Why do women remain underrepresented in some science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields? Research has uncovered various situational factors such as belongingness cues, but one understudied (and related) factor may be outperformance-related discomfort. Specifically, when people outperform others who are upset about being outperformed, they may experience sensitivity about being the target of a threatening upward comparison (STTUC; Exline and Lobel, in Psychological Bulletin 125:307–337, 1999). Three studies examined the potential role of STTUC among women in STEM and how STTUC relates to feelings of belongingness. Study 1 recruited a large internet sample of undergraduate women and found that the tendency to experience STTUC corresponded with relatively low levels of belongingness in both STEM and arts/humanities courses. Replicating prior research, results also showed significantly lower levels of belongingness in STEM vs. arts/humanities courses. Study 2 found higher anticipated levels of perceiving the outperformed person as upset and experiencing STTUC-related concerns among undergraduate women (vs. men) who imagined academically outperforming others. Study 3 examined women and non-binary first-year undergraduates in STEM and found that the tendency to experience STTUC corresponded to relatively low levels of belongingness in STEM at two time points. Taken together, results suggest that experiencing outperformance-related discomfort in STEM may predict relatively low levels of belongingness, which, over time, may contribute to weakening women’s interest in pursuing STEM. The present research may be of particular interest to educators, administrators, and policy makers interested in improving women’s representation in STEM.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
All data and supporting materials are available at https://osf.io/tv9se/?view_only=5d041d271a68443facb01d51644e3670
Altermatt, E. R., & Ivers, I. E. (2011). Friends’ responses to children’s disclosure of an achievement-related success: An observational study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 57(4), 429–454. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2011.0018
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
Belanger, A. L., Joshi, M. P., Fuesting, M. A., Weisgram, E. S., Claypool, H. M., & Diekman, A. B. (2020). Putting belonging in context: Communal affordances signal belonging in STEM. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(8), 1186–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219897181
Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G., & Steele, C. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1045–1060. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016239
Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? Psychological Bulletin, 143(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000052
Clore, G. L., & Huntsinger, J. R. (2007). How emotions inform judgment and regulate thought. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(9), 393–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.005
Cohen, G. L., & Garcia, J. (2008). Identity, belonging, and achievement: A model, interventions, implications. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(6), 365–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00607.x
Cohen, S. M., Hazari, Z., Mahadeo, J., Sonnert, G., & Sadler, P. M. (2021). Examining the effect of early STEM experiences as a form of STEM capital and identity capital on STEM identity: A gender study. Science Education, 105(6), 1126–1150. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21670
Cowgill, C., Halper, L., Rios, K., & Crane, P. (2021). “Why so few?”: Differential effects of framing the gender gap in STEM recruitment interventions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684320965123
Diekman, A. B., Brown, E. R., Johnston, A. M., & Clark, E. K. (2010). Seeking congruity between goals and roles: A new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1051–1057. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610377342
Dlouhy, K., & Froidevaux, A. (2022). Evolution of professionals’ careers upon graduation in stem and occupational turnover over time: Patterns, diversity characteristics, career success, and self-employment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(5), 641–665. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2615
Exline, J. J., & Lobel, M. (1999). The perils of outperformance: Sensitivity about being the target of a threatening upward comparison. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.307
Exline, J. J., & Lobel, M. (2001). Private gain, social strain: Do relationship factors shape responses to outperformance? European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(5), 593–607. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.79
Exline, J. J., Single, P. B., Lobel, M., & Geyer, A. L. (2004). Glowing praise and the envious gaze: Social dilemmas surrounding the public recognition of achievement. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26(2–3), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2602&3_2
Exline, J. J., & Zell, A. L. (2012). Who doesn’t want to be envied? Personality correlates of emotional responses to outperformance scenarios. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 34(3), 236–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2012.674412
Exline, J. J., Zell, A. L., Bratslavsky, E., Hamilton, M., & Swenson, A. (2012). People-pleasing through eating: Sociotropy predicts greater eating in response to perceived social pressure. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 31(2), 169–193. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2012.31.2.169
Frome, P. M., Alfeld, C. J., Eccles, J. S., & Barber, B. L. (2006). Why don’t they want a male-dominated job? An investigation of young women who changed their occupational aspirations. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(4), 359–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610600765786
Good, C., Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women’s representation in mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 700–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026659
Government of Canada. (2019). Persistence and representation of women in STEM programs. Statistics Canada. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/75-006-x/2019001/article/00006-eng.htm
Heilbronner, N. N. (2013). The STEM pathway for women: What has changed? Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212460085
Koch, E. J. (2023). Success with a twinge of distress: Antecedents and consequences of outperformance-related discomfort. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12736
Koch, E. J., & Metcalfe, K. P. (2011). The bittersweet taste of success: Daily and recalled experiences of being an upward social comparison target. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 33(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2010.539960
Koch, E. J., & Totton, S. F. M. (2017). “What’ve I done to deserve this?” The role of deservingness in reactions to being an upward comparison target. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407515619043
Lewis, K. L., Stout, J. G., Finkelstein, N. D., Pollock, S. J., Miyake, A., Cohen, G. L., & Ito, T. A. (2017). Fitting in to move forward: Belonging, gender, and persistence in the physical sciences, technology, engineering, and mathematics (pSTEM). Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41(4), 420–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684317720186
Master, A., Cheryan, S., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2016). Computing whether she belongs: Stereotypes undermine girls’ interest and sense of belonging in computer science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 424–437. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000061
McBride, J. (2018). Nobel laureate Donna Strickland: ‘I see myself as a scientist, not a woman in science.’ The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/oct/20/nobel-laureate-donna-strickland-i-see-myself-as-a-scientist-not-a-woman-in-science
Park, L. E., Young, A. F., Troisi, J. D., & Pinkus, R. T. (2011). Effects of everyday romantic goal pursuit on women’s attitudes toward math and science. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(9), 1259–1273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211408436
Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samat, S., & Acquisti, A. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006
Perry, S. P., Wages, J. E., Skinner-Dorkenoo, A. L., Burke, S. E., Hardeman, R. R., & Phelan, S. M. (2021). Testing a self-affirmation intervention for improving the psychosocial health of Black and White medical students in the United States. Journal of Social Issues, 77(3), 769–800. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12448
Ramsey, L. R. (2017). Agentic traits are associated with success in science more than communal traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 6–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.10.017
Richards, C., Bouman, W. P., Seal, L., Barker, M. J., Nieder, T. O., & T’Sjoen, G. (2016). Non-binary or genderqueer genders. International Review of Psychiatry, 28(1), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.3109/09540261.2015.1106446
Robins, R. W., Hendin, H. M., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2001). Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(2), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201272002
Scinta, A., & Gable, S. L. (2005). Performance comparisons and attachment: An investigation of competitive responses in close relationships. Personal Relationships, 12(3), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2005.00120.x
Settles, I. H., Jellison, W. A., & Pratt-Hyatt, J. S. (2009). Identification with multiple social groups: The moderating role of identity change over time among women-scientists. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(5), 856–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.04.005
Tellhed, U., Bäckström, M., & Björklund, F. (2017). Will I fit in and do well? The importance of social belongingness and self-efficacy for explaining gender differences in interest in STEM and HEED majors. Sex Roles, 77(1–2), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0694-y
Thoman, D. B., Arizaga, J. A., Smith, J. L., Story, T. S., & Soncuya, G. (2014). The grass is greener in non-science, technology, engineering, and math classes: Examining the role of competing belonging to undergraduate women’s vulnerability to being pulled away from science. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38(2), 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313499899
Woodcock, A., Hernandez, P. R., Estrada, M., & Schultz, P. W. (2012). The consequences of chronic stereotype threat: Domain disidentification and abandonment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 635–646. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029120
Xavier Hall, C. D., Wood, C. V., Hurtado, M., Moskowitz, D. A., Dyar, C., & Mustanski, B. (2022). Identifying leaks in the STEM recruitment pipeline among sexual and gender minority US secondary students. PLoS ONE, 17(6) Article e0268769. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268769
We thank James Shepperd for comments on an earlier draft and Lindsay Berrigan and Michael Boudreaux for statistical assistance.
The authors acknowledge the support of the following funding sources: St. Francis Xavier University Council for Research (UCR); National Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Women in Science and Engineering (WISE) Chair for the Atlantic Region; Centre for Employment Innovation at St. Francis Xavier University; Research Grants Office at St. Francis Xavier University.
Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate
All participants provided informed consent electronically. All studies received clearance through the St. Francis Xavier University Research Ethics Board (REB).
Human and Animal Ethics
The research reported complies with the standards of the Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans (Canada).
Consent for Publication
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Koch, E.J., Davis-Janes, A.S. & Franz-Odendaal, T.A. Outperformance-Related Discomfort: Another Factor in Women’s Under-Representation in STEM?. Sex Roles 89, 539–551 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01418-1