Abstract
Organizations have increasingly emphasized the role of employees as potential interventionists following acts of workplace sexism. However, sexism can be expressed in a variety of ways and bystanders may not be equally likely to recognize and intervene after witnessing different forms of workplace sexism. The current study correspondingly draws on the model of ambivalent sexism and the deontic theory of justice to propose that bystanders will experience weaker moral reactions following witnessed benevolent sexism as compared to hostile sexism and will correspondingly be less likely to intervene. We tested our hypotheses with an experimental vignette study that exposed participants to either benevolent or hostile sexism. Consistent with expectations, results showed that hostile sexism was perceived to be more of a moral violation and elicited more moral anger than benevolent sexism. Additionally, the results supported a serial mediation model in which witnessed hostile sexism (as compared to benevolent sexism) was associated with a greater willingness to intervene through perceived moral violation and moral anger. These results can inform organizational practices and empirical research aimed at understanding and improving bystander intervention willingness in response to workplace sexism.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of Supporting Data
Data are available upon reasonable request.
References
Ashburn-Nardo, L., Morris, K. A., & Goodwin, S. A. (2008). The confronting prejudiced responses (CPR) model: Applying CPR in organizations. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(3), 332–342. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2008.34251671
Baron, R. S., Burgess, M. L., & Kao, C. F. (1991). Detecting and labeling prejudice: Do female perpetrators go undetected? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(2), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167291017002
Barreto, M., & Doyle, D. M. (2023). Benevolent and hostile sexism in a shifting global context. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2, 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00136-x
Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2005). The burden of benevolent sexism: How it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 633–642. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.270
Bowes-Sperry, L., & O’Leary-Kelly, A. M. (2005). To act or not to act: The dilemma faced by sexual harassment observers. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 288–306. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.16387886
Bowes-Sperry, L., & Powell, G. N. (1999). Observers’ reactions to social-sexual behavior at work: An ethical decision making perspective. Journal of Management, 25(6), 779–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(99)00026-4
Bradley-Geist, J. C., Rivera, I., & Geringer, S. D. (2015). The collateral damage of ambient sexism: Observing sexism impacts bystander self-esteem and career aspirations. Sex Roles, 73, 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0512-y
Chasteen, A. L., Horhota, M., Crumley-Branyon, J. J., & Haseley, E. (2021). Unwanted help: Accepting versus declining ageist behavior affects impressions of older adults. Psychology and Aging, 36(6), 700–709. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000620
Chawla, N., Wong, E. M., & Gabriel, A. S. (2019). Expanding the discourse surrounding sexual harassment: The case for considering experienced and observed hostile sexism, benevolent sexism, and gendered incivility. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 12, 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2019.13
Chawla, N., Gabriel, A. S., O’Leary-Kelly, A., & Rosen, C. C. (2021). From #MeToo to #TimesUp: Identifying next steps in sexual harassment research in the organizational Sciences. Journal of Management, 47(3), 551–566. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920632098051
Chisango, T., & Javangwe, G. (2012). Are people better at recognizing ambivalent sexism on the basis of the non-standard profiles than the standard ASI ones? Sex Roles, 67, 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0146-2
Chui, C. W., & Dietz, J. (2014). Observing workplace incivility towards women: The roles of target reactions, actor motives, and actor-target relationships. Sex Roles, 71, 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0367-7
Connelly, K., & Heesacker, M. (2012). Why is benevolent sexism appealing? Associations with system justification and life satisfaction. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36(4), 432–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312456369
Dardenne, B., Dumont, M., & Bollier, T. (2007). Insidious dangers of benevolent sexism: Consequences for women’s performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 764. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.764
Dhanani, L. Y., & LaPalme, M. L. (2019). It’s not personal: A review and theoretical integration of research on vicarious workplace mistreatment. Journal of Management, 45(6), 2322–2351. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920631881616
Dipboye, R. L., & Colella, A. (2005). The dilemmas of workplace discrimination. In R. Dipboye, & A. Collela (Eds.), The psychological and organizational bases of discrimination at work (pp. 425–462). Erlbaum.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) (2020). Charge Statistics (Charges filed with EEOC) FY 1997 Through FY 2020. https://www.eeoc.gov/statistics/charge-statistics-charges-filed-eeoc-fy-1997-through-fy-2020
Feldblum, C. R., & Lipnic, V. A. (2016). Technical report from the select task force on the study of harassment in the workplace. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. https://www.eeoc.gov/select-task-force-study-harassment-workplace
Folger, R. (2001). Fairness as deonance. In S. W. Gilliland, D. D. Steiner, & D. P. Skarlicki (Eds.), Theoretical and cultural perspectives on organizational justice (p. 3–33).
