Abstract
Institutions of higher education (IHEs) often disseminate risk reduction strategies intended to reduce sexual assault victimization and/or perpetration. This research examined the content and context of publicly available risk reduction strategies offered by a nationally representative sample of 4-year IHEs in the United States (N = 242; public and private not-for-profit institutions, Historically Black Colleges and Universities, and Tribal institutions). We identified strategies for 102 (42%) IHEs. Using a sociocognitive approach to critical discourse analysis, we examined the specific messages conveyed via IHE risk reduction strategies, how larger sociocultural discourses and power structures were reproduced or reinforced, and the potential implications for readers (i.e., university students). Nearly all IHEs directed their strategies toward potential victims. These strategies were broad in scope, imploring behavioral modification and restriction (e.g., never be alone), and requiring specific responses to sexual assault (e.g., physical resistance). Fewer IHEs directed their strategies toward potential perpetrators; these strategies were narrower in scope, focusing on sexual consent. Overall, strategies reproduced rape myths (e.g., stranger-perpetrated assault is common) and positioned potential victims as uniquely responsible for preventing sexual assault—messaging that may be particularly harmful when disseminated by powerful institutions responsible for sexual assault prevention and response. IHEs should assess the utility of risk reduction strategies and, if retained, revise their strategies to counter harmful sexual assault messaging.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
These data are not publicly available because they could identify the institutions sampled.
References
Adams-Clark, A. A., Smith, C. P., Bhuptani, P. H., & Freyd, J. J. (2020). University crime alerts: Do they contribute to institutional betrayal and rape myths? Dignity: A Journal of Analysis of Exploitation and Violence, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.23860/dignity.2020.05.01.06
Babcock, R. E., & Kortegast, C. A. (2024). “My life is controlled by a lingering thought in my head that it could happen anytime”: How women navigate fear of sexual violence on campus. Journal of Women and Gender in Higher Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/26379112.2024.2366216
Basile, K. C., Smith, S. G., Kresnow, M. -j., Khatiwada, S., & Leemis, R. W. (2022). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey: 2016/2017 report on sexual violence. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/nisvs/documentation/nisvsReportonSexualViolence.pdf
Bedera, N. (2021). Moaning and eye contact: Men’s use of ambiguous signals in attributions of consent to their partners. Violence Against Women, 27(15–16), 3093–3113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801221992870
Bedera, N., & Nordmeyer, K. (2015). “Never go out alone”: An analysis of college rape prevention tips. Sexuality & Culture, 19(3), 533–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-015-9274-5
Bernstein, E., Kanefsky, R., Cook, M., & Newins, A. R. (2024). Acceptance of rape myths and psychological symptoms: The indirect effect of self-blame. Journal of American College Health, 72(6), 1641–1645. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2022.2086005
Bhuptani, P. H., & Messman, T. L. (2023). Role of blame and rape-related shame in distress among rape victims. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 15(4), 557–566. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001132
Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: Men, women, and rape. Simon and Schuster.
Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.217
Canan, S. N., Jozkowski, K. N., Wiersma-Mosley, J., Blunt-Vinti, H., & Bradley, M. (2020). Validation of the sexual experience survey-short form revised using lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual women’s narratives of sexual violence. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(3), 1067–1083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01543-7
Cherniawsky, S., & Morrison, M. (2022). “You should have known better”: The social ramifications of victimization-focused sexual assault prevention tips. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(1–2), NP125–NP146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520913650
Cohn, E. S., Dupuis, E. C., & Brown, T. M. (2009). In the eye of the beholder: Do behavior and character affect victim and perpetrator responsibility for acquaintance rape? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(7), 1513–1535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00493.x
Coulter, R. W. S., Mair, C., Miller, E., Blosnich, J. R., Matthews, D. D., & McCauley, H. L. (2017). Prevalence of past-year sexual assault victimization among undergraduate students: Exploring difference by and intersections of gender identity, sexual identity, and race/ethnicity. Prevention Science, 18(6), 726–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0762-8
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Dworkin, E. R., Brill, C. D., & Ullman, S. E. (2019). Social reactions to disclosure of interpersonal violence and psychopathology: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 72, Article 101750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101750
Estrich, S. (1987). Real rape. Harvard University Press.
Eyssel, F., & Bohner, G. (2011). Schema effects of rape myth acceptance on judgments of guilt and blame in rape cases: The role of perceived entitlement to judge. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(8), 1579–1605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510370593
Fedina, L., Holmes, J. L., & Backes, B. L. (2018). Campus sexual assault: A systematic review of prevalence research from 2000 to 2015. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 19(1), 76–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016631129
Finlay, L. (2002). “Outing” the researcher: The provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973202129120052
Frese, B., Moya, M., & Megías, J. L. (2004). Social perception of rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(2), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260503260245
Gómez, J. M. (2022). Gender, campus sexual violence, cultural betrayal, institutional betrayal, and institutional support in U.S. ethnic minority college students: A descriptive study. Violence Against Women, 28(1), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801221998757
Gómez, J. M., & Gobin, R. L. (2020). Black women and girls & #MeToo: Rape, cultural betrayal, & healing. Sex Roles, 82(1–2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01040-0
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Sage.
Harris, J. C. (2020). Women of Color undergraduate students’ experiences with campus sexual assault: An intersectional analysis. The Review of Higher Education, 44(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2020.0033
Holland, K. J., Ahrens, C. E., Hutchison, L., & Howard, R. L. for the Academic Alliance for Survivor Choice. (2021). Sexual misconduct is a serious threat to the campus community yet, rates of reporting to university officials (e.g., Title IX office) [Written public comment for the June 2021 Title IX Public Hearing]. U.S. Department of Education. https://ocrcas.ed.gov/sites/default/files/storage/correspondence/202106-titleix-publichearing-comments/asc.pdf
Holland, K. J., Hutchison, L., Ahrens, C. E., Goodman-Williams, R., Howard, R. L., & Cipriano, A. E. for the Academic Alliance for Survivor Choice (2022). We are research experts on the issue of campus sexual harassment and assault and are writing to provide comments [Public written comment on the Title IX proposed rule: Nondiscrimination on the basis of sex in education programs or activities receiving federal financial assistance (Docket ED-2021-OCR-0166)]. Regulations.gov. https://www.regulations.gov/comment/ED-2021-OCR-0166-75977
Janosik, S. M., & Gehring, D. D. (2003). The impact of the Clery Campus Crime Disclosure Act on student behavior. Journal of College Student Development, 44(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2003.0005
Jozkowski, K. N., & Willis, M. (2020). People perceive transitioning from a social to a private setting as an indicator of sexual consent. Psychology & Sexuality, 11(4), 359–372. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003276180-7
Kern, S. G., Peterson, Z. D., Jozkowski, K. N., & Gerstein, E. D. (2024). Psychological symptoms associated with sexual victimization experiences: Differences as a function of the type and number of sexual acts and aggressive tactics. The Journal of Sex Research, 61(3), 342–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2022.2130855
Kirkner, A., Plummer, S. -B., Findley, P. A., & McMahon, S. (2022). Campus sexual violence victims with disabilities: Disclosure and help seeking. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(9–10), NP7156–NP7177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520967149
Kline, N. K., Berke, D. S., Rhodes, C. A., Steenkamp, M. M., & Litz, B. T. (2021). Self-blame and PTSD following sexual assault: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(5–6), NP3153–NP3168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518770652
Linder, C., & Lacy, M. (2020). Blue lights and pepper spray: Cisgender college women’s perceptions of campus safety and implications of the “stranger danger” myth. The Journal of Higher Education, 91(3), 433–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2019.1664195
Linder, C., Melton, H., Hills, W., Coe, K., Richards, J., & Moore, A. (2024). Exploring the impact of Clery sexual assault timely warnings on a campus community. The Journal of Higher Education. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2024.2378639.
Littleton, H. L., & Dodd, J. C. (2016). Violent attacks and damaged victims: An exploration of the rape scripts of European American and African American U.S. college women. Violence Against Women, 22(14), 1725–1747. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216631438
Littleton, H., Tabernik, H., Canales, E. J., & Backstrom, T. (2009). Risky situation or harmless fun? A qualitative examination of college women’s bad hook-up and rape scripts. Sex Roles, 60(11–12), 793–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9586-8
Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1994). Rape myths. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18(2), 133–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb00448.x
Marcantonio, T. L., & Jozkowski, K. N. (2021). Do college students feel confident to consent to sex after consuming alcohol? Journal of American College Health, 71(5), 1604–1611. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2021.1943413
McKimmie, B. M., Masser, B. M., & Bongiorno, R. (2014). What counts as rape? The effect of offense prototypes, victim stereotypes, and participant gender on how the complainant and defendant are perceived. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(12), 2273–2303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513518843
McMahon, S., & Banyard, V. L. (2012). When can I help? A conceptual framework for the prevention of sexual violence through bystander intervention. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 13(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838011426015
Mellins, C. A., Walsh, K., Sarvet, A. L., Wall, M., Gilbert, L., Santelli, J. S., Thompson, M., Wilson, P. A., Khan, S., Benson, S., Bah, K., Kaufman, K. A., Reardon, L., & Hirsch, J. S. (2017). Sexual assault incidents among college undergraduates: Prevalence and factors associated with risk. PLOS ONE, 12(11), Article e0186471. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186471.
