Positive stereotypes have been shown to negatively impact targets in individualistic cultural contexts. However, individuals from individualistic cultures and those from collectivistic cultures have different perceptions of positive stereotypes, which may lead to different reactions to positive stereotypes. The present study investigated the mechanism underlying targets’ negative reactions to positive gender stereotypes in China, a country with a collectivistic culture. Study 1 revealed that women who heard the positive gender stereotype “women are good at language” reported experiencing stronger negative reactions (including greater dislike, negative emotions, and perceptions of gender prejudice) toward the perpetrator of the stereotype than women who did not hear the positive gender stereotype. Further, we found that a sense of depersonalization mediated the relation between hearing the positive stereotype and negative reactions. Study 2 revealed that men who heard the positive gender stereotype “men are good at math” believed that the perpetrator of the stereotype exhibited more gender prejudice than did men who did not hear the positive stereotype. However, there were no significant differences between men who heard the positive gender stereotype and those who did not hear the stereotype in feelings of dislike or negative emotions. In addition, a sense of depersonalization did not mediate men’s reactions to the positive gender stereotype. These findings extend our knowledge on the interpersonal consequences of and reactions to positive gender stereotypes within collectivistic contexts.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Data and materials are available to share.
Alt, N. P., Chaney, K. E., & Shih, M. J. (2019). But that was meant to be a compliment!”: Evaluative costs of confronting positive racial stereotypes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22(5), 655–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218756493
Bao, H. W., Cai, H., Jing, Y., & Wang, J. (2021). Novel evidence for the increasing prevalence of unique names in China: A reply to Ogihara. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 731244. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.731244
Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2005). The burden of benevolent sexism: How it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(5), 633–642. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.270
Bloise, S. M., & Johnson, M. K. (2007). Memory for emotional and neutral information: Gender and individual differences in emotional sensitivity. Memory (Hove, England), 15(2), 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210701204456
Brewer, M. B. (2017). Intergroup discrimination: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? In C. Sibley, & F. Barlow (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice (pp. 90–110). Cambridge University Press.
Cai, H., Zou, X., Feng, Y., Liu, Y., & Jing, Y. (2018). Increasing need for uniqueness in contemporary China: Empirical evidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 554. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00554
Cai, H., Huang, Z., & Jing, Y. (2019). Living in a changing world: The change of culture and psychology. In D. Matsumoto, & H. C. Hwang (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Culture and psychology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190679743.003.0023
Chaffee, K. E., Lou, N. M., & Noels, K. A. (2020). Does stereotype threat affect men in language domains? Frontiers in psychology, 11, 1302. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01302
Cheryan, S., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2000). When positive stereotypes threaten intellectual performance: The psychological hazards of “model minority” status. Psychological Science, 11(5), 399–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00277
Cottrell, C. A., & Neuberg, S. L. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to “prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(5), 770–789. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35220.127.116.110
Cross, S. E., Hardin, E. E., & Gercek-Swing, B. (2011). The what, how, why, and where of self-construal. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2), 142–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310373752
Czopp, A. M. (2008). When is a compliment not a compliment? Evaluating expressions of positive stereotypes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(2), 413–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.12.007
Czopp, A. M., Kay, A. C., & Cheryan, S. (2015). Positive stereotypes are pervasive and powerful. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(4), 451–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615588091
Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(10), 1171–1188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200262001
Eagly, A. H., & Koenig, A. M. (2021). The vicious cycle linking stereotypes and social roles. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(4), 343–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214211013775
Ellemers, N. (2018). Gender stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 275–298. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011719
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
Hall, J. A., & Schmid Mast, M. (2008). Are women always more interpersonally sensitive than men? Impact of goals and content domain. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(1), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207309192
Hall, J. A., Murphy, N. A., & Mast, M. S. (2006). Recall of nonverbal cues: Exploring a new definition of interpersonal sensitivity. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 30(4), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-006-0013-3
Heilman, M. E. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.003
Hornsey, M. J. (2008). Social identity theory and self-categorization theory: A historical review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 204–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00066.x
Kashima, Y., Bain, P. G., & Perfors, A. (2019). The psychology of cultural dynamics: What is it, what do we know, and what is yet to be known? Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 499–529. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103112
Kay, A. C., Day, M. V., Zanna, M. P., & Nussbaum, A. D. (2013). The insidious (and ironic) effects of positive stereotypes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(2), 287–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.11.003
Kim, H. S., & Drolet, A. (2003). Choice and self-expression: A cultural analysis of variety-seeking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.1683
Kim, H. S., & Markus, H. R. (1999). Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(4), 785–800. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.1245
Kim, Y. H., Cohen, D., & Au, W. T. (2010). The jury and abjury of my peers: The self in face and dignity cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(6), 904–916. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017936
Levy, B. (1996). Improving memory in old age through implicit self-stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(6), 1092–1107. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35126.96.36.1992
Li, J., Faisal, E., & Al Hariri, A. (2022). Numbers for boys and words for girls? Academic gender stereotypes among chinese parents. Sex Roles, 87, 306–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-022-01317-x
Liu, M., Hu, W., Jiannong, S., & Adey, P. (2010). Gender stereotyping and affective attitudes towards science in chinese secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 379–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802595847
Lynn, M., & Snyder, C. R. (2002). Uniqueness seeking. Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 395–410). Oxford University Press.
Marin, T. J., & Miller, G. E. (2013). The interpersonally sensitive disposition and health: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 139(5), 941–984. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030800
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2010). Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 420–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610375557
Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N. M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., Bar-Anan, Y., Bergh, R., Cai, H., Gonsalkorale, K., Kesebir, S., Maliszewski, N., Neto, F., Olli, E., Park, J., Konrad, S., Shiomura, K., Tulbure, B. T., Wiers, R. W., Somogyi, M., & Greenwald, A. G. (2009). National differences in gender–science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10593–10597. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.080992110
Nowicki, E. A., & Lopata, J. (2017). Children’s implicit and explicit gender stereotypes about mathematics and reading ability. Social Psychology of Education, 20(2), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-015-9313-y
Ogihara, Y. (2017). Temporal changes in individualism and their ramification in Japan: Rising individualism and conflicts with persisting collectivism. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 695. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00695
Ogihara, Y. (2021). Direct evidence of the increase in unique names in Japan: The rise of individualism. Current Research in Behavioral Sciences, 2, 100056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbeha.2021.100056
Ogihara, Y., & Dye, A. (2022). Common names decreased in Japan: Further evidence of an increase in individualism. Experimental Results, 3, e5. https://doi.org/10.1017/exp.2021.27
Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3
Plante, I., O’Keefe, P. A., Aronson, J., Fréchette-Simard, C., & Goulet, M. (2019). The interest gap: How gender stereotype endorsement about abilities predicts differences in academic interests. Social Psychology of Education, 22(1), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-018-9472-8
Proudfoot, D., & Kay, A. C. (2023). Communal expectations conflict with autonomy motives: The western drive for autonomy shapes women’s negative responses to positive gender stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 124(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000311
Ramasubramanian, S., Winfield, A., & Riewestahl, E. (2020). Positive stereotypes and counter-stereotypes: Examining their effects on prejudice reduction and favorable intergroup relations. In A. C. Billings, & S. Parrottred Media stereotypes: From ageism to xenophobia (pp. 257–276). Peter Lang Publishing. https://doi.org/10.3726/b15280
Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Glick, P., & Phelan, J. E. (2012). Reactions to vanguards: Advances in backlash theory. In P. G. Devine, & E. A. Plant (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 167–227). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394286-9.00004-4
Schneider, D. J. (2004). The psychology of stereotyping. The Guilford Press.
Sczesny, S., Nater, C., & Eagly, A. H. (2018). Agency and communion: Their implications for gender stereotypes and gender identities. In A. Abele, & B. Wojciszke (Eds.), Agency and communion in social psychology (pp. 103–116). Routledge.
Shih, M., Pittinsky, T. L., & Ambady, N. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10(1), 80–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00111
Shih, M., Ambady, N., Richeson, J. A., Fujita, K., & Gray, H. M. (2002). Stereotype performance boosts: The impact of self-relevance and the manner of stereotype activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 638–647. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.528
Shih, M., Pittinsky, T. L., & Ho, G. C. (2012). Stereotype boost: Positive outcomes from the activation of positive stereotypes. In M. Inzlicht, & T. Schmader (Eds.), Stereotype threat: Theory, process, and application (pp. 141–158). Oxford University Press.
Shih, M., Wout, D. A., & Hambarchyan, M. (2015). Predicting performance outcomes from the manner of stereotype activation and stereotype content. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 6(2), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037707
Shu, Y., Hu, Q., Xu, F., & Bian, L. (2022). Gender stereotypes are racialized: A cross-cultural investigation of gender stereotypes about intellectual talents. Developmental Psychology, 58(7), 1345–1359. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001356
Siy, J. O., & Cheryan, S. (2013). When compliments fail to flatter: American individualism and responses to positive stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030183
Siy, J. O., & Cheryan, S. (2016). Prejudice masquerading as praise: The negative echo of positive stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(7), 941–954. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216649605
Song, J., Zuo, B., Wen, F., & Yan, L. (2017). Math-gender stereotypes and career intentions: An application of expectancy-value theory. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 45(3), 328–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2017.1283680
Song, J., Li, J., Liu, Y., & Ruan, Y. (2021). The attitude of work-oriented and family-oriented chinese women toward the evaluations based on the traditional positive stereotype that women are virtuous. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 653234. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.653234
Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 845–851. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.2065
Steffens, M. C., & Jelenec, P. (2011). Separating implicit gender stereotypes regarding math and language: Implicit ability stereotypes are self-serving for boys and men, but not for girls and women. Sex Roles, 64(5), 324–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9924-x
Todd, A. R., Thiem, K. C., & Neel, R. (2016). Does seeing faces of young black boys facilitate the identification of threatening stimuli? Psychological Science, 27(3), 384–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615624492
Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96(3), 506–520. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.3.506
Triandis, H. C. (2018). Individualism and collectivism. Routledge.
Wilson, J. P., Hugenberg, K., & Rule, N. O. (2017). Racial bias in judgments of physical size and formidability: From size to threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000092
Zhang, R., & Kulich, S. J. (2022). Chinese values. In Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 1–9). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_357-2
The authors would like to thank the editor, Rachael Robnett, and reviewers for their insightful comments and constructive suggestions which significantly improved the paper.
This work was partially supported by the National Social Science Key Program of China (21ASH011), Tianjin Philosophy and Social Science Youth Program (TJJX21-011), and Tianjin Research Innovation Project for Postgraduate Students (2022BKY009). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analyses, the decision to publish, or the preparation of the manuscript. Additionally, the funders had no influence on the interpretation of data and the final conclusions drawn.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants involved in the study.
Consent to publish
The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent to publish.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Z., Zhao, L., Guan, J. et al. The Negative Effects of Positive Gender Stereotypes: Evidence from a Collectivistic Cultural Context. Sex Roles 89, 786–800 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01413-6