Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Implicit and Explicit Sexist Attitudes Towards Women Drivers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although women drivers engage in fewer risky behaviors and have a lower involvement in traffic accidents than men, there is a commonly held stereotype that they are bad drivers. To understand this perception, various psychosocial factors related to sexism have been studied. However, very little is known about sexist attitudes towards women drivers, especially when studied through implicit attitude models. The aim of this study was to understand implicit and explicit sexist attitudes towards women drivers. A sample of N = 104 participants from Mar del Plata, Argentina, completed a stimulus classification task using response times to measure implicit attitudes, and three self-reporting measures of explicit attitudes, ambivalent sexism, and control of prejudices. The results indicated more positive implicit attitudes and low explicit antipathy towards women drivers. No age differences were found, but gender differences were observed (i.e., women showed more positive implicit and explicit attitudes towards their own group). Implicit and explicit attitudes showed a moderate correlation with each other and were not associated with a concern with acting prejudiced scale. Hostile sexism was a predictor of sexist driving attitudes. The results are discussed in the context of previous evidence on sexism in driving and implicit attitude models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agencia Nacional de Seguridad Vial (2021). Principales indicadores de seguridad vial con una perspectiva de género en Argentina. Ministerio de Transporte Argentina. https://www.argentina.gob.ar/sites/default/files/2018/12/ansv_informe_seguridad_vial_con_perspectiva_de_genero_diciembre_2021.pdf.

  • Ajzen, I., & Dasgupta, N. (2015). Explicit and implicit beliefs, attitudes, and intentions: The role of conscious and unconscious processes in human behavior. In P. Haggard, & B. Eitam (Eds.), The sense of agency (pp. 115–144). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190267278.003.0005.

  • Akrami, N., & Ekehammar, B. (2005). The association between implicit and explicit prejudice: The moderating role of motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46(4), 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2005.00466.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Balbissi, A. H. (2003). Role of gender in road accidents. Traffic Injury Prevention, 4(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389580309857.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Albentosa, J., Stephens, A. N., & Sullman, M. J. (2018). Driver anger in France: The relationships between sex, gender roles, trait and state driving anger and appraisals made while driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 52, 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.11.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banaji, M. R. (2001). Implicit attitudes can be measured. In H. L. Roediger, J. S. Nairne, I. Neath, & A. M. Surprenant (Eds.), The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder (pp. 117–150). American Psychological Association.

  • Banaji, M. R., & Heiphetz, L. (2010). Attitudes. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 353–393). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

  • Becker, J. C., & Sibley, C. G. (2016). Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination. Psychology. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203361993.

  • Calanchini, J., Schmidt, K., Sherman, J. W., & Klein, S. A. W. (2022). The contributions of positive outgroup and negative ingroup evaluation to implicit bias favoring outgroups. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119(40), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2116924119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro-Nuño, M., & Lopez-Valpuesta, L. (2023). Traffic compliance effect of more women behind the wheel: Pride or prejudice? Women’s Studies International Forum, 98., Article 102727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2023.102727.

  • Correll, J., Judd, C., Park, B., & Wittenbrink, B. (2010). Measuring prejudice, stereotypes and discrimination. In J. F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick, & V. M. Esses (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination (pp. 45–62). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446200919.

  • Cullen, P., Möller, H., Woodward, M., Senserrick, T., Boufous, S., Rogers, K., Brown, J., & Ivers, R. (2021). Are there sex differences in crash and crash-related injury between men and women? A 13-year cohort study of young drivers in Australia. SSM-Population Health, 14., Article 100816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100816.

  • Degraeve, B., Granié, M. A., & Pravossoudovitch, K. (2014). April 14–16). Men and women drivers: A study of social representations through prototypical and correspondence analysis [Paper presentation]. Women’s Issues in Transportation 5th International Conference: Bridging the Gap, Paris France.

  • Degraeve, B., Granié, M. A., Pravossoudovitch, K., & Monaco, G. L. (2015). Social representations associated with men and women drivers among French adolescents and adults. Effects of the perceiver’s age, sex, and socioeconomic status. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 34, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.07.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deniz, P., Lajunen, T., Özkan, T., & Gaygısız, E. (2021). Masculinity, femininity, and angry drivers: Masculinity and femininity as moderators between driver anger and anger expression style among young drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 161., Article 106347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106347.

  • Dunham, Y., Baron, A. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2016). The development of implicit gender attitudes. Developmental Science, 19(5), 781–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ercan, N., & Uluğ, Ö. M. (2015). October 9–11). You see that driver? I bet that’s a woman! A social psychological approach to understand sexism in traffic [Paper presentation]. Conference on Knowledge and Politics in Gender and Women’s Studies, Ankara, Turkey.

  • Faust-Christmann, C. A., Reinhard, R., Hoffmann, A., Lachmann, T., & Bleser, G. (2019). A face validation study for the investigation of proteus effects targeting driving behavior. In J. Y. C. Chen & G. Fragomeni (Eds.), Virtual, augmented and mixed reality. Multimodal interaction (pp. 335–348). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21607-8_26.

