, McGraw-Hill, New York (2004).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Osnovaniya, Fundamenty i Mekhanika Gruntov, No. 5, p. 9, September-October, 2017.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shi, J., Zhang, X., Chen, L. et al. Numerical Investigation of Pipeline Responses to Tunneling-Induced Ground Settlements in Clay. Soil Mech Found Eng 54, 303–309 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11204-017-9473-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11204-017-9473-1

Navigation