Abstract
While previous research has established the existence of an orgasm gap between men and women, research exploring this phenomenon within dyadic samples of mixed-sex couples has been limited. The current study aims to investigate the impact of this orgasm disparity on novel sexual outcomes for couples, including desire and expectation for orgasm. We conducted secondary data analyses on a sample of 104 sexually active mixed-sex couples using an online Qualtrics panel (Mage = 43.9 years; 94.2% heterosexual; 79.3% White). Cisgender men and women within the couple reported on their sexual satisfaction, orgasm frequency, desired orgasm frequency, expectation for how often people should orgasm (“orgasm expectation”), and perceptions of their partner’s orgasm frequency. An orgasm gap emerged, and men significantly underreported the size of the orgasm gap in their relationships. In a dyadic path model, men’s and women’s own orgasm frequency positively predicted their desire and expectation for orgasm. Additionally, women’s orgasm frequency predicted men’s orgasm expectation. This relationship between orgasm frequencies and expectancies may partially explain women’s lower orgasm importance compared to men. A cycle of orgasm inequality within relationships may be perpetuated when women who experience less frequent orgasms lower their desire and expectation for orgasm. Sex educators, activists, and therapists should work to improve entitlement to sexual pleasure and orgasm, particularly for women who wish to increase their orgasm frequency.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Availability of Data and Material
Data and materials for this study can be found at https://osf.io/btcn2 and https://osf.io/mtkqa.
References
Armstrong, E. A., England, P., & Fogarty, A. C. K. (2012). Accounting for women’s orgasm and sexual enjoyment in college hookups and relationships. American Sociological Review, 77(3), 435–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412445802
Babin, E. A. (2013). An examination of predictors of nonverbal and verbal communication of pleasure during sex and sexual satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(3), 270–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512454523
Bandura, A., & National Institution of Mental Health. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1985-98423-000
Blumenstock, S. M. (2021). Expectations and sexual desire in romantic relationships: An experimental investigation of pleasure and emotional closeness expectancies among young adults. The Journal of Sex Research, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2021.1991260
Braun, V., Gavey, N., & Mcphillips, K. (2003). The “fair deal”? Unpacking accounts of reciprocity in heterosex. Sexualities, 6(2), 237–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460703006002005
Byers, E. S. (2005). Relationship satisfaction and sexual satisfaction: A longitudinal study of individuals in long-term relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 42(2), 113–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490509552264
Byers, E. S., Henderson, J., & Hobson, K. M. (2009). University students’ definitions of sexual abstinence and having sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(5), 665–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9289-6
Chadwick, S. B., Francisco, M., & van Anders, S. M. (2019). When orgasms do not equal pleasure: Accounts of “bad” orgasm experiences during consensual sexual encounters. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(8), 2435–2459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01527-7
Chadwick, S. B., & van Anders, S. M. (2017). Do Women’s Orgasms Function as a Masculinity Achievement for Men? Journal of Sex Research, 54(9), 1141–1152. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1283484
Chadwick, S. B., & van Anders, S. M. (2022). Orgasm coercion and negative relationship and psychological outcomes: The role of gender, sexual identity, perpetration tactics, and perceptions of the perpetrator’s intentions. Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02162-x
Cultice, R. A., Sanchez, D. T., & Albuja, A. F. (2021). Sexual Growth Mindsets and Rejection Sensitivity in Sexual Satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 0(0), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211054390
Davison, S. L., Bell, R. J., LaChina, M., Holden, S. L., & Davis, S. R. (2009). The relationship between self-reported sexual satisfaction and general well-being in women. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 6(10), 2690–2697. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01406.x
Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). W. H. Freeman.
Fahs, B. (2011). Performing sex: The making and unmaking of women’s erotic lives. State University of New York Press.
Frederick, D. A., John, S., Kate, H., Garcia, J. R., & Lloyd, E. A. (2018). Differences in orgasm frequency among gay, lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual men and women in a U.S. national sample. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(1), 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0939-z
Garcia, J. R., Lloyd, E. A., Wallen, K., & Fisher, H. E. (2014). Variation in orgasm occurrence by sexual orientation in a sample of U.S. singles. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 11(11), 2645–2652. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12669
Gérard, M., Berry, M., Shtarkshall, R. A., Amsel, R., & Binik, Y. M. (2021). Female multiple orgasm: An exploratory internet-based survey. The Journal of Sex Research, 58(2), 206–221. https://doi-org.proxy.libraries.rutgers.edu/10.1080/00224499.2020.1743224
Goldey, K. L., Posh, A. R., Bell, S. N., & van Anders, S. M. (2016). Defining pleasure: A focus group study of solitary and partnered sexual pleasure in queer and heterosexual women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 2137–2154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0704-8
Gusakova, S., Conley, T. D., Piemonte, J. L., & Matsick, J. L. (2020). The role of women’s orgasm goal pursuit in women’s orgasm occurrence. Personality and Individual Differences, 155, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109628
Haavio-Mannila, E., & Kontula, O. (1997). Correlates of increased sexual satisfaction. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26, 399–419. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024591318836
Haning, R. V., O’Keefe, S. L., Randall, E. J., Kommor, M. J., Baker, E., & Wilson, R. (2007). Intimacy, orgasm likelihood, and conflict predict sexual satisfaction in heterosexual male and female respondents. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 33(2), 93–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926230601098449.
Hogben, M., & Byrne, D. (1998). Using social learning theory to explain individual differences in human sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 35(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499809551917
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Hudson, W. W., Harrison, D. F., & Crosscup, P. C. (1981). A short-form scale to measure sexual discord in dyadic relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 17(2), 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498109551110
Jagose, A. (2010). Counterfeit pleasures: Fake orgasm and queer agency. Textual Practice, 24, 517–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502361003690849
Jones, A. C., Robinson, W. D., & Seedall, R. B. (2018). The role of sexual communication in couples’ sexual outcomes: A dyadic path analysis. Journal of Marital Family Therapy, 44, 606–623. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12282
Kashy, D. A., & Kenny, D. A. (2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 451–477). Cambridge University Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2000-07611-017
Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., & Gebhard, P. H. (1953). Sexual behavior in the human female. Saunders.
Klein, V., & Conley, T. D. (2021). The role of gendered entitlement in understanding inequality in the bedroom. Social Psychological and Personality Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211053564
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2010-18801-000
Kontula, O., & Miettinen, A. (2016). Determinants of female sexual orgasms. Socioaffective Neuroscience & Psychology, 25(6). https://doi.org/10.3402/snp.v6.31624
Leonhardt, N. D., Willoughby, B. J., Busby, D. M., Yorgason, J. B., & Holmes, E. K. (2018). The significance of the female orgasm: A nationally representative, dyadic study of newlyweds’ orgasm experience. Journal of Sex Medicine, 15(8), 1140–1148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.05.018
Litzinger, S., & Gordon, K. C. (2005). Exploring relationships among communication, sexual satisfaction, and marital satisfaction. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 31(5), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926230591006719
Lloyd, E. A. (2005). The case of the female orgasm: Bias in the science of evolution. Harvard University Press.
Lydon, J. E., Fitzsimons, G. M., & Naidoo, L. (2003). Devaluation versus enhancement of attractive alternatives: A critical test using the calibration paradigm. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(3), 349–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0146167202250202
Lydon, J. E., Meana, M., Sepinwall, D., Richards, N., & Mayman, S. (1999). The commitment calibration hypothesis: When do people devalue attractive alternatives? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(2), 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0146167299025002002
Mahar, E. A., Mintz, L. B., & Akers, B. M. (2020). Orgasm equality: Scientific findings and societal implications. Current Sexual Health Reports, 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-020-00237-9
Mark, K., Herbenick, D., Fortenberry, D., Sanders, S., Reece, M., Regan, P. C., et al. (2014). The object of sexual desire: Examining the “what” in “what do you desire.” The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 11, 2709–2719. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12683
Matsick, J. L., Conley, T. D., & Moors, A. C. (2016). The science of female orgasms: Pleasing female partners in casual and long-term relationships. In K. Aumer (Ed.), The psychology of love and hate in intimate relationships (pp. 47–63). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39277-6_4
McClelland, S. I. (2010). Intimate justice: A critical analysis of sexual satisfaction. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(9), 663–680. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00293.x
