The 2016 U.S. Presidential election presented a unique opportunity to study gender and leadership. Using the social identity theory of leadership (Hogg 2001) as a guiding framework, we sought to understand the effect of social identities—gender and political affiliation—on voters’ evaluations of Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton in this election. We surveyed 440 participants’ attitudes toward female leaders, political affiliation, level of media exposure, and their evaluations of Clinton’s charisma and effectiveness in Study 1. Results indicate that female voters, those with favorable attitudes toward female leaders, and Democrats were more likely to support Clinton; these relationships were strengthened by media exposure. Contrary to predictions, gender attitudes and political affiliation did not have a significant interaction effect on evaluations of Clinton. In Study 2, we conducted a content analysis of the media’s portrayal of Clinton on both ends of the political spectrum. Our findings revealed that partisan news outlets with opposite political leanings did significantly differ in their portrayal of Clinton’s prototypicality and competence as a leader. As a result, media coverage acted to magnify the role of political affiliation in voters’ evaluations of Clinton’s suitability for the highest political office. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Abele, A. E. (2003). The dynamics of masculine-agentic and feminine-communal traits: Findings from a prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 768–776. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.2068.
Alexander, D., & Andersen, K. (1993). Gender as a factor in the attribution of leadership traits. Political Research Quarterly, 46, 527–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299304600305.
Arrington, M. (2008). I . source. Retrieved from https://techcrunch.com/2008/11/27/i-cant-believe-some-people-are-still-saying-twitter-isnt-a-news-source/.
Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. (2000). All in a day's work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 25, 472–491. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.3363315.
Ashmore, R. D., Del Boca, F. K., & Bilder, S. M. (1995). Construction and validation of the gender attitude inventory, a structured inventory to assess multiple dimensions of gender attitudes. Sex Roles, 32, 753–785. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01560188.
Awamleh, R., & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Perceptions of leader charisma and effectiveness: The effects of vision content, delivery, and organizational performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 10, 345–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00022-3.
Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348, 1130–1132. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160.
Balliet, D., Tybur, J. M., Wu, J., Antonellis, C., & Van Lange, P. A. (2018). Political ideology, trust, and cooperation: In-group favoritism among republicans and democrats during a U.S. national election. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 62, 797–818. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002716658694.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1995). MLQ multifactor leadership questionnaire (2nd ed.). Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.
Benkler, Y., Faris, R., Roberts, H., & Zuckerman, E. (2017). Study: Breitbart-led right-wing media ecosystem altered broader media agenda. Columbia Journalism Review. Retrieved from http://www.cjr.org/analysis/breitbart-media-trump-harvard-study.php.
Bennett, J. C. (2001). Anglosphere: The new reformation? United Press International. Retrieved from http://www.upi.corn/view.cfm?StorylD=28122001-050733-7164r.
Bhatia, S., Goodwin, G. P., & Walasek, L. (2018). Trait associations for Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump in news media: A computational analysis. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9, 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617751584.
Bligh, M. C., & Kohles, J. C. (2008). Negotiating gender role expectations: Rhetorical leadership and women in the U.S. senate. Leadership, 4, 381–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715008095187.
Bligh, M. C., Kohles, J. C., & Meindl, J. R. (2004). Charisma under crisis: Presidential leadership, rhetoric, and media responses before and after the September 11th terrorist attacks. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 211–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.02.005.
Bligh, M. C., Kohles, J. C., & Pillai, R. (2005). Crisis and charisma in the California recall election. Leadership, 1, 323–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715005054440.
Bligh, M., Merolla, J., Schroedel, J. R., & Gonzalez, R. (2010). Finding her voice: Hillary Clinton's rhetoric in the 2008 presidential campaign. Women's Studies, 39, 823–850. https://doi.org/10.1080/00497878.2010.513316.
Bligh, M. C., Kohles, J. C., & Pillai, R. (2011). Romancing leadership: Past, present, and future. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 1058–1077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.09.003.
Bock, J., Byrd-Craven, J., & Burkley, M. (2017). The role of sexism in voting in the 2016 presidential election. Personality and Individual Differences, 119, 189–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.07.026.
Branscombe, N. R., Schmitt, M. T., & Harvey, R. D. (1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35220.127.116.11.
Burgess, D., & Borgida, E. (1999). Who women are, who women should be: Descriptive and prescriptive gender stereotyping in sex discrimination. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 665–692. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8918.104.22.1685.
Burrell, B. (2008). Likeable? Effective commander in chief? Polling on candidate traits in the “year of the presidential woman”. Political Science & Politics, 41, 747–752. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096508080980.
Cassidy, B. S., & Krendl, A. C. (2019). A crisis of competence: Benevolent sexism affects evaluations of women’s competence. Sex Roles. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-1011-3.
Cho, C. H., Roberts, R. W., & Patten, D. M. (2010). The language of U.S. corporate environmental disclosure. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35, 431–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.10.002.
CNN. (2016). Exit polls. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/election/2016/results/exit-polls.
Crano, W. D., Brewer, M. B., & Lac, A. (2014). Principles and methods of social research. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
de Vreese, C. H., & Boomgaarden, H. (2006). News, political knowledge and participation: The differential effects of news media exposure on political knowledge and participation. Acta Politica, 41, 317–341. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500164.
de Vreese, C. H., & Semetko, H. A. (2004). News matters: Influences on the vote in the Danish 2000 euro referendum campaign. European Journal of Political Research, 43, 699–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0304-4130.2004.00171.x.
Derks, B., Van Laar, C., & Ellemers, N. (2016). The queen bee phenomenon: Why women leaders distance themselves from junior women. The Leadership Quarterly, 27, 456–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.12.007.
Dolan, K. (2008). Women as candidates in American politics: The continuing impact of sex and gender. In C. Wolbrecht, K. Beckwith, & L. Baldez (Eds.), Political women and American democracy (pp. 110–127). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dolan, K. (2014). Gender stereotypes, candidate evaluations, and voting for women candidates: What really matters? Political Research Quarterly, 67, 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912913487949.
Domingo, D., Quandt, T., Heinonen, A., Paulussen, S., Singer, J. B., & Vujnovic, M. (2008). Participatory journalism practices in the media and beyond: An international comparative study of initiatives in online newspapers. Journalism Practice, 2, 326–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512780802281065.
Duehr, E. E., & Bono, J. E. (2006). Men, women, and managers: Are stereotypes finally changing? Personnel Psychology, 59, 815–846. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00055.x.
Dunaway, J. (2008). Markets, ownership, and the quality of campaign news coverage. The Journal of Politics, 70, 1193–1202. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381608081140.
Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2003). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 807–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.004.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.109.3.573.
Emerson, K. T. U., & Murphy, M. C. (2014). Identity threat at work: How social identity threat and situational cues contribute to racial and ethnic disparities in the workplace. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20, 508–520. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035403.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146.
Feldman, S. (1988). Structure and consistency in public opinion: The role of core beliefs and values. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 416–440. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111130.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Fiske, S. T., & Stevens, L. E. (1993). What's so special about sex? Gender stereotyping and discrimination. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc..
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.1248.
Foran, C. (2017). America's political divide intensified during Trump's first year as president. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/10/trump-partisan-divide-republicans-democrats/541917/.
Fowler, J. H., & Kam, C. D. (2007). Beyond the self: Social identity, altruism, and political participation. The Journal of Politics, 69, 813–827. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00577.x.
Franklin, C. H., & Jackson, J. E. (1983). The dynamics of party identification. American Political Science Review, 77, 957–973. https://doi.org/10.2307/1957569.
Gaffney, A. M., & Blaylock, D. L. (2010). Hillary Clinton’s race: Did she match the presidential prototype? Advancing Women in Leadership, 30. Retrieved from http://advancingwomen.com/awl/awl_wordpress/.
Green, D. P., Palmquist, B., & Schickler, E. (2004). Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hart, R. P., Carroll, C. E., & Spiars, S. (2012). Diction 6 the text analysis program help manual. Austin, TX: Digitext.
Hayes, D. (2005). Candidate qualities through a partisan lens: A theory of trait ownership. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 908–923. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00163.x.
Hayes, D. (2011). When gender and party collide: Stereotyping in candidate trait attribution. Politics & Gender, 7, 133–165. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X11000055.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00234.
Heilman, M. E., & Caleo, S. (2018). Combatting gender discrimination: A lack of fit framework. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21, 725–744. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218761587.
Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2007). Why are women penalized for success at male tasks? The implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.81.
Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S., Fuchs, D., & Tamkins, M. M. (2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 416–427. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.416.
Hogg, M. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 184–200. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0503_1.
Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. I. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25, 121–140. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791606.
Hopmann, D. N., Vliegenthart, R., De Vreese, C., & Albæk, E. (2010). Effects of election news coverage: How visibility and tone influence party choice. Political Communication, 27, 389–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2010.516798.
Hornsey, M. J. (2008). Social identity theory and self-categorization theory: A historical review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 204–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00066.x.
Howell, D. C. (2012). Statistical methods for psychology. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
Huddy, L., & Terkildsen, N. (1993). Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 119–147. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111526.
Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2015). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59, 690–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12152.
Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideologya social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76, 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs038.
Jarman, J. W. (2005). Political affiliation and presidential debates: A real-time analysis of the effect of the arguments used in the presidential debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 229–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764205280921.
Jerit, J., Barabas, J., & Bolsen, T. (2006). Citizens, knowledge, and the information environment. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 266–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00183.x.
Jin, B. (2018). Congress’s incoming class is younger, bluer, and more diverse than ever. Politico. Retrieved from https://www.politico.com/interactives/2018/interactive_116th-congress-freshman-younger-bluer-diverse/.
Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. (1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. New York: The Free Press.
Krosnick, J. A., & Kinder, D. R. (1990). Altering the foundations of support for the president through priming. American Political Science Review, 84, 497–512. https://doi.org/10.2307/1963531.
Ladkin, D. (2017). How did that happen? Making sense of the 2016 U.S. presidential election result through the lens of the ‘leadership moment’. Leadership, 13, 393–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715017714841.
Lawless, J. L. (2004). Politics of presence? Congresswomen and symbolic representation. Political Research Quarterly, 57, 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290405700107.
MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130.
Margetts, H. (2017). Why social media may have won the 2017 general election. The Political Quarterly, 88, 386–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12408.
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415.
Otero, V. (2018). Media bias chart. Retrieved from https://www.adfontesmedia.com/. Accessed 1 June 2017.
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42, 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y.
Pastor, J. C., Meindl, J. R., & Mayo, M. C. (2002). A network effects model of charisma attributions. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 410–420. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069355.
Patterson, T. E. (2016). News coverage of the 2016 general election: How the press failed the voters. Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy. Retrieved from https://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Pew Research Center. (2016). The 2016 Presidential Campaign – a news event that’s hard to miss. Retrieved from https://www.journalism.org/2016/02/04/the-2016-presidential-campaign-a-news-event-thats-hard-to-miss/.
Pew Research Center. (2017). The partisan divide on political values grows even wider. Retrieved from https://www.people-press.org/2017/10/05/the-partisan-divide-on-political-values-grows-even-wider/.
Pew Research Center. (2018). Social media use in 2018. Retrieved from https://www.pewinternet.org/2018/03/01/social-media-use-in-2018/.
Pillai, R., Kohles, J. C., & Bligh, M. C. (2007). Through thick and thin? Follower constructions of presidential leadership amidst crisis, 2001–2005. In B. Shamir, R. Pillai, M. C. Bligh, & M. Uhl-Bien (Eds.), Follower-centered perspectives on leadership: A tribute to the memory of James R. Meindl (pp. 135–166). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Ramarajan, L. (2014). Past, present and future research on multiple identities: Toward an intrapersonal network approach. Academy of Management Annals, 8, 589–659. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.912379.
Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743–762. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00239.
Sanbonmatsu, K. (2002). Gender stereotypes and vote choice. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 20–34. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088412.
Schein, V. E. (1975). Relationships between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among female managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 340–344. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076637.
Schmader, T., Major, B., & Gramzow, R. H. (2001). Coping with ethnic stereotypes in the academic domain: Perceived injustice and psychological disengagement. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00203.
Schnall, M. (2017). 2018 will be the year of women. CNN. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2017/12/14/opinions/2018-will-be-the-year-of-women-schnall/index.html.
Shamir, B. (1995). Social distance and charisma: Theoretical notes and an exploratory study. The Leadership Quarterly, 6, 19–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90003-9.
Shane, S. (2017). These are the ads Russia bought on Facebook in 2016. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/01/us/politics/russia-2016-election-facebook.html.
Sheldon, K. M., & Nichols, C. P. (2009). Comparing democrats and republicans on intrinsic and extrinsic values. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 589–623. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00452.x.
Short, J. C., & Palmer, T. B. (2008). The application of DICTION to content analysis research in strategic management. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 727–752. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107304534.
Singer, J. B., Domingo, D., Heinonen, A., Hermida, A., Paulussen, S., Quandt, T., … Vujnovic, M. (2011). Participatory journalism: Guarding open gates at online newspapers. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (1984). The role of ignorance in intergroup relations. In N. S. Miller & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Groups in contact (pp. 229–255). San Diego, CA: Academic Press Inc..
Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. New York: Free Press.
Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Designing democracy: What constitutions do. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 755–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x.
Tajfel, H. (Ed.). (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. Oxford, England: Academic Press.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1987). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
Tankard, J. W. (2001). The empirical approach to the study of media framing. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 95–106). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Van Aelst, P., Sheafer, T., & Stanyer, J. (2012). The personalization of mediated political communication: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13, 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911427802.
van Knippenberg, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2003). A social identity model of leadership effectiveness in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 243–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25006-1.
Wemple, E. (2017). Studies agree: Media gorged on Hillary Clinton email coverage. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2017/08/25/studies-agree-media-gorged-on-hillary-clinton-email-coverage/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.de0ad02cdd40
Wetherell, G. A., Brandt, M. J., & Reyna, C. (2013). Discrimination across the ideological divide: The role of value violations and abstract values in discrimination by liberals and conservatives. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 658–667. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613476096.
Wicks, R. H., Wicks, J. L., Morimoto, S. A., Maxwell, A., & Schulte, S. R. (2014). Correlates of political and civic engagement among youth during the 2012 presidential campaign. American Behavioral Scientist, 58, 622–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213515226.
Winter, D. G. (2010). Why achievement motivation predicts success in business but failure in politics: The importance of personal control. Journal of Personality, 78, 1637–1668. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00665.x.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Lau, V.W., Bligh, M.C. & Kohles, J.C. Leadership as a Reflection of Who We Are: Social Identity, Media Portrayal, and Evaluations of Hillary Clinton in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Sex Roles 82, 422–437 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01070-8
- Social identity
- Political affiliation