Advertisement

Sex Roles

pp 1–16 | Cite as

An Ethnography of Breastaurant Masculinity: Themes of Objectification, Sexual Conquest, Male Control, and Masculine Toughness in a Sexually Objectifying Restaurant

  • Richard Baldwin
Original Article

Abstract

The present study is based on a 2-year participant-observer ethnography of a group of men in a “breastaurant” to characterize the unique masculinity features that environment evokes. Currently, whereas some research examines sexually objectifying restaurant environments regarding their impacts upon women in those spaces, no known scholarly attention has been given to men and masculinities in these environments. Through thematic analysis of table dialogue supplemented by brief unstructured interviews, I identify four major and one minor theme of “breastaurant masculinity” as distinctive to that environment. These include sexual objectification, sexual conquest, male control of women, masculine toughness, and (as a minor theme) rationalizations for why men frequent breastaurants. Following recent trends in masculinities research, my study interprets the breastaurant as a type of male preserve that erects a local pastiche hegemony in which these themes gain protected status. It also theorizes that the unique interactive environment of the breastaurant between (mostly) male patrons and attractive female servers who provide heterosexual aesthetic labor to the patrons, primarily in the form of ersatz sexual availability, produces these masculinity features. Given their current rapid expansion and popularity within masculine subcultures, the breastaurant therefore becomes an important site for critical masculinities research. Practice implications are discussed for management and counseling professionals who aim to improve outcomes in social and professional situations for both women and men.

Keywords

Masculinity Masculine identity Objectification Ethnography Male only environments 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments, including standard IRB approval which was obtained for this study.

Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by the author.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Allison, A. (1994). Nightwork: Sexuality, pleasure, and corporate masculinity in a Tokyo hostess club. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almog, R., & Kaplan, D. (2017). The nerd and his discontent: The seduction community and the logic of the game as a geeky solution to the challenges of young masculinity. Men and Masculinities, 20(1), 27–48.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X15613831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, E. (2009). Inclusive masculinity: The changing nature of masculinity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Associated Press (2012, June 24). Breastaurant boom: Hooters-style eateries experience a mini-boom. Fox News. Retrieved from http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/06/24/breastaurant-boom-hooters-style-eateries-experience-mini-boom/.
  5. Atkinson, M. (2011). Deconstructing men & masculinities. Don Mills: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Barber, K. (2016a). ‘Men wanted’: Heterosexual aesthetic labor in the masculinization of the hair salon. Gender & Society, 30(4), 618–642.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243216637827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barber, K. (2016b). Styling masculinity: Gender, class, and inequality in the men’s grooming industry. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Barton, B. (2007). Managing the toll of stripping: Boundary setting among exotic dancers. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 36(5), 571–596.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241607301971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.  https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brewster, Z. W. (2003). Behavioral and interactional patterns of strip club patrons: Tipping techniques and club attendance. Deviant Behavior, 24(3), 221–243.  https://doi.org/10.1080/713840203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buerkle, C. W. (2009). Metrosexuality can stuff it: Beef consumption as (heteromasculine) fortification. Text and Performance Quarterly, 29(1), 77–93.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10462930802514370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Charmaz, K. (2008). Constructionism and grounded theory. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 397–412). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  15. Chatfield, S. L. (2018). Considerations in qualitative research reporting: A guide for authors preparing articles for Sex Roles. Sex Roles, 79(3–4), 125–135.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0930-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  17. Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829–859.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Contois, E. J. H. (2018). The spicy spectacular: Food, gender, and celebrity on Hot Ones. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 769–773.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1478690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cornwall, A., Karioris, F., & Lindisfarne, N. (Eds.). (2016). Masculinities under neoliberalism. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  20. Daily Mail. (2014, December 31). Confessions of a Hooters waitress: From $100 tips to fending off ‘pervy’ men and dealing with angry wives – the truth about America’s ‘working class sorority.’ Daily Mail Online. Retrieved from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2892684/Hooters-working-class-soroity-100-tips-fending-pervy-men-dealing-angry-wives-confessions-double-D-waitress.html.
  21. Davidson, M. M., Gervais, S. J., & Sherd, L. W. (2015). The ripple effects of stranger harassment on objectification of self and others. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39(1), 53–66.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313514371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Deutsche, J. (2005). ‘Please pass the chicken tits’: Rethinking men and cooking at an urban firehouse. Food and Foodways, 13(1–2), 91–114.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07409710590915382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dunning, E., & Maguire, J. A. (1996). Process-sociological notes on sport, violence, and gender relations. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 31(3), 295–319.  https://doi.org/10.1177/101269029603100305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eck, B. A. (2014). Compromising positions: Unmarried men, heterosexuality, and two-phase masculinity. Men and Masculinities, 17(2), 147–172.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X14533642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Egan, R. D., & Frank, K. (2005). Attempts at a feminist and interdisciplinary conversation about strip clubs. Deviant Behavior, 26(4), 297–320.  https://doi.org/10.1080/016396290931722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Erickson, J. D., & Tewksbury, R. (2000). The gentleman in the club: A typology of strip club patrons. Deviant Behavior, 21(3), 271–293.  https://doi.org/10.1080/016396200266261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frank, K. (2003). ‘Just trying to relax’: Masculinity, masculinizing practices, and strip club regulars. The Journal of Sex Research, 40(1), 61–75.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490309552167.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Gervais, S. J., Vescio, T. K., & Allen, J. (2011). When what you see is what you get: The consequences of objectifying gaze for women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35(1), 5–17.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684310386121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gibbs, G. R. (2007). Analyzing qualitative data. London: SAGE.  https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. González, A. M., & Seidler, V. J. (2008). Gender identities in a globalized world. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
  31. Griffith, J. D., Adams, L. T., Hart, C. L., & Mitchell, S. (2012). Why become a pornography actress? International Journal of Sexual Health, 24(3), 165–180.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2012.666514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Joseph, L. J., & Black, P. (2012). Who’s the man? Fragile masculinities, consumer masculinities, and the profiles of sex work clients. Men and Masculinities, 15(5), 486–506.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X12458591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Julier, A., & Lindenfeld, L. (2005). Mapping men onto the menu: Masculinities and food. Food and Foodways, 13(1–2), 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07409710590915346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lapiņa, L., & Leer, J. (2016). Carnivorous heterotopias: Gender, nostalgia and hipsterness in the Copenhagen meat scene. NORMA, 11(2), 89–109.  https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2016.1184479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lorber, J. (1993). Believing is seeing: Biology as ideology. Gender & Society, 7(4), 568–581.  https://doi.org/10.1177/089124393007004006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Loughnan, S., Pina, A., Vasquez, E. A., & Puvia, E. (2013). Sexual objectification increases rape victim blame and decreases perceived suffering. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(4), 455–461.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313485718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lutz, A. (2012, December 4). Former Hooters waitress reveals her tactics for getting the biggest tips. Business Insider. Retrieved from http://www.businessinsider.com/former-hooters-waitress-talks-2012-12.
  38. Lynn, M., & McCall, M. (2016). Beyond gratitude and gratuity: A meta-analytic review of the predictors of restaurant tipping. Retrieved from https://scholarship.sha.cornell.edu/workingpapers/21/.
  39. Maguire, J. A., & Young, K. (2002). Theory, sport & society. Oxford, England: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  40. Mansfield, L. (2007). Involved-detachment: A balance of passion and reason in feminisms and gender-related research on sport, tourism, and sports tourism. Journal of Sport & Tourism, 12, 115–141.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14775080701654762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Matthews, C. R. (2014). Biology ideology and pastiche hegemony. Men and Masculinities, 17(2), 99–119.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X14526699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Matthews, C. R. (2015). The tyranny of the male preserve. Gender & Society, 30(2), 312–333.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243215620557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Matthews, C. R. (2016). Exploring the pastiche hegemony of men. Palgrave Communications, 2(16022), 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Messner, M. A. (1992). Power at play: Sport and the problem of masculinity. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  45. Miles-McLean, H., Liss, M., Erchull, M. J., Robertson, C. M., Hagerman, C., Gnoleba, M A., … Papp, L. J. (2015). ‘Stop looking at me!’: Interpersonal sexual objectification as a source of insidious trauma. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39(3), 363–374.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684314561018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Moffitt, L. B., & Szymanski, D. M. (2011). Experiencing sexually objectifying environments: A qualitative study. The Counseling Psychologist, 39(1), 67–106.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000010364551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Newton-Francis, M., & Young, G. (2015). Not winging it at Hooters: Conventions for producing a cultural object of sexual fantasy. Poetics, 52, 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2015.06.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pascoe, C. J. (2007). Dude you’re a fag: Masculinity and sexuality in high school. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  50. Pease, B. (2000). Recreating men—Postmodern masculinity politics. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  51. Potts, A. (2000). The essence of the hard-on’: Hegemonic masculinity and the cultural construction of ‘erectile dysfunction. Men and Masculinities, 3(1), 85–103.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X00003001004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ramsey, L. R., Marotta, J. A., & Hoyt, T. (2017). Sexualized, objectified, but not satisfied: Enjoying sexualization relates to lower relationship satisfaction through perceived partner-objectification. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34(2), 258–278.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407516631157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rasmusson, S. L. (2011). ‘We’re real here’: Hooters girls, big tips, and provocative research methods. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 11(6), 574–585.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708611426113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rogers, R. A. (2008). Beasts, burgers, and hummers: Meat and the crisis of masculinity in contemporary television advertisements. Environmental Communication, 2(3), 281–301.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030802390250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  56. Sheard, K. G., & Dunning, E. G. (1973). The rugby club as a type of male preserve: Some sociological notes. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 8(3), 5–24.  https://doi.org/10.1177/101269027300800301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Smith, M. (2018). Going in through the back door: Challenging straight male homohysteria, transhysteria, and transphobia through receptive penetrative sex toy use. Sexuality & Culture. Advance online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9536-0.
  58. Szymanski, D. M., & Feltman, C. E. (2014). Experiencing and coping with sexually objectifying treatment: Internalization and resilience. Sex Roles, 71, 159–170.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0392-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Szymanski, D. M., & Feltman, C. E. (2015). Linking sexually objectifying environments among waitresses to psychological and job-related outcomes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39(3), 390–404.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684314565345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Szymanski, D. M., & Mikorski, R. (2017). Sexually objectifying environments: Power, rumination, and waitresses’ anxiety and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41(3), 314–324.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684317709438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Szymanski, D. M., Moffitt, L. B., & Carr, E. R. (2011). Sexual objectification of women: Advances to theory and research. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 6–38.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000010378402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. The Week (2012, June 26). The ‘breastaurant’ boom: Why Hooters knockoffs are thriving. The Week. Retrieved from https://www.yahoo.com/news/breastaurant-boom-why-hooters-knockoffs-thriving-110500797.html.
  63. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243287001002002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Woodward, K. (2008). Hanging out and hanging about: Insider/outsider research in the sport of boxing. Ethnography, 9, 536–560.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138108096991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of HistoryGulf Coast State CollegePanama CityUSA

Personalised recommendations