Advertisement

Sex Roles

pp 1–15 | Cite as

Characteristics of Preschool Gender Enforcers and Peers Who Associate with Them

  • Sonya Xinyue XiaoEmail author
  • Rachel E. Cook
  • Carol Lynn Martin
  • Matthew G. Nielson
Original Article

Abstract

Children who try to exclude others due to their gender can be considered as “gender enforcers.” Using multiple methods (observations, interviews) and informants (children, teachers, teacher aides), we investigated the prevalence of gender enforcement, the characteristics of gender enforcers, and potential associations of exposure to gender enforcers. Participants were 98 (Mage = 49.47 months, SD = 11.40; 52% boys) preschoolers from a southwestern city in the United States. Results showed that both girls and boys engage in gender-enforcing behavior. Further, findings suggest that aggression and biased gender-related beliefs are associated with gender-enforcing behavior. Children who spent more time (over months) with enforcers were observed to play more with same-gender peers and to show more biased gender cognitions than were children who spent less time with enforcers. The study extends our understanding of how gender norms are enforced in early childhood, and it provides insights that may help to identify young gender enforcers. These findings have potential to inform future research and practice related to gender-based aggression in childhood.

Keywords

Gender beliefs Gender norms Peer pressure Peer relations 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded in part by Grant I R01 HH55052 from the National Institute of Mental Health. Partial support was also provided by the Cowden Fellowship fund. Some of the data were presented earlier by Jessica McGuire, Carol Lynn Martin, Richard Fabes, and Laura Hanish at the 2007 Biennial Meeting of Society for Research in Child Development in poster format. We thank them for their early contribution to the research and we thank the parents, children, and teachers at the Child Development Lab at ASU for their participation.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Animal Studies and Human Participants

Further, all procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Arthur, A. E., Bigler, R. S., Liben, L. S., Gelman, S. A., & Ruble, D. N. (2008). Gender stereotyping and prejudice in young children: A developmental intergroup perspective. In S. R. Levy & M. Killen (Eds.), Intergroup attitudes and relations in childhood through adulthood; intergroup attitudes and relations in childhood through adulthood (pp. 66–86). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social-cognitive view. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Banerjee, R., & Lintern, V. (2000). Boys will be boys: The effect of social evaluation concerns on gender-typing. Social Development, 9, 397–408.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carter, D. B., & McCloskey, L. A. (1984). Peers and the maintenance of sex-typed behavior: The development of children's conceptions of cross-gender behavior in their peers. Social Cognition, 2, 294–314.  https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1984.2.4.294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Colwell, M. J., & Lindsey, E. W. (2005). Preschool children’s pretend and physical play and sex of peer play partner. Sex Roles, 52, 497–509.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-3716-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710–722.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1131945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DeLay, D., Hanish, L. D., Zhang, L., & Martin, C. L. (2017). Assessing the impact of homophobic name calling on early adolescent mental health: A longitudinal social network analysis of competing peer influence effects. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46, 955–969.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0598-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82, 405–432.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dutro, E. (2002). “But that’s a girls’ book!” Exploring gender boundaries in children’s reading practices. The Reading Teacher, 55, 376–384. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20205065.
  11. Egan, S. K., & Perry, D. G. (2001). Gender identity: A multidimensional analysis with implications for psychosocial adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 37, 451–463.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.37.4.451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., Goldsmith, H. H., & Van Hulle, C. A. (2006). Gender differences in temperament: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 33–72.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fabes, R. A., Shepard, S. A., Guthrie, I. K., & Martin, C. L. (1997). Roles of temperamental arousal and gender-segregated play in young children's social adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 33, 693–702.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.33.4.693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fabes, R. A., Hanish, L. D., & Martin, C. L. (2003a). Children at play: The role of peers in understanding the effects of child care. Child Development, 74, 1039–1043.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fabes, R. A., Martin, C. L., & Hanish, L. D. (2003b). Young children’s play qualities in same-, other-, and mixed-sex peer groups. Child Development, 74, 921–932.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fagot, B. I. (1977). Consequences of moderate cross-gender behavior in preschool children. Child Development, 48, 902–907.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1128339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fagot, B. I., & Leinbach, M. D. (1989). The young child’s gender schema: Environmental input, internal organization. Child Development, 60, 663–672.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1130731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feldman, D. C. (1984). The development and enforcement of group norms. Academy of Management Review, 9, 47–53.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goble, P., Martin, C. L., Hanish, L. D., & Fabes, R. A. (2012). Children’s gender-typed activity choices across preschool social contexts. Sex Roles, 67, 435–451.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0176-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Golombok, S., & Rust, J. (1993). The pre-school activities inventory: A standardized assessment of gender role in children. Psychological Assessment, 5, 131–136.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.5.2.131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Golombok, S., Rust, J., Zervoulis, K., Croudace, T., Golding, J., & Hines, M. (2008). Developmental trajectories of sex-typed behavior in boys and girls: A longitudinal general population study of children aged 2.5–8 years. Child Development, 79, 1583–1593.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01207.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Halim, M. L. D. (2016). Princesses and superheroes: Social-cognitive influences on early gender rigidity. Child Development Perspectives, 10, 155–160.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Halim, M. L., & Ruble, D. (2010). Gender identity and stereotyping in early and middle childhood. In J. C. Chrisler & D. R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in (pp. 495–525). New York: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1465-1_24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Halim, M. L., Ruble, D., Tamis-LeMonda, C., & Shrout, P. E. (2013). Rigidity in gender-typed behaviors in early childhood: A longitudinal study of ethnic minority children. Child Development, 84, 1269–1284.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Halim, M. L., Zosuls, K. M., Ruble, D. N., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Baeg, S., Walsh, A., … Moy, K. H. (2016). Children’s dynamic gender identities across development and the influence of cognition, context, and culture. In C. S. Tamis-LeMonda & L. Balter (Eds.), Child psychology: A handbook of contemporary issues (pp. 193–218). New York, NY: Psychology Press/Taylor.Google Scholar
  26. Hanish, L. D., Martin, C. L., Fabes, R. A., Leonard, S., & Herzog, M. (2005). Exposure to externalizing peers in early childhood: Homophily and peer contagion processes. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 267–281.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-005-3564-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65–70.Google Scholar
  28. Jadva, V., Hines, M., & Golombok, S. (2010). Infants’ preferences for toys, colors, and shapes: Sex differences and similarities. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1261–1273.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9618-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jewell, J. A., & Spears-Brown, C. S. (2014). Relations among gender typicality, peer relations, and mental health during early adolescence. Social Development, 23, 137–156.  https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. La Freniere, P., Strayer, F. F., & Gauthier, R. (1984). The emergence of same-sex affiliative preferences among preschool peers: A developmental/ethological perspective. Child Development, 55, 1958–1965.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1129942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ladd, G. W., & Profilet, S. M. (1996). The child behavior scale: A teacher-report measure of young children’s aggressive, withdrawn, and prosocial behaviors. Developmental Psychology, 32, 1008–1024.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.32.6.1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Langlois, J. H., & Downs, A. C. (1980). Mothers, fathers, and peers as socialization agents of sex-typed play behaviors in young children. Child Development, 51, 1237–1247.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1129566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leaper, C. (1994). Exploring the consequences of gender segregation on social relationships. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1994(65), 67–86.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.23219946507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Leaper, C. (2018). Gender, dispositions, peer relations, and identity. In N. K. Dees, J. Maarecek, & L. C. Bell (Eds.), Gender, sex, and sexualities: Psychological perspectives (pp. 219–245). New York: Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190658540.003.0010.Google Scholar
  35. Levy, G. D., & Carter, D. B. (1989). Gender schema, gender constancy, and gender-role knowledge: The roles of cognitive factors in preschoolers' gender-role stereotype attributions. Developmental Psychology, 25, 444–449.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.25.3.444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Liben, L. S., & Bigler, R. S. (2002). The developmental course of gender differentiation: Conceptualizing, measuring, and evaluating constructs and pathways. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 67, vii–147.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5834.t01-1-00187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Liben, L. S., & Signorella, M. L. (1993). Gender-schematic processing in children: The role of initial interpretations of stimuli. Developmental Psychology, 29, 141–149.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.29.1.141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Maccoby, E. E. (1990). Gender and relationships: A developmental account. American Psychologist, 45, 513–520.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.45.4.513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Maccoby, E. E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  40. Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1987). Gender segregation in children. In H. W. Reece (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (pp. 239–287). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  41. Martin, C. L. (2000). Cognitive theories of gender development. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 91–121). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  42. Martin, C. L., & Fabes, R. A. (2001). The stability and consequences of young children’s same-sex peer interactions. Developmental Psychology, 37, 431–446.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.37.3.431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Martin, C. L., & Halverson Jr., C. F. (1981). A schematic processing model of sex typing and stereotyping in children. Child Development, 52, 1119–1134.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1129498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Martin, C. L., Eisenbud, L., & Rose, H. (1995). Children's gender-based reasoning about toys. Child Development, 66, 1453–1471.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1131657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Martin, C. L., Fabes, R. A., Evans, S. M., & Wyman, H. (1999). Social cognition on the playground: Children's beliefs about playing with girls versus boys and their relations to sex segregated play. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16, 751–771.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407599166005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Martin, C. L., Ruble, D. N., & Szkrybalo, J. (2002). Cognitive theories of early gender development. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 903–933.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.6.903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Martin, C. L., Fabes, R. A., Hanish, L., Leonard, S., & Dinella, L. M. (2011). Experienced and expected similarity to same-gender peers: Moving toward a comprehensive model of gender segregation. Sex Roles, 65, 421–434.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0029-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Martin, C. L., Kornienko, O., Schaefer, D. R., Hanish, L. D., Fabes, R. A., & Goble, P. (2013). The role of sex of peers and gender-typed activities in young children’s peer affiliative networks: A longitudinal analysis of selection and influence. Child Development, 84, 921–937.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R. S., Ruan, W., Simons-Morton, B., & Scheidt, P. (2001). Bullying behaviors among U.S. youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. JAMA : The Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2094–2100.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.16.2094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. O’Brennan, L. M., Bradshaw, C. P., & Sawyer, A. L. (2009). Examining developmental differences in the social-emotional problems among frequent bullies, victims, and bully/victims. Psychology in the Schools, 46, 100–115.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pauletti, R. E., Cooper, P. J., & Perry, D. G. (2014). Influences of gender identity on children’s maltreatment of gender-nonconforming peers: A person × target analysis of aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 843–866.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Perren, S., & Alsaker, F. D. (2006). Social behavior and peer relationships of victims, bully-victims, and bullies in kindergarten. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 45–57.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01445.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Poteat, V. P. (2007). Peer group socialization of homophobic attitudes and behavior during adolescence. Child Development, 78, 1830–1842.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01101.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Poteat, V. P., & DiGiovanni, C. D. (2010). When biased language use is associated with bullying and dominance behavior: The moderating effect of prejudice. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 1123–1133.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9565-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Poteat, V. P., Kimmel, M. S., & Wilchins, R. (2011). The moderating effects of support for violence beliefs on masculine norms, aggression, and homophobic behavior during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 434–447.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00682.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Robbins, J. M., & Krueger, J. I. (2005). Social projection to ingroup and outgroups: A review and meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 32–47.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0901_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ruble, D. N., & Martin, C. L. (1998). Gender development. In W. Damon (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 933–1016). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  59. Ruble, D. N., Martin, C. L., & Berenbaum, S. A. (2006). Gender development. In N. Eisenberg, W. Damon W., & R. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 3, 6th ed., pp. 858–932). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  60. Sanders, J. M. (2002). Ethnic boundaries and identity in plural societies. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 327–357.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.140741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Serbin, L. A., Powlishta, K. K., & Gulko, J. (1993). The development of sex typing in middle childhood. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, i-95.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1166118
  62. Signorella, M. L., Bigler, R. S., & Liben, L. S. (1993). Developmental differences in children′ s gender schemata about others: A meta-analytic review. Developmental Review, 13, 147–183.  https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.1993.1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Smith, T. E., & Leaper, C. (2006). Self-perceived gender typicality and the peer context during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16, 91–103.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2006.00123.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Snijders, T. A., Van de Bunt, G. G., & Steglich, C. E. (2010). Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32, 44–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sroufe, L. A., Bennett, C., Englund, M., Urban, J., & Shulman, S. (1993). The significance of gender boundaries in preadolescence: Contemporary correlates and antecedents of boundary violation and maintenance. Child Development, 64, 455–466.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1131262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Thomas, R. N., & Blakemore, J. E. O. (2013). Adults’ attitudes about gender nonconformity in childhood. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 399–412.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-0023-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Thompson, S. K. (1975). Gender labels and early sex role development. Child Development, 46, 339–347.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1128126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Thorne, B. (1993). Gender play: Girls and boys in school. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Toomey, R. B., Card, N. A., & Casper, D. M. (2014). Peers’ perceptions of gender nonconformity: Associations with overt and relational peer victimization and aggression in early adolescence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 34, 463–485.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431613495446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Trautner, H. M., Ruble, D. N., Cyphers, L., Kirsten, B., Behrendt, R., & Hartmann, P. (2005). Rigidity and flexibility of gender stereotypes in childhood: Developmental or differential? Infant and Child Development, 14, 365–381.  https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Vlachou, M., Andreou, E., Botsoglou, K., & Didaskalou, E. (2011). Bully/victim problems among preschool children: A review of current research evidence. Educational Psychology Review, 23, 329–358.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9153-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zosuls, K. M., Ruble, D. N., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Shrout, P. E., Bornstein, M. H., & Greulich, F. K. (2009). The acquisition of gender labels in infancy: Implications for gender-typed play. Developmental Psychology, 45, 688–701.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zucker, K. J., Wilson-Smith, D. N., Kurita, J. A., & Stern, A. (1995). Children's appraisals of sex-typed behavior in their peers. Sex Roles, 33, 703–725.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.T. Denny Sanford School of Social and Family DynamicsArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations