Abstract
Although pro-environmental behaviors (PEBs) have been characterized as feminine, some PEBs are masculine suggesting that gender bending (e.g., engaging in pro-environmental behaviors inconsistent with one’s own gender) and gender conformity (e.g., engaging in pro-environmental behaviors consistent with one’s own gender) are possible for both women and men. Social consequences for gender bending versus conformity with PEBs were assessed in three studies. Gender bending created uncertainty about an actor’s heterosexual identity (Studies 1 and 2). Consistent with stigma-by-association, actors’ gender bending influenced judgments about an actor’s friend’s sexual identity (Study 2). However, gender bending had limited effects on ascription of gendered traits: More feminine than masculine traits were ascribed to PEB actors, even actors of masculine PEBs (Studies 1 and 2). Consistent with social ostracism, Study 3 illustrated that men were most likely to socially distance themselves from female gender benders, likely as a result of prejudice against gender-bending women. In contrast, women preferred to socially interact with gender-conforming women, likely resulting from a combination of their greater interest in feminine than masculine PEBs and preferring to interact with women more so than with men. Social repercussions are discussed in terms of stigmatizing engagement in PEBs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bashir, N. Y., Lockwood, P., Chasteen, A. L., Nadolny, D., & Noyes, I. (2013). The ironic impact of activists: Negative stereotypes reduce social change influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(7), 614–626. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1983.
Bloodhart, B. & Swim, J.K. (2019). Sustainability & consumption: What's gender got to do with it? Manuscript submitted for publication.
Bos, A. E. R., Pryor, J. B., Reeder, G. D., & Stutterheim, S. E. (2013). Stigma: Advances in theory and research. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 35(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2012.746147.
Bosson, J. K., Taylor, J. N., & Prewitt-Freilino, J. L. (2006). Gender-role violations and identity misclassification: The roles of audience and actor variables. Sex Roles, 55(1–2), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9056-5.
Boudet, H. S., Flora, J. A., & Armel, K. C. (2016). Clustering household energy-saving behaviours by behavioural attribute. Energy Policy, 92, 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.02.033.
Brick, C., Sherman, D. K., & Kim, H. S. (2017). “Green to be seen” and “brown to keep down”: Visibility moderates the effect of identity on pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 51, 226–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.04.004.
Brough, A. R., Wilkie, J. E. B., Ma, J., Isaac, M. S., & Gal, D. (2016). Is eco-friendly unmanly? The green-feminine stereotype and its effect on sustainable consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(4), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucw044.
Buck, D. M., Plant, E. A., Ratcliff, J., Zielaskowski, K., & Boerner, P. (2013). Concern over the misidentification of sexual identity: Social contagion and the avoidance of sexual minorities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(6), 941–960. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034145.
Carlsson-Kanyama, A., & Lindén, A.-L. (2007). Energy efficiency in residences—Challenges for women and men in the north. Energy Policy, 35(4), 2163–2172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.06.018.
Dahl, J. L., Vescio, T. K., Swim, J. K., & Johnson, S. L. (2013, February). Masculinity and pro-environmental engagement. Austin: Presented at the Society for Personality and Social Psychology conference.
Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(5), 991–1004. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.5.991.
Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(10), 1171–1188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200262001.
Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2008). Of men, women, and motivation: A role congruity account. In J. Y. Shah & W. L. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 434–447). New York: Guilford Press.
Dietz, T., Gardner, G. T., Gilligan, J., Stern, P. C., & Vandenbergh, M. P. (2009). Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce U.S. carbon emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(44), 18452–18456. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910851106.
Doherty, T. J., & Clayton, S. (2011). The psychological impacts of global climate change. American Psychologist, 66(4), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023141.
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2012). Social role theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 458–476). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.n49.
Filip-Crawford, G. (2015). Community interconnectedness and antigay behavior: A test of the lay disease-spread model of homosexuality (Doctoral dissertation). Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
Filip-Crawford, G., & Neuberg, S. L. (2016). Homosexuality and pro-gay ideology as pathogens? Implications of a disease-spread lay model for understanding anti-gay behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20(4), 332–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868315601613.
Geiger, N., & Swim, J. K. (2018). Gendered Impressions of Issue Publics as Predictors of Climate Activism. Frontiers in Communication, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00054
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., & van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017346.
Haines, E. L., Deaux, K., & Lofaro, N. (2016). The times they are a-changing … or are they not? A comparison of gender stereotypes, 1983–2014. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(3), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316634081.
Hunter, L. M., Hatch, A., & Johnson, A. (2004). Cross-national gender variation in environmental behaviors*. Social Science Quarterly, 85(3), 677–694. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00239.x.
Kite, M. E., & Deaux, K. (1987). Gender belief systems: Homosexuality and the implicit inversion theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11(1), 83–96 http://dx.doi.org.ezaccess.libraries.psu.edu/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1987.tb00776.x.
Klöckner, C. A. (2013). A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behaviour—A meta-analysis. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1028–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.014.
Kosakowska-Berezecka, N., Besta, T., Adamska, K., Jaśkiewicz, M., Jurek, P., & Vandello, J. A. (2016). If my masculinity is threatened I won’t support gender equality? The role of agentic self-stereotyping in restoration of manhood and perception of gender relations. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 17(3), 274–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000016.
LaMar, L., & Kite, M. (1998). Sex differences in attitudes toward gay men and lesbians: A multidimensional perspective. Journal of Sex Research, 35(2), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499809551932.
Malterud, K., & Bjorkman, M. (2016). The invisible work of closeting: A qualitative study about strategies used by lesbian and gay persons to conceal their sexual identity. Journal of Homosexuality, 63(10), 1339–1354. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2016.1157995.
McShane, B. B., & Böckenholt, U. (2017). Single-paper meta-analysis: Benefits for study summary, theory testing, and replicability. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(6), 1048–1063. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucw085.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2019). Retrieved January 25, 2019, from https://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/index.html
Neuberg, S. L., Smith, D. M., Hoffman, J. C., & Russell, F. J. (1994). When we observe stigmatized and “normal” individuals interacting: Stigma by association. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(2), 196–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294202007.
Pohlmann, A. (2015). Threatened at the table: Meat consumption, maleness and men’s gender identities (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Hawaii, Hawaii Manoa, USA. Retrieved from https://www.scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10125/100470/Pohlmann_Attila_r.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2019
Pryor, J. B., Reeder, G. D., & Monroe, A. E. (2012). The infection of bad company: Stigma by association. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(2), 224–241. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026270.
Riva, P., & Eck, J. (2016). Social exclusion: Psychological approaches to understanding and reducing its impact. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Rome, A. (2006). “Political hermaphrodites”: Gender and environmental reform in progressive America. Environmental History, 11(3), 440–463.
Rudman, L. A., & Fairchild, K. (2004). Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.157.
Rudman, L. A., & Fairchild, K. (2007). The F word: Is feminism incompatible with beauty and romance? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(2), 125–136 http://dx.doi.org.ezaccess.libraries.psu.edu/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00346.x.
Rule, N. O., & Alaei, R. (2016). “Gaydar”: The perception of sexual identity from subtle cues. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(6), https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416664403, 444–448
Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(3), 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.515.
Snyder, M. L., Kleck, R. E., Strenta, A., & Mentzer, S. J. (1979). Avoidance of the handicapped: An attributional ambiguity analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(12), 2297–2306. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.12.2297.
Swim, J. K., & Geiger, N. (2018). The gendered nature of stereotypes about climate change opinion groups (Supplemental material). Retrieved from https://journals-sagepub-com.ezaccess.libraries.psu.edu/doi/suppl/10.1177/1368430217747406. Accessed 6 May 2019
Swim, J. K., Ferguson, M. J., & Hyers, L. L. (1999). Avoiding stigma by association: Subtle prejudice against lesbians in the form of social distancing. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1207/15324839951036560.
Swim, J. K., Vescio, T. K., Dahl, J. L., & Zawadzki, S. J. (2018). Gendered discourse about climate change policies. Global Environmental Change, 48, 216–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.12.005.
Truelove, H. B., & Gillis, A. J. (2018). Perception of pro-environmental behavior. Global Environmental Change, 49, 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.02.009.
Vandello, J. A., Bosson, J. K., Cohen, D., & Burnaford, R. M. (2008). Precarious manhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1325–1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012453.
Vandenbergh, M. P., & Gilligan, J. M. (2017). Beyond politics: The private governance response to climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vannette, D. (2017, June 28). Using attention checks in your surveys may harm data quality. Retrieved from https://www.qualtrics.com/blog/using-attention-checks-in-your-surveys-may-harm-data-quality/. Accessed 22 Jan 2019
Weaver, J. R., Vandello, J. A., & Bosson, J. K. (2013). Intrepid, imprudent, or impetuous? The effects of gender threats on men’s financial decisions. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 14(2), 184–191. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027087.
Wilke, J., & Saad, L. (2013). Older Americans’ moral attitudes changing. Retrieved from https://news.gallup.com/poll/162881/older-americans-moral-attitudes-changing.aspx. Accessed 26 Jan 2019
Zelezny, L. C., Chua, P.-P., & Aldrich, C. (2000). Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. The Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 443–457. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.12.2297.
Acknowledgements
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article: National Science Foundation (NSF-BCS #1152147) awarded to Janet K. Swim and Theresa K. Vescio.
We would like to thank the following undergraduates for their assistance in data collection: Maria Amalia Arizaga, Ashley Caceres, Anita Chen, Maria Emelia Cordovez Dalmu, Alyssa A. Lauer, Laurene Roup, Mackenzie L. Sheetz, Stacy M. Sutton, Anna M. Vargo, Shuowen Zhang. We would like to thank Gabriele Filip-Crawford for her feedback when developing experimental study and Jonathan Cook for his feedback on the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interests with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Swim, J.K., Gillis, A. & Hamaty, K.J. Gender Bending and Gender Conformity: The Social Consequences of Engaging in Feminine and Masculine Pro-Environmental Behaviors. Sex Roles 82, 363–385 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01061-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01061-9