Abstract
Given feminist backlash and stigma in society, whether people would publicly say that they are a feminist might depend on their social context, which could have implications for understanding who identifies as a feminist and why, as well as community and coalition-building. We therefore tested whether disclosure of feminist identity varies across interaction contexts and by gender/sex, given some gender/sex-specificities to stigma about feminist identity. In our study, we asked women, men, and nonbinary people who are feminists (N = 640) about their willingness to disclose their feminist identity in eight interaction contexts: immediate family, extended family, friends, partners, work, strangers, anti-feminists, and pro-feminists. Results revealed substantial intra-person contextual variability in feminist identity disclosure, suggesting participants’ decision to disclose their feminist identity varies across contexts. In general, participants were most reluctant to disclose their feminist identity to a stranger, with anti-feminists and work contexts showing the next greatest likelihood to not disclose. Finally, participants were most likely to share their feminist identity with their immediate family, friends, pro-feminist, and romantic partners. We also examined the disclosure pattern for each gender/sex group (women, men, and nonbinary participants). Results emphasize that holding a feminist identity might not necessarily lead to identity disclosure and that disclosure decisions may depend on contextual pressure and gender/sex considerations.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Data Availability
This research was not pre-registered. The data and materials used in the research are available from the corresponding author upon request pending required ethics approvals.
Code Availability
Available from the corresponding author upon request pending required ethics approvals.
References
Alvarez, L., & Pérez-Peña, R. (2016, June 12). Orlando gunman attacks gay nightclub, leaving 50 dead. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/13/us/orlando-nightclub-shooting.html
Anastosopoulos, V., & Desmarais, S. (2015). By name or by deed? Identifying the source of the feminist stigma. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45(4), 226–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12290
Anderson, V. N. (2009). What’s in a label? Judgments of feminist men and feminist women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33(2), 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01490.x
Aparicio-García, M. E., Díaz-Ramiro, E. M., Rubio-Valdehita, S., López-Núñez, M. I., & García-Nieto, I. (2018). Health and well-being of cisgender, transgender and non-binary young people. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(10), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102133
Aronson, P. (2003). Feminists or “postfeminists”?: Young women’s attitudes toward feminism and gender relations. Gender & Society, 17(6), 903–922. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243203257145
Barned, C., Stinzi, A., Mack, D., & O’Doherty, K. C. (2016). To tell or not to tell: A qualitative interview study on disclosure decisions among children with inflammatory bowel disease. Social Science & Medicine, 162, 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.023
Barroso, A. (2020, July 7). 61% of U.S. women say ‘feminist’ describes them well; many see feminism as empowering, polarizing. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/07/07/61-of-u-s-women-say-feminist-describes-them-well-many-see-feminism-as-empowering-polarizing/
Bashir, N. Y., Lockwood, P., Chasteen, A. L., Nadolny, D., & Noyes, I. (2013). The ironic impact of activists: Negative stereotypes reduce social change influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(7), 614–626. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1983
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.
Beatty, J. E., & Kirby, S. L. (2006). Beyond the legal environment: How stigma influences invisible identity groups in the workplace. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 18(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-005-9003-6
Boucher, H. C. (2011). The dialectical self-concept ii: Cross-role and within-role consistency, well-being, self-certainty, and authenticity. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(7), 1251–1271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022110383316
Buschman, J. K., & Lenart, S. (1996). I am not a Feminist, but… College Women, Feminism, and negative experiences. Political Psychology, 17(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791943
Callaghan, M., Cranmer, C., Rowan, M., Siann, G., & Wilson, F. (1999). Feminism in Scotland: Self-identification and stereotypes. Gender and Education, 11(2), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540259920672
Chow, P. K. Y., & Cheng, S. T. (2010). Shame, internalized heterosexism, lesbian identity, and coming out to others: A comparative study of lesbians in mainland China and Hong Kong. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57(1), 92. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017930
Clair, J. A., Beatty, J. E., & Maclean, T. L. (2005). Out of sight but not out of mind: Managing invisible social identities in the workplace. The Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 78–95.
Clark, H. J., Lindner, G., Armistead, L., & Austin, B. J. (2004). Stigma, disclosure, and psychological functioning among HIV-infected and non-infected african-american women. Women & Health, 38(4), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1300/J013v38n04_04
Colleoni, E., Rozza, A., & Arvidsson, A. (2014). Echo chamber or public sphere? Predicting political orientation and measuring political homophily in Twitter using big data. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12084
Cooper, K. M., Gin, L. E., & Brownell, S. E. (2020). Depression as a concealable stigmatized identity: What influences whether students conceal or reveal their depression in undergraduate research experiences? International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00216-5
Cowan, G., Mestlin, M., & Masek, J. (1992). Predictors of feminist self-labeling. Sex Roles, 27(7–8), 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289942
Cross, S. E., Gore, J. S., & Morris, M. L. (2003). The relational-interdependent self-construal, self-concept consistency, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 933. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.933
Czopp, A. M., & Monteith, M. J. (2003). Confronting prejudice (literally): Reactions to confrontations of racial and gender bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(4), 532–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202250923
Dupler, J., Campbell, R., & DeMuth, D. (2010). Exploring men’s intimate relationships (with feminism): Another side of feminist consciousness. McNair Scholar’s Journal, 14(1), 3. https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/mcnair/vol14/iss1/3
Dye, A. K. (2005). Why does everyone think I hate men? The stigma of feminism and developing a feminist identity [Miami University]. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/apexprod/rws_olink/r/1501/10?clear=10&p10_accession_num=miami1133535707
Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75(4), 643–669. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884324
Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M. F., & Buss, A. H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43(4), 522–527. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076760
Follmer, K. B., Sabat, I. E., & Siuta, R. L. (2020). Disclosure of stigmatized identities at work: An interdisciplinary review and agenda for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(2), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2402
Gacusan, C. G. D., Uy, D. M. S., Yu, D. A. B., & Hechanova, M. R. M. (2021). Sexual identity management of GLB emerging adults in social support contexts. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 17(1), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2020.1746724
Goh, J. X., Kort, D. N., Thurston, A. M., Benson, L. R., & Kaiser, C. R. (2019). Does concealing a sexual minority identity prevent exposure to Prejudice? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(8), 1056–1064. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619829065
Goldberg, P. A., Gottesdiener, M., & Abramson, P. R. (1975). Another put-down of women? Perceived attractiveness as a function of support for the feminist movement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(1), 113–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076851
Gundersen, A. B., & Kunst, J. R. (2019). Feminist ≠ feminine? Feminist women are visually masculinized whereas feminist men are feminized. Sex Roles, 80(5), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0931-7
Heppner, W. L., Kernis, M. H., Nezlek, J. B., Foster, J., Lakey, C. E., & Goldman, B. M. (2008). Within-person relationships among daily self-esteem, need satisfaction, and authenticity. Psychological Science, 19(11), 1140–1145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02215.x
Herek, G. M. (2017). Documenting hate crimes in the United States: Some considerations on data sources. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 4, 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000227
Holmgren, L. E., & Hearn, J. (2009). Framing ‘men in feminism’: Theoretical locations, local contexts and practical passings in men’s gender-conscious positionings on gender equality and feminism. Journal of Gender Studies, 18(4), 403–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589230903260076
Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., & Fielding, K. S. (2018). The psychological roots of anti-vaccination attitudes: A 24-nation investigation. Health Psychology, 37(4), 307. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000586
Huddy, L., Neely, F. K., & Lafay, M. R. (2000). Trends: Support for the women’s movement. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(3), 309–350.
Jacobson, M. B., & Koch, W. (1978). Attributed reasons for support of the feminist movement as a function of attractiveness. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 4(2), 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287497
Jenen, J., Winquist, J., Arkkelin, D., & Schuster, K. (2009). Implicit attitudes towards feminism. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 60, 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9514-3
Jones, K. P., & King, E. B. (2014). Managing concealable stigmas at work: A review and multilevel model. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1466–1494. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313515518
Kelly, M. (2015). Feminist identity, collective action, and individual resistance among contemporary U.S. feminists. Women’s Studies International Forum, 48, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2014.10.025
Kelly, M., & Gauchat, G. (2016). Feminist identity, feminist politics: U.S. feminists’ attitudes toward social policies. Sociological Perspectives, 59(4), 855–872. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121415594281
King, E. B., Mohr, J. J., Peddie, C. I., Jones, K. P., & Kendra, M. (2017). Predictors of identity management: An exploratory experience-sampling study of lesbian, gay, and bisexual workers. Journal of Management, 43(2), 476–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314539350
Le Forestier, J. M., Page-Gould, E., Lai, C. K., & Chasteen, A. L. (2022). Subjective identity concealability and the Consequences of fearing identity-based Judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 48(3), 445–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211010038
Leaper, C., & Arias, D. M. (2011). College women’s feminist identity: A multidimensional analysis with implications for coping with sexism. Sex Roles, 64(7), 475–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9936-1
Lenth, R., Singmann, H., Love, J., Buerkner, P., & Herve, M. (2019). Package ‘emmeans.’ https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans
Liss, M., O’Connor, C., Morosky, E., & Crawford, M. (2001). What makes a feminist? Predictors and correlates of feminist social identity in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25(2), 124–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.00014
Losty, M., & O’Connor, J. (2018). Falling outside of the ‘nice little binary box’: A psychoanalytic exploration of the non-binary gender identity. Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 32(1), 40–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/02668734.2017.1384933
Marwell, G., & Oliver, P. (1993). The critical mass in collective action. Cambridge University Press.
Meidlinger, P. C., & Hope, D. A. (2014). Differentiating disclosure and concealment in measurement of outness for sexual minorities: The Nebraska Outness Scale. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 1(4), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000080
Mohr, J., & Fassinger, R. (2000). Measuring dimensions of lesbian and gay male experience. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 33(2), 66–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2000.12068999
Moore, A., & Stathi, S. (2019). The impact of feminist stereotypes and sexual identity on feminist self-identification and collective action. The Journal of Social Psychology, 160(3), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2019.1644280
Myaskovsky, L., & Wittig, M. A. (1997). Predictors of feminist social identity among college women. Sex Roles, 37(11), 861. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02936344
Pachankis, J. E., & Bernstein, L. B. (2012). An etiological model of anxiety in young gay men: From early stress to public self-consciousness. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 13(2), 107. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024594
Ramsey, L. R., Haines, M. E., Hurt, M. M., Nelson, J. A., Turner, D. L., Liss, M., & Erchull, M. J. (2007). Thinking of others: Feminist identification and the perception of others’ beliefs. Sex Roles, 56(9), 611–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9205-5
Redford, L., Howell, J. L., Meijs, M. H. J., & Ratliff, K. A. (2018). Implicit and explicit evaluations of feminist prototypes predict feminist identity and behavior. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216630193
Robnett, R. D., & Anderson, K. J. (2017). Feminist identity among women and men from four ethnic groups. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 23(1), 134–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000095
Roy, R. E., Weibust, K. S., & Miller, C. T. (2009). If she’s a feminist it must not be discrimination: The power of the feminist label on observers’ attributions about a sexist event. Sex Roles, 60(5), 422–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9556-6
Rudman, L. A., & Fairchild, K. (2007). The F word: Is feminism incompatible with beauty and romance? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(2), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00346.x
Rudman, L. A., Mescher, K., & Moss-Racusin, C. A. (2013). Reactions to gender egalitarian men: Perceived feminization due to stigma-by-association. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(5), 572–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430212461160
Ryan, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (2019). Toward a social psychology of authenticity: Exploring within-person variation in autonomy, congruence, and genuineness using self-determination theory. Review of General Psychology, 23(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000162
Sabat, I., Trump, R., & King, E. (2014). Individual, interpersonal, and contextual factors relating to disclosure decisions of lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 1(4), 431. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000061
Schlegel, R. J., & Hicks, J. A. (2011). The true self and psychological health: Emerging evidence and future directions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(12), 989–1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00401.x
Schlegel, R. J., Hicks, J. A., Arndt, J., & King, L. A. (2009). Thine own self: True self-concept accessibility and meaning in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(2), 473–490. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014060
Schmitz, R. M., & Tyler, K. A. (2018). Contextual constraints and choices: Strategic identity management among LGBTQ youth. Journal of LGBT Youth, 15(3), 212–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361653.2018.1466754
Smith, R., Rossetto, K., & Peterson, B. L. (2008). A meta-analysis of disclosure of one’s HIV-positive status, stigma and social support. Aids Care, 20(10), 1266–1275. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540120801926977
Stotzer, R. L. (2009). Violence against transgender people: A review of United States data. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14(3), 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.01.006
Swirsky, J. M., & Angelone, D. J. (2014). Femi-nazis and bra burning crazies: A qualitative evaluation of contemporary beliefs about feminism. Current Psychology, 33(3), 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-014-9208-7
Szymanski, D. M. (2004). Relations among dimensions of feminism and internalized heterosexism in lesbians and bisexual women. Sex Roles, 51(3), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000037759.33014.55
Tausch, N., Becker, J., Spears, R., Christ, O., & Saab, R. (2011). Explaining radical group behaviour: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and non-normative collective action [Data set]. In Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 101, Issue 1, pp. 129–148). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022728
Twenge, J. M., & Zucker, A. N. (1999). What is a feminist?: Evaluations and stereotypes in closed- and open-ended responses. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23(3), 591–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00383.x
Ünal Abaday, D. (2015). Exploring women columnists “in between” positionality in public sphere: A study into narratives on feminist identity in contemporary Turkey [Thesis, Bilkent University]. http://repository.bilkent.edu.tr/handle/11693/18609
Wheat, K., Brohan, E., Henderson, C., & Thornicroft, G. (2010). Mental illness and the workplace: Conceal or reveal? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 103(3), 83–86. https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.2009.090317
Williams, R., & Wittig, M. A. (1997). I’m not a feminist, but… factors contributing to the discrepancy between pro-feminist orientation and feminist social identity. Sex Roles, 37(11–12), 885–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02936345
Zucker, A. N. (2004). Disavowing social identities: What it means when women say, “I’m not a feminist, but …. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28(4), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00159.x
Cottrell, C. A., & Neuberg, S. L. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to “prejudice”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(5), 770–789. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.770
Glasman, L. R., & Albarracín, D. (2006). Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: A meta-analysis of the attitude–behavior relation. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 778–822. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.778
Acknowledgements
This research was undertaken, in part, thanks to funding from the Canada 150 Research Chairs program to Sari van Anders.
Funding
This research was funded by the Canada 150 Research Chairs program to Sari M. van Anders.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception, design, material preparation, data collection, and analysis. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Eun Ju Son and Sari van Anders. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethics Approval
This study was approved by Queen’s University (Ethics Clearance ID: GPSYC-1053-21).
Consent
All participants provided informed consent.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Son, E.J., Harris, E.A. & van Anders, S.M. It Depends! Contextual Variability in Feminist Identity Disclosure Among Binary and Nonbinary Individuals. Sex Roles 88, 424–441 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01363-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01363-z