Folger, R., Cropanzano, R., & Goldman, B. (2005). What is the relationship between justice and morality. In J. Greenberg & J. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (p. 215–245).
Gelfand, M. J., Nishii, L. H., Raver, J., & Schneider, B. (2005). Discrimination in organizations: An organizational level systems perspective. In R. Dipboye, & A. Colella (Eds.), Discrimination at work: The psychological and organizational bases (pp. 89–116). Erlbaum.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00104.x
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). Ambivalent sexism. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 115–188). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(01)80005-8
Glick, P., Wilk, K., & Perreault, M. (1995). Images of occupations: Components of gender and status in occupational stereotypes. Sex Roles, 32, 565–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544212
Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., Adetoun, B., Osagie, J. E., Akande, A., Alao, A., Annetje, B., Willemsen, T. M., Chipeta, K., Dardenne, B., Dijksterhuis, A., Wigboldus, D., Eckes, T., Six-Materna, I., Exposito, F., Moya, M., & López, W. L. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 763–775. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.763
Good, J. J., & Rudman, L. A. (2010). When female applicants meet sexist interviewers: The costs of being a target of benevolent sexism. Sex Roles, 62, 481–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9685-6
Gray, J. A., & Ford, T. E. (2013). The role of social context in the interpretation of sexist humor. Humor, 26(2), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2013-0017
Haidt, J. (2003). The moral emotions. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 852–870). Oxford University Press.
Hayes, A. F. (2012). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analyses: A regression-based approach (3rd Edition.). The Guilford Press.
Hershcovis, M. S., & Bhatnagar, N. (2017). When fellow customers behave badly: Witness reactions to employee mistreatment by customers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(11), 1528–1544. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000249
Hideg, I., & Ferris, D. L. (2016). The compassionate sexist? How benevolent sexism promotes and undermines gender equality in the workplace. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 111(5), 706–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000072
Hideg, I., & Shen, W. (2019). Why still so few? A theoretical model of the role of benevolent sexism and career support in the continued underrepresentation of women in leadership positions. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 26(3), 287–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518198490
Ilies, R., Hauserman, N., Schwochau, S., & Stibal, J. (2003). Reported incidence rates of work-related sexual harassment in the United States: Using meta-analysis to explain reported rate disparities. Personnel Psychology, 56(3), 607–631. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00752.x
Kilianski, S. E., & Rudman, L. A. (1998). Wanting it both ways: Do women approve of benevolent sexism? Sex Roles, 39, 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018814924402
King, E. B., Botsford, W., Hebl, M. R., Kazama, S., Dawson, J. F., & Perkins, A. (2012). Benevolent sexism at work: Gender differences in the distribution of challenging developmental experiences. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1835–1866. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310365902
Lee, S. Y., Hanson, M. D., & Cheung, H. K. (2019). Incorporating bystander intervention into sexual harassment training. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 12, 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2019.8
Liang, Y., & Park, Y. A. (2022). Because I know it hurts: Employee bystander intervention in customer sexual harassment through empathy and its moderating factors. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 27(3), 339–348. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000305
Lindebaum, D., & Geddes, D. (2016). The place and role of (moral) anger in organizational behavior studies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(5), 738–757. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2065
Magnavita, N., Di Stasio, E., Capitanelli, I., Lops, E. A., Chirico, F., & Garbarino, S. (2019). Sleep problems and workplace violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13, 997. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00997
Mulder, R., Bos, A. E., Pouwelse, M., & van Dam, K. (2016). Workplace mobbing: How the victim’s coping behavior influences third party responses. The Journal of Social Psychology, 157(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2016.1152213
Nagele-Piazza, L. (2018). New York employers must provide sexual-harassment training. SHRM. https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/legal-and-compliance/state-and-local-updates/pages/new-york-sexual-harassment-training.aspx
Nye, C. D., Brummel, B. J., & Drasgow, F. (2009). Differentiating gender discrimination and sexist behavior: An examination of antecedents and outcomes. Military Psychology, 21(3), 299–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/08995600902914388
O’Leary-Kelly, A. M., & Bowes-Sperry, L. (2001). Sexual harassment as unethical behavior: The role of moral intensity. Human Resource Management Review, 11, 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(00)00041-3
O’Leary-Kelly, A. M., Tiedt, P., & Bowes-Sperry, L. (2004). Answering accountability questions in sexual harassment: Insights regarding harassers, targets, and observers. Human Resource Management Review, 14(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2004.02.005
O’Reilly, J., & Aquino, K. (2011). A model of third parties’ morally motivated responses to mistreatment in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 526–543. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0311
O’Reilly, J., Aquino, K., & Skarlicki, D. (2016). The lives of others: Third parties’ responses to others’ injustice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(2), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000040
Oswald, D. L., Baalbaki, M., & Kirkman, M. (2019). Experiences with benevolent sexism: Scale development and associations with women’s well-being. Sex Roles, 80, 362–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0933-5
Ramos, M., Barreto, M., Ellemers, N., Moya, M., & Ferreira, L. (2018). What hostile and benevolent sexism communicate about men’s and women’s warmth and competence. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21, 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216656921
Rasinski, H. M., & Czopp, A. M. (2010). The effect of target status on third party’ reactions to confrontations of bias. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32(1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530903539754
Reich, T. C., & Hershcovis, M. S. (2015). Observing workplace incivility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(1), 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036464
Rodin, M. J., Price, J. M., Bryson, J. B., & Sanchez, F. J. (1990). Asymmetry in prejudice attribution. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26(6), 481–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(90)90052-N
Schiralli, J. E., & Chasteen, A. L. (in press). Perceptions of women who confront hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2023.2173554
Skarlicki, D. P., & Rupp, D. E. (2010). Dual processing and organizational justice: The role of rational versus experiential processing in third-party reactions to workplace mistreatment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 944. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020468
Spaccatini, F., & Roccato, M. (2021). The palliative function of sexism: Individual sexism buffers the relationship between exposure to workplace sexism and psychological distress. Sexuality and Culture, 25, 767–785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-020-09793-7
Warren, C., Wax, A., Brush, O. T., Magalona, J., & Galvez, G. (2023). Development and validation of the benevolent sexism in the workplace scale. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 96(3), 473–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12435
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
TKH contributed to planning the study, collecting data, data analyses, writing, and editing. LYD contributed to planning the study, data analyses, writing, and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate
The study was approved by the institutional review board at Ohio University and all participants provided informed consent prior to participating.
Human and Animal Ethics
The authors confirm this study was conducted in compliance with ethical standards for research involving human participants.
Consent for Publication
We confirm that all authors have consented to publication.
Competing Interests
The authors have no competing interests or funding to disclose. Data are available upon reasonable request.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hall, T.K., Dhanani, L.Y. Cloaked in Kindness: Bystander Responses to Witnessed Benevolent and Hostile Sexism. Sex Roles 89, 658–669 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01431-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01431-4