Abstract
Although the number of women in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) continues to grow, men still represent a significant majority of those employed in these industries. Mentoring programs have been identified as a useful tool to alleviate this gap and therefore have been developed in an effort to attract and retain women in STEM. However, research suggests that women are still being mentored less often than their male colleagues. To understand this issue in depth, 36 women holding managerial positions in STEM organizations in the United States and Canada were interviewed and their experiences with mentoring were discussed. The results suggest that women do have access and indeed find potential mentors but they perceive significant barriers that prevent these initial meetings from developing into long-term mentoring relationships. Specifically, four Barriers to the Development of Mentorship (BDM) were identified including: Need for Fit, Demonstrating Capability, Commitment of the Mentor, and Trust in the Mentor. BDM might help researchers and practitioners understand why women are under-mentored and consequently underrepresented in STEM workplaces. Implications of these findings are discussed, such as how to improve formal mentoring programs to overcome BDM and better serve women in STEM.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, T. D., & Finkelstein, L. M. (2003). Beyond mentoring: Alternative sources and functions of developmental support. The Career Development Quarterly, 51(4), 346–355. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2003.tb00615.x.
Allen, T. D., Eby, L. T., Poteet, M. L., Lentz, E., & Lima, L. (2004). Career benefits associated with mentoring for protégés: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.127.
Allen, T. D., Eby, L. T., & Lentz, E. (2006). Mentorship behaviours and mentorship quality associated with formal mentoring programs: Closing the gap between research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 567–578. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.567.
Allen, T. D., Eby, L. T., O’Brien, K. E., & Lentz, E. (2008). The state of mentoring research: A qualitative review of current research methods and future research implications. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(3), 343–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.08.004.
Aukett, R., Ritchie, J., & Mill, K. (1998). Gender differences in friendship patterns. Sex Roles, 19(1/2), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292464.
Berg, B. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Toronto: Allyn & Bacon.
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative data. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Burke, R. J., & McKeen, C. A. (1990). Mentoring in organizations: Implications for women. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(4–5), 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00380330.
Chandler, D. E., Kram, K. E., & Yip, J. (2011). An ecological systems perspective on mentoring at work. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 519–570. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.576087.
Chao, G. (1997). Mentoring phases and outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 51(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1997.1591.
Charmaz, K. (1996). The search for meanings – Grounded theory. Rethinking methods in psychology. London: Sage.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Chatfield, S. L. (2018). Considerations in qualitative research reporting: A guide for authors preparing articles for sex roles. Sex Roles, 79(3–4), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0930-8.
Chun, J. U., Litzky, B. E., Sosik, J. J., Bechtold, D. C., & Godshalk, V. M. (2010). Emotional intelligence and trust in formal mentoring programs. Group & Organization Management, 35(4), 421–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601110378293.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Dreher, G. F., & Ash, R. A. (1990). A comparative study of mentoring among men and women in managerial, professional and technical positions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5), 539–546. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.5.539.
Eby, L. T., Allen, T. D., Evans, S. C., Ng, T., & DuBois, D. L. (2008). Does mentoring matter? A multidisciplinary meta-analysis comparing mentored and non-mentored individuals. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72(2), 254–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.04.005.
Felmlee, D., Sweet, E., & Sinclair, H. C. (2012). Gender rules: Same- and cross-gender friendships norms. Sex Roles, 66(7–8), 518–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0109-z.
Fowler, J. F., Gudmundsson, A. J., & O’Gorman, J. G. (2007). The relationship between mentee-mentor gender combination and the provision of distinct mentoring functions. Women in Management Review, 22(8), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1108/09649420710836335.
Fox, R. L., & Schuhmann, R. A. (2000). Mentoring experiences of women city managers. Are women disadvantaged? American Review of Public Administration, 31(4), 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740122065009.
Golden-Biddle, K., & Locke, K. (2007). Composing qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Herrbach, O., Mignonac, K., & Richebé, N. (2011). Undesired side effect? The promotion of non-commitment in formal vs. informal mentorships. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(7), 1554–1569. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.561965.
Higgins, M. C., & Kram, K. E. (2001). Reconceptualising mentoring at work: A developmental network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 264–288. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378023.
Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.
Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 422–447. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393451.
Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., & Judge, T. A. (2008). A quantitative review of mentoring research: Test of a model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72(3), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.09.006.
Kaplan, S. E., Keinath, A. K., & Walo, J. C. (2001). An examination of perceived barriers to mentoring in public accounting. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 13(1), 195–220. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2001.13.1.195.
Kram, K. E. (1983). Phases of the mentor relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 608–625. https://doi.org/10.5465/255910.
Kram, K. E., & Hall, D. T. (1986). Mentoring as an antidote to stress during corporate trauma. Human Resource Management, 28(4), 493–510. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.3930280405.
Linehan, M., & Scullion, H. (2008). The development of female global managers: The role of mentoring and networking. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9657-0.
Miner, K. N., Walker, J. M., Bergman, M. E., Jean, V. A., Carter-Sowell, A., January, S. C., … Kaunas, C. (2018). From “her” problem to “our” problem: Using an individual lens versus a social-structural lens to understand gender inequity in STEM. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 11(2), 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2018.7.
Nielson, T. R., Carlson, D. S., & Lankau, M. J. (2001). The supportive mentor as a means of reducing work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59(3), 364–381. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1806.
Noe, R. A. (1988a). An investigation of the determinants of successful assigned mentoring relationships. Personnel Psychology, 41(3), 457–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00638.x.
Noe, R. A. (1988b). Women and mentoring: A review and research agenda. Academy of Management Review, 13(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1988.4306784.
O’Brien, K. E., Biga, A., Kessler, S. R., & Allen, T. D. (2010). A meta-analytic investigation of gender differences in mentoring. Journal of Management, 36(2), 537–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308318619.
O'Neill, R. M., & Blake-Beard, S. D. (2002). Gender barriers to the female mentor–male protégé relationship. Journal of Business Ethics, 37(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014778017993.
Patton, M. (2001). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Ragins, B. R., & Cotton, J. L. (1991). Easier said than done: Gender differences in perceived barriers to gaining a mentor. Academy of Management Journal, 34(4), 939–951. https://doi.org/10.5465/256398.
Richard, O. C., Ismail, K. M., Bhuian, S. N., & Taylor, E. C. (2009). Mentoring in supervisor-subordinate dyads: Antecedents, consequences and test of mediation model of mentorship. Journal of Business Research, 62(11), 1110–1118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.09.007.
Shaffer, E. S., Marx, D. M., & Prislin, R. (2013). Mind the gap: Framing of women’s success and representation in stem affects women’s math performance under threat. Sex Roles, 68(7–8), 454–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0252-1.
Taylor, E. Z., & Curtis, M. B. (2018). Mentoring: A path to prosocial behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(4), 1133–1148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3325-1.
Wanberg, C. R., Kammeyer-Mueller, J., & Marchese, M. (2006). Mentor and protégé predictors and outcomes of mentoring in a formal mentoring program. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(3), 410–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2006.05.010.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The author declares that there are no conflicts of interests in this research, and that this study did not receive any funding. Furthermore, informed consent was obtained from all individual participants and all procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of her institution and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic Supplementary Material
ESM 1
(DOCX 19 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saffie-Robertson, M.C. It’s Not You, It’s Me: An Exploration of Mentoring Experiences for Women in STEM. Sex Roles 83, 566–579 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01129-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01129-x