The Trials of Women Leaders in the Workforce: How a Need for Cognitive Closure can Influence Acceptance of Harmful Gender Stereotypes

Baldner, Conrad; Pierro, Antonio

doi:10.1007/s11199-018-0953-1

Original Article
Published: 06 September 2018

The Trials of Women Leaders in the Workforce: How a Need for Cognitive Closure can Influence Acceptance of Harmful Gender Stereotypes

Sex Roles volume 80, pages 565–577 (2019)Cite this article

2311 Accesses
13 Citations
Metrics details

Abstract

Women leaders in the workforce are adversely affected by two sets of stereotypes: women are warm and communal but leaders are assertive and competent. This mismatch of stereotypes can lead to negative attitudes toward women leaders, however, not all individuals will be equally sensitive to these stereotypes. Men and women characterized by a need for cognitive closure (the desire for stable and certain knowledge) should be particularly sensitive to these stereotypes because they can be stable knowledge sources. We hypothesized that (a) negative attitudes toward women leaders in the workforce would vary with individuals’ need for closure, independent of their gender, and that (b) binding moral foundations (a concern for the larger group and its norms and standards) would mediate this association. In two studies, MTurk workers completed measures of negative attitudes toward women managers (Study 1, n = 149), stereotyped beliefs of women as not wanting or deserving high status positions in the workforce (Study 2, n = 207), as well as need for cognitive closure, moral foundations, social desirability, gender, and political orientation. Our results were consistent with our hypotheses and suggest that attitudes toward woman managers can reflect acceptance of pre-existent norms. If these norms can be changed, then changes in attitudes could follow.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Google Scholar
Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Baker, C. (2014). Stereotyping and women's roles in leadership positions. Industrial and Commercial Training, 46(6), 332–337. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-04-2014-0020.
Article Google Scholar
Baldner, C., Pierro, A., Chernikova, M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (in press). When and why do liberals and conservatives think alike? An investigation into need for cognitive closure, the binding moral foundations, and political perception. Social Psychology.
Bastian, B., & Haslam, N. (2006). Psychological essentialism and stereotype endorsement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(2), 228–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.03.003.
Article Google Scholar
Brooks, J. (2017). Four women leaders share thoughts on gender and security. Retrieved from https://www.dvidshub.net/news/236338/four-women-leaders-share-thoughts-gender-and-security.
Cordano, M., Scherer, R. F., & Owen, C. L. (2003). Dimensionality of the women as managers scale: Factor congruency among three samples. The Journal of Social Psychology, 143(1), 141–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540309598436.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9.
Google Scholar
Davies, C. L., Sibley, C. G., & Liu, J. H. (2014). Confirmatory factor analysis of the moral foundations questionnaire: Independent scale validation in a New Zealand sample. Social Psychology, 45(6), 431–436. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000201.
Article Google Scholar
Dijksterhuis, A. P., Van Knippenberg, A. D., Kruglanski, A. W., & Schaper, C. (1996). Motivated social cognition: Need for closure effects on memory and judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32(3), 254–270. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1996.0012.
Article Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.109.3.573.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Echterhoff, G., Kopietz, R., & Higgins, E. T. (2017). Shared reality in intergroup communication: Increasing the epistemic authority of an out-group audience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(6), 806–825. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000289.
Article Google Scholar
Federico, C. M., Ekstrom, P., Tagar, M. R., & Williams, A. L. (2016). Epistemic motivation and the structure of moral intuition: Dispositional need for closure as a predictor of individualizing and binding morality. European Journal of Personality, 30(3), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2055.
Article Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T., Xu, J., Cuddy, A. C., & Glick, P. (1999). (dis) respecting versus (dis) liking: Status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth. Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00128.
Article Google Scholar
Fritz, M. S., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 18(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01882.x.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Giacomantonio, M., Pierro, A., Baldner, C., & Kruglanski, A. (2017). Need for closure, torture, and punishment motivations. Social Psychology, 48(6), 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000321.
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2008). The moral foundations questionnaire. Retrieved from http://MoralFoundations.org.
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Graham, L. (2017). Women take up just 9 percent of senior IT leadership roles, survey finds. CNBC.com. Retrieved from http://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/22/women-take-up-just-9-percent-of-senior-it-leadership-roles-survey-finds.html.
Gray, K., & Schein, C. (2012). Two minds vs. two philosophies: Mind perception defines morality and dissolves the debate between deontology and utilitarianism. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 3, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-012-0112-5.
Article Google Scholar
Gray, K., Schein, C., & Ward, A. F. (2014). The myth of harmless wrongs in moral cognition: Automatic dyadic completion from sin to suffering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1600–1615. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036149.
Article Google Scholar
Güney, S., Gohar, R., Akıncı, S. K., & Akıncı, M. M. (2013). Attitudes toward women managers in Turkey and Pakistan. Journal of International Women's Studies, 8(1), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-015-1903-5.
Article Google Scholar
Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20(1), 98–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z.
Article Google Scholar
Haines, E. L., Deaux, K., & Lofaro, N. (2016). The times they are a-changing… or are they not? A comparison of gender stereotypes, 1983–2014. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(3), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316634081.
Article Google Scholar
Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2007). The moral mind: How five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. In P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich (Eds.), The innate mind (Vol. 3, pp. 367–391). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Javalgi, R. R. G., Scherer, R., Sánchez, C., Pradenas Rojas, L., Parada Daza, V., Hwang, C. E., & Yan, W. (2011). A comparative analysis of the attitudes toward women managers in China, Chile, and the USA. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 6(3), 233–253. https://doi.org/10.1108/17468801111144067.
Article Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., & Amodio, D. M. (2012). Political ideology as motivated social cognition: Behavioral and neuroscientific evidence. Motivation and Emotion, 36(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9260-7.