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203838020.

  • Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (2013). Social cognition: From brains to culture. Sage.

  • Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2011). The associative-propositional evaluation model: Theory, evidence, and open questions. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 59–127). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385522-0.00002-0.

  • Gawronski, B., & Brannon, S. M. (2018). Attitudes and the implicit-explicit dualism. In D. Albarracín, & B. T. Johnson (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes, volume 1: Basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 158–196). Routledge.

  • Gawronski, B., & Payne, B. K. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications. Guilford Press.

  • Gaymard, S., Chauveau, L., & Cohen, G. (2023). Older women: How do they feel while driving and what about the effects of age-and-gender stereotype threat? Journal of Women & Aging, 35(3), 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/08952841.2022.2044704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geldstein, R. N., Leo, P. F. D., & Margarido, S. R. (2011). Género, violencia y riesgo en El tránsito: La dominación masculina en Los discursos de automovilistas de la ciudad de Buenos Aires. Physis: Revista De Saúde Coletiva, 21, 695–720. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-73312011000200019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Granié, M. A., & Papafava, E. (2011). Gender stereotypes associated with vehicle driving among French preadolescents and adolescents. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 14(5), 341–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2011.04.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granié, M. A., Abou-Dumontier, A., & Guého, L. (2013). How gender influences road user behaviors: The bringing–in of developmental social psychology. In N. A. Stanton (Ed.), Advances in human aspects of road and rail transportation (pp. 754–763). CRC.

  • Greenwald, A. G., & Lai, C. K. (2020). Implicit social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 71, 419–445. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050837.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., Brendl, M., Cai, H., Charlesworth, T., Cvencek, D., Friese, D. J. F., Hahn, M., Hehman, A., Hofmann, E., Hughes, W., Hussey, S., Jordan, I., Jost, C., Kirby, J., Lai, T., Lang, C. K., Lindgren, J., Maison, K. P., & Wiers, D. (2019). The Implicit Association Test at age 20: What is known and what is not known about implicit bias. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bf97c

  • Greenwald, A. G., Brendl, M., Cai, H., Cvencek, D., Dovidio, J. F., Friese, M., Hahn, A., Hehman, E., Hofmann, W., Hughes, S., Hussey, I., Jordan, C., Kirby, T. A., Lai, C. K., Lang, J. W. B., Lindgren, K. P., Maison, D., Ostafin, B. D., Rae, J. R., & Wiers, R. W. (2022). Best research practices for using the Implicit Association Test. Behavior Research Methods, 54, 1161–1180. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01624-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, A., & Gawronski, B. (2018). Implicit social cognition. In J. T. Wixted (Ed.), The Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology and cognitive neuroscience (Vol. 4, 4th ed., pp. 395–427). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119170174.epcn412.

  • Jiménez-Mejías, E., Prieto, C. A., Martínez-Ruiz, V., del Castillo, J. D. D. L., Lardelli-Claret, P., & Jiménez-Moleón, J. J. (2014). Gender-related differences in distances travelled, driving behaviour and traffic accidents among university students. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 27, 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.09.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadulina, Y. (2022). Eat my dust: Stereotypes about female drivers persist but do not affect their driving [Doctoral dissertation, Université d’Ottawa/University of Ottawa]. uO Research. https://ruor.uottawa.ca/items/32eedd26-37bc-4574-954c-fa3c9536c115.

  • Karpinski, A., & Hilton, J. L. (2001). Attitudes and the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 774–788. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.774.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kite, M. E., & Whitley, B. E. (2016). Psychology of prejudice and discrimination. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315623849.

  • Krahé, B., & Fenske, I. (2002). Predicting aggressive driving behavior: The role of macho personality, age, and power of car. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 28(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.90003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krys, K., Capaldi, C. A., van Tilburg, W., Lipp, O. V., Bond, M. H., Vauclair, C. M., Manickam, L. S. S., Domínguez-Espinosa, A., Torres, C., Lun, V. M. C., Teyssier, J., Miles, L. K., Hansen, K., Park, J., Wagner, W., Yu, A. A., Xing, C., Wise, R., Sun, C. R., & Ahmed, R. A. (2018). Catching up with wonderful women: The women‐are‐wonderful effect is smaller in more gender egalitarian societies. International Journal of Psychology, 53, 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12420.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, C. K., & Wilson, M. E. (2021). Measuring implicit intergroup biases. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(1), Article e12573. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12573

  • Ledesma, R. D., Ferrando, P. J., Trógolo, M. A., Poó, F. M., Tosi, J. D., & Castro, C. (2021). Exploratory factor analysis in transportation research: Current practices and recommendations. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 78, 340–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.02.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menatti, A. R., Smyth, F. L., Teachman, B. A., & Nosek, B. A. (2012). Reducing stigma toward individuals with mental illnesses: A brief, online intervention. Stigma Research and Action, 1, 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millisecond Software (2008). Inquisit [Computer software]. https://www.millisecond.com/.