McClelland, S. I. (2011). Who is the “self” in self reports of sexual satisfaction? Research and policy implications. Sexual Research Social Policy, 8, 304–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-011-0067-9
McNulty, J. K., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Expectancy confirmation in appraisals of marital interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(6), 764–775. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202289006
Michalos, A. C. (1985). Multiple discrepancies theory (MDT). Social Indicators Research, 16, 347–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00333288
Mintz, L. B. (2017). Becoming cliterate: Why orgasm equality matters - and how to get it. HarperOne.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). 1998–2017. Mplus user’s guide. Muthén & Muthén. https://www.statmodel.com/
Nagoski, E. (2015). Come as you are: The surprising new science that will transform your sex life. Simon and Schuster. https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Come-as-You-Are/Emily-Nagoski/9781476762111
Ott, M. A., Millstein, S. G., Ofner, S., & Halpern-Felsher, B. L. (2006). Greater expectations: Adolescents’ positive motivations for sex. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 38(2), 84–89. https://doi.org/10.1363/3808406
Pascoal, P. M., Narciso, I. D. S. B., & Pereira, N. M. (2014). What is sexual satisfaction? Thematic analysis of lay people’s definitions. Journal of Sex Research, 51(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.815149
Pavličev, M., & Wagner, G. (2016). The evolutionary origin of female orgasm. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution, 326(6), 326–337. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.22690
Peterson, Z. D., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (2007). What is sex and why does it matter? A motivational approach to exploring individuals’ definitions of sex. Journal of Sex Research, 44(3), 256–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490701443932
Piemonte, J. L., Conley, T. D., & Gusakova, S. (2019). Orgasm, gender, and responses to heterosexual casual sex. Personality and Individual Differences, 151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.06.030
Puts, D. A., Dawood, K., & Welling, L. L. M. (2012). Why women have orgasms: An evolutionary analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(5), 1127–1143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9967-x
Ragsdale, K., Bersamin, M. M., Schwartz, S. J., Zamboanga, B. L., Kerrick, M. R., & Grube, J. W. (2014). Development of sexual expectancies among adolescents: Contributions by parents, peers and the media. The Journal of Sex Research, 51(5), 551–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.753025
Regan, P. C., & Bersched, E. (1996). Beliefs about the state, goals, and objects of sexual desire. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 22(2), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926239608404915
Salisbury, C. M. A., & Fisher, W. A. (2014). “Did you come?” A qualitative exploration of gender differences in beliefs, experiences, and concerns regarding female orgasm occurrence during heterosexual sexual interactions. The Journal of Sex Research, 51(6), 616–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.838934
Schmader, T., Major, B., & Gramzow, R. H. (2001). Coping with ethnic stereotypes in the academic domain: Perceived injustice and psychological disengagement. Journal of Social Issues, 57(1), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00203
Shirazi, T., Renfro, K. J., Lloyd, E., & Wallen, K. (2018). Women’s experience of orgasm during intercourse: Question semantics affect women’s reports and men’s estimates of orgasm occurrence. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47, 605–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1102-6
Sprecher, S. (2002). Sexual satisfaction in premarital relationships: Associations with satisfaction, love, commitment, and stability. The Journal of Sex Research, 39(3), 190–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490209552141
Wade, L. D., Kremer, E. C., & Brown, J. (2005). The incidental orgasm: The presence of clitoral knowledge and the absence of orgasm for women. Women and Health, 42, 117–138. https://doi.org/10.1300/J013v42n01_07
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
Willis, M., Jozkowski, K. N., Lo, W. J., & Sanders, S. A. (2018). Are women’s orgasms hindered by phallocentric imperatives? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47, 1565–1576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1149-z
Young, M., Denny, G., Luquis, R., & Young, T. (1998). Correlates of sexual satisfaction in marriage. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 7(2), 115–127. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1998-12452-002
Wetzel, G. M. & Sanchez, D. T. (2022). Heterosexual young adults’ experience with and perceptions of the orgasm gap: A mixed methods approach. Psychology of Women Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843221076410
Funding
No funding was received for conducting this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Committee Approval
This study was approved by the Rutgers University Institutional Review Board.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wetzel, G.M., Cultice, R.A. & Sanchez, D.T. Orgasm Frequency Predicts Desire and Expectation for Orgasm: Assessing the Orgasm Gap within Mixed-Sex Couples. Sex Roles 86, 456–470 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-022-01280-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-022-01280-7
Keywords
- Orgasm gap
- Female orgasm
- Sexual satisfaction
- Sexuality
- Couples
- Sexual pleasure
- Sexual desire
- Close relationships