Abstract
Very little is known about viewers’ attitudes toward sexualized portrayals of men on social media platforms. Using an experimental methodology, the present study investigated the effect of a sexualized versus non-sexualized Tinder profile of a young White man on college students’ perceptions of the profile owner. The impact of multiple aspects of sexualization including a self-sexualizing self-description on one’s profile (i.e., interested in casual sex) as well as a sexualizing appearance (i.e., muscular and shirtless) were investigated. U.S. college students (N = 567) viewed a mock Tinder profile and then rated the target’s competence, social appeal, physical attractiveness, and likelihood of engaging in risky sexual behavior. Findings indicate a young White man with a sexualized self-presentation on a dating app may be perceived as less competent and as a sexual risk-taker. These results contribute to the small body of research documenting the impact of self-sexualization on a dating app profile.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Availability of Data and Material
Participants were not informed in the consent process that aggregated data would be shared; therefore, data are not available to interested researchers. However, the authors will provide the data to the journal for data verification purposes.
References
American Psychological Association. (2007). American Psychological Association Task Force on the sexualization of girls: Report of the APA task force on the sexualization of girls. American Psychological Association. www.apa.org/pi/wpo/sexualization.html
Anderson, M., Vogels, E. A., & Turner, E. (2020, February 6). The virtues and downsides of online dating. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2020/02/06/the-virtues-and-downsides-of-online-dating/
Bazzini, D. G., Pepper, A., Swofford, R., & Cochran, K. (2015). How healthy are health magazines? A comparative content analysis of cover captions and images of Women’s and Men’s Health magazine. Sex Roles, 72(5), 198–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0456-2
Bernard, P., Gervais, S. J., Allen, J., Campomizzi, S., & Klein, O. (2012). Integrating sexual objectification with object versus person recognition: The sexualized-body-inversion hypothesis. Psychological Science, 23(5), 469–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611434748
Bilton, N. (2014, October 29). Tinder, the fast-growing dating app, taps an age-old truth. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/30/fashion/tinder-the-fast-growing-dating-app-taps-an-age-old-truth.html
Carrotte, E. R., Prichard, I., & Lim, M. S. C. (2017). "Fitspiration" on social media: A content analysis of gendered images. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(3), Article e95–e95. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6368
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Crescenzi, L., Arau¨na, N., & Tortajada, I. (2013). Privacy, self-disclosure and self-image of Spanish teenagers on social networking sites. The case of Fotolog. Communication & Society, 26(2), 65–78. https://dadun.unav.edu/handle/10171/35454
Daniels, E. A. (2016). Sexiness on social media: The social costs of using a sexy profile photo. Sexualization, Media, & Society, October-December. https://doi.org/10.1177/2374623816683522
Daniels, E. A. (2020). Does objectification on social media cost young men? Emerging Adulthood, 8(3), 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696818804051
Daniels, E. A., & Linder, J. R. (2021). Sex object vs Athlete: Boys’ and men’s responses toward sexualized male athletes. Sex Roles, 85(9–10), 528–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-021-01228-3
Daniels, E. A., & Zurbriggen, E. L. (2016a). The price of sexy: Viewers’ perceptions of a sexualized versus nonsexualized Facebook profile photograph. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(1), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000048
Daniels, E. A., & Zurbriggen, E. L. (2016b). 'It’s not the right way to do stuff on Facebook:’ An investigation of adolescent girls’ and young women’s attitudes toward sexualized photos on social media. Sexuality & Culture: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, 20(4), 936–964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-016-9367-9
Daniels, E. A., Hood, A. J., LaVoi, N. M., & Cooky, C. (2021). Sexualized and athletic: The effects of viewing sexualized performance images of female athletes on viewers’ attitudes. Sex Roles, 84(1–2), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01152-y
Deighton-Smith, N., & Bell, B. T. (2018). Objectifying fitness: A content and thematic analysis of #Fitspiration images on social media. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 7(4), 467–483. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000143
Dijkstra, P., Buunk, B. P., & Blanton, H. (2000). The effect of target’s physical attractiveness and dominance on STD-risk perceptions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(8), 1738–1755. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02465.x
Dondzilo, L., Rodgers, R. F., Turnbull, G., & Bell, J. (2019). The importance of motivational orientation towards the muscular ideal versus the stigmatised burdensome body in male body dissatisfaction. Body Image, 31, 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.08.010
Döring, N., Reif, A., & Poeschl, S. (2016). How gender-stereotypical are selfies? A content analysis and comparison with magazine adverts. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 955–962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.10.001
Duckworth, K. D., & Trautner, M. N. (2019). Gender goals: Defining masculinity and navigating peer pressure to engage in sexual activity. Gender & Society, 33(5), 795–817. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243219863031
Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.109
