Hate speech in online users’ comments is often targeted toward underprivileged social groups such as immigrants, sexual minorities, and women. Besides the general severity of such offenses, social media users’ personal characteristics influence the evaluation of hate comments. We focus on the flagging of hate comments aimed toward women and sexual minorities (i.e., the intention to report such comments as inappropriate to a moderator or platform provider of an online discussion forum). We investigate the influence of user’s morality on the intention to flag of such comments. Relying on social role and backlash theory, we scrutinize in how far gender plays a role in flagging intention and in how far people perceive hate comments by women as an act of double deviance. Therefore, we conducted a 2 × 2 online experiment with 457 participants (51% female) recruited through political interest groups and a German news magazine site on Facebook. Results indicate that moral judgments are to some extent gendered as women are more concerned about fairness and avoiding harm to others than men are. Deviant and agentic online behavior by women is judged more strictly than such behavior by men. Results implicate that moderators of online discussions and platform providers should be sensitive to how gender stereotypes influence online discussions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.
Anderson, A. A., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., Xenos, M. A., & Ladwig, P. (2014). The “nasty effect”: Online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12009.
Aquino, K., & Reed II, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423–1440. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35126.96.36.1993.
Aquino, K., Freeman, D., Reed, A., Lim, V. K., & Felps, W. (2009). Testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior: The interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015406.
Aquino, K., McFerran, B., & Laven, M. (2011). Moral identity and the experience of moral elevation in response to acts of uncommon goodness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(4), 703–718. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022540.
Bartlett, J., & Krasodomski-Jones, A. (2015). Counter-speech. Examining content that challenges extremism online. Retrieved from http://www.demos.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/counter-speech.Pdf.
Beierlein, C., Asbrock, F., Kauff, M., & Schmidt, P. (2014). Kurzskala Autoritarismus (KSA – 3): Ein ökonomisches Messinstrument zur Erfassung dreier Subdimensionen autoritärer Einstellungen [authoritarianism scale – Short version (KSA – 3): A parsimonous measure capturing the three sub-dimensions of authoritarian attitudes]. Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen [Collection of items and scales in social sciences]. https://doi.org/10.6102/zis228.
Blasi, A. (1983). Moral development and moral action: A theoretical perspective. Developmental Review, 3(2), 178–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(83)90029-1.
Bowman, N. D., Joeckel, S., & Dogruel, L. (2012). A question of morality? The influence of moral salience and nationality on media preferences. Communications - The European Journal of Communication Research, 37, 345–369. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2012-0020.
Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106(4), 676–713. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.676.
Chess, S., & Shaw, A. (2015). A conspiracy of fishes, or, how we learned to stop worrying about #GamerGate and embrace hegemonic masculinity. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(1), 208–220.
Christopher, A. N., & Mull, M. S. (2006). Conservative ideology and ambivalent sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(2), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00284.x.
Christopher, A. N., & Wojda, M. R. (2008). Social dominance orientation, right-wing authoritarianism, sexism, and prejudice toward women in the workforce. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00407.x.
Cortese, A. J. (2006). Opposing hate speech. Westport: Praeger Publishers Retrieved from http://site.ebrary.com/lib/alltitles/docDetail.action?docID=10347075.
Council of Europe. (2016). Combating sexist hate speech. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/1680651592
Crawford, K., & Gillespie, T. (2016). What is a flag for? Social media reporting tools and the vocabulary of complaint. New Media & Society, 18, 410–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814543163.
Ditto, P. H., & Koleva, S. P. (2011). Moral empathy gaps and the American culture war. Emotion Review, 3(3), 331–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073911402393.
Downs, D. M., & Cowan, G. (2012). Predicting the importance of freedom of speech and the perceived harm of hate speech. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 1353–1375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00902.x.
Duncan, L. E., Peterson, B. E., & Winter, D. G. (1997). Authoritarianism and gender roles: Toward a psychological analysis of hegemonic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297231.
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Eden, A., Grizzard, M., & Lewis, R. J. (2012). Moral psychology and media theory: Historical and emerging viewpoints. In R. Tamborini (Ed.), Media and the moral mind (pp. 1–25). London: Routledge.
Elm, D. R., Kennedy, E. J., & Lawton, L. (2001). Determinants of moral reasoning: Sex role orientation, gender, and academic factors. Business & Society, 40(3), 241–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765030104000302.
Erikson, E. H. (1964). Insight and responsibility: Lectures on the ethical implications of psychoanalytic insight. New York: Norton.
Forsa (2017). Hate speech. Retrieved from http://www.lfm-nrw.de/fileadmin/user_upload/lfm-nrw/Service/Pressemitteilungen/Dokumente/2017/Ergebnisbericht_Hate-Speech_forsa-Mai-2017.pdf.
Gagliardone, I., Gal, D., Alves, T., & Martinez, G. (2015). Countering online hate speech. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002332/233231e.pdf.
Gardiner, B., Mansfield, M., Anderson, I., Holder, J., Louter, D., & Ulmanu, M. (2016, April 12). The dark side of Guardian comments. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/apr/12/the-dark-side-of-guardian-comments
Garvey, K., & Ford, T. G. (2014). Rationality, political orientation, and the individualizing and binding moral foundations. Letters on Evolutionary Behavioral Science, 5(1), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.5178/lebs.2014.29.
Gilbert, P. R. (2002). Discourses of female violence and societal gender stereotypes. Violence Against Women, 8(11), 1271–1300. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780102762478019.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Glenn, A. L., Koleva, S., Iver, R., Graham, J., & Ditto, P. H. (2010). Moral identity in psychopathy. Judgement and Decision Making, 5(7), 497–505.
Graham, J. (2014). Morality beyond the lab. Science, 245(6202), 1242. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259500.
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives use different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141.
Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847.
Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., & Young, L. (2012). The moral stereotypes of liberals and conservatives: Exaggeration of differences across the political spectrum. PLoS One, 7(12), e50092. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050092.
Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316(5827), 998–1002. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137651.
Haidt, J., Graham, J., & Joseph, C. (2009). Above and below left–right: Ideological narratives and moral foundations. Psychological Inquiry, 20(2–3), 110–119.
Hair Jr., J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand oaks: Sage.
Heilman, M. E. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036734.
Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S., Fuchs, D., & Tamkins, M. M. (2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 416–427. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.416.
Henry, S. (2009). Social deviance. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Herring, S. C. (2003). Gender and power in online communication. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), Blackwell handbooks in linguistics: Vol. 13. The handbook of language and gender (pp. 202–228). Oxford: Blackwell.
Herring, S. C., & Stoerger, S. (2014). Gender and (a) nonymity in computer-mediated communication. In S. Ehrlich, M. Meyerhoff, & J. Holmes (Eds.), The handbook of language, gender, and sexuality (2nd ed., pp. 567–586). Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell.
Iyer, R., Koleva, S., Graham, J., Ditto, P., Haidt, J., & Young, L. (2012). Understanding libertarian morality: The psychological dispositions of self-identified libertarians. PLoS One, 7(8), e42366. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042366.
Jaffee, S., & Hyde, J. S. (2000). Gender differences in moral orientation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 703–726. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.703.
Joeckel, S., & Frueh, H. (2016). ‘The world ain’t all sunshine’: Investigating the relationship between mean world beliefs, conservatism and crime TV exposure. Communications - The European Journal of Communication Research, 41, 195–217. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2016-0001.
Joeckel, S., Bowman, N. D., & Dogruel, L. (2013). The influence of adolescents' moral salience on actions and entertainment experience in interactive media. Journal of Children and Media, 7(4), 480–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2013.781513.
Kenski, K., Coe, K., & Rains, S. A. (2017). Perceptions of uncivil discourse online: An examination of types and predictors. Communication Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217699933.
Koleva, S. P., Graham, J., Iyer, R., Ditto, P. H., & Haidt, J. (2012). Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially purity) help explain culture war attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(2), 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.006.
Kugler, M., Jost, J. T., & Noorbaloochi, S. (2014). Another look at moral foundations theory: Do authoritarianism and social dominance orientation explain liberal-conservative differences in “moral” intuitions? Social Justice Research, 27(4), 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014-0223-5.
Leets, L. (2002). Experiencing hate speech: Perceptions and responses to anti-semitism and antigay speech. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 341–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00264.
Leskinen, E. A., Rabelo, V. C., & Cortina, L. M. (2015). Gender stereotyping and harassment: A "catch-22" for women in the workplace. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 21(2), 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000040.
MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York: Routledge.
Manganelli, A. M., Bobbio, A., & Canova, L. (2007). A short version of the right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1223–1234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.03.013.
Masullo Chen, G. (2017). Incivility and deliberation: Understanding the discourse around race, sexual orientation, and politics through online comments. Paper presented at the 66th annual conference of the International Communication Association (ICA), San Diego, CA.
Monin, B., & Jordan, A. (2009). The dynamic moral self: A social psychological perspective. In D. Narváez & D. K. Lapsley (Eds.), Personality, identity, and character. Explorations in moral psychology (pp. 341–354). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Naab, T. K., Kalch, A., & Meitz, T. G. K. (2018). Flagging uncivil user comments: Effects of intervention information, type of victim, and response comments on bystander behavior. New Media & Society, 20(2), 777–795. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816670923.
Narvaez, D., & Lapsley, D. K. (2009). Moral identity, moral functioning, and the development of moral character. In D. Medin, L. Skitka, D. Bartels, & C. Bauman (Eds.), Psychology of learning and motivation: Moral cognition and decision-making (Vol. 50, pp. 237–274). Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)00408-8.
Nguyen, N. T., Basuray, M. T., Smith, W. P., Kopka, D., & McCulloh, D. (2008). Moral issues and gender differences in ethical judgment using Reidenbach and Robin’s (1990) multidimensional ethics scale: Implications in teaching of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(4), 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9357-9.
Nunner-Winkler, G., Meyer-Nikele, M., & Wohlrab, D. (2007). Gender differences in moral motivation. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 53(1), 26–52. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2007.0003.
Okimoto, T. G., & Brescoll, V. L. (2010). The price of power: Power seeking and backlash against female politicians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(7), 923–936. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210371949.
Papacharissi, Z. (2004). Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups. New Media & Society, 6, 259–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444804041444.
Prentice, D. A., & Carranza, E. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: The content of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00066.
Prentice, D. A., & Carranza, E. (2004). Sustaining cultural beliefs in the face of their violation: The case of gender stereotypes. In M. Schaller & C. S. Crandall (Eds.), The psychological foundations of culture (pp. 259–280). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Roets, A., Van Hiel, A., & Dhont, K. (2012). Is sexism a gender issue? A motivated social cognition perspective on men’s and women’s sexist attitudes toward own and other gender. European Journal of Personality, 26(3), 350–359.
Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 629–645. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.529.
Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(5), 1004–1010. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.2064.
Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 743–762. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00239.
Rudman, L. A., & Phelan, J. E. (2008). Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.003.
Sachdeva, S., Iliev, R., & Medin, D. L. (2009). Sinning saints and saintly sinners: The paradox of moral self-regulation. Psychological Science, 20(4), 523–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02326.x.
Santana, A. D. (2015). Incivility dominates online comments on immigration. Newspaper Research Journal, 36, 92–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739532915580317.
Shao, R., Aquino, K., & Freeman, D. (2008). Beyond moral reasoning: A review of moral identity research and its implications for business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(4), 513–540. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200818436.
Sharma, S., Durand, R. W., & Gur-Arie, O. (1981). Identification and analysis of moderator variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150970.
Smith, I. H., Aquino, K., Koleva, S., & Graham, J. (2014). The moral ties that bind... even to out-groups: The interactive effect of moral identity and the binding moral foundations. Psychological Science, 25(8), 1554–1562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614534450.
Sobieraj, S., & Berry, J. (2011). From incivility to outrage: Political discourse in blogs, talk radio, and cable news. Political Communication, 28(1), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2010.542360.
Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 261–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60229-4.
Stroud, N. J., Scacco, J. M., Muddiman, A., & Curry, A. L. (2015). Changing deliberative norms on news organizations' Facebook sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(2), 188–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12104.
Thoma, S. J. (1986). Estimating gender differences in the comprehension and preference of moral issues. Developmental Review, 6(2), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(86)90010-9.
Viki, G. T., Massey, K., & Masser, B. (2005). When chivalry backfires: Benevolent sexism and attitudes toward Myra Hindley. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10(1), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532504X15277.
Whitley, B. E., & Ægisdóttir, S. (2000). The gender belief system, authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and heterosexuals' attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Sex Roles, 42(11), 947–967. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007026016001.
Whitley Jr., B. E. (1999). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(1), 126–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35220.127.116.11.
Winkler, J., Halfmann, A., & Freudenthaler, R. (2017). Backlash effects in online discussions: Effects of gender and counter-stereotypical communication on persuasiveness and likeability. Paper presented at the 66th annual conference of the International Communication Association (ICA), San Diego, CA.
Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2012). Biosocial construction of sex differences and similarities in behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 55–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394281-4.00002-7.
Conflicts of Interest
We have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
All procedures performed in this study involving human participants followed the procedural requirements for ethical research with human subjects of the University of Erfurt. Research procedures were in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Wilhelm, C., Joeckel, S. Gendered Morality and Backlash Effects in Online Discussions: An Experimental Study on How Users Respond to Hate Speech Comments Against Women and Sexual Minorities. Sex Roles 80, 381–392 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0941-5
- Gender roles
- Minority groups
- Antisocial behavior
- Online comments
- Hate speech
- Moral identity
- Moral foundation
- Gender stereotypes
- Sexual minority