Abstract
Understanding the stalled gender revolution requires understanding how couples’ domestic arrangements are related to their reports of relationship quality. Research, however, is equivocal on whether egalitarian housework arrangements are optimal for both men’s and women’s relationship quality (e.g., perceived equity and relationship satisfaction). Inconsistent findings may result from the fact that conventional approaches to measuring housework divisions do not account for how couples construct their domestic arrangements. This study reconceptualizes the division of routine housework as a count of tasks one shares equally with their partner, and compares this measure to a conventional measure of male partner’s proportion of overall housework in predicting relationship quality. Regression analyses are conducted for men and women in mixed-sex, married and cohabiting unions from two datasets: the 1992–1994 wave of the U.S. National Survey of Families and Households (N = 10,498) and the 2006 Marital and Relationship Survey (N = 1,065). Results indicate substantial variability in the degree of task sharing in couples. Consistent with social exchange theory, men’s overall proportion of housework is positively associated with women’s relationship quality but negatively associated with men’s relationship quality. Number of equally shared tasks, however, is positively associated with both men’s and women’s relationship quality, supporting an equity perspective. Overall, findings indicate that egalitarian arrangements where partners’ share equally in the completion of housework tasks are the most mutually beneficial arrangement, resulting in the highest levels of relationship quality for both men and women.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of Data and Material
The National Survey of Families and Households is publicly available here: The Marital and Relationship Survey (MARS) was supported by the Initiative in Population Research at The Ohio State University (Daniel T. Lichter, principal investigator). Data access is available upon request from the primary investigator.
Code Availability
Stata code is available upon request.
References
Adams, S. J. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 267–99). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60108-2
Allison, P. (2012). When can you safely ignore multicollinearity. Statistical Horizons, 5(1), 1–2.
Amato, P. R., Johnson, D. R., Booth, A., & Rogers, S. J. (2003). Continuity and change in marital quality between 1980 and 2000. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00001.x
Barstad, A. (2014). Equality is bliss? Relationship quality and the gender division of household labor. Journal of Family Issues, 35(7), 972–992. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X14522246
Baxter, J., & Western, M. (1998). Satisfaction with housework: Examining the paradox. Sociology, 32(1), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038598032001007
Bianchi, S. M., Sayer, L. C., Milkie, M. A., & Robinson, J. (2012). Housework: Who did, does or will do it, and how much does it matter? Social Forces, 91(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sos120
Blair, S. L., & Johnson, M. (1992). Wives’ perceptions of the fairness of the division of household labor: The intersection of housework and ideology. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54(3), 570–581. https://doi.org/10.2307/353243
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.
Blom, N., Kraaykamp, G., & Verbakel, E. (2017). Couples’ division of employment and household chores and relationship satisfaction: A test of the specialization and equity hypotheses. European Sociological Review, 33(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcw057
Bünning, M. (2015). What happens after the ‘daddy months’? Fathers’ involvement in paid work, childcare, and housework after taking parental leave in Germany. European Sociological Review, 31(6), 738–748. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcv072
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (n.d.). Table A-7. Time spent in primary activities by married mothers and fathers with own household children under 18 by employment status of self and spouse and age of youngest child, average for the combined years [Table]. U.S. Department of Labor, https://www.bls.gov/tus/#tables
Canary, D. J., & Stafford, L. (1992). Relational maintenance strategies and equity in marriage. Communications Monographs, 59(3), 243–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376268
Carlson, D. L., Miller, A. J., & Rudd, S. (2020). Division of housework, communication, and couples’ relationship satisfaction. Socius. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023120924805
Carlson, D. L., Miller, A. J., Sassler, S., & Hanson, S. (2016). The gendered division of housework and couples’ sexual relationships: A reexamination. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78(4), 975–995. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12313
Carlson, D. L., Miller, A. J., & Sassler, S. (2018). Stalled for whom? change in the division of particular housework tasks and their consequences for middle- to low-income couples. Socius. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023118765867
Carlson, D. L., Petts, R. J., & Pepin, J. R. (2021). Flexplace work and partnered fathers’ time in housework and childcare. Men and Masculinities, 24(4), 547–570.