  • Moè, A., Cadinu, M., & Maass, A. (2015). Women drive better if not stereotyped. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 85, 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.09.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosek, B. A., & Hansen, J. J. (2008). The associations in our heads belong to us: Searching for attitudes and knowledge in implicit evaluation. Cognition and Emotion, 22, 553–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930701438186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2004). Reducing the influence of extrapersonal associations on the Implicit Association Test: Personalizing the IAT. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(5), 653–667. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.653.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Özkan, T., & Lajunen, T. (2005). Why are there sex differences in risky driving? The relationship between sex and gender-role on aggressive driving, traffic offences, and accident involvement among young Turkish drivers. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 31(6), 547–558. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özkan, T., & Lajunen, T. (2006). What causes the differences in driving between young men and women? The effects of gender roles and sex on young drivers’ driving behaviour and self-assessment of skills. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 9(4), 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2006.01.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özkan, B. & Derya, A. Z. I. K. (2022). The role of sex in evaluating other male and female drivers’ driving skills and behavior. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Research, 5(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.38002/tuad.1104273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öztürk, İ., Özkan, Ö., & Öz, B. (2021). Investigating sex, masculinity and femininity in relation to impulsive driving and driving anger expression. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 81, 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.05.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, B. K., Vuletich, H. A., & Lundberg, K. B. (2017). The bias of crowds: How implicit bias bridges personal and systemic prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 28(4), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840x.2017.1335568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., & Levin, S. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 271–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280601055772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pravossoudovitch, K., Martha, C., Cury, F., & Granié, M. A. (2015). Sex and age differences in the endorsement of sex stereotypes associated with driving. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 18. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2015.94. Article E100.

  • Rhodes, N., & Pivik, K. (2011). Age and gender differences in risky driving: The roles of positive affect and risk perception. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(3), 923–931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.11.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rougier, M., Muller, D., Courset, R., Smeding, A., Devos, T., & Batailler, C. (2020). Toward the use of approach/avoidance tendencies as attitude measures: Individual-and group‐level variability of the ingroup bias. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(4), 857–875. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, C. G., & Harré, N. (2009). A gender role socialization model of explicit and implicit biases in driving self-enhancement. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 12(6), 452–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2009.08.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, A. L., Stevenson, M. C., & Camillus, J. C. (2015). Ambivalent sexism in context: Hostile and benevolent sexism moderate bias against female drivers. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2014.996224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullman, M. J., Paxion, J., & Stephens, A. N. (2017). Gender roles, sex and the expression of driving anger. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 106, 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.05.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swim, J. K., & Campbell, B. (2003). Sexism: Attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors. In R. Brown, & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes (pp. 218–237). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470693421.

  • Swim, J. K., & Hyers, L. L. (2009). Sexism. In T. D. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 407–430). Psychology.

  • Teige-Mocigemba, S., Klauer, K. C., & Sherman, J. W. (2010). A practical guide to Implicit Association tests and related tasks. In B. Gawronski, & P. K. Payne (Eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. 117–139). The Guilford Press.

  • Tosi, J. D., Haworth, N., Díaz-Lázaro, C. M., Poó, F. M., & Ledesma, R. D. (2021). Implicit and explicit attitudes in transportation research: A literature review. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 77, 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.12.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urbiola, A., Willis, G. B., Romero, J. R., & Morales, M. C. M. (2018). When implicit prejudice does not predict explicit prejudice: Spanish version of the concern with acting Prejudiced Scale. Revista De Psicología Social, 33(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2017.1385239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaamonde, J. D., & Omar, A. (2012). Validación argentina Del inventario de sexismo ambivalente. Alternativas en Psicología, 16(26), 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2023). Global status report on road safety 2023. World Health Organization.

  • Yeung, N. C. J., & von Hippel, C. (2008). Stereotype threat increases the likelihood that female drivers in a simulator run over jaywalkers. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40(2), 667–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2007.09.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Our Traffic Psychology Research Group is supported by Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas and Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata (Argentina). We express our gratitude to these institutions for their support.

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. IPSIBAT, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata and Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Funes 3350, Mar del Plata, 7600, Argentina

    Jeremías D. Tosi, Fernando M. Poó & Rubén D. Ledesma

  2. Walden University, Mar del Plata, Argentina

    Carlos M. Díaz Lázaro

Authors
  1. Jeremías D. Tosi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fernando M. Poó
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carlos M. Díaz Lázaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rubén D. Ledesma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeremías D. Tosi.

Ethics declarations

Informed Consent

Participants were provided with the informed consent form.

Competing Interests

The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tosi, J.D., Poó, F.M., Díaz Lázaro, C.M. et al. Implicit and Explicit Sexist Attitudes Towards Women Drivers. Sex Roles 90, 1099–1110 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-024-01497-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-024-01497-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation