Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112, 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x.
Casey, M. B., Nuttall, R. L., & Pezaris, E. (1997). Mediators of gender differences in mathematics college entrance test scores: A comparison of spatial skills with internalized beliefs and anxieties. Developmental Psychology, 33(4), 669–680. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-16188.8.131.529.
Ceci, S. J., Williams, W. M., & Barnett, S. M. (2009). Women's underrepresentation in science: Sociocultural and biological considerations. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 218–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014412.
Chhin, C. S., Bleeker, M. M., & Jacobs, J. E. (2008). Gender-typed occupational choices: The long-term impact of parents' beliefs and expectations. In H. G. Watt & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Gender and occupational outcomes: Longitudinal assessments of individual, social, and cultural influences (pp. 215–234). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11706-008.
Dasgupta, N., & Stout, J. G. (2014). Girls and women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: STEMing the tide and broadening participation in STEM careers. Policy Insights From the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732214549471.
Eccles, J. S. (2007). Families, schools, and developing achievement-related motivations and engagement. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 665–691). New York: Guilford Press.
Eccles, J. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 75–146). San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
Eccles, J. S., Arberton, A., Buchanan, C. M., Janis, J., Flanagan, C., & Harold, R. (1993a). School and family effects on the ontogeny of children’s interests, self-perceptions, and activity choices. In J. E. Jacobs (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1992: Developmental perspectives on motivation (Vol. 40, pp. 145–208). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Eccles, J. S., Jacobs, J. E., Harold, R. D., Yoon, K. S., Abreton, A., & Freedman-Doan, C. (1993b). Parents and gender-role socialization during the middle childhood and adolescent years. In S. Oskamp & M. Costanzo (Eds.), Gender issues in contemporary society (Vol. 6, pp. 59–83). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2017). Spontaneous spatial strategy use in learning from scientific text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.01.002.
Frome, P. M., & Eccles, J. S. (1998). Parents' influence on children's achievement-related perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.2065.
Furnham, A. (2000). Parents' estimates of their own and their children's multiple intelligences. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18(4), 583–594. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151000165869.
Furnham, A., & Thomas, C. (2004). Parents' gender and personality and estimates of their own and their children's intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(5), 887–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.10.011.
Furnham, A., Reeves, E., & Budhani, S. (2002). Parents think their sons are brighter than their daughters: Sex differences in parental self-estimations and estimations of their children's multiple intelligences. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163(1), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221320209597966.
Gladstone, J. R., Häfner, I., Turci, L. A., Kneißler, H., & Muenks, K. (2018). Associations between parents’ and students’ motivational beliefs in mathematics and mathematical performance: The role of gender. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 54, 221–234.
Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003, October). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. Paper presented at the Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, Columbus, Ohio.
Gogol, K., Brunner, M., Goetz, T., Martin, R., Ugen, S., Keller, U., … Preckel, F. (2014). “My questionnaire is too long!” the assessments of motivational-affective constructs with three-item and single-item measures. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 188–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.04.002.
Goldman, R. D., & Hewitt, B. N. (1976). The scholastic aptitude test “explains” why college men major in science more often than college women. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 23(1), 50–54. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0220.127.116.11.
Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., Beilock, S. L., & Levine, S. C. (2012). The relation between spatial skill and early number knowledge: The role of the linear number line. Developmental Psychology, 48(5), 1229–1241. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027433.
Hall, C., Dickerson, J., Batts, D., Kauffmann, P., & Bosse, M. (2011). Are we missing opportunities to encourage interest in STEM fields? Journal of Technology Education, 23, 32–46. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v23i1.a.4.
Halpern, D. F. (2013). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (4th ed.). New York: Psychology Press.
Halpern, D. F., Straight, C. A., & Stephenson, C. L. (2011). Beliefs about cognitive gender differences: Accurate for direction, underestimated for size. Sex Roles, 64(5–6), 336–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9891-2.
Harackiewicz, J. M., Rozek, C. S., Hulleman, C. S., & Hyde, J. S. (2012). Helping parents to motivate adolescents in mathematics and science: An experimental test of a utility-value intervention. Psychological Science, 23(8), 899–906. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611435530.
Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [white paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/ public/process2012.Pdf
Hyde, J. S. (2014). Gender similarities and differences. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 373–398. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115057.
Hyde, J. S. (2016). Sex and cognition: Gender and cognitive functions. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 38, 53–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2016.02.007.
Ing, M. (2014). Can parents influence children’s mathematics achievement and persistence in STEM careers? Journal of Career Development, 41(2), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845313481672.
Jansen, P., Schmelter, A., Quaiser-Pohl, C., Neuburger, S., & Heil, M. (2013). Mental rotation performance in primary school age children: Are there gender differences in chronometric tests? Cognitive Development, 28(1), 51–62.
Lazarides, R., Harackiewicz, J. M., Canning, E., Pesu, L., & Viljaranta, J. (2015). The role of parents in students' motivational beliefs and values. In C. M. Rubie-Davies, J. M. Stephens, & P. Watson (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of social psychology of the classroom (pp. 53–66). London: Routledge.
Levine, S. C., Foley, A., Lourenco, S., Ehrlich, S., & Ratliff, K. (2016). Sex differences in spatial cognition: Advancing the conversation. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science, 7(2), 127–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1380.
Lubinski, D. (2010). Spatial ability and STEM: A sleeping giant for talent identification and development. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 344–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.022.
Lyons, I. M., Ramirez, G., Maloney, E. A., Rendina, D. N., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2018). Spatial anxiety: A novel questionnaire with subscales for measuring three aspects of spatial anxiety. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 4, 526–553. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v4i3.154.
Maeda, Y., & Yoon, S. Y. (2013). A meta-analysis on gender differences in mental rotation ability measured by the Purdue spatial visualization tests: Visualization of rotations (PSVT: R). Educational Psychology Review, 25(1), 69–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9215-x.
Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students. Science Education, 95, 877–907. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20441.
Miller, D. I., & Halpern, D. F. (2013). Can spatial training improve long-term outcomes for gifted STEM undergraduates? Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.03.012.
Moakler Jr., M. W., & Kim, M. M. (2014). College major choice in STEM: Revisiting confidence and demographic factors. The Career Development Quarterly, 62(2), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2014.00075.x.
National Research Council. (2006). Learning to think spatially. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11019.
National Research Council. (2014). Advancing diversity in the US industrial science and engineering workforce. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13512.
National Science Board. (2015). Revisiting the STEM workforce: A companion to Science and Engineering Indicators 2014. Arlington: National Science Foundation (NSB-2015-10).
Newcombe, N. S. (2016). Thinking spatially in the science classroom. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 10, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.04.010.
Newcombe, N. S., Levine, S. C., & Mix, K. S. (2015). Thinking about quantity: The intertwined development of spatial and numerical cognition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 6(6), 491–505. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1369.
Parsons, J. E., Adler, T. F., & Kaczala, C. M. (1982). Socialization of achievement attitudes and beliefs: Parental influences. Child Development, 53(2), 310–321. https://doi.org/10.2307/1128973.
Pesu, L. A., Aunola, K., Viljaranta, J., & Nurmi, J. E. (2016). The development of adolescents’ self-concept of ability through grades 7-9 and the role of parental beliefs. Frontline Learning Research, 4, 92–109. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v4i3.249.
Peters, M., & Battista, C. (2008). Applications of mental rotation figures of the Shepard and Metzler type and description of a mental rotation stimulus library. Brain and Cognition, 66(3), 260–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2007.09.003.
Poon, W. Y., Leung, K., & Lee, S. Y. (2002). The comparison of single item constructs by relative mean and relative variance. Organizational Research Methods, 5(3), 275–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428102005003005.
Reilly, D., & Neumann, D. L. (2013). Gender-role differences in spatial ability: A meta-analytic review. Sex Roles, 68(9–10), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0269-0.
Rozek, C. S., Svoboda, R. C., Harackiewicz, J. M., Hulleman, C. S., & Hyde, J. S. (2017). Utility-value intervention with parents increases students’ STEM preparation and career pursuit. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(5), 909–914. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1607386114.
Shea, D. L., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: A 20-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 604–614. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0618.104.22.1684.
Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701–703. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3972.701.
Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Math and science motivation: A longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1622.214.171.124.
Simpkins, S. D., Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Charting the Eccles' expectancy-value model from mothers' beliefs in childhood to youths' activities in adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 48, 1019–1032. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027468.
Sonnert, G. (2009). Parents who influence their children to become scientists: Effects of gender and parental education. Social Studies of Science, 39, 927–941. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312709335843.
Stieff, M., Dixon, B. L., Ryu, M., Kumi, B. C., & Hegarty, M. (2014). Strategy training eliminates sex differences in spatial problem solving in a stem domain. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 390–402. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034823.
Syzmanowicz, A., & Furnham, A. (2011). Gender differences in self-estimates of general, mathematical, spatial and verbal intelligence: Four meta analyses. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 493–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.07.001.
Szymanowicz, A., & Furnham, A. (2013). Gender and gender role differences in self- and other-estimates of multiple intelligences. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153, 399–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2012.754397.
Tiedemann, J. (2000). Parents' gender stereotypes and teachers' beliefs as predictors of children's concept of their mathematical ability in elementary school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 144–151. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-06126.96.36.199.
Tosto, M. G., Hanscombe, K. B., Haworth, C., Davis, O. S., Petrill, S. A., Dale, P. S., … Kovas, Y. (2014). Why do spatial abilities predict mathematical performance? Developmental Science, 17(3), 462–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12138
Uttal, D. H., & Cohen, C. A. (2012). Spatial thinking and STEM education: When, why, and how? Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 57, 147–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394293-7.00004-2.
Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A. R., Warren, C., … Newcombe, N. S. (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 352–402. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028446
Ventura, M., Shute, V., Wright, T. J., & Zhao, W. (2013). An investigation of the validity of the virtual spatial navigation assessment. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00852.
Voyer, D., Voyer, S. D., & Saint-Aubin, J. (2017). Sex differences in visual-spatial working memory: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(2), 307–334. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1085-7.
Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 817–835. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016127.
Walter, E., & Dassonville, P. (2011). Activation in a frontoparietal cortical network underlies individual differences in the performance of an embedded figures task. PLoS One, 6(7), e20742. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020742.
Wang, X. (2013). Why students choose STEM majors: Motivation, high school learning, and postsecondary context of support. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1081–1121. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831213488622.
Watt, H. M., Hyde, J. S., Petersen, J., Morris, Z. A., Rozek, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2017). Mathematics—A critical filter for STEM-related career choices? A longitudinal examination among Australian and US adolescents. Sex Roles, 77, 254–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0711-1.
West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 56–75). Newbery Park: Sage.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015.
Willis, G. B. (2004). Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Yee, D. K., & Eccles, J. S. (1988). Parent perceptions and attributions for children's math achievement. Sex Roles, 19(5–6), 317–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289840.
Yoon, S. Y., & Mann, E. L. (2017). Exploring the spatial ability of undergraduate students: Association with gender, STEM majors, and gifted program membership. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(4), 313–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217722614.
Zhang, X., Hu, B. Y., Ren, L., & Fan, X. (2017). Pathways to reading, mathematics, and science: Examining domain-general correlates in young Chinese children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 366–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.09.004.