Carlson, D. L., & Soller, B. (2019). Sharing’s more fun for everyone? gender attitudes, sexual self-efficacy, and sexual frequency. Journal of Marriage and Family, 81(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12524
Charbonneau, A., Lachance-Grzela, M., & Bouchard, G. (2019). Housework allocation, negotiation strategies, and relationship satisfaction in cohabiting emerging adult heterosexual couples. Sex Roles, 81(5), 290–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0998-1
Cherlin, A. J. (2004). The Deinstitutionalization of American Marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(4), 848–861. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00058.x
Chong, A., & Mickelson, K. D. (2016). Perceived fairness and relationship satisfaction during the transition to parenthood: The mediating role of spousal support. Journal of Family Issues, 37(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X13516764
Collins, C. (2019). Making motherhood work. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691185156
Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 1208–1233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01208.x
DeMaris, A. (2010). The 20-year trajectory of marital quality in enduring marriages: Does equity matter? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(4), 449–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510363428
DeMaris, A., & Longmore, M. A. (1996). Ideology, power, and equity: Testing competing explanations for the perception of fairness in household labor. Social Forces, 74(3), 1043–1071. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/74.3.1043
Dernberger, B. N., & Pepin, J. R. (2020). Gender flexibility, but not equality: Young adults' division of labor preferences. Sociological Science, 7, 36–56. https://doi.org/10.15195/v7.a2
Donaghue, N., & Fallon, B. J. (2003). Gender-role self-stereotyping and the relationship between equity and satisfaction in close relationships. Sex Roles, 48(5), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022869203900
England, P. (2010). The gender revolution: Uneven and stalled. Gender & Society, 24(2), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243210361475
England, P., Levine, A., & Mishel, E. (2020). Progress toward gender equality in the United States has slowed or stalled. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(13), 6990–6997. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1918891117
Frisco, M. L., & Williams, K. (2003). Perceived Housework Equity, Marital Happiness, And Divorce in Dual-Earner Households. Journal of Family Issues, 24(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X02238520
Gager, C. T. (1998). The role of valued outcomes, justifications, and comparison referents in perceptions of fairness among dual-earner couples. Journal of Family Issues, 19(5), 622–648.
Gager, C. T., & Yabiku, S. T. (2010). Who Has The Time? The Relationship Between Household Labor Time and Sexual Frequency. Journal of Family Issues, 31(2), 135–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X09348753
Gerson, K. (2010). The unfinished revolution: Coming of age in a new era of gender, work, and family. Oxford University Press.
Giddens, A. (1992). The Transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. John Wiley & Sons.
Gillespie, B. J., Peterson, G., & Lever, J. (2019). Gendered perceptions of fairness in housework and shared expenses: Implications for relationship satisfaction and sex frequency. Plos One, 14(3), Article e0214204. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214204
Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce?: The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Psychology Press.
Greenstein, T. N. (1996). Gender ideology and perceptions of the fairness of the division of household labor: Effects on marital quality. Social Forces, 74(3), 1029–1042. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/74.3.1029
Hochschild, A., & Machung, A. (1989). The second shift: Working families and the revolution at home. Penguin.
Homans, G. (1974). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. Harcourt Brace. (Original work published 1961).
Hu, Y., & Yucel, D. (2018). What fairness? Gendered division of housework and family life satisfaction across 30 countries. European Sociological Review, 34(1), 92–105. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcx085
Kamo, Y. (1993). Determinants of marital satisfaction: A comparison of the United States and Japan. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10(4), 551–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407593104005
Kornrich, S., Brines, J., & Leupp, K. (2013). Egalitarianism, housework, and sexual frequency in marriage. American Sociological Review, 78(1), 26–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412472340
Lavee, Y., & Katz, R. (2002). Divison of labor, perceived fairness, and marital quality: The effect of gender ideology. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00027.x
Lennon, M. C., & Rosenfield, S. (1994). Relative fairness and the division of housework: The importance of options. American Journal of Sociology, 100(2), 506–531. https://doi.org/10.1086/230545
Lichter, D. T., & Carmalt, J. H. (2009). Religion and marital quality among low-income couples. Social Science Research, 38(1), 168–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.07.003
Litzinger, S., & Gordon, K. C. (2005). Exploring relationships among communication, sexual satisfaction, and marital satisfaction. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 31(5), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926230591006719
Lively, K. J., Steelman, L. C., & Powell, B. (2010). Equity, emotion, and household division of labor response. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73(4), 358–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272510389012
Long, J. S., & Mustillo, S. A. (2021). Using predictions and marginal effects to compare groups in regression models for binary outcomes. Sociological Methods & Research, 50(3), 1284–1320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124118799374
Lyttelton, T., Zang, E., & Musick, K. (2022). Telecommuting and gender inequalities in parents’ paid and unpaid work before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Marriage and Family, 84(1), 230–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12810
Meeks, B. S., Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (1998). Communication, love and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(6), 755–773. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407598156003
McDonnell, C., & Luke, N. (2019, April 11). When is housework not a chore? Exploring variation in happiness during housework activities [Poster presentation], Population Association of America Annual Meeting, Austin, TX.