Article Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Kruglanski, A. W., & Simon, L. (1999). Effects of epistemic motivation on conservatism, intolerance and other system-justifying attitudes. In L. L. Thompson, J. M. Levine, & D. M. Messnick (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge (pp. 91–116). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Chapter Google Scholar
Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A., & Ristikari, T. (2011). Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 616–642. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023557.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Koleva, S. P., Graham, J., Iyer, R., Ditto, P. H., & Haidt, J. (2012). Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially purity) help explain culture war attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(2), 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.006.
Article Google Scholar
Kruglanski, A. W. (1996a). Motivated social cognition: Principles of the interface. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 493–520). New York: Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Kruglanski, A. W. (1996b). Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing” and “freezing”. Psychological Review, 103(2), 263–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.263.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: '“Seizing” and “freezing”. Psychological Review, 103, 263–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.263.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Kruglanski, A. W., Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., & De Grada, E. (2006). Groups as epistemic providers: Need for closure and the unfolding of group-centrism. Psychological Review, 113(1), 84–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.1.84.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Livi, S., Kruglanski, A. W., Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., & Kenny, D. A. (2015). Epistemic motivation and perpetuation of group culture: Effects of need for cognitive closure on trans-generational norm transmission. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129, 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.09.010.
Article Google Scholar
Makwana, A. P., Dhont, K., Akhlaghi-Ghaffarokh, P., Masure, M., & Roets, A. (2017). The motivated cognitive basis of transphobia: The roles of right-wing ideologies and gender role beliefs. Sex Roles, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0860-x.
Marcus, G. (2004). The birth of the mind. New York: Basic Books.
Google Scholar
McCoy, S. K., & Major, B. (2007). Priming meritocracy and the psychological justification of inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(3), 341–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.04.009.
Article Google Scholar
McKinsey & Company. (2016). Women in the workplace 2016. San Francisco, CA: Author. Retrieved from https://womenintheworkplace.com.
Peters, L. H., Terborg, J. R., & Taynor, J. (1974). Women as managers scale (WAMS): A measure of attitudes towards women in management positions. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 2, 66 (Ms. no. 153).
Google Scholar
Pierro, A., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2005). Revised need for Cognitive Closure Scale (unpublished manuscript). Università di Roma La Sapienza, Roma, Italia.
Pierro, A., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2008). “Seizing and freezing” on a significant-person schema: Need for closure and the transference effect in social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(11), 1492–1503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208322865.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741.
Article Google Scholar
Roets, A., Kruglanski, A. W., Kossowska, M., Pierro, A., & Hong, Y. Y. (2015). The motivated gatekeeper of our minds: New directions in need for closure theory and research. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 221–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2015.01.001.
Article Google Scholar
Roets, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2011). Allport’s prejudiced personality today: Need for closure as the motivated cognitive basis of prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(6), 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411424894.
Article Google Scholar
Roets, A., Van Hiel, A., & Dhont, K. (2012). Is sexism a gender issue? A motivated social cognition perspective on men's and women's sexist attitudes toward own and other gender. European Journal of Personality, 26(3), 350–359. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.843.
Article Google Scholar
Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Perspective gender stereotypes and backlash towards agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 743–762. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00239.
Article Google Scholar
Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., & Nauts, S. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48(1), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.10.008.
Article Google Scholar
Schein, V. E. (1975). Relationships between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among female managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(3), 340–344. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076637.
Article Google Scholar
Sensales, G., Areni, A., & Baldner, C. (2018). Politics and gender issues: At the crossroads of sexism in language and attitudes. An overview of some Italian studies. In G. Sáez Díaz (Ed.), Sexism: Past, present and future perspectives. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Google Scholar
Stöber, J. (2001). The social desirability Scale-17 (SDS-17): Convergent validity, discriminant validity, and relationship with age. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17(3), 222–232. https://doi.org/10.1027//1015-5759.17.3.222.
Article Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, F., & Park, J. H. (2009). Perceptions of social dangers, moral foundations, and political orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(3), 169–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.02.017.
Article Google Scholar
Vecina, M. L., & Piñuela, R. (2017). Relationships between ambivalent sexism and the five moral foundations in domestic violence: Is it a matter of fairness and authority? The Journal of Psychology, 151(3), 334–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2017.1289145.
Article PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Social and Developmental Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Via dei Marsi, 78, 00185, Rome, Italy
Conrad Baldner & Antonio Pierro

Authors

Conrad Baldner
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Antonio Pierro
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Conrad Baldner.

Ethics declarations

The authors did not use any external funding sources, nor did they have any conflicts of interest to report. Informed consent was obtained from participants.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 33.3 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baldner, C., Pierro, A. The Trials of Women Leaders in the Workforce: How a Need for Cognitive Closure can Influence Acceptance of Harmful Gender Stereotypes. Sex Roles 80, 565–577 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0953-1

Download citation

Published: 06 September 2018
Issue Date: 15 May 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0953-1

Keywords

Anti-women attitudes
Stereotypes
Leadership
Need for cognitive closure
Moral foundations