Eleftheriou, A., Bullock, S., Graham, C. A., Stone, N., & Ingham, R. (2016). Does attractiveness influence condom use intentions in heterosexual men? An experimental study. BMJ Open, 6(6), Article e010883–e010883. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010883
Farquhar, J. C., & Wasylkiw, L. (2007). Media images of men: Trends and consequences of body conceptualization. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 8(3), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.8.3.145
Fasoli, F., Durante, F., Mari, S., Zogmaister, C., & Volpato, C. (2018). Shades of sexualization: When sexualization becomes sexual objectification. Sex Roles, 78(5–6), 338–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0808-1
Frederick, D. A., Fessler, D. M. T., & Haselton, M. G. (2005). Do representations of male muscularity differ in men’s and women’s magazines? Body Image, 2, 81–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim2004.12.002
Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
Gervais, S. J., Bernard, P., Klein, O., & Allen, J. (2013). Toward a unified theory of objectification and dehumanization. In S. J. Gervais (Ed.), Objectification and (de)humanization: 60th Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 1-23). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6959-9_1
Gray, K., Knobe, J., Sheskin, M., Bloom, P., & Barrett, L. (2011). More than a body: Mind perception and the nature of objectification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(6), 1207–1220. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025883
Grov, C., Saleh, L. D., Lassiter, J. M., & Parsons, J. T. (2015). Challenging race-based stereotypes about gay and bisexual men’s sexual behavior and perceived penis size and size satisfaction. Sexuality Research & Social Policy: A Journal of the NSRC, 12(3), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-015-0190-0
Hatton, E., & Trautner, M. N. (2011). Equal opportunity objectification? The sexualization of men and women on the cover of Rolling Stone. Sexuality & Culture, 15(3), 256–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-011-9093-2
Heflick, N., Goldenberg, J., Cooper, D., & Puvia, E. (2011). From women to objects: Appearance focus, target gender, and perceptions of warmth, morality, and competence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(3), 572–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.020
Iqbal. (2021, March 17). Tinder revenue and usage statistics (2021). Business of Apps. https://www.businessofapps.com/data/tinder-statistics/
Jänkälä, A., Lehmuskallio, A., & Takala, T. (2019). Photo use while dating: From forecasted photos in Tinder to creating copresence using other media. Human Technology, 15(2), 202–225. https://doi.org/10.17011/ht/urn.201906123156
Kapidzic, S., & Herring, S. C. (2015). Race, gender, and self-presentation in teen profile photographs. New Media & Society, 17(6), 958–976. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813520301
Karsay, K., Knoll, J., & Matthes, J. (2018). Sexualizing media use and self-objectification: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42(1), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684317743019
Kimmel, M. (2008). Guyland: The perilous world where boys become men. Harper.
Krishnamurti, T., Davis, A. L., & Fischhoff, B. (2020). Inferring sexually transmitted infection risk from attractiveness in online dating among adolescents and young adults: Exploratory study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(6), Article e14242–e14242. https://doi.org/10.2196/14242
Labre, M. P. (2002). Adolescent boys and the muscular male body ideal. Journal of Adolescent Health, 30(4), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1054-139X(01)00413-X
Labre, M. P. (2005). Burn fat, build muscle: A content analysis of men’s health and men’s fitness. International Journal of Men’s Health, 4(2), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.3149/jmh.0402.187
Loughnan, S., Fernandez-Campos, S., Vaes, J., Anjum, G., Aziz, M., Harada, C., Holland, E., Singh, I., Puvia, E., & Tsuchiya, K. (2015). Exploring the role of culture in sexual objectification: A seven nations study. Revue Internationale De Psychologie Sociale, 28(1), 125–152. https://www.cairn.info/revue-internationale-de-psychologie-sociale-2015-1-page-125.htm
Loughnan, S., Haslam, N., Murnane, T., Vaes, J., Reynolds, C., & Suitner, C. (2010). Objectification leads to depersonalization: The denial of mind and moral concern to objectified others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(5), 709–717. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.755
Loughnan, S., & Pacilli, M. G. (2014). Seeing (and treating) others as sexual objects: Toward a more complete mapping of sexual objectification. TPM-Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 21(3), 309–325. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM21.3.6
McCroskey, J. M., & McCain, T. A. (1974). The measurement of interpersonal attraction. Speech Monographs, 41(3), 261–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637757409375845
Miller, B. (2015). “Dude, where’s your face?” Self-presentation, self-description, and partner preferences on a social networking application for men who have sex with men: A content analysis. Sexuality & Culture, 19(4), 637–658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-015-9283-4
Miller, B. (2020). A picture is worth 1000 messages: Investigating face and body photos on mobile dating apps for men who have sex with men. Journal of Homosexuality, 67(13), 1798–1822. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2019.1610630
Moreno, M. A., Parks, M. R., Zimmerman, F. J., Brito, T. E., & Christakis, D. A. (2009). Display of health risk behaviors on MySpace by adolescents: Prevalence and associations. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 163(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2008.528
Morrison, T., & Halton, M. (2009). Buff, tough, and rough: Representations of muscularity in action motion pictures. Journal of Men’s Studies, 17(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.3149/jms.1701.57
Murashka, V., Liu, J., & Peng, Y. (2020). Fitspiration on Instagram: Identifying topic clusters in user comments to posts with objectification features. Health Communication, 36(12), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1773702
Nezlek, J. B., Krohn, W., Wilson, D., & Maruskin, L. (2015). Gender differences in reactions to the sexualization of athletes. Journal of Social Psychology, 155(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2014.959883
Pacilli, M. G., Spaccatini, F., Barresi, C., & Tomasetto, C. (2019). Less human and help-worthy: Sexualization affects children’s perceptions of and intentions toward bullied peers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 43(6), 481–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025419873040
Peluchette, J., & Karl, K. (2009). Examining students’ intended image on Facebook: “What were they thinking?!” Journal of Education for Business, 85(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832320903217606
Pujazon-Zazik, M. A., Manasse, S. M., & Orrell-Valente, J. K. (2012). Adolescents’ self-presentation on a teen dating web site: A risk-content analysis. Journal of Adolescent Health, 50(5), 517–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.11.015
Ricciardelli, L. A., & McCabe, M. P. (2004). A biopsychosocial model of disordered eating and the pursuit of muscularity in adolescent boys. Psychological Bulletin, 130(2), 179–205. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.179
Sarabia, I., & Estévez, A. (2016). Sexualized behaviors on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.037
Sawyer, A. N., Smith, E. R., & Benotsch, E. G. (2017). Dating application use and sexual risk behavior among young adults. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 15(2), 183-191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-017-0297-6
Shaffer, J. P. (1995). Multiple hypothesis testing. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 561–584. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.46.020195.003021
Shapiro, G. K., Tatar, O., Sutton, A., Fisher, W., Naz, A., Perez, S., & Rosberger, Z. (2017). Correlates of tinder use and risky sexual behaviors in young adults. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 20(12), 727–734. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0279
Smolak, L., Murnen, S. K., & Myers, T. A. (2014). Sexualizing the self: What college women and men think about and do to be “sexy.” Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38(3), 379–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684314524168
Sumter, S. R., Vandenbosch, L., & Ligtenberg, L. (2017). Love me Tinder: Untangling emerging adults’ motivations for using the dating application tinder. Telematics and Informatics, 34(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.04.009
Swanholm, E., Vosvick, M., & Chng, C. (2009). Pessimism, trauma, risky sex: Covariates of depression in college students. American Journal of Health Behavior, 33(3), 309–318. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.33.3.9
Tiggemann, M., & Zaccardo, M. (2018). ‘Strong is the new skinny’: A content analysis of #fitspiration images on Instagram. Journal of Health Psychology, 23(8), 1003–1011. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316639436
Tortajada, I., & Arau¨na, N., & Martı´nez, I. J. (2013). Advertising stereotypes and gender representation in social networking sites. Comunicar, 21(41), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.3916/C41-2013-17
Twenge, J. M., Sherman, R. A., & Wells, B. E. (2015). Changes in American adults’ sexual behavior and attitudes, 1972–2012. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(8), 2273–2285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0540-2
van der Zanden, T., Mos, M., Schouten, A., & Krahmer, E. (2021). What people look at in multimodal online dating profiles: How pictorial and textual cues affect impression formation. Communication Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650221995316
Wade, L. (2017). American hookup: The new culture of sex on campus. Norton & Company Inc.
Ward, L. M. (2016). Media and sexualization: State of empirical research, 1995–2015. Journal of Sex Research, 53(4–5), 560–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1142496
Wasike, B. (2020). Jocks versus jockettes: An analysis of the visual portrayal of male and female cover models on sports magazines. Journalism, 21(10), 1432–1449. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917716818
Acknowledgements
We thank Heather Williquette for her work on a pilot version of this study. An earlier version of this project was presented at the Society for the Study of Emerging Adulthood’s Biennial Conference in Washington, DC in 2017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The first and third authors contributed to the study’s conception and design. The third author engaged in the data collection. The second author performed the data analysis. The first and second authors wrote the first draft of the manuscript and subsequent revisions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
All procedures in the study were approved by the Institutional Review Board at the first author’s institution, and participants were treated in accordance with APA research guidelines.
Consent to Participate
Participants were informed of their rights as a research participant including the right to skip any question they prefer not to answer and/or to withdraw from the study with no penalty.
Consent for Publication
We created the tables and figure in this paper and give permission to publish them.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest/competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Daniels, E.A., Jerald, M.C. & Dieker, J. Putting a Sexy Self Forward on Tinder: What Do Viewers Think About Sexualized White Men?. Sex Roles 86, 428–440 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-022-01278-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-022-01278-1
Keywords
- Sexualization
- Sexual objectification
- Men
- Social media
- Online dating