Mirowsky, J. (1985). Depression and marital power: An equity model. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 557–592. https://doi.org/10.1086/228314
Newkirk, K., Perry-Jenkins, M., & Sayer, A. G. (2017). Division of household and childcare labor and relationship conflict among low-income new parents. Sex Roles, 76(5–6), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0604-3
Noonan, M. (2013). The impact of social policy on the gendered division of housework. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 5(2), 124–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12008
Nordenmark, M., & Nyman, C. (2003). Fair or unfair? Perceived fairness of household division of labour and gender equality among women and men: The Swedish case. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 10(2), 181–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506803010002004
Pedulla, D. S., & Thébaud, S. (2015). Can we finish the revolution? Gender, work-family ideals, and institutional constraint. American Sociological Review, 80(1), 116–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122414564008
Pepin, J. R., & Cotter, D. A. (2018). Separating spheres? Diverging trends in youth’s gender attitudes about work and family. Journal of Marriage and Family, 80(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12434
Petts, R. J., Carlson, D. L., & Knoester, C. (2020). If I [take] leave, will you stay? Paternity leave and relationship stability. Journal of Social Policy, 49(4), 829–849. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279419000928
Petts, R. J., Carlson, D. L., & Knoester, C. (2021). Fathers’ time off work after the birth of a child and relationship dissolution among socioeconomically disadvantaged us families. Sociological Focus, 54(3), 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2021.1921641
Petts, R. J., & Knoester, C. (2018). Paternity leave-taking and father engagement. Journal of Marriage and Family, 80(5), 1144–1162. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12494
Petts, R. J., & Knoester, C. (2020). Are parental relationships improved if fathers take time off of work after the birth of a child? Social Forces, 98(3), 1223–1256. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soz014
Risman, B. J. (1999). Gender vertigo: Afamilies in transition. Yale University Press.
Ruppanner, L., Brandén, M., & Turunen, J. (2018). Does unequal housework lead to divorce? Evidence from Sweden. Sociology, 52(1), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516674664
Sassler, S., & Miller, A. (2017). Cohabitation nation: Gender, class, and the remaking of relationships. University of California Press.
Scarborough, W. J., Sin, R., & Risman, B. (2018). Attitudes and the stalled gender revolution: Egalitarianism, traditionalism, and ambivalence from 1977 through 2016. Gender & Society, 33(2), 173–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243218809604
Schieman, S., Ruppanner, L., & Milkie, M. A. (2018). Who helps with homework? Parenting inequality and relationship quality among employed mothers and fathers. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 39, 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-017-9545-4
Sprecher, S. (2001). Equity and social exchange in dating couples: Associations with satisfaction, commitment, and stability. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(3), 599–613. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00599.x
Sprecher, S., Metts, S., Burleson, B., Hatfield, E., & Thompson, A. (1995). Domains of expressive interaction in intimate relationships: Associations with satisfaction and commitment. Family Relations, 44(2), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.2307/584810
Sweet, J. A., & Bumpass, L. L. (1996). The national survey of families and households - waves 1 and 2: Data description and documentation. Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison. http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/nsfh/home.htm
Thompson, L. (1991). Family work: Women’s sense of fairness. Journal of Family Issues, 12(2), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251391012002003
Walster, E. G., Walster, W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Allyn and Bacon.
Wilcox, W. B., & Nock, S. L. (2006). What’s love got to do with it? Equality, equity, commitment and women’s marital quality. Social Forces, 84(3), 1321–1345. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0076
Wilkie, J. R., Ferree, M. M., & Ratcliff, K. S. (1998). Gender and fairness: Marital satisfaction in two-earner couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60(3), 577–594. https://doi.org/10.2307/353530
Yogev, S., & Brett, J. (1985). Perceptions of the division of housework and child care and marital satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 47(3), 609–618. https://doi.org/10.2307/352262
Zamir, O., Gewirtz, A., Labella, M., DeGarmo, D. S., & Snyder, J. (2018). Experiential avoidance, dyadic interaction and relationship quality in the lives of veterans and their partners. Journal of Family Issues, 39(5), 1191–1212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X17698182
Funding
There is no funding to report for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
This study has exempt status for human subjects research.
Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests
There are no conflicts of interest for this study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carlson, D.L. Reconceptualizing the Gendered Division of Housework: Number of Shared Tasks and Partners’ Relationship Quality. Sex Roles 86, 528–543 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-022-01282-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-022-01282-5