Skip to main content
Log in

Picturing Sexual Agency: A Visual Content Analysis of Adults’ Sexual Stereotypes of Young Women

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 2015, Bay-Cheng proposed that sexual stereotypes of young women had evolved into four types: sexually abstinent and in-control Virgins; sexually experienced and in-control Agents; sexually experienced and out-of-control Sluts; and sexually abstinent and out-of-control Losers. Bay-Cheng also speculated that perceptions of the four types would align with the Stereotype Content Model’s (Fiske et al., 2002) dimensions of competence-incompetence and warmth-coolness. We tested this through a fine-grained visual content analysis of 833 images selected by 175 participants (aged 19–64) to represent the four sexual types. We coded each image’s composition (e.g., appearance, pose, attire, setting, race) for indicators of the depicted woman’s competence, incompetence, warmth, and coolness. Analyses indicated that images representing both Virgins and Agents included more visual markers of competence and fewer markers of incompetence than Sluts and Losers; however, Agents were distinct from Virgins in having significantly more markers of coolness. Images of Sluts had more visual markers of coolness than Virgins and Losers, but significantly fewer markers of warmth than Virgins and Agents. Images of Losers were distinct in displaying the least competence and the most incompetence compared to the other sexual types. In a separate analysis of race, Losers were also disproportionately represented by Asian Pacific Islander Desi American women whereas Black women and women of mixed or ambiguous race were disproportionately selected as Agents. Findings indicate that although sanctions against sexually active young women (i.e., Agents and Sluts) may be receding, young women who are involuntarily abstinent may be vulnerable to ridicule.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

The datasets analyzed for the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code Availability

The codebook used for the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Rebecca No for her assistance with coding and Ziqiang Chen and Kathleen Preston for their assistance with analyses.

Funding

This research was not supported through external funds.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study design and conceptualization. Material preparation and data collection were performed by Laina Y. Bay-Cheng. Codebook development and coding procedure were led by Janna L. Kim. Coding was performed by Janna L. Kim and Hannah G. Ginn. Dataset management was led by Hannah G. Ginn. Janna L. Kim and Laina Y. Bay-Cheng conducted data analyses. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Janna L. Kim and Laina Y. Bay-Cheng. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janna L. Kim.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

This research was approved by the University at Buffalo’s Institutional Review Board. This is original work that has not been previously published and is not under consideration at another journal.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Research Involving Human Participants

This research was approved by the University at Buffalo’s Institutional Review Board for research involving human participants. The research did not involve non-human animals.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, J.L., Bay-Cheng, L.Y. & Ginn, H.G. Picturing Sexual Agency: A Visual Content Analysis of Adults’ Sexual Stereotypes of Young Women. Sex Roles 87, 565–582 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-022-01336-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-022-01336-8

Keywords

Navigation