Addressing Unintended Consequences of Gender Diversity Interventions on Women’s Sense of Belonging in STEM
Validated interventions that increase bias literacy (i.e., knowledge of gender bias) and decrease sexism are critical to addressing pervasive gender biases in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). However, interventions that highlight existing gender inequities may inadvertently act as a social identity threat cue for women. Including identity-safe cues in diversity interventions (i.e., suggesting that women are valued in STEM) may lessen these problematic outcomes. To explore this possibility, we conducted three experiments utilizing Video Interventions for Diversity in STEM (VIDS), a validated diversity intervention relying on high quality videos to convey the existence of gender bias in STEM. Consistent with prior research, relative to control conditions, VIDS led to greater bias literacy and lower gender bias among both men and women (Experiments 1 and 2) and encouraged women’s intentions to take collective action (Experiment 2). At the same time, compared to control conditions, VIDS resulted in lower sense of belonging in the sciences, greater negative affect, and greater self-reported social identity threat, both among women from the general U.S. population (Experiments 1 and 2) and female scientists (Experiment 3). Including identity-safe cues, which present a positive female scientist role model (Experiment 2) or suggest that gender bias can be overcome (Experiments 2 and 3), helped alleviate VIDS’ harmful effects on women’s belonging and trust in the sciences, but had limited impact on stereotype threat. These findings highlight the need for researchers and practitioners to examine potential unintended negative consequences of diversity interventions and investigate techniques to buffer such outcomes.
KeywordsBias literacy intervention Social identity threat STEM
The authors thank the leaders of the Summer Institutes for assistance with participant recruitment, playwright Dipika Guha, biological sciences consultants Matthew Akamatsu and Jessica Miles, and Sean P. Lane for advice about data analysis. This research was funded in part by Alfred P. Sloan Foundation grants #213-3-15 to the sixth and last author and #B2013-38 to the sixth author, and a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Professor grant to the last author.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This research was conducted in compliance with APA standards regarding the treatment of human participants. All participants received an online informed consent form prior to taking part in the experiments, and were provided with a thorough debriefing.
This research was funded in part by Alfred P. Sloan Foundation grants #213–3-15 to the sixth and last author and #B2013–38 to the sixth author, and a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Professor grant to the last author.
- Asgari, S., Dasgupta, N., & Stout, J. G. (2012). When do counterstereotypic ingroup members inspire versus deflate? The effect of successful professional women on young women’s leadership self-concept. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 370–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211431968.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Avery, D. R., Volpone, S. D., Stewart, R. W., Luksyte, A., Hernandez, M., McKay, P. F., & Hebl, M. M. R. (2013). Examining the draw of diversity: How diversity climate perceptions affect job pursuit intentions. Human Resource Management, 52, 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
- Bellas, M. L. (1993). Faculty salaries: Still a cost of being female? Social Science Quarterly, 74, 62–75.Google Scholar
- Bilimoria, D., & Liang, X. (2013). State of knowledge about the workface participation, equity, and inclusion of women in academic science and engineering. In M. Wyer, M. Barbercheck, D. Cookmeyer, H. O. Ozturk, & M. Wayner (Eds.), Women, science and technology: A reader in feminist science studies (pp. 21–50). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Blascovich, J., & Mendes, W. B. (2010). Social psychophysiology and embodiment. In S. T. Fiske & D. T. Gilbert (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 194–227). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Carnes, M., Devine, P. G., Isaac, C., Manwell, L. B., Ford, C. E., Byars-Winston, A., … Sheridan, J. (2012). Promoting institutional change through bias literacy. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 5, 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028128.
- Carnes, M., Devine, P. G., Manwell, L. B., Byars-Winston, A., Fine, E., Ford, C. E., et al. (2015). The effect of an intervention to break the gender bias habit for faculty at one institution: A cluster randomized, controlled trial. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 90, 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Carr, P. B., Dweck, C. S., & Pauker, K. (2012). “Prejudiced” behavior without prejudice? Beliefs about the malleability of prejudice affect interracial interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 452–471. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028849.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Dasgupta, N., Scircle, M. M., & Hunsinger, M. (2015). Female peers in small work groups enhance women's motivation, verbal participation, and career aspirations in engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 4988–4993. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1422822112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., Quinn, D. M., & Gerhardstein, R. (2002). Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1615–1628. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616702237644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Diekman, A. B., Brown, E. R., Johnston, A. M., & Clark, E. K. (2010). Seeking congruity between goals and roles: A new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Psychological Science, 21, 1051–1057. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610377342.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Floyd, D. L., Prentice-Dunn, S., & Rogers, R. W. (2000). A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 407–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02323.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Hennes, E. P., Pietri, E. S., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Mason, K. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, A., et al. (2018). Increasing the perceived malleability of gender bias using a modified video intervention for diversity in STEM (VIDS). Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(5), 788–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lazarus, R., & Folkman, S. (1991). The concept of coping. In A. Monat & R. S. Lazarus (Eds.), Stress and coping: An anthology (3rd ed., pp. 189–206). New York: Columbus University Press.Google Scholar
- Logel, C., Walton, G. M., Spencer, S. J., Iserman, E. C., von Hippel, W., & Bell, A. E. (2009). Interacting with sexist men triggers social identity threat among female engineers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1089–1103. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015703.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Major, B., & O'Brien, L. T. (2005). The social psychology of stigma. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 393–421. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070137.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mendes, W. B., & Jamieson, J. (2012). Embodied stereotype threat: Exploring brain and body mechanisms underlying performance impairments. In M. Inzlicht & T. Schmader (Eds.), Stereotype threat (pp. 51–68). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Moss-Racusin, C. A., Pietri, E. S., Hennes, E. P., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Roussos, G., … Handelsman, J. (2018). Reducing STEM gender bias with VIDS (video interventions for diversity in STEM). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 24, 236–260.Google Scholar
- Murphy, M. C., & Taylor, V. J. (2012). The role of situational cues in signaling and maintaining stereotype threat. In M. Inzlicht & T. Schamder (Eds.), Stereotype threat (pp. 17–34). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- National Science Foundation (NSF), National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2017). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2017. Special Report NSF 17–310. Arlington, VA. Retrieved from www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/. Accessed 1 Aug 2017.
- Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Hansen, J. J., Devos, T., Lindner, N. M., Ranganath, K. A., … Banaji, M. R. (2007). Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 36–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280701489053.
- Pietri, E. S., Johnson, I. R., & Ozgumus, E. (2018). One size may not fit all: Exploring how the intersection of race and gender and stigma consciousness predict effective identity-safe cues for black women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.06.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades' evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 243–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- President’s Counsel of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-executive-report-final_2-13-12.pdf.
- Purdie-Vaughns, V., Steele, C. M., Davies, P. G., Diltmann, R., & Crosby, J. R. (2008). Social identity contingencies: How diversity cues signal threat or safety for African Americans in mainstream institutions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 615–630. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.1245.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rosser, S. V., Daniels, J. Z., & Wu, L. (2006). Institutional factors contributing to dearth of women STEM faculty: Classification and status matter; location doesn't. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 12, 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v12.i1.60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2008). The social psychology of gender: How power and intimacy shape gender relations. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Schmader, T., & Beilock, S. (2012). An integration of processes that underlie stereotype threat. In M. Inzlicht & T. Schamder (Eds.), Stereotype threat (pp. 34–50). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., Kobrynowicz, D., & Owen, S. (2002). Perceiving discrimination against one’s gender group has different implications for well-being in women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202282006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stroebe, K., Dovidio, J. F., Barreto, M., Ellemers, N., & John, M. S. (2011). Is the world a just place? Countering the negative consequences of pervasive discrimination by reaffirming the world as just. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 484–500. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466610X523057.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Swim, J. K., & Cohen, L. L. (1997). Overt, covert, and subtle sexism: A comparison between the attitudes toward women and modern sexism scales. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00103.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Walton, G. M., Logel, C., Peach, J. M., Spencer, S. J., & Zanna, M. P. (2015a). Two brief interventions to mitigate a “chilly climate” transform women’s experience, relationships, and achievement in engineering. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 468–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Walton, G. M., Murphy, M. C., & Ryan, A. M. (2015b). Stereotype threat in organizations: Implications for equity and performance. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 523–550. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar