Detailed analysis of the geomagnetic ground survey performed in middle-northern Croatia over the time interval 2003–2005

  • Eugen VujićEmail author
  • Giuliana Verbanac
  • Vladis Vujnović
  • Antun Marki


During the time interval 2003–2005 a ground survey of the total magnetic field intensity in the middle-northern part of Croatia was performed, in order to get a detailed insight of the field distribution over the region. A special effort was done to understand the uncertainty and errors in data reduction, namely different amplitudes of the diurnal variations and different secular variations at the ground stations with respect to the observatories. For data reduction to epoch 2004.5 the total field recordings from AQU, FUR, NCK and THY geomagnetic observatories have been used. We estimate the mean determination error to be one order of magnitude smaller than the maximal reduction error. Multiple linear regression and the method of empirical orthogonal functions were applied on the ground survey and observatory time series. This allowed us to explain the correlations among them and the variance of the total field. Furthermore, we identified two sources of serious artificial disturbances caused by DC leakage: the tramway system of the capital and one railway station in neighbouring Slovenia. Also, we estimate the region free of these disturbances. The magnitude of one of them is estimated to be more than five nT at the distance of about 10 km.

Key words

ground survey data reduction geomagnetic observatory artificial disturbances 


  1. Andriambahoaka Z., Schott J.J. and Ranaivonomenjanahary F., 2007. Repeat station data reduction using the CM4 model. Publ. Inst. Geophys. Pol. Acad. Sci., C-99(398), 242–249.Google Scholar
  2. Barton C.E. and Newitt L.R., 1995. Regional Magnetic Survey, Chart, and Model Descriptions. Australian Geological Survey Organisation, Canberra, ACT, Australia.Google Scholar
  3. Bendat J.S. and Piersol A.G., 2000. Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures. John Wiley & Sons Inc., USA.Google Scholar
  4. Blakely R.J., 1996. Potential Theory in Gravity and Magnetic Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell W.H., 1989. The regular geomagnetic-field variations during quiet solar conditions. In Jacobs J.A. (Ed.), Geomagnetism, Vol. 3. Academic Press, San Diego, USA, 385–460.Google Scholar
  6. Chambodut A. and Mandea M., 2005. Evidence for geomagnetic jerks in comprehensive models. Earth Planets Space, 57, 139–149.Google Scholar
  7. Cueto M., McKnight D. and Herraiz M., 2003. Daily geomagnetic variations on the Iberian Peninsula. Geophys. J. Int., 152, 113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Santis A., Chiappini M., Dominici G. and Meloni A., 1997. Regional geomagnetic field modelling: the contribution of the Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica. Annal. Geophys., 40, 1161–1169.Google Scholar
  9. Jankowski J. and Sucksdorff C.,1996. Guide for Magnetic Measurements and Observatory Practice. International Association of Geomagnetism and Aeronomy (
  10. Joselyn J.A., 1989. Geomagnetic quiet day selection. Pure Appl. Geophys., 131, 333–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Korte M. and Thébault E., 2007. Geomagnetic repeat station crustal biases and vectorial anomaly maps for Germany. Geophys. J. Int., 170, 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lowes F.J., 1987. Magnetic monitoring of DC electric railways. Phys. Technol., 18, 209–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lötter C.J., 1987. Stable inversions of MAGSAT data over the geomagnetic equator by means of ridge regression. J. Geophys., 61, 77–81.Google Scholar
  14. Mandea M. and Purucker M, 2005. Observing, modeling and interpreting magnetic fields of the solid Earth. Surv. Geophys., 26, 415–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Meloni A., Battelli O., De Santis A. and Dominici G., 1994. The 1990.0 magnetic repeat station survey and normal reference fields for Italy. Annal. Geophys., 37, 949–967.Google Scholar
  16. Newitt L.R., Barton C.E. and Bitterly J., 1996. Guide for Magnetic Repeat Station Surveys, International Association of Geomagnetism and Aeronomy (
  17. Press W.H., Teukolsky S.A., Vetterling W.T. and Flannery B.P., 2001. Numerical Recipes in Fortran 77: The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press, USA.Google Scholar
  18. Riddihough R.P., 1971. Diurnal corrections to magnetic surveys — an assessment of errors. Geophys. Prospect., 19, 551–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sabaka T., Olsen N. and Purucker M., 2004. Extending comprehensive models of the Earth’s magnetic field with Oersted and CHAMP data. Geophys. J. Int., 159, 521–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. St-Louis B. (Ed.), 2004. Intermagnet Technical Reference Manual (Version 4.2.). (
  21. Tokumoto T. and Tsunomura S., 1984. Calculation of magnetic field disturbance produced by electric railway. Memoirs of the Kakioka Magnetic Observatory, 20(2), 33–44 (in Japanese, English translation at Scholar
  22. Torta J.M., Curto J.J. and Bencze P., 1997. Behaviour of the quiet day ionospheric current system in the European region. J. Geophys. Res., 102(A2), 2483–2494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Verbanac G. and Korte M., 2006. The geomagnetic field in Croatia. Geofizika, 23(2), 105–117.Google Scholar
  24. Verbanac G., Korte M. and Mandea M., 2007. On long-term trends of the European geomagnetic observatory biases. Earth Planets Space, 59, 685–695.Google Scholar
  25. Von Storch H. and Navarra A., 1999. Analysis of Climate Variability. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  26. Vujnović V., Verbanac G., Orešković J., Marki A., Marić K., Lisac I. and Ivandić M., 2004. Results of the preliminary geomagnetic field strength measurements in the northern part of middle Croatia. Geofizika, 21, 69–87.Google Scholar
  27. Wardinski I. and Mandea M., 2006. Annual and semi-annual variations of the geomagnetic variations of the geomagnetic field components analysed by the multi-taper method. Earth Planets Space, 58, 785–791.Google Scholar
  28. Yanagihara K., 1977. Magnetic field disturbance produced by electric railway. Geophys. Mag., 38, 17–34.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Geophysics of the ASCR, v.v.i 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eugen Vujić
    • 1
    Email author
  • Giuliana Verbanac
    • 1
  • Vladis Vujnović
    • 1
  • Antun Marki
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of SciencesUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations