Abstract
Consistent with objectification theory, the primary goal of the present study was to investigate the role of perceived humanization from one’s intimate partner as a predictor of depression (i.e., symptom severity), eating disorders (i.e., body dissatisfaction), and sexual dysfunction (i.e., dissatisfaction with quality of the sexual relationship) during pregnancy through decreased self-objectification. We tested our hypotheses within a dyadic framework, considering the respective contributions of humanization perceived by each partner to self-objectification and well-being in 159 U.S. heterosexual couples. Results converged with research linking partner humanization to lower levels of self-objectification in women. Further, feeling humanized by one’s partner also decreased self-objectification in men. Subsequently, lower levels of self-objectification were associated with lower levels of depressive symptoms and body dissatisfaction for both men and women and higher levels of sexual satisfaction for women. Our study also revealed the complex role of self-objectification in couple relationships: Less self-objectification by women, related to humanization from one’s partner, was associated with fewer depressive symptoms reported by their partners, but less self-objectification by men was, paradoxically, associated with more depressive symptoms reported by their partners. Results have implications for practitioners implementing couple and family interventions with pregnant women and their partners.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. In E. Parzen, K. Tanabe, & G. Kitagawa (Eds.), Selected papers of Hirotugu Akaike. Springer series in statistics (perspectives in statistics) (pp. 215–222). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_16.
Bartellas, E., Crane, J. M. G., Daley, M., Bennett, K. A., & Hutchens, D. (2000). Sexuality and sexual activity in pregnancy. British Journal of Obsetrics and Gynaecology, 107, 964–968. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb10397.x.
Beck, C. T. (2001). Predictors of postpartum depression: An update. Nursing Research, 50, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-200109000-00004.
Bennett, H. A., Einarson, A., Taddio, A., Koren, G., & Einarson, T. R. (2004). Prevalence of depression during pregnancy: Systematic review. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 103, 698–709. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000116689.75396.5f.
Brock, R. L., Kroska, E., & Lawrence, E. (2016). Current status of research on couples. In T. Sexton & J. Lebow (Eds.), Handbook of family therapy (pp. 409–433). New York: Taylor & Francis.
Byrd, J. E., Hyde, J. S., DeLamater, J. D., & Plant, E. A. (1998). Sexuality during pregnancy and the year postpartum. Journal of Family Practice, 47, 305–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499609551826.
Cabrera, N. J., Volling, B. L., & Barr, R. (2018). Fathers are parents, too! Widening the lens on parenting for children’s development. Child Development Perspectives, 12, 152–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12275.
Clark, A., Skouteris, H., Wertheim, E., Paxton, S., & Milgrom, J. (2009). The relationship between depression and body dissatisfaction across pregnancy and the postpartum: A prospective study. Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105308097940.
De Judicibus, M. A., & McCabe, M. P. (2002). Psychological factors and the sexuality of pregnant and postpartum women. The Journal of Sex Research, 39, 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490209552128.
Duncombe, D., Wertheim, E. H., Skouteris, H., Paxton, S. J., & Kelly, L. (2008). How well do women adapt to changes in their body size and shape across the course of pregnancy? Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105308088521.
Dunkel Schetter, C., & Tanner, L. (2012). Anxiety, depression and stress in pregnancy: Implications for mothers, children, research, and practice. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 25, 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0b013e3283503680.
Dworkin, S. L., & Wachs, F. L. (2004). Getting your body back: Postindustrial fit motherhood in shape fit pregnancy magazine. Gender & Society, 18, 610–624. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243204266817.
Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York: Guilford Publications.
Forbush, K. T., Wildes, J. E., & Hunt, T. K. (2014). Gender norms, psychometric properties, and validity for the eating pathology symptoms inventory. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 47, 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22180.
Forbush, K. T., Wildes, J. E., Pollack, L. O., Dunbar, D., Luo, J., Patterson, K., … Watson, D. D. of P. S. (2013). Development and validation of the eating pathology symptoms inventory (epsi). Psychological Assessment, 25, 859–878. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032639.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x.
Garcia, R. L., Earnshaw, V. A., & Quinn, D. M. (2016). Objectification in action: Self- and other-objectification in mixed-sex interpersonal interactions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40, 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315614966.
Goldenberg, J. L., Goplen, J., Cox, C. R., & Arndt, J. (2007). “Viewing” pregnancy as an existential threat: The effects of creatureliness on reactions to media depictions of the pregnant body. Media Psychology, 10, 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260701375629.
Grieve, R., & Helmick, A. (2008). The influence of men’s self-objectification on the drive for muscularity: Self-esteem, body satisfaction and muscle dysmorphia. International Journal of Men’s Health, 7, 288–298. https://doi.org/10.3149/jmh.0703.288.
Grigoriadis, S., VonderPorten, E. H., Mamisashvili, L., Tomlinson, G., Dennis, C. L., Koren, G., … Ross, L. E. (2013). The impact of maternal depression during pregnancy on perinatal outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 74, 321–341. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.12r07968.
Hayes, A. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Johnston-Robledo, I., & Fred, V. (2008). Self-objectification and lower income pregnant women’s breastfeeding attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00293.x.
Johnston-Robledo, I., Wares, S., Fricker, J., & Pasek, L. (2007). Indecent exposure: Self-objectification and young women’s attitudes toward breastfeeding. Sex Roles, 56, 429–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9194-4.
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis (methodology in the social sciences). New York: Guilford Press.
Kukla, R. (2005). Pregnant bodies as public spaces. In S. Hardy & C. Wiedmer (Eds.), Motherhood and space (pp. 283–305). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-12103-5_16.
Lawrence, E., Barry, R. A., Brock, R. L., Bunde, M., Langer, A., Ro, E., … Dzankovic, S. (2011). The relationship quality interview: Evidence of reliability, convergent and divergent validity, and incremental utility. Psychological Assessment, 23, 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021096.
Lawrence, E., Brock, R. L., Barry, R. A., Langer, A., & Bunde, M. (2009). Assessing relationship quality: Development of an interview and implications for couple assessment and intervention. In E. Cuyler & M. Ackhart (Eds.), Psychology of relationships (pp. 173–191). New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc..
Lawrence, E., Rothman, A. D., Cobb, R. J., & Bradbury, T. N. (2010). Marital satisfaction across the transition to parenthood: Three eras of research. In M. S. Schulz, M. K. Pruett, P. K. Kerig, & R. D. Parkes (Eds.), Strengthening couple relationships for optimal child development: Lessons from research and intervention (pp. 97–114). https://doi.org/10.1037/12058-007.
Mahar, E. A., Webster, G. D., & Markey, P. M. (2020). Partner–objectification in romantic relationships: A dyadic approach. Personal Relationships, 27(1), 4-26. doi.org/10.1111/pere.12303
McKinley, N. M. (2006). The developmental and cultural contexts of objectified body consciousness: A longitudinal analysis of two cohorts of women. Developmental Psychology, 42, 679–687. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.4.679.
Mckinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00467.x.
Meltzer, A. L., & McNulty, J. K. (2014). “Tell me i’m sexy . . . and otherwise valuable”: body valuation and relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 21, 68–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12018.
Micali, N., Simonoff, E., & Treasure, J. (2007). Risk of major adverse perinatal outcomes in women with eating disorders. British Journal of Psychiatry, 190, 255–259. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.106.020768.
Moradi, B., & Huang, Y. P. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x.
Morris, K. L., Goldenberg, J. L., & Heflick, N. A. (2014). Trio of terror (pregnancy, menstruation, and breastfeeding): An existential function of literal self-objectification among women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036493.
Morry, M. M., & Staska, S. L. (2001). Magazine exposure: Internalization, self-objectification, eating attitudes, and body satisfaction in male and female university students. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 33, 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087148.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
Noll, S. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00181.x.
Oehlhof, M. E. W., Musher-Eizenman, D. R., Neufeld, J. M., & Hauser, J. C. (2009). Self-objectification and ideal body shape for men and women. Body Image, 6, 308–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.05.002.
Paulson, J. F., & Bazemore, S. D. (2010). Prenatal and postpartum depression in fathers and its association with maternal depression: A meta-analysis. JAMA, 303, 1961–1969. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.605.
Pearlstein, T. (2015). Depression during pregnancy. Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 29, 754–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.04.004.
Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701341316.
Prichard, I., & Tiggemann, M. (2005). Objectification in fitness centers: Self-objectification, body dissatisfaction, and disordered eating in aerobic instructors and aerobic participants. Sex Roles, 53, 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-4270-0.
Ramsey, L. R., & Hoyt, T. (2015). The object of desire: How being objectified creates sexual pressure for women in heterosexual relationships. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39, 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684314544679.
Ramsey, L. R., Marotta, J. A., & Hoyt, T. (2017). Sexualized, objectified, but not satisfied: Enjoying sexualization relates to lower relationship satisfaction through perceived partner-objectification. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34, 258–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407516631157.
Rauff, E. L., & Downs, D. S. (2011). Mediating effects of body image satisfaction on exercise behavior, depressive symptoms, and gestational weight gain in pregnancy. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 42, 381–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-011-9300-2.
Roberts, T.-A., Calogero, R. M., & Gervais, S. J. (2018). Objectification theory: Continuing contributions to feminist psychology. In C. B. Travis, J. W. White, A. Rutherford, W. S. Williams, S. L. Cook, & K. F. Wyche (Eds.), APA handbooks in psychology series. APA handbook of the psychology of women: History, theory, and battlegrounds (pp. 249–271). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
Rubin, L. R., & Steinberg, J. R. (2011). Self-objectification and pregnancy: Are body functionality dimensions protective? Sex Roles, 65, 606–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9955-y.
