Abstract
To study the subsurface features and structures, the gravity effects of the surrounding topography should be reduced from acquired gravity field data. Several methods are available to calculate terrain effects on each gravity station. Some of these methods are tedious and time consuming due to a large number of calculations, long-distance terrain effects, and minimum acceptable errors. The other fast methods do not fulfill the accuracy requirement for local surveys. In rough topographies, using average elevation for sectors of the calculation area leads to overestimation or underestimation of the terrain effect. Since most of the terrain correction methods employ the pre-divided web or mesh for the survey area, the used sectors do not match geographical features with distinct mass centers. An Optimally Selecting Sectors (OSS) algorithm is proposed, which automatically partitions the surrounding area to a set of sectors in a way that separates different mass centers, finds optimum elevation of these sectors, and calculates terrain effect at the gravity stations. This new procedure improves the accuracy of calculated terrain effects. A proper tolerance inside the algorithm controls the accuracy of the method. Defining this tolerance relies on the application of gravity data. The application of this method on synthetic models with different geometrical shapes and real digital elevation data of a mountainous area at the Kurdistan region shows improvement in the accuracy of terrain correction. However, the proposed method OSS introduces extra calculation compared to some of the previous terrain correction methods.
Access this article
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
References
Banerjee B. and Das Gupta S.P., 1977. Gravitational attraction of a rectangular parallelepiped. Geophysics, 42, 1053–1055.
Campbell D.L., 1980. Gravity terrain corrections for stations on a uniform slope - A power law approximation. Geophysics, 45, 109–112.
Capponi M., Mansi A.H. and Sampietro D., 2018. Improving the computation of the gravitational terrain effect close to ground stations in the GTE software. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 62, 206–222.
Dai T.-F. and Hollyer G.M., 2004. An Optimized Gravity Terrain Correction Algorithm and Test Results from the Rio Tinto Valley, Spain. Geosoft Inc, Toronto, Canada.
Forsberg R., 1985. Gravity field terrain effect computation by FFT. Bull. Geod, 39, 342–360.
Gomez M.E., Bagu D.R., Del Cogliano D. and Perdomo R.A., 2013. Evaluation of terrain correction through FFT and classical integration in two selected areas of the Andes and their impact on geodial heights. Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas, 19, 407–419.
Gučević J.P., Ogrizović V., Delčev S. and Vasilić V., 2010. Optimum resolution and size of DTM during modelling topographic effect. Geodetski list, 64, 177–192.
Hammer S., 1939. Terrain correction for gravimeter stations. Geophysics, 4, 149–230.
Hećimović Ž. and Bašić T., 2005. Terrain effect on gravity field parameters using different terrain models. Newton’s Bulletin, 3, 92–102.
Kearey P., Brooks M. and Hill I, 2002. An Introduction to Geophysical Exploration. 3rd Edition. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, U.K.
Ketelaar A.C.R., 1987. Terrain correction for gravity measurements using a digital terrain model (DTM). Geoexploration, 24, 109–124.
McCubbine J.C., Featherstone W.E. and Kirby J.F., 2017. Fast-Fourier-based error propagation for the gravimetric terrain correction. Geophysics, 82, G71-G76.
Majkráková M., Papčo J., Zahorec P., Droščák D., Mikuška J. and Marušiak I, 2016. An analysis of methods for gravity determination and their utilization for the calculation of geopotential numbers in the Slovak national leveling network. Contrib. Geophys. Geodesy, 46, 179–202.
Nagy D., 1966. The prism method for terrain corrections using digital computers. Pure Appl. Geophys., 63, 31–39.
Nagy D., Papp G. and Benedek J., 2000. The gravitational potential and its derivatives for the prism. J. Geodesy, 60, 552–560.
Nowell D., 1999. Gravity terrain corrections - an overview. J. Appl. Geophys., 42, 117–134.
Parker R.L., 1995. Improved Fourier terrain correction, Part I. Geophysics, 60, 1007–1017.
Sideris M.G., 1985. A Fast Fourier Transform method for computing terrain correction. Manuscripta Geodaetica, 10, 66–73.
Telford W., Geldart L. and Sheriff R., 2004. Applied Geophysics. 2nd Edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Tontini F.C., Graziano F., Cocchi L., Carmisciano C. and Stefanelli P., 2007. Determining the optimal Bouguer density for a gravity data set: implications for the isostatic setting of the Mediterranean Sea. Geophys. J. Int., 169, 380–388.
Wessel B., Huber M., Wohlfart C., Marschalk U., Kosmann D. and Roth A., 2018. Accuracy assessment of the global TanDEM-X Digital Elevation Model with GPS data. ISPRS-J. Photogramm. Remote Sen., 139, 171–182.
Zahorec P., 2015. Inner zone terrain correction calculation using interpolated heights. Contrib. Geophys. Geodesy, 45, 219–235.
Zahorec P. and Papčo J., 2018. Estimation of Bouguer correction density based on underground and surface gravity measurements and precise modelling of topographic effects - two case studies from Slovakia. Contrib. Geophys. Geodesy, 48, 319–336.
Zhdanov M.S. and Liu X., 2013. 3-D Cauchy-type integrals for terrain correction of gravity and gravity gradiometry data. Geophys. J. Int., 194, 249–268.
Zhou X., Zhong B. and Li X., 1990. Gravimetric terrain corrections by triangular element method. Geophysics, 55, 232–238.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jahanjooy, S., Pirouei, M. & Kolo, K. High accuracy gravity terrain correction by Optimally Selecting Sectors algorithm based on Hammer charts method. Stud Geophys Geod 64, 172–185 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-019-0273-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-019-0273-0