New, J. (2014, October 16). The ‘yes means yes’ world. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2014/10/17/colleges-across-country-adopting-affirmative-consent-sexual-assault-policies
Payne, D. L., Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33(1), 27–68. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1998.2238
Peterson, Z. D., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (2004). Was it rape? The function of women’s rape myth acceptance and definitions of sex in labeling their own experiences. Sex Roles, 51(3/4), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:sers.0000037758.95376.00
Peterson, Z. D., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (2011). A match-and-motivation model of how women label their nonconsensual sexual experiences. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35(4), 558–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684311410210
Ravitch, S. M., & Carl, N. M. (2021). Qualitative research: Bridging the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological (2nd ed.). Sage.
Relyea, M., & Ullman, S. E. (2015). Unsupported or turned against: Understanding how two types of negative social reactions to sexual assault relate to postassault outcomes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313512610
Rosenthal, M., Smith, C. P., & Freyd, J. J. (2017). Behind closed doors: University employees as stakeholders in campus sexual violence. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 9(4), 290–304. https://doi.org/10.1108/JACPR-02-2017-0272
Sall, K., & Littleton, H. (2022). Institutional betrayal: A mixed methods study of college women’s experiences with on-campus help-seeking following rape. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 23(5), 584–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2022.2079795
Schachter, M. (2023, April 3). Should enthusiasm be a requirement for sex? Killing Kittens. https://www.killingkittens.com/blog/should-enthusiasm-be-a-requirement-for-sex/
Sigurvinsdottir, R., Ullman, S. E., & Canetto, S. S. (2020). Self-blame, psychological distress, and suicidality among African American female sexual assault survivors. Traumatology, 26(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1037/trm0000195
Silver, N., & Hovick, S. R. (2018). A schema of denial: The influence of rape myth acceptance on beliefs, attitudes, and processing of affirmative consent campaign messages. Journal of Health Communication, 23(6), 595–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2018.1473532
Smidt, A. M., Rosenthal, M. N., Smith, C. P., & Freyd, J. J. (2021). Out and in harm’s way: Sexual minority students’ psychological and physical health after institutional betrayal and sexual assault. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 30(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2019.1581867
Smith, C. P., & Freyd, J. J. (2013). Dangerous safe havens: Institutional betrayal exacerbates sexual trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 26(1), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.21778
Smith, C. P., & Freyd, J. J. (2014). Institutional betrayal. American Psychologist, 69(6), 575–587. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037564
Smith, C. P., & Freyd, J. J. (2017). Insult then injury: Interpersonal and institutional betrayal linked to health and dissociation. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 26(10), 1117–1131. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2017.1322654
Smith, C. P., Cunningham, S. A., & Freyd, J. J. (2016). Sexual violence, institutional betrayal, and psychological outcomes for LGB college students. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 2(4), 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000094
Tracy, S. J. (2020). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact (2nd ed.). Wiley.
Ullman, S. E., & Najdowski, C. J. (2011). Prospective changes in attributions of self-blame and social reactions to women’s disclosures of adult sexual assault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(10), 1934–1962. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510372940
U.S. Department of Education (2021). Clery Act appendix for FSA Handbook. https://fsapartners.ed.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/2020-10/CleryAppendixFinal.pdf
van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006
van Dijk, T. A. (2009). Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse studies (pp. 62–86). Sage.
van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 466–485). Wiley.
Wesely, J. K., Brown, E. R., & Phills, C. E. (2022). Words matter: A qualitative content analysis of campus crime alerts and considerations for best practices. Journal of American College Health, 70(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2020.1719114
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory, and methodology. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse studies (pp. 1–33). Sage.
Zidenberg, A. M., Wielinga, F., Sparks, B., Margeotes, K., & Harkins, L. (2022). Lost in translation: A quantitative and qualitative comparison of rape myth acceptance. Psychology, Crime & Law, 28(2), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2021.1905810
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Daniel Nguyen for his contributions to data collection and analysis.
Funding
No funding was received for conducting the current study or preparing this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Rebecca Howard Valdivia - conceptualization, project administration, investigation, data curation, formal analysis, writing (original draft), writing (review & editing). Kathryn Holland - formal analysis, writing (original draft), writing (review & editing). Allison Cipriano - writing (original draft), writing (review & editing).
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval/Consent
This research was conducted in accordance with APA ethical standards. Because this research involved data collection from public-facing U.S. college websites, and not from human subjects, this research was not regulated by an institutional review board.
Completing Interests
We have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Howard Valdivia, R.L., Holland, K.J. & Cipriano, A.E. It’s on Victims: A Critical Discourse Analysis of U.S. College Sexual Assault Risk Reduction Strategies. Sex Roles (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-024-01518-6
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-024-01518-6