Rust, J., & Golombuck, S. (1985). The golombok-rust inventory of sexual satisfaction (griss). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24, 63–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1985.tb01314.x.
Sáez, G., Riemer, A. R., Brock, R. L., & Gervais, S. J. (2019). Objectification in heterosexual romantic relationships: Examining relationship satisfaction of female objectification recipients and male objectifying perpetrators. Sex Roles, 81, 370–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0990-9.
Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136.
Silveira, M. L., Ertel, K. A., Dole, N., & Chasan-Taber, L. (2015). The role of body image in prenatal and postpartum depression: A critical review of the literature. Archives of Women’s Mental Health. Springer-Verlag Wien., 18, 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-015-0525-0.
Slater, A., & Tiggemann, M. (2002). A test of objectification theory in adolescent girls. Sex Roles, 46, 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020232714705.
Slater, A., & Tiggemann, M. (2010). Body image and disordered eating in adolescent girls and boys: A test of objectification theory. Sex Roles, 63, 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9794-2.
Stearns, C. A. (1999). Breastfeeding and the good maternal body. Gender & Society, 13, 308–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124399013003003.
Steer, A., & Tiggemann, M. (2008). The role of self-objectification in women’s sexual functioning. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27, 205–225. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2008.27.3.205.
Stice, E., & Shaw, H. (2004). Eating disorder prevention programs: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 206–227. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.206.
Strelan, P., & Hargreaves, D. (2005). Women who objectify other women: The vicious circle of objectification? Sex Roles, 52, 707–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-3737-3.
Strelan, P., & Pagoudis, S. (2018). Birds of a feather flock together: The interpersonal process of objectification within intimate heterosexual relationships. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 79(1-2), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0851-y
Szymanski, D. M., Moffitt, L. B., & Carr, E. R. (2011). Sexual objectification of women: Advances to theory and research. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 6–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000010378402.
Tiggemann, M., & Lynch, J. E. (2001). Body image across the life span in adult women: The role of self-objectification. Developmental Psychology, 37, 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.37.2.243.
Tiggemann, M., & Williams, E. (2012). The role of self-objectification in disordered eating, depressed mood, and sexual functioning among women: A comprehensive test of objectification theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684311420250.
Tiggemann, M., & Kuring, J. K. (2004). The role of body objectification in disordered eating and depressed mood. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1348/0144665031752925.
Tylka, T. L., & Hill, M. S. (2004). Objectification theory as it relates to disordered eating among college women. Sex Roles, 51, 719–730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-004-0721-2.
Watson, D., O’Hara, M. W., Naragon-Gainey, K., Koffel, E., Chmielewski, M., Kotov, R., … Ruggero, C. J. (2012). Development and validation of new anxiety and bipolar symptom scales for an expanded version of the idas (the idas-ii). Assessment, 19, 399–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191112449857.
Wiseman, M. C., & Moradi, B. (2010). Body image and eating disorder symptoms in sexual minority men: A test and extension of objectification theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57(2), 154–166. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018937.
Yonkers, K. A., Wisner, K. L., Stewart, D. E., Oberlander, T. F., Dell, D. L., Stotland, N., … Lockwood, C. (2009). The management of depression during pregnancy: a report from the american psychiatric association and the american college of obstetricians and gynecologists. General Hospital Psychiatry, 31, 403–413..1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.04.003.
Zurbriggen, E. L., Ramsey, L. R., & Jaworski, B. K. (2011). Self- and partner-objectification in romantic relationships: associations with media consumption and relationship satisfaction. Sex Roles, 64, 449–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9933-4
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by several internal funding mechanisms awarded to PI Rebecca L. Brock from the UNL Department of Psychology, the Nebraska Tobacco Settlement Biomedical Research Development Fund, and the UNL Office of Research and Economic Development. We thank the families who participated in this research and the entire team of research assistants who contributed to various stages of the study. In particular, we thank Jennifer Blake and Kailee Groshans for project coordination, and Molly Franz and Michelle Haikalis for contributions to literature review and data preparation.
Funding
This research was funded by several internal funding mechanisms awarded to PI Rebecca L. Brock from the UNL Department of Psychology, the Nebraska Tobacco Settlement Biomedical Research Development Fund, and the UNL Office of Research and Economic Development.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals
This research involved human participants. Research was approved by the University of Nebraska-Lincoln Institutional Review Board. IRB Approval #: 20151215700EP. Title: Family Development Project.
No animals were involved in this research.
Informed Consent
Participants completed written informed consent procedures at the beginning of the laboratory visit.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brock, R.L., Ramsdell, E.L., Sáez, G. et al. Perceived Humanization by Intimate Partners during Pregnancy Is Associated with fewer Depressive Symptoms, Less Body Dissatisfaction, and Greater Sexual Satisfaction through Reduced Self-Objectification. Sex Roles 84, 285–298 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01166-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01166-6