Toward a More Complete Understanding of Bystander Willingness to Help: What Role Does Critical Consciousness Play?

Abstract

Sexual assault is a common phenomenon on university campuses with about one in five women victimized while in college. Consequently, bystander intervention programs have been gaining momentum. To improve such programs, research has begun to identify factors that may facilitate or impede individuals’ willingness to help a potential victim of sexual assault. The current study adds to this literature by: (a) examining potential differences in rape myth acceptance, critical consciousness, and willingness to help based on types of self-reported exposure to sexual assault; (b) exploring the previously unexamined mediating role of critical consciousness in the relationship between exposure to sexual assault and willingness to help; and (c) clarifying how the extent of rape myth acceptance impacts the relationship between exposure to sexual assault and willingness to help. Using a sample of 511 U.S. undergraduate students, results generally demonstrated that those with multiple types of exposure to sexual assault victimization demonstrated the highest levels of critical consciousness and greater willingness to help. Additionally, there was both a significant indirect effect of exposure to sexual assault on willingness to help via critical consciousness and a conditional effect of exposure to sexual assault on willingness to help that was stronger at lower levels of rape myth acceptance. Results highlight the importance of programming targeted at increasing critical consciousness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Amaro, H., & Raj, A. (2000). On the margin: Power and women’s HIV risk reduction strategies. Sex Roles, 42(7/8), 723–749. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007059708789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Banyard, V. L. (2008). Measurement and correlates of prosocial bystander behavior: The case of interpersonal violence. Violence and Victims, 23(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.23.1.83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Banyard, V. L., & Moynihan, M. M. (2011). Variation in bystander behavior related to sexual and intimate partner violence prevention: Correlates in a sample of college students. Psychology of Violence, 1(4), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Banyard, V. L., Plante, E. G., & Moynihan, M. M. (2004). Bystander education: Bringing a broader community perspective to sexual violence prevention. Journal of Community Psychology, 32(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.10078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Banyard, V. L., Moynihan, M. M., & Plante, E. G. (2007). Sexual violence prevention through bystander education: An experimental evaluation. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(4), 463–481. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barnett, M. A., Feierstein, M. D., Jaet, B. P., Saunders, L. C., Quackenbush, S. W., & Sinisi, C. A. (1992). The effects of knowing a rape victim on reactions of other victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7, 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626092007001004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Baugher, S. N., Elhai, J. D., Monroe, J. R., & Gray, M. J. (2010). Rape myth acceptance, sexual trauma history, and posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(11), 2036–2053. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260509354506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Black, M. C., Basile, K. C., Breiding, M. J., Smith, S. G., Walters, M. L., Merrick, M. T., … Stevens, M. R. (2011). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. Retrieved from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/pdf/NISVS_Report2010-a.pdf. Accessed June 2016.

  9. Bondurant, B. (2001). University women’s acknowledgement of rape. Violence Against Women, 7(3), 294–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778010122182451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bridges, J. (1991). Perceptions of date and stranger rape: A difference in sex role expectations and rape-supportive beliefs. Sex Roles, 24, 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: Men, women, and rape. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Burn, S. (2009). A situational model of sexual assault prevention through bystander intervention. Sex Roles, 60, 779–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9581-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and support for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.38.2.217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cammarota, J. (2016). The praxis of ethnic studies: Transforming second sight into critical consciousness. Race Ethnicity and Education, 19, 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2015.1041486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Carmody, D. C., & Washington, L. M. (2001). Rape myth acceptance among college women: The impact of race and prior victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16(5), 424–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626001016005003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Decety, J., & Yoder, K. J. (2015). Empathy and motivation for justice: Cognitive empathy and concern, but not emotional empathy, predict sensitivity to injustice for others. Social Neuroscience, 11, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2015.1029593.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Deitz, S. R., Blackwell, K. T., Daley, P. C., & Bentley, B. J. (1982). Measurement of empathy toward rape victims and rapists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(2), 372–384. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.43.2.372.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fetchenhauer, D., Jacobs, G., & Belschak, F. (2005). Belief in a just world, causal attributions, and adjustment to sexual violence. Social Justice Research, 18, 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-005-3369-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Freire, P. (1974). Education for critical consciousness. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hammond, L., Ioannou, M., & Fewster, M. (2017). Perceptions of male rape and sexual assault in a male sample from the United Kingdom: Barriers to reporting and the impacts of victimization. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 14(2), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hayes, A. F. (2012). My macros and code for SPSS and SAS. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/spss-sas-and-mplusmacros-and-code.html. Accessed June 2016.

  23. Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3), 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hayes, R. M., Lorenz, K., & Bell, K. A. (2013). Victim blaming others: Rape myth acceptance and the just world belief. Feminist Criminology, 8(3), 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085113484788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Katz, J., Pazienza, R., Olin, R., & Rich, H. (2015). That’s what friends are for: Bystander responses to friends or strangers at risk for party rape victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(16), 2775–2792. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514554290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Koss, M. P., Abbey, A., Campbell, R., Cook, S., Norris, J., Testa, M., et al. (2007). Revising the SES: A collaborative process to improve assessment of sexual aggression and victimization. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00385.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Latané, B., & Darley, J. (1969). Bystander “apathy”. American Scientist, 57, 244–268. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.stanford.idm.oclc.org/stable/27828530. Accessed June 2016.

  28. Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18(2), 133–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb00448.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mason, G. E., Riger, S., & Foley, L. A. (2004). The impact of past sexual experiences on attributions of responsibility for rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(10), 1157–1171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260504269094.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. McCreary, D. R., Rhodes, N. D., & Saucier, D. M. (2002). A confirmatory factor analysis of the Short Form Sex Role Behavior Scale. Sex Roles, 47, 455–457.https://doi-org.stanford.idm.oclc.org/10.1023/A:1021099106603.

  32. McMahon, S. (2010). Rape myth beliefs and bystander attitudes among incoming college students. Journal of American College Health, 59(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2010.483715.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. McWhirter, E. H., & McWhirter, B. T. (2016). Critical consciousness and vocational development among Latina/o high school youth: Initial development and testing of a measure. Journal of Career Assessment, 24(3), 543–558. https://doi-org.ezproxy.uakron.edu:2443/10.1177/1069072715599535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Miller, A. K., Amacker, A. M., & King, A. R. (2011). Sexual victimization history and perceived similarity to a sexual assault victim: A path model of perceiver variables predicting victim culpability attributions. Sex Roles, 64(5–6), 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9910-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Muehlenhard, C. L., & MacNaughton, J. S. (1988). Women's beliefs about women who 'lead men on. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 7(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1988.7.1.65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Parent, M. C. (2013). Handling item-level missing data: Simpler is just as good. The Counseling Psychologist, 41, 568–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000012445176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Payne, D. L., Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33(1), 27–68. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1998.2238.

  38. Prilleltensky, I. (2012). Wellness as fairness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 49, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-011-9448-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sasson, S., & Paul, L. A. (2014). Labeling acts of sexual violence: What roles do assault characteristics, attitudes, and life experiences play? Behavior and Social Issues, 23, 35–49. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v23i0.5215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7(2), 147–177. https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989X.7.2.147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sinozich, S., & Langton, L. (2014). Special report: Rape and sexual assault victimization among college-age 1995–2013. Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/rsavcaf9513.pdf. Accessed August 2018.

  42. Smith, C. A., & Frieze, I. H. (2003). Examining rape empathy from the perspective of the victim and the assailant. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(3), 476–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01907.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Spence, J. T. (1991). Do the BSRI and PAQ measure the same or different concepts. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 141–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00483.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Thomas, A. J., Barrie, R., Brunner, J., Clawson, A., Hewitt, A., Jeremie-Brink, G., & Rowe-Johnson, M. (2014). Assessing critical consciousness in youth and young adults. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 24, 485–496. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Vonderhaar, R. L., & Carmody, D. C. (2015). There are no “innocent victims”: The influence of just world beliefs and prior victimization on rape myth acceptance. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(10), 1615–1132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514549196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Wallerstein, N., & Sanchez-Merki, V. (1994). Freirian praxis in health education: Research results from an adolescent prevention program. Health Education Research, 9(1), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/9.1.105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Watts, R. J., Abdul-Adil, J., & Pratt, T. (2002). Enhancing critical consciousness in young African American men: A psychoeducational approach. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 3(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.3.1.41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Zelin, A. I., Walker, R. V., & Johnson, D. M. (2018). Cornered at a bar: How victim clothing, alcohol intake, and relationship with bystander impacts intention to help. Violence Against Women. https://doi.org/10.1177/107801218809948.

  49. Zucker, A. N., Stewart, A. J., Pomerleau, C. S., & Boyd, C. J. (2005). Resisting gendered smoking pressures: Critical consciousness as a correlate of women's smoking status. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 53(3–4), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-5684-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge that this research was supported by Defined Lines, a student organization at the University of Akron dedicated to ending sexual assault and changing the culture surrounding sexual assault on campus. Funding support for the research was provided by the Avon Foundation for Women, which awarded Defined Lines a 2104 Avon Campus Grant. Work on this paper by the third author was supported by NIH grant T32 DA019426.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elsa E. Rojas-Ashe.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

Participants were shown the below informed consent in Qualtrics and indicated their consent by continuing to the next page of the survey and completing the study measures.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rojas-Ashe, E.E., Walker, R.V., Holmes, S.C. et al. Toward a More Complete Understanding of Bystander Willingness to Help: What Role Does Critical Consciousness Play?. Sex Roles 81, 415–427 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-1007-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Bystander behavior
  • Sexual assault
  • Critical consciousness
  • Prevention
  • Bystander intervention