Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Religious Paradox: Can Priming Ideas of God Reduce Rape Victim Blame?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rape victim blame contributes to unreported incidents of sexual assault and failure to support victims (Ahrens in American Journal of Community Psychology, 38(3-4), 263-274, 2006). The present study investigated the relationship between religiosity, religious priming, and rape victim blame. Using an online Qualtrics panel, 247 U.S. participants were randomly assigned to either a neutral prime or a religious prime. They then read a short vignette of an acquaintance rape scenario and answered questions regarding perceptions of victim blame, victim credibility, benevolent and hostile sexism, religiosity, religious fundamentalism, and Rape Myth Acceptance (RMA). Results revealed that the religious prime reduced victim blame for highly religious participants but not among participants scoring lower in religiosity. The results confirmed that religiosity was positively correlated with both victim blame and RMA. The data also confirmed previous findings that men scored higher on blame than women and that higher religiosity correlated with higher victim blame. Additionally, RMA mediated the relationship between religiosity and rape victim blame. The results of this study could prove valuable in settings where sexual assault demands action from specifically religious individuals or institutions (e.g., jurors on a rape case in a highly-religious region or religious universities trying to confront the high prevalence of sexual assault on campus).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The present research was supported by an Undergraduate Research and Creative Opportunity (URCO) grant awarded to the first author by the Office of Research at Utah State University. We also wish to acknowledge Dr. Sarah Schwartz, director of the Statistical Consulting Studio at Utah State University, who provided important guidance and expertise on the mediation and moderation analyses and reporting that greatly improved this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathryn Sperry.

Ethics declarations

The study was approved by Institutional Review Board and participants were given a Letter of Information prior to their participation and continued to the survey only if agreeing to be in the study. There are no potential conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 17 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Heath, E.G., Sperry, K. A Religious Paradox: Can Priming Ideas of God Reduce Rape Victim Blame?. Sex Roles 84, 196–207 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01163-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01163-9

Keywords

Navigation